Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom => Topic started by: CJB666 on April 13, 2018, 06:12:22



Title: District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three reds
Post by: CJB666 on April 13, 2018, 06:12:22
District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three red lights’

TfL Tube strike 2018: Fury as District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three red lights’

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/tfl-tube-strike-2018-fury-as-district-line-staff-walk-out-in-support-of-driver-who-went-through-a3812231.html

Passengers are to be hit tomorrow [Friday] by a District line walk-out over a Tube driver alleged to have passed three red signals in his 11 weeks driving.

He had been qualified for 18 weeks but due to sickness, retraining and a compulsory removal from duty only drove for 11, London Underground claims. Two of the signals passed at danger (spads) were within a four-week period.

Nigel Holness, director of network operations at London Underground (LU), said it was “simply not safe for this employee to continue in a role as a driver”. LU refused to identify the severity of the spads — which could derail a train — or where they took place.


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three reds
Post by: TaplowGreen on April 13, 2018, 07:25:19
Sounds like LU have bent over backwards and this is just the usual RMT/ASLEF opportunism.

In the majority of Businesses I suspect the individual would be seeking alternative employment by now.


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver
Post by: Ralph Ayres on April 13, 2018, 10:27:35
Contrary to what the Standard claims, a SPAD is highly unlikely to derail a train as the signal positions are designed such that the train will be stopped automatically short of any danger.  It does seem that LU are ignoring the process they themselves have in place relating to trainees who have problems during their training. It may well be that this trainee does prove not suitable to be a driver but LU shouldn't be trying to circumvent the agreed process. It may for instance actually reflect shortcomings on the part of the trainer.


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three reds
Post by: ChrisB on April 13, 2018, 10:31:00
It has been reported that they have followed due process & and moved him to a station-based job while retraining is taking place.


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three reds
Post by: Phantom on April 13, 2018, 13:15:45
How much of that line is above ground?
Would be interesting to know what he was looking at if he couldn't see a red light in a dark tunnel


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver ‘who went through three reds
Post by: paul7575 on April 13, 2018, 14:18:22
How much of that line is above ground?
Would be interesting to know what he was looking at if he couldn't see a red light in a dark tunnel
Don’t have exact figures but a significant majority of the District is on the surface. 

Paul


Title: Re: District line staff walk out in support of driver
Post by: SandTEngineer on April 13, 2018, 15:09:58
Contrary to what the Standard claims, a SPAD is highly unlikely to derail a train as the signal positions are designed such that the train will be stopped automatically short of any danger.  It does seem that LU are ignoring the process they themselves have in place relating to trainees who have problems during their training. It may well be that this trainee does prove not suitable to be a driver but LU shouldn't be trying to circumvent the agreed process. It may for instance actually reflect shortcomings on the part of the trainer.
I'm afraid I have to challenge you on that.  There are lots of places on LU where a SPAD by a passenger train could involve an eventual derailment, albeit a protected one to other traffic.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net