Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: Mookiemoo on March 22, 2008, 18:29:16



Title: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Mookiemoo on March 22, 2008, 18:29:16
Why?

You know where you have two seats facing each other - with space for a table - but you get something about six inches wide good for nothing more than the person closest to the window placing a cup of coffee on it - kind of like those on a 165 in first class....

Why?

Cant be that much more to put in a table

Currently on an arriva 175 and I am at a TABLE - but the set behind me are the mini tables.  As I'm alone in the carriage I have just been sad enough to get my rule out and measure the width between the seats - they are the SAME...... so why the mini table?


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Btline on March 22, 2008, 18:34:35
I think it allows more standing room on the Thames Turbos!  ;D


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Conner on March 22, 2008, 18:54:25
It adds space for a disabled space.


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Mookiemoo on March 22, 2008, 18:57:57
It adds space for a disabled space.

Just looked around, there is NO disabled space in this carriage - also on a 165 I'm sure the disabled space is not in both carriages?  And why have them in first class - there is no difference in leg room/space - just lack of a horizontal surface at table height

And as I said, I measured the space!  There is no difference..... (I have a tape measure on me as I was up at my mothers helping her measure for some new furniture!)


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Conner on March 22, 2008, 19:00:13
It adds space for a disabled space.

Just looked around, there is NO disabled space in this carriage - also on a 165 I'm sure the disabled space is not in both carriages?  And why have them in first class - there is no difference in leg room/space - just lack of a horizontal surface at table height

And as I said, I measured the space!  There is no difference..... (I have a tape measure on me as I was up at my mothers helping her measure for some new furniture!)
What I meant is I think you could put a wheelchair where the table would be.


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Mookiemoo on March 22, 2008, 19:05:40
It adds space for a disabled space.

Just looked around, there is NO disabled space in this carriage - also on a 165 I'm sure the disabled space is not in both carriages?  And why have them in first class - there is no difference in leg room/space - just lack of a horizontal surface at table height

And as I said, I measured the space!  There is no difference..... (I have a tape measure on me as I was up at my mothers helping her measure for some new furniture!)
What I meant is I think you could put a wheelchair where the table would be.

Not if you also wanted four passengers to use the seats!

And how would you get a wheel chair through the door into a 165 first class compartment?


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Mookiemoo on March 22, 2008, 19:07:34
It adds space for a disabled space.

Just looked around, there is NO disabled space in this carriage - also on a 165 I'm sure the disabled space is not in both carriages?  And why have them in first class - there is no difference in leg room/space - just lack of a horizontal surface at table height

And as I said, I measured the space!  There is no difference..... (I have a tape measure on me as I was up at my mothers helping her measure for some new furniture!)
What I meant is I think you could put a wheelchair where the table would be.

Not if you also wanted four passengers to use the seats!

And how would you get a wheel chair through the door into a 165 first class compartment?


Also - the mini tables are half way through the carriage (as in SC on a 165/166) - you would NEVER get any wheel chair between the seats!


Title: Re: Mini tables on trains ......
Post by: Conner on March 22, 2008, 19:18:03
It adds space for a disabled space.

Just looked around, there is NO disabled space in this carriage - also on a 165 I'm sure the disabled space is not in both carriages?  And why have them in first class - there is no difference in leg room/space - just lack of a horizontal surface at table height

And as I said, I measured the space!  There is no difference..... (I have a tape measure on me as I was up at my mothers helping her measure for some new furniture!)
What I meant is I think you could put a wheelchair where the table would be.

Not if you also wanted four passengers to use the seats!

And how would you get a wheel chair through the door into a 165 first class compartment?


Also - the mini tables are half way through the carriage (as in SC on a 165/166) - you would NEVER get any wheel chair between the seats!
This is the use of them in 158's but is obviously different for 165/6's, I really could only imagine it is to have more standing room.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net