Great Western Coffee Shop

My apologies for posting this item slightly belatedly, but it does include some great images and ideas for possible future re-openings.  ;)

From The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/public-leaders-network/gallery/2016/aug/01/britains-abandoned-stations-tracks-and-trains-readers-pictures):


Personally, I think the 'Beeching Line' should be re-opened, if only as a matter of principle.  ;) :D ;D

Hmmm, pretty pictures, but not exactly grounded in reality. Here are the 12 lines which Campaign for Better Transport believes have the strongest economic and social case for reopening. (From http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/our-top-12-rail-line-reopenings (http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/our-top-12-rail-line-reopenings)).

Ashington - Blyth - Newcastle: A victim of Beeching’s cuts, the line remained open to freight, meaning it would be relatively straightforward to reinstate passenger trains. Returning passenger services would significantly improve transport connections in a well-populated area in long-term economic decline. Northumberland County Council is supporting the scheme and reintroducing services will be one of the options in the new Northern Rail Franchise. ()

Portishead - Bristol: Returning passenger services to the Portishead line would support this fast-growing part of Bristol's commuter belt. The rail link would help tackle road congestion and reduce an hour long car trip during rush hour to around 17 minutes by train. A potential site for a new station at Portishead has been identified and the reopening has now got funding as part of a wider Bristol Metro network, with completion by 2019.

South Staffordshire Railway: Connecting Stourbridge, Walsall and Lichfield, reinstating this route would have both passenger and freight benefits. It would reduce road congestion and have the potential to make the controversial 'Brownhills Eastern Bypass' unnecessary, whilst allowing rail freight to bypass congested Birmingham and potentially remove heavy lorries off the roads.

Leamside line: The 20 mile Leamside line in County Durham closed in 1991. The route has great potential for both freight and passenger services offering Durham’s 60,000 residents an alternative to the busy East Coast mainline and A1 motorway, and providing a freight link to the Nissan car plant in Sunderland. Reopening the line has been identified as a priority by both Durham County Council and the Freight on Rail campaign.

Lewes - Uckfield: Reinstating this line would allow trains to run directly from west Kent and east Surrey to Brighton's economic and social hub, significantly reducing pressure on the congested road network. It would also offer a diversionary route for the Brighton Main Line, an important strategic element the network currently lacks.

Skipton - Colne: Restoring 11 miles of track would create an additional trans-Pennine rail route linking the West and East Coast Main Lines and connect the socially deprived and depressed areas of North-East Lancashire to the more prosperous West Yorkshire area.

Leicester - Burton-on-Trent: Re-establishing passenger services on this 30 mile stretch of line, currently used for freight, would provide 100,000 people with access to the rail network and reduce pressure on local roads. The line would also provide a tourist route through the National Forest.

Fleetwood - Preston: Reopening the six mile line, closed to passenger services since 1970, along with two new stations would support economic regeneration in an area of 60,000 people and reduce pressure on local roads.

Wisbech - March: With around 30,000 people living in and around Wisbech, it is one of the larger settlements in the country not on the rail network and its isolated position has contributed to its economic decline. Reopening the seven miles of line between Wisbech and March would enable access to the regional centres of Peterborough and Cambridge and support regeneration initiatives.

Totton - Hythe: Closed to passengers in 1966, the growth of many of the towns on this seven mile line, and the resultant pressure on the road network, has created a strong case for reopening. To maximise benefit to commuters a direct link with services to Southampton via Chandlers Ford would need to be established. Reopening costs are not thought to be prohibitive as the line has remained open for freight, serving the Fawley oil refinery.

East-West Rail Link: This would re-establish the rail link between Cambridge and Oxford and improve rail services between East Anglia, Central and Southern England. The western section of the scheme from Oxford to Bedford was approved by the Government in November 2011, with completion expected in 2019.

Bere Alston - Tavistock  - Okehampton: This first stage of this line is already subject to a planning application and would link Tavistock with Plymouth and the national rail network, thereby enabling new housing while reducing traffic on the A386 and providing a tourist route to Cornwall and West Devon’s mining landscape. A second stage, reopening to Okehampton, would provide an inland alternative to the coastal route for trains to Cornwall.

The photo of Loudwater is a bit miss leading, there are no abandoned station building only modern industrial units sitting of the site, perhaps the only clue left is the M40 over bridge build just before the line closed

An image search reveals that the picture in the article was taken on 21st September 1974.   Changed a bit since then, then?

The weeds are a bit taller, probably.  ;) :D ;D

from ITV Tyne-Tees (http://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2016-10-12/ashington-to-newcastle-rail-link-a-step-closer/?)


I wonder what their definition of "frequent" is?  With a half hourly service from until mid evening, their goal is to average 20 passengers per train journey by 2034.   With a population of around 28,000 in Ashington, that looks like a practical ambition.


Edit to add - link to user group site at http://www.senrug.co.uk/Re-open-AshingtonBlythTyneLine.php

Thanks for the link. I suspect that timeline is a little optimistic, but seems like a lot of railway for not a lot of money, and it has the council behind it, plus the DfT will want a nice juicy project in the North East, so it certainly seems like a good candidate for CP6. I wonder if it can be electrified without affecting the Metro lines?