Title: MRUG fare pages updated - 2.7% this time ... but what happens next time? Post by: grahame on January 01, 2020, 14:39:00 So ... we have a 2.7% fare rise tomorrow and I have been updating the Melksham Rail User Group pricing pages to reflect the changes.
http://www.mrug.org.uk/localfares.html for local fares http://www.mrug.org.uk/bristolfares.html for Bath and Bristol fares http://www.mrug.org.uk/londonfares.html for London fares Always a complex situation to be explained in simple words, with three sets of fares to London and three sets back, sometimes a return is more economic and sometimes you'll do better buying two singles. And that's before you add in "Any Permitted", "via Warminster and Salisbury", advanced fares, split ticketing, railcards, groupsave and travel cards. To Bristol we provide a list of return train times - all changed, as have the connection points. For the outward journey, just say "catch any train and change at the next station". For the return, people have to know which train so they don't end up at Trowbridge when the shuttle train is up at Chippenham, or at Chippenham when it's down at Trowbridge. (http://www.wellho.net/pix/mkm_pad_2020_fares_02.jpg) (http://www.wellho.net/pix/mkm_pad_2020_fares_01.jpg) The annual round of fare rises is designed simply to keep fares on a parallel course to inflation ... but it always seems to generate a lot of press in August (when there isn't much news around) when the figure is announces and then a lot more in January (when there isn't much news around) when it comes into force. In reality, the press and coverage is more about the general level of fares and some of the inequities of the system that are perpetuated year after year than the actual rise amount. Basically, we have a system that's somewhat complex, a number of decades old, and could do with sorting out. Problem has been ... governments don't want an alternative system that lessens the farebox income. And in parallel governments don't want a system under which they get the blame for fares going up for their supporter. Fares don't only go up by headline figures, though; as we saw last month, changing timetables across peak / off peak divides, and whether (or not) concessions on removing peaks over the Christmas holiday season happen can make a substantial but disguised difference. There's a further hidden difference in relation to the number of advanced fares offered in each price bracket; on occasions GWR will say they are offering more as something of a sop to passenger groups - Pewsey and the North Cotswold line come to mind, but those extra advance fares can be around for a short period then be pared right back with zero announcement anon way to for customer groups to track the quotas. The Williams review should report soon. And that has targetted to simply fares and make them more uniform, at the same time suggesting that local commuter and regional services will be independently looked after by the regions, and that competing companies with competing product will compete for time slots on busy trunk lines. I fail to see that bringing a uniformity ... but then I'm sure the experts do. The person I asked to explain how it could work said she didn't know either! And, I suspect, First will be awarded a 2 year "DA3" to run our trains from 1st April 2020. Prior to the election, any award was in doubt as I could foresee a Corbyn government taking over the operation as franchises and agreements expired. By I would be surprised to see four years, because I suspect Boris wants to try out his right wing competition stuff without having to wait four years. Which gives First 2 years to invest and get payback, so I wouldn't expect too much TOC lead investment. All of which is a long way to say - "yes, 2.7% this time ... but that just prolongs the out of date system and we may see something more significant changing before 2nd January 2021". Or of course the power than be could decide than any changes other than cosmetic ones and sneaky money grabs would be too dangerous to their popularity to risk. Title: Re: MRUG fare pages updated - 2.7% this time ... but what happens next time? Post by: grahame on January 02, 2020, 08:12:50 Call for rethink on rail fares after latest above-inflation increase says The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/money/2020/jan/02/call-for-rethink-on-rail-fares-after-latest-above-inflation-increase)
Quote Campaigners have called on the government to rethink rail fares as commuters return to work facing another 2.8% rise in the cost of their travel. [snip] Darren Shirley, the chief executive of the Campaign for Better Transport, said: “Rail passengers are tired of rising fares and broken promises. It’s time for a complete overhaul of the fares system and a fairer way to calculate future level [of fares].” Bruce Williamson, of the pressure group Railfuture, said: “Welcome to another decade of misery for rail passengers. How on earth is the government going to meet its climate commitments by pricing people off environmentally friendly trains and on to our polluted and congested roads?” The government said it was trialling new fares to reflect modern working and travelling patterns as part of a “year of action” towards improving the railways. [snip] The transport secretary, Grant Shapps, said the government would reform rail to “ensure the focus is always on putting passengers first”. He added: “Delivering such significant change will take time, but passengers can have total confidence that these trials will help provide the evidence needed to develop wider reforms to the fares system and a significantly better service.” A full review of how the rail system operates was commissioned by Chris Grayling as transport secretary in the wake of timetable chaos in 2018, and its findings are due to be published shortly. The former British Airways boss Keith Williams, who is chairing the review, has said fares will be one key area for reform. Labour pointed out that rail fares were being cut in Germany while they increased in the UK. The shadow transport secretary, Andy McDonald, said: “It shows that this government is not serious about supporting either public transport or tackling climate change, road congestion or air quality.” This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |