Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: Chris from Nailsea on February 07, 2008, 22:42:42



Title: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 07, 2008, 22:42:42
Agreed: scrap all the computer controlled announcements!

At Bristol Temple Meads, we already have a much better source of information - always delivered with unfailing good humour, accuracy and timeliness.  Just in the last couple of evenings, catching the 1753 to Nailsea, I've seen yet again how it can be done.

See http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=110 for further details: Wayne Spence is absolutely brilliant - he deserves a much wider audience!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on February 08, 2008, 07:21:15
See http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=110 for further details: Wayne Spence is absolutely brilliant - he deserves a much wider audience!
Wayne is great and does a wonderful job at BTM and is a huge credit to his company. I saw once that he was offered promotion to another part of FGW but turned it down as he wanted to stay in his current job because he enjoys it so much. Good on him and I know that many passengers who use BTM appreciate Wayne.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: zebedee on February 08, 2008, 09:16:51
"We are very sorry for the severe delay to this service...."

No your not!  Your a computer controlled voice!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Topham Hatt on February 08, 2008, 14:06:23
A typical letter from FGW customer services gives the following definitions -

Reliability is the number of scheduled Monday to Friday trains that actually run. Punctuality is the number of Monday to Friday peak trains that arrive at their destination on time (which means within a set number of minutes of the scheduled time).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 08, 2008, 15:24:11
See http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=110 for further details: Wayne Spence is absolutely brilliant - he deserves a much wider audience!

Bloody right there! He doesn't deserve to work for such a bad company really. He is fabulous, never seen him without a smile on his face, and he is always happy to help!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on February 08, 2008, 20:46:22
I agree, Wayne is brilliant, and always smiling. I also think one of the PA announcers at BTM is excellent. If you know the one that says "This has been (as opposed to "is") a platform alteration this evening" then you'll know the one I mean. Clear, precise, and a joy to listen to. Another PA announcer injected some humour earlier this week, and everyone laughed. We all know it's not the staff's fault, and Wayne and the "voices" make a huge difference in keeping our spirits up. 

I also agree that a computer generated voice saying that "I am extremely sorry for the delay to your journey" is almost offensive. How can a computer be extremely sorry? And do I care if it is?       


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 08, 2008, 21:03:08
"We are very sorry for the severe delay to this service ..."

Yes, have you noticed that the computer is 'very sorry' while the delay is less than (I think) 30 minutes,

"I am extremely sorry for the delay to your journey ..."

but then it suddenly becomes 'extremely sorry' as soon as the delay exceeds 30 minutes!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on February 08, 2008, 21:07:22
Well, the computer doesn't exactly have a 'anger level counter'...  ;)

For what the computer systems do, they're very handy - and have enabled many a station to be approved within the DDA due to visual/hearing impairment rules, while not having to have the expense of staff doing manual announcements...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on February 08, 2008, 21:17:03
Yes, I had noticed that after a while the computer becomes extremely sorry, though I hadn't worked out the exact threshold.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: signalandtelegraph on February 09, 2008, 08:48:38
Of course, this would also require them to keep a spare set near each terminus, and extra drivers "on standby" so that the missing return journey could be started on time at the other end (both of which they should be doing as a matter of course anyway!)

That way they would not have to cancel services due to "drivers exceeding their hours" because all they would have to do is ring up the standby guys and get them to report in.

Or is that just too simple?

Perfectly logical but not cost effective for the company and the shareholders unfortunately.  There used to be one firm that did this, went by the name of British Rail I believe and had lots of spare stock, locomotives and drivers. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 09, 2008, 09:56:37
I accept your point, John and Jim, but sometimes such announcements are indeed made at the very last minute:

Last night I was on the (25 mins late) 15:37 from Ealing Broadway & it was only once we were actually in Reading Station waiting to pull out that they announced it would now be non-stop to Oxford.  Result - mad panic & scramble to get off before we got whisked off to Oxford (I wonder if everyone made it - anyone who was listening to a personal stereo wouldn't have had a hope!) ... .

Occasionally, too, I've experienced on board train announcements being promptly contradicted by platform announcements at Bristol Temple Meads (bloody Digital Doris again!), causing no end of confusion!   ???

Didn't realise Doris was a regular at Temple Meads?

Thought it was that stupid woman or the excellent Phil?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: vacman on February 09, 2008, 10:07:05
At ex-wessex stations the voice will say "First Great Western appologises for this delay....." rather than "i'm sorry...."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: smokey on February 09, 2008, 10:29:34
Vacman is right about ex-Wessex stations, they do say "First Great Western apologises...."

Anyone ever noticed how at Plymouth station the computer (former FGW system) announces "Roche" as "WROACH".

Be then computers only work on information fed to it, hence I've heard summer Newquay services being announced as calling at Par, ST BLAZEY, GOONBARROW JUNCTION and Newquay.

Just try asking for a ticket from St Blazey to Goonbarrow Junc. ;D ;D ;D

Also for around the first year of the Wessex "Digital Doris" system No trains called (by the computer) at Bugle or Luxulyan but did call at a NEW station "BUGXULYAN"  :D

I've also got a picture somewhere of the departure screens at Exeter Central showing a service calling at "...Axminster, CHARD JUNCTION, Crewkerne....."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 09, 2008, 10:36:41
Amazingly the announcement system can handle Kingswear, not even owned by NR  :D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: vacman on February 09, 2008, 10:51:21
Vacman is right about ex-Wessex stations, they do say "First Great Western apologises...."

Anyone ever noticed how at Plymouth station the computer (former FGW system) announces "Roche" as "WROACH".

Be then computers only work on information fed to it, hence I've heard summer Newquay services being announced as calling at Par, ST BLAZEY, GOONBARROW JUNCTION and Newquay.

Just try asking for a ticket from St Blazey to Goonbarrow Junc. ;D ;D ;D

Also for around the first year of the Wessex "Digital Doris" system No trains called (by the computer) at Bugle or Luxulyan but did call at a NEW station "BUGXULYAN"  :D

I've also got a picture somewhere of the departure screens at Exeter Central showing a service calling at "...Axminster, CHARD JUNCTION, Crewkerne....."

Plymouth used to announce Roche as "rosh".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 09, 2008, 23:08:37
... and (he's been mentioned elsewhere in this forum) there's a very distinctive Canadian (I think) accented TM who causes much hilarity on our westbound HSTs with announcements about the train stopping at 'Highbridge and BurnHAM' ...  ;D 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 09, 2008, 23:51:22
... and (he's been mentioned elsewhere in this forum) there's a very distinctive Canadian (I think) accented TM who causes much hilarity on our westbound HSTs with announcements about the train stopping at 'Highbridge and BurnHAM' ...  ;D 
I know the one!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on February 10, 2008, 20:47:57
Is he the one often on the 0811? I though he was US, not Canadian, and I know a lot of Canadians.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 10, 2008, 21:03:11
Goodness me, the 0811 is much too early for me!

Honestly, though, I don't know about the accent: I was just going by a previous suggestion, at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1418.msg8384#msg8384 .


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 11, 2008, 14:23:29
I've heard some funny announcements, Digital Doris at Cheltenham Spa:

"...Calling at Ashchurch for Tewkesbury, Worcester Shrub Hill, Worcester Foregate Street, and Malvern Link. Change at Malvern Link...for stations beyond Malvern Link." And of course, the famous "DnDunbridge" ("Dean, Dunbridge")

Posh Pamela (As I used to call her) at Bristol TM:

"I am sorry there will be no catering facilities on this train, today. I am sorry there will be no, there will be no, catering facilities on this train..."

Also on board announcements have sometimes been a laugh. There used to be this funny conductor on Virgin XC from Chelt Spa to Bristol TM who mentioned about "False teeth" and "Spare change" when remembering to take baggage, and also naming stations like Bristol TM as a "Bustling metropolis", Bristol PW as "Bijou" and Chelt Spa as "Charismatic". Always brightened my day :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: zebedee on February 11, 2008, 14:59:12
There was a proper Cornish catering manager on one of the virgin trains who would go mental reading out the list of snacks - ending in "Come on down, the price is right!"  Brilliant!  XC seems to have killed the humour though.....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 11, 2008, 15:44:24
There was a proper Cornish catering manager on one of the virgin trains who would go mental reading out the list of snacks - ending in "Come on down, the price is right!"  Brilliant!  XC seems to have killed the humour though.....

Nigel you mean? Also known as "The bloke in the shop"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 11, 2008, 17:07:37
There was a proper Cornish catering manager on one of the virgin trains who would go mental reading out the list of snacks - ending in "Come on down, the price is right!"  Brilliant!  XC seems to have killed the humour though.....

Nigel you mean? Also known as "The bloke in the shop"

Hes Brilliant  :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 12, 2008, 10:53:32
I've made this a new topic for the announcements as we have an interesting new subject going- thanks Chris  ;D

I remember that 'Laavley hot chocolate! Come on down, the price is right!' catering manager, I always viewed him as a proper Westcountry-type! He always got a laugh out of the passengers too.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on February 12, 2008, 18:13:49
I often found the Virgin approach bordering on the amateurish. One notable occasion when we were stuck near Stafford the TM apologised for the delay but it was due to us being stuck behind a "red colour light signal". Strictly accurate I suppose, but hardly illuminating and gave the impression that he hadn't been with the railway long. Later on in the jouney passengers were laughing at (not with) his announcements they were so bad. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 12hoursunday on February 16, 2008, 15:16:40
Stand by for automated anouncements on Intercity 125's. Coming soon to a HST near you! :P

You heard it here first!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 16, 2008, 15:19:40
You are joking  :( ???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 12hoursunday on February 16, 2008, 15:26:29
You are joking  :( ???

Me? Joke? No sorry my friend it's true. But only when the driver buzzes up the Train Manager via the Driver/ Guard telephone. If the Guard fails to answer within 15 seconds a call will go out "Will the Train Manager please contact the Driver"

For the time being.

Power Cars and TGS's will commence fitting of the new equipment shortly.




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: oooooo on February 16, 2008, 15:28:46
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 12hoursunday on February 16, 2008, 15:54:45
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??

and "This weeks sinificant enginering works are as follows. At Bristol the bloke bangs on about it every 10 or so minutes telling us about bus replacement at Par and Gunnislake and the such.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: dog box on February 17, 2008, 07:40:31
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??

That one drives me mad too ,.........something like please dont not leave unattended cases and parcels, i can understand the cases but Parcels when did you last see someone walking around BTM with a parcel completely wrapped in brown paper and tied up with string.
Worse still is the constant yap of  Welsh then English then Welsh announcements at Cardiff its near enough non stop..........and for those of you interested the US T/M mentioned in previous posts is featured on the job profiles on the FGW Website


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: gaf71 on February 17, 2008, 10:42:18
... and (he's been mentioned elsewhere in this forum) there's a very distinctive Canadian (I think) accented TM who causes much hilarity on our westbound HSTs with announcements about the train stopping at 'Highbridge and BurnHAM' ...  ;D 
Thats George, Exeter TM, and he is Canadian, and a very nice bloke!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 17, 2008, 17:06:15
Thanks, dog box and gaf71 - I've just looked again at that page on the FGW site, http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=110 , where he is indeed featured!

"Based in Exeter, George moved to England from Canada some 15 years ago ... "

Well, it's great that he has retained his distinctive accent, then!

 :D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 17, 2008, 18:01:14
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??
That one drives me mad too ,.........something like please dont not leave unattended cases and parcels, i can understand the cases but Parcels when did you last see someone walking around BTM with a parcel completely wrapped in brown paper and tied up with string.

I agree, oooooo and dog box!  The reference to 'parcels' brings up childhood images of 'brown paper packages tied up with string' - pure Sound of Music, surely?  I think it may be Posh Pamela (who has been mentioned here previously) who tries to get round this by requesting that "unattended articles" should not be left lying around - you can almost visualise her disdainful look as she refers to "unattended articles"!

And such announcements are (or were) broadcast at Nailsea and Backwell: "any unattended articles will be removed without warning."  Oh, yes: removed by who, exactly?  As Nailsea is an unmanned station, is this yet another job opportunity for the civilian lady who runs the coffee van at the foot of the steps to platform 2, perhaps???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: dog box on February 17, 2008, 18:40:50
 also why had Digital Doris got to call Bedmister....Bed..Minster ....it drives me mad!!!!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 17, 2008, 20:44:02
And such announcements are (or were) broadcast at Nailsea and Backwell: "any unattended articles will be removed without warning."  Oh, yes: removed by who, exactly?  As Nailsea is an unmanned station, is this yet another job opportunity for the civilian lady who runs the coffee van at the foot of the steps to platform 2, perhaps???
It's even funnier that she says "...may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"...what security services, if the station's unmanned?! It's the same at Frome when no-one's there in the evening! The "No smoking" announcement is getting a bit annoying, mainly because of the announcer's nasally voice on that part. It definitely isn't digital Doris!

Quote from: dog box
also why had Digital Doris got to call Bedmister....Bed..Minster ....it drives me mad!!!!!
It's the same with Warminster as well, "War..minster!"
Another thing that I've realised about Digital Doris is she sounds really depressed when she says "London paddingtoooonn....", and yet much more upbeat when she says "GLOUCester!" or "Bristltmplmeeeaaads!" If you've ever been to Cardiff Central/Queen Street she pronounces the Welsh station names pretty well!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 17, 2008, 21:11:55
And such announcements are (or were) broadcast at Nailsea and Backwell: "any unattended articles will be removed without warning."  Oh, yes: removed by who, exactly?  As Nailsea is an unmanned station, is this yet another job opportunity for the civilian lady who runs the coffee van at the foot of the steps to platform 2, perhaps???
It's even funnier that she says "...may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"...what security services, if the station's unmanned?!

Hmmm.  Yes, I'm becoming convinced that the friendly lady who runs the little coffee van on the roadside at Nailsea is in fact also SAS-trained and has body armour, a balaclava and Heckler & Koch ready in her glove compartment ...  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on February 17, 2008, 23:48:25
And such announcements are (or were) broadcast at Nailsea and Backwell: "any unattended articles will be removed without warning."  Oh, yes: removed by who, exactly?  As Nailsea is an unmanned station, is this yet another job opportunity for the civilian lady who runs the coffee van at the foot of the steps to platform 2, perhaps???
It's even funnier that she says "...may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"...what security services, if the station's unmanned?!

Hmmm.  Yes, I'm becoming convinced that the friendly lady who runs the little coffee van on the roadside at Nailsea is in fact also SAS-trained and has body armour, a balaclava and Heckler & Koch ready in her glove compartment ...  ;D

Maybe I'd better not criticise her coffee then.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: smokey on February 20, 2008, 19:02:56
Digital Doris makes a lovely anouncement at St Erth in the mornings,

"The next train from platform 3 is the 08.17 First Great Western service to Penzance calling at Lelant, Carbis Bay, St Ives, St Erth and Penzance. Platform 3 for the 08.17 First Great Western service to Penzance."*

Nice makes sense.

Yes I know it's the way the St Ives line is time-tabled.
For the rest of the Day Digital Doris ignores the St Ives Services.

* Or wording to that effect.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Conner on February 20, 2008, 21:22:26

Yes I know it's the way the St Ives line is time-tabled.

It is not actually the way it is timetabled it is because it is one train working. It is a train from St Erth-St Ives-St Erth-Penzance


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 20, 2008, 21:24:29
Digital Doris seems to vary per station. At Frome she announces just once a few minutes before the train's due, Warminster it's twice, and larger stations like Westbury/Gloucester she says when the train's approaching the platform and when it's arrived. And there's the somewhat tinny voice from those information points!

One thing in common though- she's always saying First Great Western are apologising for every delay over 3 minutes!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devonian on February 21, 2008, 10:05:06
Anyone know why at Newton Abbot the lovely digital voice informs us that "The train now standing at platform one is the 0806 FGW service to London Paddington".

Now, unless you have a VERY vivid imagination, there is no train to be seen and it is about 20 seconds later that the train comes into view around the corner.

Also, this morning, apparantly FGW were running up to Manchester rather than XC.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 21, 2008, 10:14:24
Digital Doris seems to vary per station. At Frome she announces just once a few minutes before the train's due, Warminster it's twice, and larger stations like Westbury/Gloucester she says when the train's approaching the platform and when it's arrived. And there's the somewhat tinny voice from those information points!

One thing in common though- she's always saying First Great Western are apologising for every delay over 3 minutes!

The approching ones ARE NOT automated.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 21, 2008, 10:15:24
Digital Doris makes a lovely anouncement at St Erth in the mornings,

"The next train from platform 3 is the 08.17 First Great Western service to Penzance calling at Lelant, Carbis Bay, St Ives, St Erth and Penzance. Platform 3 for the 08.17 First Great Western service to Penzance."*

Nice makes sense.

Yes I know it's the way the St Ives line is time-tabled.
For the rest of the Day Digital Doris ignores the St Ives Services.

* Or wording to that effect.


Please, it's PenZANCE


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 21, 2008, 10:17:16
Anyone know why at Newton Abbot the lovely digital voice informs us that "The train now standing at platform one is the 0806 FGW service to London Paddington".

Now, unless you have a VERY vivid imagination, there is no train to be seen and it is about 20 seconds later that the train comes into view around the corner.

Also, this morning, apparantly FGW were running up to Manchester rather than XC.
[/quote

It's just the timings, it will say it a set time after the train hits the "Newton Abbot Arrival" tracker thingy.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 21, 2008, 10:23:53
Its based on the signals i believe.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on February 21, 2008, 10:34:25
Its based on the signals i believe.

Not quite, it is done on TRUST reports I thought.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 21, 2008, 10:43:58
An Trust feeds off the signals/other trackside equipment  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on February 21, 2008, 18:07:01
I've heard some funny announcements, Digital Doris at Cheltenham Spa:

"...Calling at Ashchurch for Tewkesbury, Worcester Shrub Hill, Worcester Foregate Street, and Malvern Link. Change at Malvern Link...for stations beyond Malvern Link." And of course, the famous "DnDunbridge" ("Dean, Dunbridge")

Posh Pamela (As I used to call her) at Bristol TM:

"I am sorry there will be no catering facilities on this train, today. I am sorry there will be no, there will be no, catering facilities on this train..."

Also on board announcements have sometimes been a laugh. There used to be this funny conductor on Virgin XC from Chelt Spa to Bristol TM who mentioned about "False teeth" and "Spare change" when remembering to take baggage, and also naming stations like Bristol TM as a "Bustling metropolis", Bristol PW as "Bijou" and Chelt Spa as "Charismatic". Always brightened my day :)

I know the one- except Chesterfield was Charismatic and Birmingham NS was "bold and beautiful!"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on February 21, 2008, 18:13:31
The best announcemt, however, was on a Virgin Train once:

"The onboard shop which sells hot and cold drinks, snacks, books and magazines, is now closed.

 >:(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on February 21, 2008, 18:25:37
An Trust feeds off the signals/other trackside equipment  ;)

It's not done off signals, nor TRUST.

Well, it is partially based on signals. It's announced when the train hits a track circuit OR when it hits a switch on the track. The system will then associate that "switch" or "track circuit" to the headcode that is approaching through the signalling system itself, or TRUST (it depends on how much TYRELL will talk to the signalling system at that station).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devonian on February 22, 2008, 06:12:28
An Trust feeds off the signals/other trackside equipment  ;)

It's not done off signals, nor TRUST.

Well, it is partially based on signals. It's announced when the train hits a track circuit OR when it hits a switch on the track. The system will then associate that "switch" or "track circuit" to the headcode that is approaching through the signalling system itself, or TRUST (it depends on how much TYRELL will talk to the signalling system at that station).

Either way, can it be retimed to prevent the system sounding quite so pathetic? It seems to have been retimed for the other platforms at Newton Abbot


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devonian on February 22, 2008, 06:13:04
I've heard some funny announcements, Digital Doris at Cheltenham Spa:

"...Calling at Ashchurch for Tewkesbury, Worcester Shrub Hill, Worcester Foregate Street, and Malvern Link. Change at Malvern Link...for stations beyond Malvern Link." And of course, the famous "DnDunbridge" ("Dean, Dunbridge")

Posh Pamela (As I used to call her) at Bristol TM:

"I am sorry there will be no catering facilities on this train, today. I am sorry there will be no, there will be no, catering facilities on this train..."

Also on board announcements have sometimes been a laugh. There used to be this funny conductor on Virgin XC from Chelt Spa to Bristol TM who mentioned about "False teeth" and "Spare change" when remembering to take baggage, and also naming stations like Bristol TM as a "Bustling metropolis", Bristol PW as "Bijou" and Chelt Spa as "Charismatic". Always brightened my day :)

I know the one- except Chesterfield was Charismatic and Birmingham NS was "bold and beautiful!"

We had "Naughty Newton Abbot" from this guy  :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on February 27, 2008, 10:09:41
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??
That one is really annoying and ive heard it so much I know it word for word

"Please do not leave your luggage unattended on the station. Luggage left unattended may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"

They seem to be playing the one about no smoking more often than the luggage one currently, obviously as there is now a smoking ban

"all of our trains and stations are no smoking area's, please do not smoke until you have left the station premises"

Here in Wales we obviously get the announcements in Welsh as well. They also seem to be announcing trains that are starting off in Cardiff 3 times now e.g yesterday I noticed they announced the next train to depart from platform 0 for the Notts service 3 times in around the 6 minutes before it was departing.   Im sure it only used to be the once they would announce trains that were starting off, around 3 mins before departure time.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on February 27, 2008, 17:25:52
Either way, can it be retimed to prevent the system sounding quite so pathetic? It seems to have been retimed for the other platforms at Newton Abbot

Yes it's an option in the software. The software I've used (later versions than FGWs) allow you to modify the timings depending on whether a train has just stopped at a previous stop, to allow for the acceleration, etc.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Doctor Gideon Ceefax on February 27, 2008, 17:27:56
Virgin Trains have the right idea, their stations have manual announcements, and it's so much less intrusive than all this automated crap. My suggestion is those in charge of stations at Great Western to go and pay a visit to Rugby or Stafford, and see how much more pleasant it is.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on February 27, 2008, 22:53:58
Birmingham New Street Smoking:

"This station is a non smoking area. Please extinguish all smoking materials immediately."

 ;D :o 8)

Digital Doris often repeats announcements at Worcs Forgate Street! Sometimes immediately/10 secs after the first one!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on February 27, 2008, 23:30:06
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??
That one is really annoying and ive heard it so much I know it word for word

"Please do not leave your luggage unattended on the station. Luggage left unattended may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"

They seem to be playing the one about no smoking more often than the luggage one currently, obviously as there is now a smoking ban

"all of our trains and stations are no smoking area's, please do not smoke until you have left the station premises"

Here in Wales we obviously get the announcements in Welsh as well. They also seem to be announcing trains that are starting off in Cardiff 3 times now e.g yesterday I noticed they announced the next train to depart from platform 0 for the Notts service 3 times in around the 6 minutes before it was departing.   Im sure it only used to be the once they would announce trains that were starting off, around 3 mins before departure time.

At reading you get almost five minutes of constant announcement - if everything is running normally

Tonight:
"the next train to arrive on platform 4 is the 1750 train to hereford calling at ................."

30 seconds after it stopped you can see the train passing the previous signal and you get times:

"the train now approaching platform 4 is ...................."

Silly - bloody silly - since the annoouncementn is only heard on platform 4 and not elsewhere in the station


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on February 28, 2008, 18:01:37
Standing at Reading station tonight I had time to think and I couldnt help but notice something that I've always wondered about.

1. Platform announcements - can only ever be heard on the platform they relate to - i.e. The next train to depart from platform 4 is the 1750 FGW service to HEreford.  Surely it would be more useful to have the anouncement audible everywhere since this is no help to the poor schmuck stuck on the wrong platform

2. Timing - The "The next train" announcement occurs so late that it has barely finished before the train is almost at the platform and you get "The train now approaching .... "  The next train to my mind should be announced much earlier (where possible).

What is the logic behind this?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on February 28, 2008, 18:37:56
1. I was at Reading this afternoon and could quite clearly hear all of the platform announcements relating to every platform. Plus, they are relayed into the waiting rooms and toilets.

2. The Next Train announcements are made on two sets of overhead screens, side by side, on each platform at Reading - right up to an hour ahead, with platform numbers shown.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on February 28, 2008, 18:53:05
1. I was at Reading this afternoon and could quite clearly hear all of the platform announcements relating to every platform. Plus, they are relayed into the waiting rooms and toilets.

2. The Next Train announcements are made on two sets of overhead screens, side by side, on each platform at Reading - right up to an hour ahead, with platform numbers shown.

Do you have supersonic hearing?

I know they are on the screens - thats not the point

Either split the two tannoys up more or just do the "The train now approaching announcement"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: miniman on February 28, 2008, 18:59:11
I think the announcements are triggered automatically when the train passes a certain point. Platform 4 at Reading is very heavily used, I think it's the only westbound HST platform which means it's serving loads of places. My guess is because there are so many trains through there, and quite a few stationary / slow moving outside the station that the trigger point is closer to the station than normal. So if a train comes in quite quickly there's a shorter gap. Certainly the gap between the announcements at Chippenham is pretty well spaced - the "platform 1 for the..." is usually at least 1-2 minutes before the train arrives.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: dog box on February 28, 2008, 21:11:50
Hsts can use 4,5 ,8, 9 at Reading


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on February 28, 2008, 22:51:45
Hsts can use 4,5 ,8, 9 at Reading

Yep

On Wed the 1750 left from 8!

Last minute plat change 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 28, 2008, 23:48:39
I agree, those pre-recorded station platform announcements are often a pain in the ear!

At Bristol Temple Meads, with about 15 platforms (don't even ask!), we quite often get a situation where an automatically-triggered announcement for platform 8 is almost immediately 'shouted down' by an alternative announcement from platform 5. The problem with having such announcements broadcast at full volume on all platforms is exactly that: even those with the hearing of a bat can't understand any of it!

The double screens are indeed useful, though: they often show apparently the same list of timed departures, side by side - perhaps so you can amuse yourself by playing 'spot the difference', while waiting for your delayed train???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thefab442 on February 29, 2008, 07:55:17
The "No smoking" announcement is getting a bit annoying, mainly because of the announcer's nasally voice on that part. It definitely isn't digital Doris!

Another thing that I've realised about Digital Doris is she sounds really depressed when she says "London paddingtoooonn....", and yet much more upbeat when she says "GLOUCester!" or "Bristltmplmeeeaaads!" If you've ever been to Cardiff Central/Queen Street she pronounces the Welsh station names pretty well!

I believe that the No Smoking announcement is Doris, but she sounds really pissed off! AWLLL OUR CHRAINS ANN STAYSHUNS ARE NO SMOKING AIR-RE-YAS, WHEN YOU ALIGHT FROM THE CHRAIN PLEASE DO NOT SMOWKE UNTIL YOU HAVE LEFT THE STAYSHUN PREMISES. Both the London (end) announcements are funny - Lundun Padddddingtunnnnnnnnnnnnn and Lundun Waterloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Odd thing is the continuous versions she is happy with (I am sorry that the 07.55 First Great Western service to London Paddingtun!... is delayyyyed).


Another dodgy station is "Ann" "dover". I mean, if she can't say that right, god help her with Micheldever - which neither Celia nor Phil can say properly. Phil is close with "Mitchell... dever" but you can hear the slight gap.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: r james on February 29, 2008, 08:56:36
Quite often at cardiff central it announces that the train standing on platform X is the ........ service, even though the train is already moving and on its way out of the station!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 29, 2008, 09:42:44
Even worse at Bristol is when you're on platform 3 and straining to hear a already too quiet announcement, and the booming voice on platform 5/6 kicks in! Who knows why they don't tone down platform 5/6's voice a bit...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: shadow on February 29, 2008, 09:56:09
Not sure if it still does it, as i dont pay attention and the trains moved platforms.
The 17:30 HST from WSM to PAD, when it came in on platform 15 at Temple Meads, the 'Train now standing' announcement even though the train was not standing at the platform (it still hadn't come under the bridge, or was coming under the bridge at the time)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: miniman on February 29, 2008, 10:44:51
Not sure if it still does it, as i dont pay attention and the trains moved platforms.
The 17:30 HST from WSM to PAD, when it came in on platform 15 at Temple Meads, the 'Train now standing' announcement even though the train was not standing at the platform (it still hadn't come under the bridge, or was coming under the bridge at the time)
Yeah it still does that  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 12hoursunday on February 29, 2008, 10:49:35

Automactic announcements are usually transmitted to the platform concerned (unless it's a advertised platform alteration) and manual announcments can be heard at all platforms.


Not sure if it still does it, as i dont pay attention and the trains moved platforms.
The 17:30 HST from WSM to PAD, when it came in on platform 15 at Temple Meads, the 'Train now standing' announcement even though the train was not standing at the platform (it still hadn't come under the bridge, or was coming under the bridge at the time)

The automactic announcments are designed to work with signalling system. Slow approach to Plat 15 @ BTM (15mph) and some adjustment has always been needed at this location in both directions!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: smokey on February 29, 2008, 13:05:47
The "No smoking" announcement is getting a bit annoying, mainly because of the announcer's nasally voice on that part. It definitely isn't digital Doris!

Another thing that I've realised about Digital Doris is she sounds really depressed when she says "London paddingtoooonn....", and yet much more upbeat when she says "GLOUCester!" or "Bristltmplmeeeaaads!" If you've ever been to Cardiff Central/Queen Street she pronounces the Welsh station names pretty well!

I believe that the No Smoking announcement is Doris, but she sounds really pissed off! AWLLL OUR CHRAINS ANN STAYSHUNS ARE NO SMOKING AIR-RE-YAS, WHEN YOU ALIGHT FROM THE CHRAIN PLEASE DO NOT SMOWKE UNTIL
YOU HAVE LEFT THE STAYSHUN PREMISES. Both the London (end) announcements are funny - Lundun Padddddingtunnnnnnnnnnnnn and Lundun Waterloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Odd thing is the continuous versions she is happy with (I am sorry that the 07.55 First Great Western service to London Paddingtun!... is delayyyyed).


Another dodgy station is "Ann" "dover". I mean, if she can't say that right, god help her with Micheldever - which neither Celia nor Phil can say properly. Phil is close with "Mitchell... dever" but you can hear the slight gap.


The young lady who did the recordings for Digital Doris spent 3 long days in Nottingham recording every station in the UK including Welsh stations in English and Welsh and an awfiul lot of phrases.

The Smoking is not permitted on stations etc message has been editted together hence the change in pitch.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on February 29, 2008, 15:00:22
Quite often at cardiff central it announces that the train standing on platform X is the ........ service, even though the train is already moving and on its way out of the station!
Ive noticed that at Cardiff Central too - mind you they do seem to be announcing every train that is starting off at Cardiff 3 times now (Portsmouth, Nottingham, Holyhead etc) and the trains which are passing through cardiff get "the next train to arrive at...." and "the train now approaching platform....."  So if you are in platform 3/4's waiting room waiting for the West Wales train you can hear announcements for trains to Nottingham and Manchester etc.

At Cardiff all trains departing and arriving at platforms 0,1,2,3 & 4 get the announcements on all 5 of those platforms.  The valley line/Cardiff local services from platforms 6 & 7 get a seperate announcement system which can only be heard I believe on those 2 platforms.

We rarely get the train standing at Platform announcements here in Wales. Its either "the next train to arrive" "the next train to depart" or "the train now approaching". If its a platform alteration as is often the case with platforms 3 and 4 at Cardiff, again the annoucement will be heard on all platforms between 0-4.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on February 29, 2008, 15:05:33
The one that gets on my tits is the ones at stations about lugguage 'any unattended lugguage will be removed without warning'. Well isnt that a totally daft statement? If its unattended lugguage who are you supposed to warn about removing it anyway??
That one is really annoying and ive heard it so much I know it word for word

"Please do not leave your luggage unattended on the station. Luggage left unattended may be removed without warning, or damaged or destroyed by the security services"

They seem to be playing the one about no smoking more often than the luggage one currently, obviously as there is now a smoking ban

"all of our trains and stations are no smoking area's, please do not smoke until you have left the station premises"

Here in Wales we obviously get the announcements in Welsh as well. They also seem to be announcing trains that are starting off in Cardiff 3 times now e.g yesterday I noticed they announced the next train to depart from platform 0 for the Notts service 3 times in around the 6 minutes before it was departing.   Im sure it only used to be the once they would announce trains that were starting off, around 3 mins before departure time.

At reading you get almost five minutes of constant announcement - if everything is running normally


You do at Cardiff yes.  We got told the Portsmouth train was terminating 3 times, the Nottingham train was departing 3 times, the Manchester train was next to arrive and then approaching, the Swansea train was next to arrive and then approaching,  and these announcements would be heard on platforms 0-4 and all waiting rooms too.

Another announcement ive heard is when the FGW Swansea service is delayed and the West Wales ATW service arrives before it, they will say "Would passengers waiting for the delayed service to Swansea please wait for further announcements about this train".  Of course everyone just gets on the 3 carriage ATW service as it call at all the same stations as the FGW one!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thefab442 on February 29, 2008, 16:20:54
The young lady who did the recordings for Digital Doris spent 3 long days in Nottingham recording every station in the UK including Welsh stations in English and Welsh and an awfiul lot of phrases.

The Smoking is not permitted on stations etc message has been editted together hence the change in pitch.

Yeah, I believe her name is Ruth and she hails from Truro - that could be why she says Redruth as "Red.... RUTH!!". I dunno about the latter point though, I expect its a new recording but she had a blocked nose or something and so it sounds different? The "Cross Country" recording isn't too bad though, unlike Phil's "CROSSCUNTRY SERVICE TO!!! Bournemouth"


It must be pretty tedious recording all those stations, then doing them all again (they have a "continual" and "end" version), then all the misc announcements, then all the numbers and times and TOCs. Not that given the offer, I'd say no. :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 29, 2008, 22:55:26
Another announcement ive heard is when the FGW Swansea service is delayed and the West Wales ATW service arrives before it, they will say "Would passengers waiting for the delayed service to Swansea please wait for further announcements about this train".  Of course everyone just gets on the 3 carriage ATW service as it call at all the same stations as the FGW one!
I used to get this from Doris at Cheltenham Spa when the Virgin trains were late. Strangely enough though not many boarded the FGW local ones, even when the Virgins were very late...

Quote from: thefab442
I believe that the No Smoking announcement is Doris, but she sounds really pissed off! AWLLL OUR CHRAINS ANN STAYSHUNS ARE NO SMOKING AIR-RE-YAS, WHEN YOU ALIGHT FROM THE CHRAIN PLEASE DO NOT SMOWKE UNTIL YOU HAVE LEFT THE STAYSHUN PREMISES. Both the London (end) announcements are funny - Lundun Padddddingtunnnnnnnnnnnnn and Lundun Waterloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Odd thing is the continuous versions she is happy with (I am sorry that the 07.55 First Great Western service to London Paddingtun!... is delayyyyed).


Another dodgy station is "Ann" "dover". I mean, if she can't say that right, god help her with Micheldever - which neither Celia nor Phil can say properly. Phil is close with "Mitchell... dever" but you can hear the slight gap.
To me she seriously sounds like someone else in that announcement, as that one's normally after the unattended luggage one and to me it's almost certainly a different voice. Much more nasal and scratchy...

I've yet to hear the London Waterloo one, but another one from DD that sprang to mind lately was York end station. "Wakefield westgate, Leeds...AaYooooooork!"



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on February 29, 2008, 23:02:52
Another announcement ive heard is when the FGW Swansea service is delayed and the West Wales ATW service arrives before it, they will say "Would passengers waiting for the delayed service to Swansea please wait for further announcements about this train".  Of course everyone just gets on the 3 carriage ATW service as it call at all the same stations as the FGW one!
I used to get this from Digital Doris at Cheltenham Spa when the Virgin trains were late. Strangely enough though not many boarded the FGW local ones, even when the Virgins were very late...

Quote from: thefab442
I believe that the No Smoking announcement is Doris, but she sounds really pissed off! AWLLL OUR CHRAINS ANN STAYSHUNS ARE NO SMOKING AIR-RE-YAS, WHEN YOU ALIGHT FROM THE CHRAIN PLEASE DO NOT SMOWKE UNTIL YOU HAVE LEFT THE STAYSHUN PREMISES. Both the London (end) announcements are funny - Lundun Padddddingtunnnnnnnnnnnnn and Lundun Waterloooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Odd thing is the continuous versions she is happy with (I am sorry that the 07.55 First Great Western service to London Paddingtun!... is delayyyyed).


Another dodgy station is "Ann" "dover". I mean, if she can't say that right, god help her with Micheldever - which neither Celia nor Phil can say properly. Phil is close with "Mitchell... dever" but you can hear the slight gap.
To me she seriously sounds like someone else in that announcement. As that one's normally after the unattended luggage one you can compare them, and to me it's almost certainly a different voice. Much more nasal and scratchy...

I've yet to hear the London Waterloo one, but another one from DD that sprang to mind lately was York end station. "Wakefield westgate, Leeds...AaYooooooork!"

Celia also did a memorable one, when Wessex used to do a terminator to Castle Cary, at Bristol TM she announced it so gravely and low.  "Frome, Bruton and Caasulecaarey..."

Finally has anyone heard the 'don't feed the pigeons' announcement at BTM? They don't use that one anymore, but Celia literally shouting "PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE PIGEONS! Thankyou!" in a schoolmistress-style manner must have taught those pigeon-feeders a lesson!

Quote
It must be pretty tedious recording all those stations, then doing them all again (they have a "continual" and "end" version), then all the misc announcements, then all the numbers and times and TOCs. Not that given the offer, I'd say no.
Yes, DD sounded a bit fed up at times! I wouldn't mind doing it although imagine constantly hearing your own voice at almost every station!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thefab442 on March 02, 2008, 16:21:08
It's quite good when she announces a Holyhead service, and her mood constantly changes "LLANFAIRPWLL!!! banga, valley and HOLLLLYHEAD!!!".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: WDcommuter on March 03, 2008, 12:03:46
She sounds slightly disgusted when she says 'West Drayton' - makes me wonder if she's ever been up the stairs to platform 1  :-X


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on March 03, 2008, 20:25:22
I like the male announcer which gives the announcements in Welsh - the way he says 'Nottingham' makes me laugh. 

Also Holyhead is Caergybi in Welsh.  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 03, 2008, 20:41:40
I never knew there was a Welsh name for Bath Spa, until I went to Newport and heard the Welsh announcement! Can't remember what it was but it was completely different...

NB, there isn't a Welsh name for Bristol Temple Meads...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 03, 2008, 22:24:36
Do FGW/Virgin announce in Welsh at all, or is it just ATW with the obligation?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on March 04, 2008, 00:17:49
Quote from: Graz
NB, there isn't a Welsh name for Bristol Temple Meads...

Arlais Meddu Bryste


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Shazz on March 04, 2008, 02:33:41
Do FGW/Virgin announce in Welsh at all, or is it just ATW with the obligation?

iirc for any station in wales its now a legal obligation to do it in welsh as well as english


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on March 04, 2008, 07:25:54
iirc for any station in wales its now a legal obligation to do it in welsh as well as english

I would imagine they'd see it as being "in English as well as in Welsh" :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 04, 2008, 17:42:29
I mean on board the Virgin/FGW trains. ;)

I know that all stations have to have Welsh.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 04, 2008, 20:10:04
They've never done it on FGW or the ATW trains I've been on around Cardiff...though that was only a few times :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on March 04, 2008, 21:54:35
I never knew there was a Welsh name for Bath Spa, until I went to Newport and heard the Welsh announcement! Can't remember what it was but it was completely different...

NB, there isn't a Welsh name for Bristol Temple Meads...

Bryste Temple Meads?



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on March 05, 2008, 07:16:20
I never knew there was a Welsh name for Bath Spa, until I went to Newport and heard the Welsh announcement! Can't remember what it was but it was completely different...

NB, there isn't a Welsh name for Bristol Temple Meads...

Bryste Temple Meads?



As anounced - but screens show it otherwise.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ldf1985 on March 07, 2008, 21:06:49
I use Westbury station daily, which I believe still has the old 'Wessex Trains' announcement system.  Along with the screens, I think the system is very poor and unreliable.

For example...

1. Delayed trains just seem to 'disappear' from the announcments and screens, leading people to be believe that their train has been cancelled, when in fact, it is just running late.

2. Platform alterations announcements aren't announced at all, or are announced very late (usually as the train is approaching the 'altered to' platform).

3. Incorrect train information displayed on a screen (e.g. I've seen a Penzance service displayed as the 'Portsmouth Harbour' service, leading to mass confusion).

4. No 'reason for the delay', via the announcements, why a train is running late (Wessex did a very good job of doing this).

5. Announcement system seems to be incapable of announcing any delays over '99 Minutes'.  There was once a 2 hour late running Cardiff Central service, although she kept announcing 'delayed by approximately 99 minutes.  First Great Western APOLOGISES for this late running, and the inconvenience this may cause you'.





Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Lee on March 07, 2008, 21:19:02
Welcome to the forum, ldf1985


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on March 08, 2008, 07:19:04
I use Westbury station daily, which I believe still has the old 'Wessex Trains' announcement system.  Along with the screens, I think the system is very poor and unreliable.

For example...

1. Delayed trains just seem to 'disappear' from the announcments and screens, leading people to be believe that their train has been cancelled, when in fact, it is just running late.

2. Platform alterations announcements aren't announced at all, or are announced very late (usually as the train is approaching the 'altered to' platform).

3. Incorrect train information displayed on a screen (e.g. I've seen a Penzance service displayed as the 'Portsmouth Harbour' service, leading to mass confusion).

4. No 'reason for the delay', via the announcements, why a train is running late (Wessex did a very good job of doing this).

5. Announcement system seems to be incapable of announcing any delays over '99 Minutes'.  There was once a 2 hour late running Cardiff Central service, although she kept announcing 'delayed by approximately 99 minutes.  First Great Western APOLOGISES for this late running, and the inconvenience this may cause you'.
Welcome to the forum ldf1985.

Hopefully the current CIS system that remains at a number of ex-Wessex stations will be replaced by FGW's plans to spend ^15million on upgrading customer information at stations.

All the points you make about the current system found at Westbury and other ex-Wessex stations I too have experienced. Its fine when all trains are running on time but its quite unerving when your train is running late and it just disappears from the screen and the next train appears. You have no idea whether your train is going to even turn up! No fun late at night when there are no staff to ask 'whats going on'?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on March 08, 2008, 07:25:54
I use Westbury station daily, which I believe still has the old 'Wessex Trains' announcement system.  Along with the screens, I think the system is very poor and unreliable.

For example...

1. Delayed trains just seem to 'disappear' from the announcments and screens, leading people to be believe that their train has been cancelled, when in fact, it is just running late.

2. Platform alterations announcements aren't announced at all, or are announced very late (usually as the train is approaching the 'altered to' platform).

3. Incorrect train information displayed on a screen (e.g. I've seen a Penzance service displayed as the 'Portsmouth Harbour' service, leading to mass confusion).

4. No 'reason for the delay', via the announcements, why a train is running late (Wessex did a very good job of doing this).

5. Announcement system seems to be incapable of announcing any delays over '99 Minutes'.  There was once a 2 hour late running Cardiff Central service, although she kept announcing 'delayed by approximately 99 minutes.  First Great Western APOLOGISES for this late running, and the inconvenience this may cause you'.





1. Thats how it happens, it automatically leaves the screen 5mins after booked slot unless staff add minutes.
2. Normally at Westbury, (and certainally last Sunday) some of them are unknown until the train comes in. It depends if there is anyone in the office to answer the phone telling them about it!
3. Sometimes with delays the system gets confused. I'm not going to give a whole essay on that point.
4. Delays reasons are I belive set up by control - and have no input from staff at Westbury.
5. Quite rare really to have even an FGW train that late!!!!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on March 08, 2008, 13:41:13
IMO, Westburys boards are very irritating.

For a start:

The 1942 might be delayed. But it will tell me 'Delay 17' minutes.

Why couldn't it just tell me expected 1959?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on March 08, 2008, 17:38:06
IMO, Westburys boards are very irritating.

For a start:

The 1942 might be delayed. But it will tell me 'Delay 17' minutes.

Why couldn't it just tell me expected 1959?

Not enough room on the screen I guess...?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on March 08, 2008, 19:10:08
I use Westbury station daily, which I believe still has the old 'Wessex Trains' announcement system.  Along with the screens, I think the system is very poor and unreliable.

For example...

1. Delayed trains just seem to 'disappear' from the announcments and screens, leading people to be believe that their train has been cancelled, when in fact, it is just running late.

2. Platform alterations announcements aren't announced at all, or are announced very late (usually as the train is approaching the 'altered to' platform).

3. Incorrect train information displayed on a screen (e.g. I've seen a Penzance service displayed as the 'Portsmouth Harbour' service, leading to mass confusion).

4. No 'reason for the delay', via the announcements, why a train is running late (Wessex did a very good job of doing this).

5. Announcement system seems to be incapable of announcing any delays over '99 Minutes'.  There was once a 2 hour late running Cardiff Central service, although she kept announcing 'delayed by approximately 99 minutes.  First Great Western APOLOGISES for this late running, and the inconvenience this may cause you'.



I cant fault Cardiff Central for their announcements - compaired to what it sounds like Westbury's are like they are good. They always give details of trains which are delayed and even announce when a train has been cancelled (although rarely give a reason why). They are also good at announcing platform alterations, although why is it that terminating trains at Cardiff Central, whenever they are supposed to terminate at platform 4 they end up terminating at platform 3 (and vice versa) and this means the announcer does a "platform alteration" announcement which is a bit daft really.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 08, 2008, 22:03:53
The display screen at Westbury is unique, I've never seen it anywhere else even in big ex-Wessex stations like Gloucester/Cheltenham Spa. Also any delay over 99 minutes (at other ex-Wessex stations at least) runs into the 100s.

I've found the ex-Wessex stations OK for the reasons for delays too, I've heard everything from "This is due to the train failure" to "This is due to the emergency situation on the train"...!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thefab442 on March 08, 2008, 22:31:16
I seem to recall once, in the mists of time (last January!), at Exeter Central during diversions...

"Your attention please on Platform 3, we are sorry that the 13xx First Great Western service to London Paddington has been cancelled. This is due to an earlier the train failure."

Quite interesting, however, to hear...

"Platform 3 for the 14xx First Great Western service to London Paddington. Calling at Honiton, Yeovil Junction, Yeovil Pen Mill, Castle Cary, Westbury, Pewsey, Newbury, Reading and London Paddington." (or similar). Was rather busy and we ended up waiting at Chard for ages for two down HSTs to pass.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 14, 2008, 20:13:55
Wow, not bad for an alternative to London! Probably took ages though!

Chris - you posted a bit earlier about the station announcer at Bristol TM, called Phil...is that the guy who has the very unique (and clear!) voice and announces almost every delayed train?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on March 14, 2008, 20:19:13
He's excellent. Should win an award for clarity.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 14, 2008, 21:40:04
Yes, I agree with John - Phil is a contender for a 'plain English' award for clearly pronounced, grammatically correct and accurate announcements!

He can also be heard above the inordinately loud 'digital female' voice from platform 5, too - they really ought to adjust the volume of those speakers on platform 5.   ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 15, 2008, 00:02:46
You can hear that voice from the entire station, pretty much, and it very effectively drowns out the platform 3 voice which is on the contrary far too quiet!

Where in Temple Meads is Phil based? Always wondered about that ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 15, 2008, 15:24:00
Phil does B'ham New Street and all the Leeds commuter stations as well (and more I have/ have not heard).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: dog box on March 15, 2008, 16:29:37
You can hear that voice from the entire station, pretty much, and it very effectively drowns out the platform 3 voice which is on the contrary far too quiet!

Where in Temple Meads is Phil based? Always wondered about that ;)

Think its somewhere on platform 5,6 ,7 ,8


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ldf1985 on March 17, 2008, 17:40:49
I've noticed over the last couple of weeks that the announcements at Westbury are a lot more 'punctual' and 'regular'.

'The train now approaching platform', and 'The train at platform' announcements seem to be more widely 'in use'.

For the first time ever, I heard the 'will passengers intending to travel on this service, please join the train now, as it is ready to leave' announcement, when a train was standing at a platform.

Out of interest, does a member of staff have to operate the announcement system at stations, or does it work automatically?

And finally, for the first time in months, I heard a delay reason given to a train - 'This is due to a shortage of serviceable trains'!!!



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jim on March 17, 2008, 22:40:01
I've noticed over the last couple of weeks that the announcements at Westbury are a lot more 'punctual' and 'regular'.

'The train now approaching platform', and 'The train at platform' announcements seem to be more widely 'in use'.

For the first time ever, I heard the 'will passengers intending to travel on this service, please join the train now, as it is ready to leave' announcement, when a train was standing at a platform.

Out of interest, does a member of staff have to operate the announcement system at stations, or does it work automatically?

And finally, for the first time in months, I heard a delay reason given to a train - 'This is due to a shortage of serviceable trains'!!!



The only ones at Westbury done automatically are 2 "The next train to arrives" and the delays....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 19, 2008, 22:57:32
Where in Temple Meads is Phil based? Always wondered about that ;)

Think its somewhere on platform 5,6 ,7 ,8

Thanks, dog box!  ;)

Having done a bit of 'Sherlock Holmes' detective work this evening (just using up a few minutes, waiting for my 1753!), I discovered a door marked 'SILENCE Customer announcements may be taking place'.  It's at the eastern end of platform 5 ... "Elementary, my dear Watson!"

 ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on March 20, 2008, 21:22:49
I've noticed over the last couple of weeks that the announcements at Westbury are a lot more 'punctual' and 'regular'.

'The train now approaching platform', and 'The train at platform' announcements seem to be more widely 'in use'.

For the first time ever, I heard the 'will passengers intending to travel on this service, please join the train now, as it is ready to leave' announcement, when a train was standing at a platform.

Out of interest, does a member of staff have to operate the announcement system at stations, or does it work automatically?

And finally, for the first time in months, I heard a delay reason given to a train - 'This is due to a shortage of serviceable trains'!!!


At stations in Wales they always do both  "the next train to arrive" and "the train now approaching platform" announcements.  If a train is starting off somewhere e.g. Cardiff they will do "the next train to depart" announcement but do it at least twice, if not 3 times.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 20, 2008, 22:25:43
Where in Temple Meads is Phil based? Always wondered about that ;)

Think its somewhere on platform 5,6 ,7 ,8

Thanks, dog box!  ;)

Having done a bit of 'Sherlock Holmes' detective work this evening (just using up a few minutes, waiting for my 1753!), I discovered a door marked 'SILENCE Customer announcements may be taking place'.  It's at the eastern end of platform 5 ... "Elementary, my dear Watson!"

 ;) :D ;D

But is not it pre-recorded? Or is BTM the station that he does full time, with all the others on pre-recorded?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 20, 2008, 22:35:21
Phil's announcements for Bristol Temple Meads itself are not pre-recorded: they're clearly done live - they are even amended in mid-announcement, if the information he has is updated!

I can't comment on the announcements at other stations, though: I've not heard them.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 20, 2008, 22:40:47
Phil's announcements for Bristol Temple Meads itself are not pre-recorded: they're clearly done live - they are even amended in mid-announcement, if the information he has is updated!

I can't comment on the announcements at other stations, though: I've not heard them.



He does many stations in the UK (B New Street, Leeds area, Reading (I think)....), so perhaps his main "job" is at B T M!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on March 21, 2008, 07:23:53
We talking about Mr Phil Sayer - the famous automated announcer? ;)

The way the software works that has Phil and Celia loaded in is that any corrections may occur are either cut in (if it's the same announcement as what the details are for) or it's put in the 'queue'. All automated ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on March 21, 2008, 09:48:11
I wonder whether we are talking at cross purposes. As Chris says, the one we're talking about is definitely not prerecorded. And he's excellent. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: shadow on March 21, 2008, 20:48:58
Phil's announcements for Bristol Temple Meads itself are not pre-recorded: they're clearly done live - they are even amended in mid-announcement, if the information he has is updated!

I can't comment on the announcements at other stations, though: I've not heard them.



I wonder whether we are talking at cross purposes. As Chris says, the one we're talking about is definitely not prerecorded. And he's excellent. 

He is most definatly not recorded!
I heard a phone in the background once!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on March 21, 2008, 22:26:05
^ Not to mention the squeaking of the tracks that sometimes can be heard over the speakers as he's talking, if there's a freight going through the P3/P5 part or a train pulling into P5!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 21, 2008, 22:28:55
Thanks, John R, shadow and Graz!  :)

I agree with John - I think we are indeed referring to different kinds of announcements here.  The pre-recorded 'standard' announcements (whether by 'Ruth', 'Celia', 'Doris' or 'Phil'!) are clearly not the same thing as the 'real-time' announcements by 'a male voice' (whether it's the live Phil, or someone else!) at Bristol Temple Meads.  Can anyone, perhaps from FGW staff at BTM, clarify this for us, please?

By the way, just as a comparison, my 1753 yesterday was subject to a last-minute change, and this was announced 'live' over the tannoy by someone I shall have to refer to as 'male voice #2'.  He was very enthusiastic, saying "attention please, attention please ..." in repeated announcements, but he didn't have the clear and authoritative delivery of 'a male voice'.  (By the way, if 'male voice #2' is reading this, it's honestly not a personal criticism: rather, ask 'a male voice' for some coaching!)  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 21, 2008, 23:33:48
As far as I know, all Phil's station announcements are pre-recorded. As I said before, he does loads of UK stations.

But I doubt he has a full time job at BTM- he is a professional voice artist.

Look at his website.

It is quite possible that "male voice 2" is just a supervisor who corrects/supplements the main computerised system- this happens a lot a Worcester when Digital Doris sprouts rubbish!

-----------------------

I find it funny that the woman that does the London Underground was sacked!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 21, 2008, 23:43:13
Thanks, Btline.

In that case, it is becoming clear that 'a male voice', who makes clearly live announcements at Bristol Temple Meads, is not in fact 'Phil'.

As I asked, can anyone, perhaps from FGW staff at BTM, clarify this for us, please?  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Lee on March 22, 2008, 02:05:28
As far as I know, all Phil's station announcements are pre-recorded. As I said before, he does loads of UK stations.

But I doubt he has a full time job at BTM- he is a professional voice artist.

Look at his website.

Indeed (link below.)
http://www.sayerhamilton.com/


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 22, 2008, 02:23:48
Thanks for that, Lee!

Having listened to the voice samples on that website, it is now absolutely clear to me that the voice of the 'live announcements' at Bristol Temple Meads is not Phil Sayer.

The question remains: what name can we now give to the excellent, clear and precise 'a male voice' at BTM?  I'm rather tempted to go up to that door on platform 5 at BTM, hammer on it loudly, and shout "You in there: what's your name?"

 ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on March 22, 2008, 09:40:09
Thanks, John R, shadow and Graz!  :)

I agree with John - I think we are indeed referring to different kinds of announcements here.  The pre-recorded 'standard' announcements (whether by 'Ruth', 'Celia', 'Doris' or 'Phil'!) are clearly not the same thing as the 'real-time' announcements by 'a male voice' (whether it's the live Phil, or someone else!) at Bristol Temple Meads.  Can anyone, perhaps from FGW staff at BTM, clarify this for us, please?

By the way, just as a comparison, my 1753 yesterday was subject to a last-minute change, and this was announced 'live' over the tannoy by someone I shall have to refer to as 'male voice #2'.  He was very enthusiastic, saying "attention please, attention please ..." in repeated announcements, but he didn't have the clear and authoritative delivery of 'a male voice'.  (By the way, if 'male voice #2' is reading this, it's honestly not a personal criticism: rather, ask 'a male voice' for some coaching!)  ;)

Yes, he's been on a couple of days this week, and he doesn't have the same weight to his voice, so it's actually quite difficult to hear.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: shadow on March 22, 2008, 10:42:36
Thanks for that, Lee!

Having listened to the voice samples on that website, it is now absolutely clear to me that the voice of the 'live announcements' at Bristol Temple Meads is not Phil Sayer.

The question remains: what name can we now give to the excellent, clear and precise 'a male voice' at BTM?  I'm rather tempted to go up to that door on platform 5 at BTM, hammer on it loudly, and shout "You in there: what's your name?"

 ;) :D ;D

Charlie?
I like the name Charlie
I give it a day before someone with a strange sense of humour makes a poll on here to choose his name...wouldn't surprise me, stranger things have happened on the net


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on March 22, 2008, 13:24:05
hang on - i'm confused!

Does Phil do any announcing at BTM?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on March 25, 2008, 16:26:48
Only to myself  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ldf1985 on May 31, 2008, 18:52:58
I've noticed that the new information 'flatscreen' at Westbury, in the new waiting room, has completely different software (which looks ten times better and shows more train services), than the rest of the screens on the station.

Will this new style of software be rolled out to the rest of the station?

Regards


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on May 31, 2008, 19:31:05
I've noticed that the new information 'flatscreen' at Westbury, in the new waiting room, has completely different software (which looks ten times better and shows more train services), than the rest of the screens on the station.

Will this new style of software be rolled out to the rest of the station?

Regards
Hopefully the below link will go some way to answering your question regarding information screens at Westbury ldf1985:

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2901.0

I believe that all the old Wales and West customer information screens are being replaced as part of FGW's franchise commitment to improving customer information at ex-Wessex Trains stations.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on May 31, 2008, 19:52:23
I don't actually think it's new software - just a new version of the interface that displays information to passengers.

Understandably, using that display on the CRT screens on the platforms would look rather horrendous due to flicker...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on June 01, 2008, 00:21:29
The "Cross Country" recording isn't too bad though, unlike Phil's "CROSSCUNTRY SERVICE TO!!! Bournemouth"

Phil's CrossCuntry is better than DD's "First Great Western Service" which sounds like someone's just shoved something where the sun don't shine as she says it.... following by the London Paddingtunnnnnnn which sounds like object has now been removed from place where sun does not shine and all is well again.... sorry to be crude, but it does my friggin head in every time.  >:(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on June 02, 2008, 10:37:10
I can't say I like the flatscreens too much at Westbury at all. For one thing they're much smaller and you can't easily view them from an angle (you can with the CRTs), you have to look at them pretty much 'dead-on'.

Another thing about that system I dislike is it switching from page 1 to page 2 every five seconds. Problem is, page 2 usually only has one train on it! I much prefer the old system.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on June 02, 2008, 14:11:13
I can't say I like the flatscreens too much at Westbury at all. For one thing they're much smaller and you can't easily view them from an angle (you can with the CRTs), you have to look at them pretty much 'dead-on'.

Another thing about that system I dislike is it switching from page 1 to page 2 every five seconds. Problem is, page 2 usually only has one train on it! I much prefer the old system.

I absolutley hate the page 1 and 2 system (new to Worcester a year or so ago).

It spends a few secs on page 1 (the page that 99% of people need). I often do not have enough time to find what I m looking for - there is a heck of a lot of info on those screens and it takes time to adjust.

It them moves to page 2 (where all trains except the ex-Londons are "No Report") and spends at least twice the time.

It then scrolls through waste of time pages (No smoking - I know that as its the law; don't leave bags around, mind the gap.....)

And then returns to page 1.

I often have to wait 3 cycles before I can be confident about what I have read. I don't have slow reading problems, so I wonder how difficult it for slow readers....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on June 02, 2008, 14:29:37
Quote from: Btline
It spends a few secs on page 1 (the page that 99% of people need). I often do not have enough time to find what I m looking for
Perhaps they should put a bit of slack in the system... (http://www.takeforum.com/forum/images/smiles/abxe.gif)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on June 02, 2008, 15:42:53
Quote from: Btline
It spends a few secs on page 1 (the page that 99% of people need). I often do not have enough time to find what I m looking for
Perhaps they should put a bit of slack in the system... (http://www.takeforum.com/forum/images/smiles/abxe.gif)
:P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on June 02, 2008, 21:56:48
I also think it spends much longer on page 2! Fourtunately though we don't get any dopey 'no smoking' or 'no unattended luggage' screens down here. Not yet anyway!

For anyone not in the know of Westbury (The only station I know which has screens that look like this), the old system is...

(http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd13/GrazzaD/cancellation.jpg)

I certainly don't have any problems interpreting it! ;)

Quote
Phil's CrossCuntry is better than DD's "First Great Western Service" which sounds like someone's just shoved something where the sun don't shine as she says it.... following by the London Paddingtunnnnnnn which sounds like object has now been removed from place where sun does not shine and all is well again.... sorry to be crude, but it does my friggin head in every time.  >:(
Have you heard DD saying 'CrossCountry'? Sounds like she's in the middle of another sentence! Take a visit to Gloucester / Cheltenham Spa and you hear her in all her glory ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on June 02, 2008, 21:58:41
That is a good screen. Quick and easy to use due to the different colours and use of capitals here and there.

The Worcs ones are hard to decipher.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on June 02, 2008, 22:46:30
Note the Trans-Wilts cancellations on the picture if you look carefully!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on June 03, 2008, 07:02:39
Note the Trans-Wilts cancellations on the picture if you look carefully!
I didn't want to say  :-X


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Graz on July 02, 2008, 15:02:33
Let's say it was a subtle hint! Actually the reason I originally took that was for STT, to show those cancellations ;)

One thing I've always noticed is that Doris doesn't pronounce Keynsham right. She calls it 'Keensham' where in fact it should be 'Kaynsham'.
Another thing I've noticed, if you're ever at Gloucester/Chelt Spa, is if Willington is one of the stations a train is calling at it sounds like a different person announcing it!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on July 22, 2008, 22:35:42
Conductor training includes on train announcements. We were told to put personality into the PA and not to use Doris, (who is just about obsolete anyway, although she does kick in automatically after every 4th door opening with a safety briefing on some classes of unit).  Long boring rambles are also proscribed, but we have been instructed to find our own cheerful, clear and informative style.  Customers will probably be pleased to know that training is very customer focused and that we are constantly being told not to leave passengers without info at extended signal stops etc.

My group of trainees have been out and about  these past few days practising this.  Apart from a quickly corrected error in announcing the stations on a certain Bristol branch in the wrong order,  :'( I think, (ok then...hope) that we did make journeys a little more interesting.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 22, 2008, 23:02:59
Thanks very much for that particularly topical post, G.Uard!

Firstly, I have noticed much more informality in the on-board announcements recently - a welcome development of the crew 'telling it as it is', rather than the previous, rather stuffy, "First Great Western apologise for the possible inconvenience this may cause"?

Secondly, I was very pleasantly surprised to hear an on-board announcement on my train to BTM this morning, to the effect that, "If anyone needs to buy a ticket to this station, I'll be selling them at the back of the train for the next five minutes!"  Well, I was so impressed, I did just that - thanks, to that 'customer focused' member of train crew this morning!

And finally ... I (and many others) listened with interest to the very clear, clearly enunciated and increasingly firm announcements from the platform announcer at BTM this evening about the 'gentleman' who was apparently persisting in riding a bicycle on platform 3.  Just a shame someone from the BTP office there didn't hear him and nip out to shove a truncheon between the culprit's wheel spokes!

 ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on July 22, 2008, 23:09:55
Yes I agree, and I think it is well received. A recent announcement at Temple Meads made reference to the awful weather, and passengers visibly smiled. So long as it doesn't degenerate into the somewhat amateurish and cheekie chappie approach that Virgin encouraged whilst running XC, which often made me cringe.

I still puzzle though as to the mixed message it gives passengers when TMs invite them to buy tickets on the train, "to avoid a 20 minute wait at the barriers" as one TM said recently. One part of FGW says you must buy a ticket before you board, whilst another acknowledges the ability and custom to buy on board. Still, that's probably a different thread....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on July 22, 2008, 23:31:42
I still puzzle though as to the mixed message it gives passengers when TMs invite them to buy tickets on the train, "to avoid a 20 minute wait at the barriers" as one TM said recently. One part of FGW says you must buy a ticket before you board, whilst another acknowledges the ability and custom to buy on board. Still, that's probably a different thread....

You know TM's/Conductors earn commission on what they sell onboard  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 22, 2008, 23:52:00
You know TM's/Conductors earn commission on what they sell onboard  ;)

Yes, SDA, I do know - and I don't have any problem with that!  If the ticket machine at Nailsea isn't working, why shouldn't a very cheery chap sell me a ticket on the platform at BTM - and get some commission, as well as my gratitude, for so doing??  ;D

I still puzzle though as to the mixed message it gives passengers when TMs invite them to buy tickets on the train, "to avoid a 20 minute wait at the barriers" as one TM said recently.

Nonsense: I've never, ever, waited more than three or four minutes at the gates at BTM - they have a very efficient team there!  (I'd mention names, but don't want to cause embarrassment!)  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on July 22, 2008, 23:54:25
Chris, I was merely pointing out to John a possible reason for a TM being so willing to sell further tickets  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 23, 2008, 00:03:55
No problem!  I'm delighted to see 'revenue protection' working in real life, rather than 'fare dodging' being condoned!!  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on July 25, 2008, 16:14:47
I liked Virgin's guards! They made people chuckle (apart from the people getting off at the station!).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on July 25, 2008, 16:36:16
Alighting from a Voyager always makes me smile. Damn awful trains.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on July 25, 2008, 17:44:08
Alighting from a Voyager always makes me smile. Damn awful trains.
:P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swlines on July 25, 2008, 18:23:30
Alighting from a Voyager always makes me smile. Damn awful trains.

Boarding a Voyager always makes me want to hurl my insides out. Especially when boarding next to a toilet. Damn "toilets-were-designed-for-static-and-no-movement" trains.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on October 16, 2008, 18:17:45
I really enjoyed standing on St Erth station listening to the automated PA announcing the 1747 would arrive next at my platform 3 times and it not appearing, then it was really comforting to find it had disappeared from the next train indicator and the next Paddington bound train was not until 22:something.  It was nice of National Rail enquiries to tell me they were experiencing large demand and the TrainTracker phoneline not having uptodate information, and finally after 25 minutes the PA telling the now very concerned passengers that the train was 25 minutes late and it arrive 5 minutes later.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on October 16, 2008, 20:27:41
I really enjoyed standing on St Erth station listening to the automated PA announcing the 1747 would arrive next at my platform 3 times and it not appearing, then it was really comforting to find it had disappeared from the next train indicator and the next Paddington bound train was not until 22:something.  It was nice of National Rail enquiries to tell me they were experiencing large demand and the TrainTracker phoneline not having uptodate information, and finally after 25 minutes the PA telling the now very concerned passengers that the train was 25 minutes late and it arrive 5 minutes later.


Oh, dear... nicely put, but.... oh

 :-\   :(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on October 17, 2008, 06:05:26
Listen out for a colleague who takes a small xylophone to work.  Depending on weather or topical events, he serenades passengers over the PA before making announcements. (Remember Gladys Pugh on Hi de Hi ?)

I particularly remember one Friday morning during the August monsoon, when commuters arriving at BTM were treated to the opening bars of Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on October 17, 2008, 08:41:55
Listen out for a colleague who takes a small xylophone to work.  Depending on weather or topical events, he serenades passengers over the PA before making announcements. (Remember Gladys Pugh on Hi de Hi ?)

I particularly remember one Friday morning during the August monsoon, when commuters arriving at BTM were treated to the opening bars of Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head.

On a similar note, the announcement jingle on the Night Riviera is quite funky!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on December 22, 2008, 18:21:40
Conductor training includes on train announcements. We were told to put personality into the PA and not to use Doris, (who is just about obsolete anyway, although she does kick in automatically after every 4th door opening with a safety briefing on some classes of unit).  Long boring rambles are also proscribed, but we have been instructed to find our own cheerful, clear and informative style.  Customers will probably be pleased to know that training is very customer focused and that we are constantly being told not to leave passengers without info at extended signal stops etc.

My group of trainees have been out and about  these past few days practising this.  Apart from a quickly corrected error in announcing the stations on a certain Bristol branch in the wrong order,  :'( I think, (ok then...hope) that we did make journeys a little more interesting.

Good to hear. I remember a Sunday evening train from Bristol to Didcot a few months back where after every stop the TM made a long and threatening announcement about the dire consequences that would befall anyone who tried travelling on his train with an Advance ticket for another service, which was immediately followed by another long screed from the customer host who warned first-class pax about being charged for complimentaries if they failed to show their ticket before ordering. Now, I'm all for giving people clear information but I suspect that these announcements (at least regarding ticket validity) and largely ineffective: the terminally confused will not understand what's being said and the chancers won't care! With station stops every 12 - 15 minutes (BTH, CPM, SWI, DID...) I was glad to escape when I DID  :-[ (pun intended...I'll get my coat). All a bit oppressive really, and not much of a welcome on board.

And as for the Welsh-language announcements at CDF they're a bleedin' nuisance when a Milford Haven service changes platform at the last moment: there are so many station calls that by the end of the announcement in Welsh before you get anything in English sometimes all you'll see is the tail lights of your train disappearing off towards Bridgend. No doubt it's been said before, but given the relatively small number of people who speak Welsh only wouldn't it benefit the majority if these announcements were in English first, then Welsh? Still, I suppose it's helped me learn some Welsh place names and numbers (Hendy-gwyn ar Daf anyone?)



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 22, 2008, 19:22:06
And now (on HSS at least) we have further messages to store our bags properly and if we see anything suspicious to report it to the train crew (or as was said this morning, the police, which seems rather impractical advice.)

Added to which we are being told after each stop to check our train times on Xmas Eve, which seems OTT for morning commuters.

If I thought the announcements would be switched off in the quiet carriage then I would certainly sit in there.

By the way, what constitutes a suspicious bag? Any bags stored in the overhead lockers or at the carriage ends could belong to anyone, so I how do I know if they are suspicious?
 

   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2008, 17:36:08
Announcements which should be AXED:

*Any in a language other than English
*Security - bags etc.
*Smoking (esp that B'ham New Street one!)
*Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in
*Anything with the word "customer"
*Stowing luggage
*Anything about not running due to the <insert weather word> weather
*Long messages from the "Customer Retail manager" (or Buffet man on proper TOCs) - short ones are ok eg "shop closing after Lancaster"

There are probably many others. But these would save some electricity!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on December 23, 2008, 17:51:26

*Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in


I think that's the case for all announcements  ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on December 23, 2008, 18:04:56
Announcements which should be AXED:

1Any in a language other than English
2Security - bags etc.
3Smoking (esp that B'ham New Street one!)
4Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in
5Anything with the word "customer"
6Stowing luggage
7Anything about not running due to the <insert weather word> weather
8Long messages from the "Customer Retail manager" (or Buffet man on proper TOCs) - short ones are ok eg "shop closing after Lancaster"

There are probably many others. But these would save some electricity!

1. Why? tourism to England is on the up due to the weak ^.
2. Making announcements about security re-assures people
3. Smoking is illegel on stations and countless times do I see people doing it, so make it obvious so people can be grassed up!
4. You assume every person on the train travels frequently?
5. Its a technicality, I can't say it really matters.
6. This is particularly useful for the refurbished Voyagers where there is a large luggage rack.
7. Why????
8. Once again, not everybody travels on Virgin trains all the time. How many trains do you know that have an actual shop - potential for confusion perhaps?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2008, 18:13:06
Announcements which should be AXED:

1Any in a language other than English
2Security - bags etc.
3Smoking (esp that B'ham New Street one!)
4Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in
5Anything with the word "customer"
6Stowing luggage
7Anything about not running due to the <insert weather word> weather
8Long messages from the "Customer Retail manager" (or Buffet man on proper TOCs) - short ones are ok eg "shop closing after Lancaster"

There are probably many others. But these would save some electricity!

1. Why? tourism to England is on the up due to the weak ^.
2. Making announcements about security re-assures people
3. Smoking is illegel on stations and countless times do I see people doing it, so make it obvious so people can be grassed up!
4. You assume every person on the train travels frequently?
5. Its a technicality, I can't say it really matters.
6. This is particularly useful for the refurbished Voyagers where there is a large luggage rack.
7. Why????
8. Once again, not everybody travels on Virgin trains all the time. How many trains do you know that have an actual shop - potential for confusion perhaps?

1. I meant Welsh.
2. Does it? Most people find it annoying and useless!
3. True, but people know it is illegal - having announcements won't change peoples' behaviour.
4. Less frequent travellers are less likely to leave something, and even they will have heard it many times on planes etc.
5. TOCs have passengers, not customers.
6. But in practice people won't change their habits, esp on Voyagers which are normally packed.
7. It is insulting, and it one of those announcements which is taking place of COMMON SENSE.
8. No, but those announcements take an age and are pointless.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: gaf71 on December 23, 2008, 18:23:12
The security announcements are a Government thing I think, and they have to be made. TRANSECC or something similar, though I don't know what the abbreviation means.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on December 23, 2008, 18:54:37
Announcements which should be AXED:

1Any in a language other than English
2Security - bags etc.
3Smoking (esp that B'ham New Street one!)
4Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in
5Anything with the word "customer"
6Stowing luggage
7Anything about not running due to the <insert weather word> weather
8Long messages from the "Customer Retail manager" (or Buffet man on proper TOCs) - short ones are ok eg "shop closing after Lancaster"

There are probably many others. But these would save some electricity!

1. Why? tourism to England is on the up due to the weak ^.
2. Making announcements about security re-assures people
3. Smoking is illegel on stations and countless times do I see people doing it, so make it obvious so people can be grassed up!
4. You assume every person on the train travels frequently?
5. Its a technicality, I can't say it really matters.
6. This is particularly useful for the refurbished Voyagers where there is a large luggage rack.
7. Why????
8. Once again, not everybody travels on Virgin trains all the time. How many trains do you know that have an actual shop - potential for confusion perhaps?

1. I meant Welsh.
2. Does it? Most people find it annoying and useless!
3. True, but people know it is illegal - having announcements won't change peoples' behaviour.
4. Less frequent travellers are less likely to leave something, and even they will have heard it many times on planes etc.
5. TOCs have passengers, not customers.
6. But in practice people won't change their habits, esp on Voyagers which are normally packed.
7. It is insulting, and it one of those announcements which is taking place of COMMON SENSE.
8. No, but those announcements take an age and are pointless.

I've only every heard Welsh announcements in WALES ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on December 23, 2008, 19:12:45
I was on a Bristol bound HST out of Paddington a week or two ago when an elderly gentleman passenger alighted at Swindon and proceeded to very politely, but very forcibly, explain to the Guard, who was of either Indian or Pakistani origin I should imagine, that he and his fellow passengers hadn't understood one word of his announcements all the way from London to Swindon and honestly he really did think some simple lessons in basic English would be jolly useful don't you know?

The guard's face was a picture!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2008, 19:22:38
Announcements which should be AXED:

1Any in a language other than English
2Security - bags etc.
3Smoking (esp that B'ham New Street one!)
4Don't forget your belongings - people have heard it so many times, they do not take it in
5Anything with the word "customer"
6Stowing luggage
7Anything about not running due to the <insert weather word> weather
8Long messages from the "Customer Retail manager" (or Buffet man on proper TOCs) - short ones are ok eg "shop closing after Lancaster"

There are probably many others. But these would save some electricity!

1. Why? tourism to England is on the up due to the weak ^.
2. Making announcements about security re-assures people
3. Smoking is illegel on stations and countless times do I see people doing it, so make it obvious so people can be grassed up!
4. You assume every person on the train travels frequently?
5. Its a technicality, I can't say it really matters.
6. This is particularly useful for the refurbished Voyagers where there is a large luggage rack.
7. Why????
8. Once again, not everybody travels on Virgin trains all the time. How many trains do you know that have an actual shop - potential for confusion perhaps?

1. I meant Welsh.
2. Does it? Most people find it annoying and useless!
3. True, but people know it is illegal - having announcements won't change peoples' behaviour.
4. Less frequent travellers are less likely to leave something, and even they will have heard it many times on planes etc.
5. TOCs have passengers, not customers.
6. But in practice people won't change their habits, esp on Voyagers which are normally packed.
7. It is insulting, and it one of those announcements which is taking place of COMMON SENSE.
8. No, but those announcements take an age and are pointless.

I've only every heard Welsh announcements in WALES ;)

And?  ;)
They should still be AXED along with Welsh road signs (dangerous) and markings. They can keep the station name boards - at least ATW put the welsh in a light green so the English stands out.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on December 23, 2008, 20:50:26
Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda i chi, Btline.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2008, 20:52:14
Nadolig Llawen a Blwyddyn Newydd Dda i chi, Btline.

Hmmmm - I'll take it that the above translates into a "  >:( " comment!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 23, 2008, 20:54:12
Cue Moderators trying to find translation to ensure Btline has not been insulted.  ;D

(Far from it, Welshman is wishing you the complements of the season.)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on December 23, 2008, 21:05:57
At the end of the day it's a balance between annoyance and information. There's nothing worse as a regular commuter than shutting your eyes in a quiet coach early in the morning and then face a barrage of loud announcements every few minutes with information you've heard SO many times before. Let's face it, some TM's do rather like the sound of their own voice!

I think more messages should be conveyed via internal displays in the carriages and only the really important stuff (calling points, reasons for delay, etc.) should be verbally announced. That is of course difficult on certain trains - the HST refresh originally planned to have internal displays, but this was shelved to keep the costs down, but where it is available it should be used more.

Granted, not everybody reads displays, and visually impaired customers might not be able to - hence the need for verbal announcements sometimes, but as anyone who's been on a Heathrow Connect or a frequent stop Adelante service (especially before the announcements were shortened three years ago) will tell you, overbearing announcements really can spoil a journey.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on December 24, 2008, 11:55:51
Cue Moderators trying to find translation to ensure Btline has not been insulted.  ;D

(Far from it, Welshman is wishing you the compliments of the season.)

But only in a post-modern ironic sense...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on December 24, 2008, 12:25:35
I was on a Bristol bound HST out of Paddington a week or two ago when an elderly gentleman passenger alighted at Swindon and proceeded to very politely, but very forcibly, explain to the Guard, who was of either Indian or Pakistani origin I should imagine, that he and his fellow passengers hadn't understood one word of his announcements all the way from London to Swindon and honestly he really did think some simple lessons in basic English would be jolly useful don't you know?

The guard's face was a picture!


Hmmm! I had no trouble understanding Indian station announcers when they were speaking English. 

I know that a couple of colleagues have pronounced Indian accents, but they are perfectly understandable. Not sure I like this very much.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: smokey on December 26, 2008, 12:54:22
I do find the Welsh annoucements at ATW stations (in Wales) a bit annoying as they seem so long, BUT when in Wales do as the Welsh do, and if any annonucement is dropped it should be the English version. ;D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on December 26, 2008, 15:20:29
BUT when in Wales do as the Welsh do....

Apparently, only 13.4% of the population of Wales claims to be fluent in Welsh, and 66.1% claim no knowledge of Welsh at all.  ;D

http://users.comlab.ox.ac.uk/geraint.jones/about.welsh/#numbers refers



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 26, 2008, 17:11:43
I do find the Welsh annoucements at ATW stations (in Wales) a bit annoying as they seem so long, BUT when in Wales do as the Welsh do, and if any annonucement is dropped it should be the English version. ;D ;D

Is there anybody is Wales who can speak Welsh but not English?

I doubt it! Drop the Welsh.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 26, 2008, 20:22:35
Maybe a few in the north west corner.

What's ridiculous is that Welsh is announced first (IIRC). So the majority are inconvenienced for the minority.

Back in the late 1970s a group promoting the Welsh Language trashed the BR stand at the National Eisteddfodd. BR said it would make no difference to its policy yet within months it had agreed to make everything bilingual. Where there was very little difference between the Welsh and English spelling, the Welsh would prevail and be the only one used, so for example Treorchy became Treorci. (Another interesting concept of the minority ruling.)  I'm not sure whether this policy remains in place. Maybe Welshman can advise.   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on December 27, 2008, 10:14:31
In many cases, placenames have reverted to the correct or at least better spelling.  In my youth, I went to see my aunt in Llanelly.  Now she'd live in Llanelli.

I agree that some of the "bilingualism" is nonsensical.  Business Park is translated as Parc Busness.  Whoever was responsible for that should be shot.  The difficulty that Welsh has is that it's a very old language so that there is a tendency to Welshify technological terms to get "compiwter" rather than thinking it through to get the infinitely preferable "cyfrifiadur". 

English is no better really.  Who invented "television" - a half-Greek half-Latin word?

There are still many people, particularly in the West and North West of Wales whose first language is Welsh.

You can run Google in Welsh and experience the joy of clicking the button that says "Dwi'n Teimlo'n Lwcus".
Hint:  "Lwcus" (pronounced Look-iss) means "lucky".

That's enough for today children.

Except back to the original topic of this thread - why do they announce "the next station stop is...".  What is a "station stop"?  Is there a "station start" or a "station go"?   >:(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on December 27, 2008, 10:18:17
PS - if you convert Google into Welsh, you'll have to work out what "English" is in Welsh to change back.

Har har.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 27, 2008, 10:23:46
Saesneg!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: DanielP on December 27, 2008, 15:50:32
I don't mind having Welsh announcements first as (although I'm not Welsh myself), I am trying to pick up Welsh. The one to watch out for is that the Welsh word "dileu" looks (and sounds) like it should be "delay", but actually means "cancelled"!! It is also funny listening to mutations in the train announcements, as "Pontypridd" can also be "Fontypridd" and "Bontypridd", depending what comes before. Sometimes, you can hear it all three ways in one announcement.

As for business park, that is no more daft than the English word "bankrupt", which is actually two Italian words crushed together "banca" and "rotta" (meaning broken table- when a money lender went out of business, their stall was broken up to show that this)- why couldn't us stupid English think up our own word??

Daniel


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on December 28, 2008, 22:10:35

Except back to the original topic of this thread - why do they announce "the next station stop is...".  What is a "station stop"?  Is there a "station start" or a "station go"?   >:(

A station stop is preferable to a random stop at a signal.
You can bet that there was an incident when the next stop is xxx was announced, the train was held outside the station and someone tried to alight.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 28, 2008, 23:15:00

Except back to the original topic of this thread - why do they announce "the next station stop is...".  What is a "station stop"?  Is there a "station start" or a "station go"?   >:(

A station stop is preferable to a random stop at a signal.
You can bet that there was an incident when the next stop is xxx was announced, the train was held outside the station and someone tried to alight.

Well, thanks to CDL, that won't happen!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on December 29, 2008, 14:10:59
Quote from: Btline
Well, thanks to CDL, that won't happen!

If only that were true.

Last week I was travelling to Cardiff on my local ATW service, a 150 as it happens.  At Fernhill a large number of schoolkids from a local comprehensive were on the platform.  The guard/conductor/train manager/whatever got off and announced that only those who had money should board.  He then let these youngsters on the train.  They all wanted to travel to the next stop which is Mountain Ash, a full 3 minutes away.

We got to Mountain Ash and the train remained at the platform with doors closed until all these kids had paid.  On this occasion the g/c/tm/w was supported by 2 BTPmen, one with the new video camera on his shoulder.

I spoke to the g/c/tm/w who said that problems with these schoolkids were a daily occurrence despite the fact that it is quicker for them to walk from the school to Mountain Ash than take the train.  Their usual practice is to force the doors open before the train stops in order to avoid paying.  Apparently this is quite easy to do.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 29, 2008, 15:21:09
It is on 150s, as the doors cn just be prised.

The driver is warned, though, and if the train is traveling, it will stop.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 29, 2008, 15:22:09
It is. ;)

The doors can just be prised open, but the driver is warned.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on January 03, 2009, 17:07:57
Quote
And as for the Welsh-language announcements at CDF they're a bleedin' nuisance when a Milford Haven service changes platform at the last moment: there are so many station calls that by the end of the announcement in Welsh before you get anything in English sometimes all you'll see is the tail lights of your train disappearing off towards Bridgend. No doubt it's been said before, but given the relatively small number of people who speak Welsh only wouldn't it benefit the majority if these announcements were in English first, then Welsh? Still, I suppose it's helped me learn some Welsh place names and numbers (Hendy-gwyn ar Daf anyone?)


That platform change seems to happen quite often at Cardiff Central - usually because the Milford Haven train comes in so early the FGW Swansea service is still on the platform. I dont know why the FGW service doesnt just depart platform 4 leaving Platform 3 free for the Milford Haven service.

Also there are so many request stops on this service in West Wales it makes the announcement even longer as they run through them all again.  I dont mind the Welsh announcements tho - I prefer them to the English ones. And its amusing the way they say some of the place names.

Edited to remove attribution of quote - Graham


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on January 04, 2009, 06:56:57
Quote
Some Stuff

Nothing to do with me.  Please could my user name be removed from the quote. Thanks.

Done - Graham


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bemmy on January 04, 2009, 12:22:03
Is there anybody is Wales who can speak Welsh but not English?

I doubt it! Drop the Welsh.
I don't understand this hatred of all things Welsh. Why do English people feel so threatened by the small country next door???

Imagine England had been ruled by France for 700 years, and everybody in the country spoke French fluently, and the English language was in danger of dying out, regarded as a pointless language spoken by a few of us backward folks from the westcountry. Wouldn't you nevertheless want the right to use your native language in your own country? Would you accept French-only announcements at stations?

When at Cardiff Central, I like trying to catch the Welsh names of English places in the announcements... I often used to catch the train "i Gaerwysg Dewi Sant", although nowadays they only run as far as Taunton.  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on January 04, 2009, 13:48:13
I think "hatred" is rather a strong word and perhaps inappropriate here.

The English generally I think rather like the Welsh - we admire their passion, their honesty and their self-reliance. I'm not so sure the sentiment is exactly reciprocated, but then the English long ago accepted that all our neighbours heartily dislike us: the Scots, Welsh, Irish, French and even the Cornish seem to like nothing so much as to feel aggrieved by some perceived slight visited upon them by English people.

I believe what irritates people about Welsh language signs and announcements is the fact that so few people in Wales actually understand them. If there was a majority in the region who spoke Welsh as a first language it would make a lot more sense - you don't hear people complaining about the dual-language signs at Southall station where there's a majority Bangladeshi community for instance.

Thus it seems like a minority interest group is dictating to the majority - and it's that sense of unfairness which tends to cause people to fret about it.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on January 04, 2009, 15:06:58
I think "hatred" is rather a strong word and perhaps inappropriate here.

I believe what irritates people about Welsh language signs and announcements is the fact that so few people in Wales actually understand them. If there was a majority in the region who spoke Welsh as a first language it would make a lot more sense - you don't hear people complaining about the dual-language signs at Southall station where there's a majority Bangladeshi community for instance.

Thus it seems like a minority interest group is dictating to the majority - and it's that sense of unfairness which tends to cause people to fret about it.

Spot on. As a Welshman born and bred in Cardiff, I agree entirely. I've grown to accept, reluctantly, the need for bilinguiality, to pander to the minority. But when Welsh is put first, as in long station announcements, then it inconveniences the majority, to the point where they might actually miss their train. If English was put first, it would not inconvience those Welsh speaking, because as everyone knows, the number who can't speak English is miniscule.

By the way, most Welsh don't hate the English, far from it, though an exception is when we are watching 30 men run around a grassy rectangle with an oval ball.       


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on January 04, 2009, 16:05:29
Why shouldn't Wales enjoy its own language? Granted, announcements in English first would be more convenient for a majority of travellers, but I think that understandably, our Welsh neighbours like to emphasise their identity.  Whether or not this makes sound 'commercial' sense is however, debatable. Given the strength of feeling for the Welsh language, I can't see it being 'demoted' to second place in the capital city. 

On the plus side, from listening to the Welsh language announcements at Cardiff, I can now get a good idea of where to find my train.  Some of the time anyway. ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on January 04, 2009, 16:50:20
I think the point is that most Welsh people are irritated by ATW putting Welsh first on announcements.  As evidence of this I believe this was the most raised subject in the online ATW "meet the managers".

So if those of us who are Welsh are irritated by it, I suggest those who are not Welsh don't try and justify putting the minority language first withough understanding the feelings of the natives.   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on January 04, 2009, 17:13:34
Is there anybody is Wales who can speak Welsh but not English?

I doubt it! Drop the Welsh.
I don't understand this hatred of all things Welsh.

Wo - I did not state that at all! I am 100% in favour of the Welsh language being kept alive in schools and on station notice boards etc.

However, when roads signs become hard to read, and announcements in Welsh cause people to miss trains, it gets annoying. Everybody knows about "Cardiff" means - so why do we have to have it read in Welsh...first?

I would put money on there being no people in the world who can speak Welsh and not English. But the language should definitely be kept alive - the loss of any language, esp Welsh would be a travesty.

Has that clarified my view?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on January 04, 2009, 17:19:18
...you don't hear people complaining about the dual-language signs at Southall station where there's a majority Bangladeshi community...

I have nothing against them, but what is the point of having dual language signs for one station?

Apart from one station near Newcastle (with Latin/English signs due to Hadrian's Wall connexion), it is the only station in the UK to have non UK language signs.

If people don't understand the English signs, what happens when they get to Paddington/Tube?

Therefore.....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bemmy on January 05, 2009, 22:41:25
Is there anybody is Wales who can speak Welsh but not English?

I doubt it! Drop the Welsh.
I don't understand this hatred of all things Welsh.

Wo - I did not state that at all! I am 100% in favour of the Welsh language being kept alive in schools and on station notice boards etc.

However, when roads signs become hard to read, and announcements in Welsh cause people to miss trains, it gets annoying. Everybody knows about "Cardiff" means - so why do we have to have it read in Welsh...first?

I would put money on there being no people in the world who can speak Welsh and not English. But the language should definitely be kept alive - the loss of any language, esp Welsh would be a travesty.

Has that clarified my view?
Yes thanks!  :) sorry I overreacted a bit there... living in Bristol I get sick of people moaning about the Welsh. Anyway I feel that the Welsh announcements are important for asserting the Welsh language and culture, regardless of the fact that all Welsh speakers understand English. But I can see there's a problem at Cardiff Central, because whenever I've been there, there never seems to be a gap between the announcements.

Station announcements in Cornish would be taking it a bit far though!  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on January 06, 2009, 09:31:07
...you don't hear people complaining about the dual-language signs at Southall station where there's a majority Bangladeshi community...

isn't that the point?  Have Bengali signs where there is a majority (or a very significant minority) who speak Bengali (or where their is a significant number of people who don't speak English).  This means Welsh signs in places were Welsh is heavily spoken.  But having Welsh signs in Newport or Cardiff is just stupid.

Making announcements or signs so long that understanding or safety is impaired just to make a political point is rather stupid.   A desire to promote a (perhaps laudable) political agenda should not be allowed to overshaddow the purpose of announcements at a station which is to convey information efficiently.

It is the Biligual signs where the name is the same but just spelt differently that annoys me the most - I mean what is the point?  Can't the spelling be standardised to either English or Welsh (perhaps to be decided by the relative prevelance of each language in the town in question) As an English speaker, I'd quite happily give up "Wrexsam" for "Wecsam" in exchange for "London Paddington" always being "London Paddington"

On the wider question of Welsh language nationalism.  I am a liberal and think that people should be completely free to learn whatever langauge they want.  What I object to with Welsh is that children are forced to learn Welsh whether they want to or not.  That is deeply illiberal.  In such a policy the langauge-nationists have moved on from saying "I demand the right to speak Welsh" to saying "I demand the right to force you and your children to speak Welsh" which is wrong and an equal evil to the English laguage nationalist a centary go who took at upon themselves to demand that others spoke English.




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on January 06, 2009, 10:06:09
The Welsh Language Act 1993 and the Government of Wales Act 1998 provide that the Welsh and English languages should be treated equally in the public sector, so far as is reasonable and practicable. Interestingly, Arriva Trains Wales are co-signatory to the Wales & Borders Rail Franchise with the Secretary of State the Welsh Assembly Government. As such, the  continual use of Welsh as a first language in station announcements, particularly at a station, (i.e. Cardiff Central), where the vast majority of travellers do not use Welsh as part of their daily life, could be seen as a breach of legislation, if only in spirit.

That said, do the Welsh language announcements really cause confusion?  Personally, I think not.  Cardiff Central is pretty well sign posted in both languages, as are Newport and Swansea. Engish announcements follow those in Welsh almost without pause. There are also plenty of English timetables available at station entrances. Significantly, last minute platform alterations and other announcements are made in English only, (possibly station staff are not fluent enough in Welsh).  ;D

IMO, the arrival/departure boards at Cardiff, which flash in alternate languages, are far more confusing.  Too little time is devoted to either language.

And...why should London Paddington not be Llundain Paddington in Wales?  I don't hear aircraft bound from Heathrow to Greece being announced as OA flight 300 to Athinai.  Similarly, where on earth is Marseilles, or Belgrade for that matter?







Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on January 06, 2009, 13:50:43

And...why should London Paddington not be Llundain Paddington in Wales?  I don't hear aircraft bound from Heathrow to Greece being announced as OA flight 300 to Athinai.  Similarly, where on earth is Marseilles, or Belgrade for that matter?


The prevailing trend globally is to defer to local spelling and pronuciation.  Peking and Bombay and Calcutta are now Bejing, Mumbai and Kolkata.  "Llundain Paddington" runs against that trend.  My point was that it is not unreasonable for English speakers to have to read Welsh spellings for towns in the Welsh speaking parts of Wales and that it is not unreasonable  for Welsh speakers to have to read the English names for towns in the English speaking parts of Wales and in England.  Merely suggested as a way of avoiding confusion and people missing their trains.

I do think that in a railway environment, the overriding concern should be clarity.  The worst example of lack of clarity in place names I have seen recently wasn't in Wales.  It was a Virgin WC train to London.  The side of the train said "destination Euston" not "London Euston".  It is not difficult to imagine a non-English speaking and/or a non-railway familar passenger will holding a ticket with "To: London Terminals" printed on it, setting out to find their train and not boarding the train to "Euston" because they want one to "London".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on January 06, 2009, 16:13:54
 ;D  Carrying that argument to its logical conclusion, I await with bated breath the confusion caused by K^benhavn, Lisboa,  Praha and Moskva.  In Greece, London is Londino, in France, Londres.  Just a few examples from literally thousands. 

IIRC, Mumbai, Kolkatta and Chennai, were changed from the colonial form to a style more appropriate for an independent nation.  Several other Indian cities have followed suit. 

With regard to Beijing, ( according to Wikipedia)..."Peking is the name of the city according to Chinese Postal Map Romanization, and the traditional customary name for Beijing in English. The term Peking originated with French missionaries four hundred years ago and corresponds to an older pronunciation predating a subsequent sound change in Mandarin from [kʲ] to [tɕ][15] ([tɕ] is represented in pinyin as j, as in Beijing). It is still used in many languages."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bemmy on January 06, 2009, 18:14:44
IMO, the arrival/departure boards at Cardiff, which flash in alternate languages, are far more confusing.  Too little time is devoted to either language.
Yeah even if you recognise Welsh names it's confusing, especially as some of them are quite long, like Aberdaugleddau and Manceinion Piccadilly. They should double the number of screens, and have one for each language side by side. I wouldn't expect Arriva to fund it, but surely the Welsh Assembly could find the money -- we're only talking about a few tellies and a bit of cable.

;D  Carrying that argument to its logical conclusion, I await with bated breath the confusion caused by K^benhavn, Lisboa,  Praha and Moskva.  In Greece, London is Londino, in France, Londres.  Just a few examples from literally thousands. 

IIRC, Mumbai, Kolkatta and Chennai, were changed from the colonial form to a style more appropriate for an independent nation.  Several other Indian cities have followed suit. 
In India of course, not everyone is in favour of the new names, so some people use the old name and some use the new one -- this goes for streets as well as cities -- making it extra confusing for the foreigner who can't find Chowringhee, the most famous street in Kolkata, on a map because officially it's Jawaharlal Nehru Road. People aren't even consistant in their preference for old or new names -- one person might say they are travelling from Chennai to Bombay, while another might describe the same journey as Madras to Mumbai.

As for the railways, they use the old name for some places (such as Brahmapur for Berhampur) and the new names for others (like Varanasi for Benares). In addition you have to learn in which cities you'll find major stations such as Yesvantpur (Bangalore/Bengaluru), Hazrat Nizamuddin (Delhi), Howrah (Kolkata/Calcutta) etc. Throughout the country every station sign is in Hindi, English and the local state language (where this isn't Hindi, which is most places) -- even though there are vast areas where hardly anyone knows anything apart from a local language, which may not even be the state language. The prerecorded station announcements are also in three languages in most areas (in many Indian languages, the word they use for a train is Gary ;D).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on January 06, 2009, 18:43:53
Why waste money on doubling the screens?

EVERYBODY understands the English, so use English only!

And can someone explain the point of the Bengali signs at Southall.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on January 06, 2009, 19:22:46
And can someone explain the point of the Bengali signs at Southall.

It was a community initiative meant to show that Thames Trains were involved in the local community which has a very large population of Sikhs. It managed to offend some other religious beliefs and also some people with a nationalistic viewpoint, though reports of them being removed a couple of years ago seem to have been wrong.

By the way, I think they're in Punjabi - if that makes a difference!?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bemmy on January 06, 2009, 19:27:17
Why waste money on doubling the screens?
The Welsh Assembly has money for that kind of thing, so it need not come from any railway budget.

Quote
And can someone explain the point of the Bengali signs at Southall.
Turns out they're in the Gurmukhi script, used for Punjabi: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Southall_station_sign.jpg.
Some people think it's a nice idea because Southall's identity is influenced by the large number of Indian people there. It's not to help people who can't read English, after all most of them will be familiar with a different script anyway.

A few years ago I caught a train from Levenshulme, the signs there were in English and Urdu.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on January 06, 2009, 19:28:24
My personal view is that if you live in England, you should be made to speak English when in a public place. Then again, if that was to be the case I wouldn't be very welcome in Wales ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bemmy on January 06, 2009, 19:33:41
My personal view is that if you live in England, you should be made to speak English when in a public place.
Why? I agree that immigrants who settle here should know English, but what's wrong with using your own language?? Or chatting to a French friend in French???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on January 06, 2009, 20:10:12
But what is the point of the Bengalli, Gurnmui, whatever signs when they are not anywhere else?!

If someone can't cope with English sighs at Southall, how will they cope at Paddington/ on the Tube?

And surely having sign in minority languages discourages integration, thus damaging the local community. I would have thought the majority of people in Southall would want to learn English, in order to help themselves merge with the rest of London/the UK.

NB: I have no problem with the signs!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on January 07, 2009, 09:42:03
The Southall signs and the Latin signs at Wallsend metrostop are basically there to lend a distinctive apearance to the station (either as a nod to its ethnic makeup or as a celebration of its history).  They are one-offs and add a bit of fun and local colour.  I did the Hadrians Wall walk a couple of years ago.  It starts from Sedegunum (Wallsend) and the station signs are fantastic (where else would I have learnt that "Noli Fumare" means "No Smoking")

As a non-Welsh speaker I could view Welsh in Wales in the same vein as merely being a harmless but interesting addition to the rich variety of life (afterall noone needs signs in Welsh as an aid to understanding).  I have problems adopting that view because I think that there are some unpleasant undercurrents in the Welsh language movement.  It makes proud Welshmen and Women who don't speak Welsh feel like second class citizens (or perhaps even traitors to the English) in their own country and it uses the school system to force people to learn and speak Welsh who otherwise would not.  This is illiberal and undemocratic.  So I don't object to the use of Welsh in public buildings and railways when it is the natural medium of the local people in Welsh speaking parts of Wales, but I think it is artificial and wrong in places like Newport.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: G.Uard on January 07, 2009, 09:54:49

In India of course, not everyone is in favour of the new names, so some people use the old name and some use the new one -- this goes for streets as well as cities -- making it extra confusing for the foreigner who can't find Chowringhee, the most famous street in Kolkata, on a map because officially it's Jawaharlal Nehru Road. People aren't even consistant in their preference for old or new names -- one person might say they are travelling from Chennai to Bombay, while another might describe the same journey as Madras to Mumbai.

As for the railways, they use the old name for some places (such as Brahmapur for Berhampur) and the new names for others (like Varanasi for Benares). In addition you have to learn in which cities you'll find major stations such as Yesvantpur (Bangalore/Bengaluru), Hazrat Nizamuddin (Delhi), Howrah (Kolkata/Calcutta) etc. Throughout the country every station sign is in Hindi, English and the local state language (where this isn't Hindi, which is most places) -- even though there are vast areas where hardly anyone knows anything apart from a local language, which may not even be the state language. The prerecorded station announcements are also in three languages in most areas (in many Indian languages, the word they use for a train is Gary ;D).


Yes bemmy, I noticed the use of 'gary', in what I presume were Malayalam announcements, whilst down at Ernakulam in the deep south.  I have to say though, that I was impressed with the signing, announcements and general level of willingness to help which I found throughout my 2,200 mile journey.  I do still chuckle about trains 'shartly' arriving though.




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on January 12, 2009, 17:06:34
Just been told that they have been fitted? Any truth in this?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: super tm on January 12, 2009, 17:16:55
Not as far as I Know.  There was a system that enabled you to key in a code and limited number of auto announcement were available.  That was about 5 years ago but was never really used. 

We had to stop using it because it refered to the Refresca Buffet Car and this name was subsequently dropped.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on January 12, 2009, 17:54:27
Ok thanks for confirming that, the person who mentioned it to me claimed that it could mention that the train was now reaching its final destination.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on January 12, 2009, 18:46:26
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3183/2895410424_58ed4fcf22.jpg?v=0)

(http://www.flickr.com/photos/30509233@N02/2895410424)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on January 12, 2009, 18:55:10
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D

(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3183/2895410424_58ed4fcf22.jpg?v=0)

(http://www.flickr.com/photos/30509233@N02/2895410424)

How can people be that stupid?
The station's name is shown on its nameboard along the platform


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on January 12, 2009, 19:00:45
well me and you know the route.... but mum with 3 screaming kids and a buggy.... wont notice that!


still funny tho haha


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chrisoates on January 12, 2009, 19:01:57
Just been told that they have been fitted? Any truth in this?
Not yesterday - had a delightful TM who was turning his announcements into a sort of prose.

Other TMs have made me laugh, 'now arriving at Camborne...famous for it's hill'

One in Devon who gave a good talk on local geography.

And a train that calls at lots of places that are perfectly pronounced but ends up in Glaaaaaaarrrrrster.

I wouldn't mind some recordings of these chaps (haven't heard an amusing Lady TM (yet))


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 12hoursunday on January 14, 2009, 02:45:49
Just been told that they have been fitted? Any truth in this?

This question was asked months ago (April in fact). Most power cars are fitted with the units which will automaticlly call the guard when he/she is required by the driver.
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2509.15 (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2509.15)

I expect that this is what the HSTs will be getting! >:(
HST's aren't getting automated announcments. Atleast I haven't heard different.

Oh yes they are. A number of sets are fitted already! But you will pleased to know that it for the time being to enable the driver to contact the guard to order his tea ;D or to let him know if being delayed/diverted etc. So listen out for the This is a staff announcment " will the train manager please contact the driver I've got a funny feeling it won't end there!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on January 14, 2009, 10:52:56
This question was asked months ago (April in fact). Most power cars are fitted with the units which will automaticlly call the guard when he/she is required by the driver.
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2509.15 (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2509.15)

This is indeed correct :) I've heard the announcement on numerous occasions. "Would The Train Manager Please Contact The Driver" Most of the time, we are stopped by signals or the Driver wants a cuppa ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on January 14, 2009, 13:18:08
The HST announcement triggers automatically when the driver has tried to get hold of the Train Manager with a 3-3 buzzer code and the TM hasn't responded within a set time - 10 seconds I think?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chrisoates on January 14, 2009, 23:20:29
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D


I was on a SWT 158 today and noticed a silly thing - the display shows the next station name and the voice announces it, if you are dozing or mp3'ing and don't look up quickly you don't know where you are because the display immediately goes blank until the train starts again.

   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on January 14, 2009, 23:31:04
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D


I was on a SWT 158 today and noticed a silly thing - the display shows the next station name and the voice announces it, if you are dozing or mp3'ing and don't look up quickly you don't know where you are because the display immediately goes blank until the train starts again.



I have also noticed this I don't think it's a fault just not thought out very well

   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on January 15, 2009, 00:13:25
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D


It'll be interesting to see how many people this weekend get off terminating trains at St. Davids having 'not heard' the announcements to get off at Tiverton Parkway and catch the fast bus to Plymouth  :P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on January 15, 2009, 17:00:13
Auto announcements are aweful.  I'd much rather have a live human voice and reckon autoannouncemnets are much more likely to be ignored


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on January 15, 2009, 19:12:23
the ones on the  swt class 159's can be amusing at torquay sometimes.... now arriving at paignton this is your final destination... the number of angry faces as they realise they have to get back on after the mad rush to get off  :) :D


It'll be interesting to see how many people this weekend get off terminating trains at St. Davids having 'not heard' the announcements to get off at Tiverton Parkway and catch the fast bus to Plymouth  :P

Sometimes you can barely hear the announcements in HSTs. I'm not sure why it's so variable. Yesterday my train back to Nailsea was in reverse formation, which can lead to confusion with SDO at the station. Even though I strained to hear the announcement I couldn't, so it was no surprise when people stood in the wrong place. The TM was quite ratty with them until I pointed out that nobody could hear her announcement as to which coaches were being platformed.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on January 15, 2009, 20:14:33
Agreed, John: the volume / clarity of HST on-board announcements is very variable.

The only consistency seems to be that the loudest announcements are those broadcast in the quiet carriage???  ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on January 15, 2009, 20:59:46
Might have smething to do with the fact that coach a houses the guards PA equipment along with the buffet?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on January 15, 2009, 22:46:32
The wiring can't be much good. The guard often has to do the announcements twice. Once for the front of the train, then for the back coaches.

This is because the sound does not seem to travel. You often hear a faint announcement, followed by a clear one.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on January 15, 2009, 22:52:29
Maybe this http://amos.indiana.edu/library/scripts/phone.html (http://amos.indiana.edu/library/scripts/phone.html) would work better?  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on January 15, 2009, 23:38:14
surly the public address system on trains needs to be working not just for customer services but also for h&s?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on January 16, 2009, 16:14:39
Some of the PA speakers in First Class when they do the announcements on HST's you can't hear because it's so distorded, Its sometimes so loud that it's painful to listen to  :-[

Dodgey wiring I would say :P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on January 16, 2009, 17:25:02
Although on some occasions it may be, I don't think PA problems are always down to the wiring or speakers in individual coaches. Announcements are often clearly audible when broadcast from one of the PA handsets (adjacent to the buffet counter in coach F or in the senior conductor's office in coach A) but not the other.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on January 16, 2009, 19:50:38
Some of the PA speakers in First Class when they do the announcements on HST's you can't hear because it's so distorded, Its sometimes so loud that it's painful to listen to  :-[

Dodgey wiring I would say :P

This is so true. And the quiet carriage is always the loudest!

I also take exception to the catering trolley having to "bleep" every time the vendor tells it someone has had a drink or a biscuit. Utterly, utterly pointless, and so bl**dy irritating.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on January 18, 2009, 19:00:06
This is so true. And the quiet carriage is always the loudest!

I also take exception to the catering trolley having to "bleep" every time the vendor tells it someone has had a drink or a biscuit. Utterly, utterly pointless, and so bl**dy irritating.

I would avoid Voyagers like the plague then ;)

My experience of those is that there is alarms and beeps and things going off every five minutes  >:(

But the one thing that annoys me but at the same time I find incredibly funny is when people continue talking on their mobile phones dispite the train being in a tunnel...  ::) *hints at the businessman, you'll have lost the signal dude ;D *


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: r james on March 20, 2009, 22:21:17
Well I was on a HST today between Bridgend and Cardiff, and I can confirm that there was an automated announcement played.  It gave various information about the safety instructions as well as information about first class etc. 

Is this coming to all HSTs?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on April 19, 2009, 14:04:34
Virgin have published their May 2009 Euston - North Wales timetable in Welsh.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on April 19, 2009, 19:57:50
Virgin have published their May 2009 Euston - North Wales timetable in Welsh.

Are they also available in English, or are they only published in Welsh?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on April 19, 2009, 20:11:31
Virgin have published their May 2009 Euston - North Wales timetable in Welsh.

Are they also available in English, or are they only published in Welsh?

Both! :P

I wonder why they hav wasted money and paper doing this? Does anyone on the line not speak English?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on April 19, 2009, 20:23:36
I wonder why they hav wasted money and paper doing this? Does anyone on the line not speak English?

Probably a majority in the Euston area doesn't speak English - but I'd wager a fair bet that not one of them speaks Welsh either.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on April 19, 2009, 21:20:11
I see no problem whatsoever with Virgin (or any other TOC for that matter) producing bilingual timetables for Wales. One thing that you will notice if you spend any time there, outside the big cities, is that in many many places the first language in use in day to day life is...wait for it...Welsh! Go into any shop in most of Wales and you're guaranteed to hear the language being spoken, with English very much the second. People will quite happily talk to you in English but for the most part they converse in Welsh.

Now, I speak almost no Welsh (the bits that I do have been gleaned from learning to understand the ATW platform announcements) but it seems to me totally reasonable for a Welsh person to expect to be able to read something in their first language in their home country. It's not for me to suggest that they shouldn't be able to just because I can't understand it!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: johoare on April 19, 2009, 23:10:18
I think it would be interesting to know the proportion of welsh people who speak welsh as their first language? If anyone happens to know.. :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on April 20, 2009, 09:28:22
http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=cym (http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=cym)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 20, 2009, 21:24:31
From wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Welsh_language),

Quote
Welsh as a first language is largely concentrated in the less urban north and west of Wales, principally Gwynedd, Conwy, Denbighshire, Anglesey, Carmarthenshire, north Pembrokeshire, Ceredigion, parts of west Glamorgan, north-west and extreme south-west Powys, although first-language and other fluent speakers can be found throughout Wales.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: johoare on April 20, 2009, 22:45:02
Thank you for both your replies.. I guess I was being lazy and could have looked that up myself!  ;) :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on April 21, 2009, 10:35:00
It's interesting just how sharp the divide between Welsh and English-speaking areas can be. I have family living right on the border between Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire. Go ten minutes down the road into Carmarthenshire and day to day business is conducted in Welsh. Ten minutes the opposite way into Pembrokeshire and English is very much the first language.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on April 30, 2009, 10:47:22
I'm hearing this at slough at the moment but its not the only place I've heard it.

You are standing on the platform and before the train arrives the tannoy goes "Slough, this is Slough".  No I could understand that being announced on the incoming train.

But surely people on the platform are aware of where they are? 

Is this really Slough, Sorry, I thought I was standing on a platform in Bristol!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: tramway on April 30, 2009, 10:52:44
I thought the 'You are here' signs you find around Dubai to be very useful as well.  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on April 30, 2009, 15:30:32
I'm hearing this at slough at the moment but its not the only place I've heard it.

You are standing on the platform and before the train arrives the tannoy goes "Slough, this is Slough".  No I could understand that being announced on the incoming train.

Most places it is totally unnecessary, from the days when most calls were made by trains without an auto PIS. But the main problem now seems to be that the incoming train triggers the auto announcement using the berth track circuit when it is still well beyond the platform end - the station auto announcer software should then have a built in delay to allow the train to stop and the doors to be opened.  It is this delay that is usually missing...

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on April 30, 2009, 16:36:29
It is this delay that is usually missing...

I think there is a delay built-in, but it's often not enough. For example at Oxford if there was an extra 30 second delay it would be just about perfect for all but the slowest arriving train. Conversely, at Didcot Parkway platforms 3,4 and 5 the train has often been sat in the platform for a minute before the PA springs into life. It's attention to detail stuff I suppose. Mind you, the relevance of saying the station name in the announcement is dubious - more a case of the way it's always been done than actually useful.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on April 30, 2009, 19:58:11
This happens a lot at Bristol TM.

It can also happen at New Street with a terminating train:

"B'ham New Street. This is B'ham New Street. The train now standing on platform 4B terminates here. All change. All change please. This is the service from London Euston.

Spoken by the great Phil Sayer (who seems to be dying out now :'( e.g. at Charing Choss - replaced by DD ::) )

It is still pointless - the pax on board will know where they are! (+ they'll have had the Virgin "TM" yelling at them on the approaches!)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on April 30, 2009, 19:58:20
I think it's just a tradition that was helpful in the days when no trains had air conditioning, everything had windows that opened and there was no PA system (I'm thinking here particularly of mk I and early mk 2 stock) - platform announcements with "Oxford, this is Oxford" would be clearly audible inside the train. The tradition continues, although now may trains have sealed windows and air conditioning, not to mention loud underfloor engines on multiple units, it's less useful than before.

The installation at Oxford has been tweaked from the others I am familiar with - the announcement "Oxford, this is Oxford" kicks in well before the train arrives, but instead of going into a "the train now standing at platform 1" routine is simply re-states the "platform 1 for the xxxx First Great Western service to ..."

But I'm not complaining. It's just such an incredibly welcome change to have a CIS with plenty of screens giving out correct information at Oxford station!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on April 30, 2009, 21:09:03
i noticed it at taunton, i nearly burst out with ''this is hatley hatley hatley, change here for busten and wensted''  ;)



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 30, 2009, 23:04:02
I think you need to get out more, mate ...  ;) :D ;D  ;D

On a slightly more serious note, I do agree that most of the pre-recorded announcements at Bristol Temple Meads are 'ahead of the times': last night, I was told that "the train now standing at platform 11 is the 22-whatever from Westbury" - well, no it wasn't, because that train was still trundling towards us, past platform 12, having just passed under Bath Road Bridge ...  ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on April 30, 2009, 23:11:38
You are standing on the platform and before the train arrives the tannoy goes "Slough, this is Slough".

But surely people on the platform are aware of where they are? 

Perhaps it's to help the phonetically-challenged who think it's pronounced 'Sluff'?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on May 01, 2009, 00:39:39
But to be fair to FGW, Slough and Oxford are the trial locations for the new passenger information system, so they probably can't be expected to get it right straight out of the box - and Oxford is a particular problem, as so many trains from Didcot get stopped just outside the station waiting for platform 2 to clear, so once they get back on the move and trigger the system, they aren't going at much of a pace. If they get a clear run, Annie usually starts up just as the train is coming to a stop on the platform, though still a bit too soon.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on May 01, 2009, 00:52:21

"B'ham New Street. This is B'ham New Street. The train now standing on platform 4B terminates here. All change. All change please. This is the service from London Euston.



Its worse than that!

"Slough, this is Slough.  The train now approaching platform 3 is the 1732 First Great Western Service to London Paddington. CAlling at London Paddington only.  A buffet service is available on this train"

They dont even pretend the train is there when they announce you are in Slough - AND - the buffet usually close after Reading so there is no buffet service!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 01, 2009, 02:02:59
I think you need to get out more, mate ...  ;) :D ;D  ;D

On a slightly more serious note, I do agree that most of the pre-recorded announcements at Bristol Temple Meads are 'ahead of the times': last night, I was told that "the train now standing at platform 11 is the 22-whatever from Westbury" - well, no it wasn't, because that train was still trundling towards us, past platform 12, having just passed under Bath Road Bridge ...  ::)

happens at taunton too the train last night was announced at standing at platform 2 at the time it was due to arrive but wasnt there yet... infact was five mins late? missed my connection at e s d thankyou xc!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 01, 2009, 18:06:53
...AND - the buffet usually close after Reading so there is no buffet service!

Just like an onboard Virgin Trains announcement:

"The shop in Coach D, which sells hot & cold drinks, light refreshments, books and magazines, is now closed."
 ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on May 01, 2009, 18:28:51
I must say, that always bugs me too. The buffet is there to provide a service to the customer (or so they would like you to believe) so it really ought to stay open for at least the majority of the journey - nobody minds the odd ten minutes towards the end, but closing it 45 minutes or so from the destination is just taking the, um, instant tea.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: r james on May 01, 2009, 18:58:31
I think essentially, with catering a proper review is required to change the locations where staff get off after closing, as i know for instance that its often the case that it only closes as the person serving has to get off at the next station for their depot as there isnt a further one down the line, 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 01, 2009, 21:10:15
Basically rail catering needs to be nationalised by the government.

So there is one company which does catering on all trains.

Then they can have bases at all key stations, and staff work around a region from that station.

So XC services can have catering beyond Edinburgh and Plymouth - staffed by the "Aberdeen" and "Cornwall" divisions respectively.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on May 01, 2009, 21:28:45
I don't see the collosal fuss about the lack of catering from Plymouth - Penzance. Its 3 trains per day (each direction) and consists of overpriced rubbish from a trolley. If you were that desperate then you would travel by FGW HST (units have no catering remember!) or buy something before the train leaves Plymouth.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 01, 2009, 22:36:51
The reason why this system is on trial is because its the updated version of the DITRA System than what they have at their other stations.

The main difference is the exchange of I/I'm for We/Were, and the system has lots more options that the previous to say the least.

Also this version is the same as what South West Trains have, and as mentioned above "The train now standing..." is no longer said and is replaced with "Platform x for the..." and SWT choose to disabled the "XYZ. This is XYZ" and FGW choose not to!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 01, 2009, 22:44:12
Welcome to the Coffee Shop forum, Louis - and well done for joining in right away with a fairly lively debate here!  ;) :D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 01, 2009, 23:08:35
The reason why this system is on trial is because its the updated version of the DITRA System than what they have at their other stations.

The main difference is the exchange of I/I'm for We/Were, and the system has lots more options that the previous to say the least.

Also this version is the same as what South West Trains have, and as mentioned above "The train now standing..." is no longer said and is replaced with "Platform x for the..." and SWT choose to disabled the "XYZ. This is XYZ" and FGW choose not to!

Do you know why Phil seems to be incompatible with the new version of Ditra?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Oxman on May 02, 2009, 00:16:59
The timing of announcements at Oxford is being recalibrated. Hopefully the "this is Oxford" announcement will be better timed after this has been done although, as WillC has pointed out, there are problems with trains approaching at different speeds.

Although it has little value for passengers arriving on trains with sliding doors, it does the job for people on HSTs who maybe standing by a door with an open droplight window, waiting to alight from the train.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 02, 2009, 06:45:49
The reason why this system is on trial is because its the updated version of the DITRA System than what they have at their other stations.

The main difference is the exchange of I/I'm for We/Were, and the system has lots more options that the previous to say the least.

Also this version is the same as what South West Trains have, and as mentioned above "The train now standing..." is no longer said and is replaced with "Platform x for the..." and SWT choose to disabled the "XYZ. This is XYZ" and FGW choose not to!

Do you know why Phil seems to be incompatible with the new version of Ditra?

What do you mean by imcompatible???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 02, 2009, 16:43:34
Apparently, the reason why Phil was axed at Charing Cross is because he is incompatible with the new Ditra system.

So they used DD instead. >:(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on May 02, 2009, 16:57:26
I dont see the point in these announcements either. Ive heard them quite often at Bristol Temple Meads. 

In Cardiff  we tend to get "The train now approaching platform 3 is the <insert time> service from <insert location>. This train will terminate here"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 02, 2009, 21:57:08
Apparently, the reason why Phil was axed at Charing Cross is because he is incompatible with the new Ditra system.

So they used DD instead. >:(

Charing Cross was a more advanced system than what SWT/FGW use, i believe, Phil and Celia are the voices of the Ditra System, and come build-in and are known as the Male/Female voices of the system. Not unless they are talking about using Phil on a new system not made/built by Ditra.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on May 02, 2009, 23:37:02
At Oxford Sayer (man) makes announcements for trains using the "up" platform (Padd/Reading/Bomo/Soton etc) and Drummond (lady) makes announcements for trains using the "down" platform (terminatins ex-London services, Cotswold Line, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle etc).

PS, at risk of sounding repetitive, yet again I'm going to record my appreciation for the shiny new Oxford CIS. It's brilliant.  :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 03, 2009, 00:11:06
Excellent to hear Phil making a comeback! (even if that Drummond woman is as well >:( )


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 03, 2009, 00:33:57
At Oxford Sayer (man) makes announcements for trains using the "up" platform (Padd/Reading/Bomo/Soton etc) and Drummond (lady) makes announcements for trains using the "down" platform (terminatins ex-London services, Cotswold Line, Manchester, Leeds, Newcastle etc).

PS, at risk of sounding repetitive, yet again I'm going to record my appreciation for the shiny new Oxford CIS. It's brilliant.  :)

;o would u be able to get me some recordings of the new system please?

o no! well you have it better than me, Plymouth its just Celia for all platforms :'(!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on May 03, 2009, 01:15:36
Celia seems to have taken over most of  Bristol TM from what I heard the other day.... I quite like her sexy tones...  ;D  I DO NOT like the awful 'god I sound bored' tones of the woman they use at Paddington.  Sounds so false.

Exeter SD have had the "EXD this is EXD" announcement recalibrated as the down-London was being announced before the train was over the crossing, and it was possible to get the XC Aberdeen service out of the platform before it had finished.  ;D

In answer to what's the point, I was always asked plenty of times on the platform whether they were in the right city or not, so while some think "what's the point", it's no doubt comforting for some too.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Ollie on May 03, 2009, 11:51:01
I DO NOT like the awful 'god I sound bored' tones of the woman they use at Paddington.  Sounds so false.
I have been waiting a while for a mention that Paddington has gone to auto announcements, well done you :P

But you have to love her "Please board the train NOW, as it is ready to leave"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 03, 2009, 13:25:10
I hate the woman (Digital Doris) that does Worcester, most LM stations, Charing Cross, Liverpool Street - and now Paddington by the sounds of it. She is even worse than that Drummond woman!

(a) She is not clear enough for busy "concourse" stations. Phil is the best for these.

(b) She mis-pronounces half the stations. She had to re-record "Cradley Heath" and "Rowely Regis" because her attempts were woeful. But now "Cradley Heath" and "Rowely Regis" sound louder than the rest! Again, Phil's pronunciations are second to none.

(c) At Worcester, sometimes she repeats an announcement for the Paddington train THREE times in a ROW! I also hate the: "Due to today's inclement weather, please ...... blah H&S blah" announcement she does when it is raining. Phil only speaks when he is needed.

(d) The "please board the train now" is stupid. Along with "this train has 8 coaches, please use all available doors when boarding the train" Sorry DD - only 5 coaches are platformed!

Sorry for the rants about this, but when are TOCs going to realise that the system is no good? I can't believe Liverpool Street and Charing Cross got rid of Phil for her!

Quick question: Actually, Phil does announce at Worcester. Ten points for who can tell me where! ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on May 03, 2009, 13:52:25


But you have to love her "Please board the train NOW, as it is ready to leave"

Does it actually say that  :D

For all those "Phil" lovers (btline ;)) head down to Newton Abbot.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 03, 2009, 15:45:03
Yes it does! As if passengers are going to wait on the platform until the departure time... ::)

Thanks D/M, I'll add NA to my places to visit list - just to hear his announcements! :P ;D ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 03, 2009, 16:43:56
Celia seems to have taken over most of  Bristol TM from what I heard the other day.... I quite like her sexy tones...  ;D  I DO NOT like the awful 'god I sound bored' tones of the woman they use at Paddington.  Sounds so false.

Exeter SD have had the "EXD this is EXD" announcement recalibrated as the down-London was being announced before the train was over the crossing, and it was possible to get the XC Aberdeen service out of the platform before it had finished.

In answer to what's the point, I was always asked plenty of times on the platform whether they were in the right city or not, so while some think "wh at's the point", it's no doubt comforting for soon.

Yeee ave noticed that, was up there just yesterday!

I love the way Celia says "service to Exeter St Daavidss!!!!" and our environment sound sensors were working overtime, everytime there was a little noise, the volume went up, then down again!
Our (Plymouth) security annoucement get louder as it goes through till celias virtually shouting it by the end!!

Was on the XC Penzance - Aberdeen yesterday! was packed in every carriage except First Class and Quiet,
the annoucement is to long for the Aberdeen train, bet everyone thinks, when is she going to say "...and Aberdeen"



But you have to love her "Please board the train NOW, as it is ready to leave"

Does it actually say that  :D

For all those "Phil" lovers (btline ;)) head down to Newton Abbot.

Yeee i love newton abbot!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: miniman on May 03, 2009, 19:39:28
Clearly a reasonable level of announcements is useful, but the reality is that we are bombarded with information we mostly don't need and it is mostly delivered by people who really shouldn't be allowed near a microphone. We had a train manager on Friday who was borderline screaming into the PA and it really is bloody annoying.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on May 03, 2009, 21:57:36
We've gone from being uniformed to overinformed.

Back along people complained they weren't kept informed about things so we're not at the situation were we're told every time the station cat's farted.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: r james on May 04, 2009, 07:47:24
SO are FGW looking to have the same voice and same system t each of the stations?  Surely would make things more cost effective?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 04, 2009, 08:29:06
SO are FGW looking to have the same voice and same system t each of the stations?  Surely would make things more cost effective?

All depends on cost, if they are happy with the system at Oxford and Slough (The one they use at all their other stations, but the updated version), they will most properly use that system and will then start replacing some more of the old Great Western Link and Wessex Trains systems, if i remember stations such as Exeter Central, Cheltenham Spa, Gloucester and Trowbridge are set to get a new CIS's according to the Stations Improvements part of their website. But i would imagine that they will replace all of the old systems at their busier stations, such as Westbury, Dawlish, Teignmouth, Paignton, and some stations down in to Cornwall.

If they dont like the system, they will start getting bids for who can replace the old Wessex/Great Western Link systems and will go for the best one, in the case of price and how advanced the system is. I think Siemens are one of the bidders along with Amey (who are the company that provided the Phil/Celia systems).

Any chance anyone could get me some pictures and recordings of the new systems at Oxford and Slough please???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on May 04, 2009, 13:14:02
The old system in the Thames Valley area is nothing to do with Great Western Link. It was installed by Thames Trains. And as far as I understand it, the intention is to fit the new system across the whole FGW network, at stations big and small - and the Thames Valley should get it first - the TT system has never been that reliable, as many of us know only too well , was hard at it on Friday at Moreton-in-Marsh, announcing the 8.52 from Malvern was running 10 late when you could hear it approaching the station.

At Oxford, the platform 1 announcements are made by a man - the directional announcements by the different voices seems quite a good idea, once you pick up on it. Having very rarely encountered Phil, I've no idea if this is him or not.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 04, 2009, 15:59:51
The man - the good pronouncer - is Phil Sayer, most famous for Birmingham New Street.

The woman is Celia Drummond, who pronounces names strangely (especially "Landon Waterlooooooooo"!), but is better than Digital Doris.

I see the benefit of a two voice system at a station like Clapham Junction or Reading, where lots of announcements occur simultaneously, but a station like Oxford only needs one voice. Preferably Phil.

The answer to my riddle earlier is that Phil announces the WOF lifts: "Street levelaaaand wayyyyyy out!"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Oxman on May 04, 2009, 20:09:19
Oxford has a male voice on the up side and a female voice on the down side and, with simultaneous announcements, it is simple and effective.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 04, 2009, 20:50:46
But you have to love her "Please board the train NOW, as it is ready to leave"

Does it actually say that  :D

Apparently, devon_metro, she's been saying that at Westbury for ages: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1715.msg15834#msg15834

 ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 04, 2009, 21:59:54
The old system in the Thames Valley area is nothing to do with Great Western Link. It was installed by Thames Trains. And as far as I understand it, the intention is to fit the new system across the whole FGW network, at stations big and small - and the Thames Valley should get it first - the TT system has never been that reliable, as many of us know only too well , was hard at it on Friday at Moreton-in-Marsh, announcing the 8.52 from Malvern was running 10 late when you could hear it approaching the station.

At Oxford, the platform 1 announcements are made by a man - the directional announcements by the different voices seems quite a good idea, once you pick up on it. Having very rarely encountered Phil, I've no idea if this is him or not.


I was going to say Thames Trains! but then i changed my mind and put Great Western Link!! lol


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 04, 2009, 22:09:41
Oxford has a male voice on the up side and a female voice on the down side and, with simultaneous announcements, it is simple and effective.

But at a relatively unbusy station like Oxford, I doubt there are simultaneous announcements. The station is not big enough for different "zones" of announcements, like at Clapham Junction. Even Birmingham New Street can cope with just Phil.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: johoare on May 04, 2009, 23:17:49
One of my favourite announcements (since I got sent to work in Bracknell), is the Reading to Waterloo line announcements.. I don't do it very often as getting the train from Maidenhead to Bracknell (10 miles) takes the best part of two hours.. however.. the male recorded announcements (on the train) make ALL the stations between Reading and Waterloo sound like an exciting place that everyone would want to go, apart from "Martin's Heron" which sounds like his especially favourite place to go and even better than the rest! .. It makes me laugh (in a good way!) when I hear it, it's nice to hear such enthusiatic announcing  :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on May 04, 2009, 23:27:13
One of my favourite announcements (since I got sent to work in Bracknell), is the Reading to Waterloo line announcements.. I don't do it very often as getting the train from Maidenhead to Bracknell (10 miles) takes the best part of two hours.. however.. the male recorded announcements (on the train) make ALL the stations between Reading and Waterloo sound like an exciting place that everyone would want to go, apart from "Martin's Heron" which sounds like his especially favourite place to go and even better than the rest! .. It makes me laugh (in a good way!) when I hear it, it's nice to hear such enthusiatic announcing  :)

I remember that from when I was working in Egham!

The worst ones at the moment are London Midland - I do not know if it all over the network but it is especially prominent on New Street to Lime Street north of Crewe (I I think it happens between Euston and Hemel as well but the stations are so close together its not as obvious)

You pull away from, say Crewe and within 2 minutes you get "we are now approaching Hartford" - even though it might be a good 10 minutes way!  Give me a human TM anyday!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 05, 2009, 18:36:27
i liked it last time i was on a paignton bound swt service from honiton it was in the middle of the day and unusually was only one class 159 so 3 car, however from pinhoe onwards the automated message kept on stating this train will split at exeter st davids all passengers wishing to travel beyond exeter please proceed to the front three carrages of the train.... was very amusing when everyone in our carrage apart from a hand full went to the front of the train and the people who knew that the train travels in the opposite direction after exeter came to out carrage, now im guessing that not many people that are not train fans dont know that it is extreamly unlikly that a 3 car 159 would be split up, but for the anoucement to say please proceed to the front 3 cars when there are only 3?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: cereal_basher on May 05, 2009, 19:51:55
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 05, 2009, 19:57:48
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

ive never been on a fgw hst which wasnt eather full or nearly full


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 05, 2009, 20:30:00
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

If Phil had recorded that, he would be saying it non stop at New Street (for each XC service)!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 05, 2009, 20:32:35
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

If Phil had recorded that, he would be saying it non stop at New Street (for each XC service)!!

xc counts the toilets as somewhere passengers can stand... after all they are quite spacious but for somereason nobody ever uses this option?  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: cereal_basher on May 05, 2009, 20:34:36
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

If Phil had recorded that, he would be saying it non stop at New Street (for each XC service)!!
I have been around many times when it could have been used but never actually heard it before.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 05, 2009, 20:37:11
xc counts the toilets as somewhere passengers can stand... after all they are quite spacious but for some reason nobody ever uses this option?  ;D

Not fare-paying passengers anyway... :P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on May 05, 2009, 20:50:55
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

If the TM has phoned control and said "my service is F & S" then they normally get it put on CIS further up.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: cereal_basher on May 05, 2009, 20:53:28
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

If the TM has phoned control and said "my service is F & S" then they normally get it put on CIS further up.
The TV Screens regularly display the words Service Reported Full and Standing, just the first time I have heard the announcement.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on May 05, 2009, 20:58:18
I think CIS have to activate the announcement as well as put the text on, which is why you may not hear it.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 05, 2009, 20:59:28
xc counts the toilets as somewhere passengers can stand... after all they are quite spacious but for some reason nobody ever uses this option?  ;D

Not fare-paying passengers anyway... :P

i bet voyagers get less fair dodgers! would you wanna hide in one of those with the door locked?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on May 05, 2009, 22:17:38
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

Yes, several times including at Reading (plat 4) and Plymouth and they were jammed packed.

Helpfully, one of the ones at Plymouth was during major disruption and as followed by a manual announcement recommending passengers (sorry, customers) got the following train, though no one took any notice and a handful of us enjoyed near empty carriages.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on May 06, 2009, 11:29:33
Oxford has a male voice on the up side and a female voice on the down side and, with simultaneous announcements, it is simple and effective.

But at a relatively unbusy station like Oxford, I doubt there are simultaneous announcements. The station is not big enough for different "zones" of announcements, like at Clapham Junction. Even Birmingham New Street can cope with just Phil.

Which "relatively unbusy" Oxford station is this? There are plenty of announcements that are going on near the same time, eg 06 and 36 mins northbound XC departures and 07 and 37 FGW London stoppers, plus a slightly late 01 or 31 London-bound fast can butt in as well.

The different voices for different platforms work well. I find I just tune out of the ones that don't relate to the platform I'm interested in.

It may be a bit odd if adopted at a rural stop with one train an hour each way but no doubt someone will address that issue when they start to roll the system out across the network.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 06, 2009, 11:38:29
Yesterday at Plymouth I heard the announcement for the 1000 Penzance-Paddington service and after all the normal stuff the female voice announced "I am sorry to inform you that this service has been reported full and standing". I thought it was unusual, has anyone heard that before?

Haha i reminded my m8 who was working in the office to add that bit in 8), filmed that one come in, only left 4 late lol. He was ringing swindon asking them if they could add anymore to the 'Please Note' section, but it was already full  ::)

Plymouths got loads of problems, on monday the 1937 annoucement went off, everyone thought it was coming in, but infact it was set of by default, as the system does not detect trains rite. After it went off they annouced it was 15 late! Also the computer crashes alot, and the system has only just been reset (when phil came back for a few weeks), thats why the annoucements are not on alot cause they have to restart it and remember to skip scandisk!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on May 06, 2009, 11:43:20
Also, a fully functional auto announcer for Oxford should provide two or even three different announcements for each train, and more if there are delays, so it isn't a simple case of announcements not clashing just because there aren't two trains timetabled together. Having two voices at Oxford also future proofs it for the Chiltern plans of course...

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis on May 06, 2009, 12:07:31
Also, a fully functional auto announcer for Oxford should provide two or even three different announcements for each train, and more if there are delays, so it isn't a simple case of announcements not clashing just because there aren't two trains timetabled together. Having two voices at Oxford also future proofs it for the Chiltern plans of course...

Paul

The station staff at Plymouth were talking about having 2 voices (like at exeter st davids) in use instead of just the female because annoucements on platform 5/6 clash with the ones on 3/4/7/8, due to the amounts of trains that terminate on 5/6 when a train is arriving on 7/8.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 07, 2009, 18:55:53
Oxford has a male voice on the up side and a female voice on the down side and, with simultaneous announcements, it is simple and effective.

But at a relatively unbusy station like Oxford, I doubt there are simultaneous announcements. The station is not big enough for different "zones" of announcements, like at Clapham Junction. Even Birmingham New Street can cope with just Phil.

Which "relatively unbusy" Oxford station is this? There are plenty of announcements that are going on near the same time, eg 06 and 36 mins northbound XC departures and 07 and 37 FGW London stoppers, plus a slightly late 01 or 31 London-bound fast can butt in as well.

The different voices for different platforms work well. I find I just tune out of the ones that don't relate to the platform I'm interested in.

It may be a bit odd if adopted at a rural stop with one train an hour each way but no doubt someone will address that issue when they start to roll the system out across the network.

I was really thinking of a station like Clapham Junction, with a train every 30s off peak, and 13s at rush hour. ;)

But you have a point about being able to "tune out" of announcements you don't need. That is useful. :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on May 07, 2009, 19:10:36
Oxford has a male voice on the up side and a female voice on the down side and, with simultaneous announcements, it is simple and effective.

But at a relatively unbusy station like Oxford, I doubt there are simultaneous announcements. The station is not big enough for different "zones" of announcements, like at Clapham Junction. Even Birmingham New Street can cope with just Phil.

Which "relatively unbusy" Oxford station is this? There are plenty of announcements that are going on near the same time, eg 06 and 36 mins northbound XC departures and 07 and 37 FGW London stoppers, plus a slightly late 01 or 31 London-bound fast can butt in as well.

The different voices for different platforms work well. I find I just tune out of the ones that don't relate to the platform I'm interested in.

It may be a bit odd if adopted at a rural stop with one train an hour each way but no doubt someone will address that issue when they start to roll the system out across the network.

I was really thinking of a station like Clapham Junction, with a train every 30s off peak, and 13s at rush hour. ;)

But you have a point about being able to "tune out" of announcements you don't need. That is useful. :)

i use the monitors and tune out everything apart from this is a platform alteration


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Oxman on May 08, 2009, 00:03:39
The new CIS at Oxford introduced zoning of announcements (platform 1, Platform 2, concourse), so there was a deliberate decision made to have a male voice on the up and a female voice on the down. It also allowed the concourse to be taken out of most announcements, so its now a much quieter place. The only regular announcements on the concourse are the mandatory security announcements every 30 minutes. Most of the staff are now familiar with the system and select the areas they want a manual announcement to be heard in.

Measurements were being taken this week to adjust the timing of announcements for arriving trains.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on May 08, 2009, 01:05:48
Measurements were being taken this week to adjust the timing of announcements for arriving trains.

That's good. An extra 30-45 seconds should do it nicely!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devonian on May 08, 2009, 07:32:34
One of the most annoying announcements is on SET trains that split at Ashford. Especially if it is a stopper. After every announcement you would get "Would customers please note that this train divides en route at (long pause) Ashford International. The front four coaches will continue to x,y,z. The eight coaces will continue to a,b,c. Please ensure you are on the correct part of the train".

I feel like it has been etched into my brain. :(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ldf1985 on May 29, 2009, 12:38:38
The system at Westbury keeps crashing.  When it does, passengers are left with no automated announcements and only a First Great Western screensaver on the monitors.

Liam


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on June 03, 2009, 15:47:18
I was at BTM this morning (around 10am) for about 40 minutes.  No automated announcements for any services.  Screens on platform 3 (the one next to the ticket barriers) were also down.  No attempt was made to make any manual announcements - they just relied on people looking at the screens that were working.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on June 04, 2009, 00:10:52
I was at BTM this morning (around 10am) for about 40 minutes.  No automated announcements for any services.  Screens on platform 3 (the one next to the ticket barriers) were also down.  No attempt was made to make any manual announcements - they just relied on people looking at the screens that were working.

Amd I was at Slough tonight where there was a windsor train on plat 1 being announced with a hereford train on plat over the same set of speakers!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on June 20, 2009, 20:41:53
I heard an announcement from the buffet on a journey back from London this week which ended thus:-

"...... and a 24 hour licensed bar."

Can we have a 24 hour train service to go with this? ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on June 20, 2009, 21:00:41
I heard an announcement from the buffet on a journey back from London this week which ended thus:-

"...... and a 24 hour licensed bar."

Can we have a 24 hour train service to go with this? ;D

hehe the sleeper?  ;D but i agree in some locations night trains would be good


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: amiddl on June 28, 2009, 21:51:32
Traveling down to Plymouth this moring on the 9.48 from Newbury was surprised on what sounded like a pre-recorded announcement for Liskeard to be pronounced Lisky-e-ard rather than Liskard.

I wondered why it would be wrong on what sounded like a pre-recorded announcement and what other similar mispronunciations exist across the west.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on June 28, 2009, 21:59:35
afaik the only pre recorded announcement is "Would the train manager please contact the guard" of course only used in exceptional circumstances (e.g. trespassers at Dawlish  ::))


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on June 28, 2009, 22:08:39
train manager contact the guard?

can he not talk to himself without an announcement?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on June 28, 2009, 22:44:17
Looks like you made a slight error there Mr Devon_Metro... :P

Although I am in no position to comment, considering my rather bizarre way of spelling Cinnamon in another Thread ;) ;D :P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: amiddl on June 28, 2009, 22:45:54
Sorry I wasn't very clear - announcement was on the platform at Newbury not on train


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on June 28, 2009, 22:47:04
Quote
Looks like you made a slight error there Mr Devon_Metro... :P

:D :P Classic!

Re: mispronunciations - both Digital Doris and Celia Drummond make gross mispronunciations! I even believe Phil does on occasions... (but far less of course! ;) )

Who does the Up platform at Newbury?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on June 28, 2009, 23:17:26
train manager contact the guard?

can he not talk to himself without an announcement?

Oops. Replace guard with driver ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: welshman on June 29, 2009, 00:45:32
Not half as irritating as the estuary English of ATW announcements.  Why they couldn't have hired an announcer who can pronounce Welsh placenames I don't know.  The Welsh language versions aren't read by a Scotsman.

 >:(


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on June 29, 2009, 09:59:05
How about the fact that EVERYONE pronounces Colwall wrong!

Irritates the inhabitants no end.

It should be pronounced Co-el


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Andy on June 29, 2009, 11:04:00
One thing I always appreciate when travelling to Cornwall is hearing the stops pronounced properly by a native speaker, particularly Liskeard, St Austell, Truro, Redruth, St Erth and Penzance.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Wolvercote Wanderer on June 29, 2009, 14:25:44
Sorry I wasn't very clear - announcement was on the platform at Newbury not on train

The auto-announcer at Newbury is the same as the one that used to be at Oxford.  She was rubbish - she didn't know how to say some stations at all.  During Evergreen, when Chiltern were running from Oxford, there was just a long pause for stations to Snow Hill and an 'and' in there just before the final stop which was also silent!  She also pronounces some stations as if she's going to say somewhere else after even if it's the final station... Aberdeen for example.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on June 29, 2009, 14:32:05
Keynsham - the old Wessex voice calls it "Keen-shum", when as everyone knows (especially if you used to listen to Radio Luxembourg, although that's rather before my time), it should be pronounced "Cane-shum". The other announcers (including the inexplicably-reviled Celia Drummond) get it right though.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on June 29, 2009, 16:08:02
For those that didn't "get" the last post...............

"Keynsham was not spelt as it was pronounced, leaving Mr Batchelor afraid that his army of fans might deluge the Royal Mail with post destined for a non-existent Canesham."

http://www.gertlushonline.co.uk/horace-batchelor.html


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on June 29, 2009, 23:16:59
How about the fact that EVERYONE pronounces Colwall wrong!

Irritates the inhabitants no end.

It should be pronounced Co-el

I'm not sure using dialect pronunciations is a terribly good way to go.

For example, in dialect, Slough-it (best approximation I can come up with) is a small town with a station on the national rail network - and it's not west of London.

Give up?

The station in question is Slaithwaite, near Huddersfield. Broad dialect uses the pronunciation above, while the 'posh' local pronunciation is Slathwaite (the first i is silent) but it's not unusual for BBC newsreaders in Leeds, not exactly a million miles away and still in Yorkshire, to mispronounce it as Slaythwaite - to the derision of Hudddersfield folk.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 29, 2009, 23:37:17
Fair point, willc - but announcers using the local pronunciation occasionally can be rather amusing: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4296.msg35800#msg35800  ;) ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on June 29, 2009, 23:49:24
I assume a similar argument applies to the use of "SWINDON (WILTS)" and "NEWPORT S.WALES" as destinations on tickets. I guess Swindon and Swinton could be easily confused, but there isn't another Newport with an open railway station and I can name at least one other in South Wales that isn't the stop between Cardiff Central and Severn TUnnel Junction...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on June 30, 2009, 00:32:35
Amusing maybe Chris, but not a lot of use if you don't know the area and such local quirks...

The Swindon (Wilts) is probably more to do with the existence of Swindon (Glos) not all that far away in Cheltenham - and with two other towns of some size called Newport it's surely just common sense, even if the others lack trains nowadays.

In these parts we do occasionally hear about planespotters arriving at Lyneham in west Oxfordshire, who don't realise the RAF base is in the Wiltshire village of the same name.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 30, 2009, 00:41:22
Fair enough, willc! :-[

Hopefully RAF pilots know the difference, though!  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on June 30, 2009, 03:11:34
I assume a similar argument applies to the use of "SWINDON (WILTS)" and "NEWPORT S.WALES" as destinations on tickets. I guess Swindon and Swinton could be easily confused, but there isn't another Newport with an open railway station and I can name at least one other in South Wales that isn't the stop between Cardiff Central and Severn TUnnel Junction...

Umm....Newport (Essex) [NWE].


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on June 30, 2009, 08:26:55

In these parts we do occasionally hear about planespotters arriving at Lyneham in west Oxfordshire, who don't realise the RAF base is in the Wiltshire village of the same name.

Does that explain those idiotic signs at Jcts 16 & 17 of the M4 which state:

"For RAF Lyneham, follow Lyneham"   ???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Phil on June 30, 2009, 10:37:19
Even local cricket teams get confused here in Wiltshire when playing against Dauntsey's.

Dauntsey's Cricket Club is based in the village of West Lavington. The village of Dauntsey itself however is some 25 miles away in North Wiltshire.

Matches are scheduled to start an hour earlier than most because Dauntsey's are so used to teams turning up late, having made a 25 mile detour, that they at least stand some chance of starting on time.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on June 30, 2009, 11:35:55
There are two Woolfardisworthys in Devon; you can tell them apart because the one near Tiverton is pronounced 'Wool-far-dis-worthy', while the one near Clovelly isn't!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: miniman on June 30, 2009, 18:19:17
Does that explain those idiotic signs at Jcts 16 & 17 of the M4 which state:

"For RAF Lyneham, follow Lyneham"   ???
Simply because in many cases, military vehicles (particularly the big heavy ones) are sent on different routes to those on the roadsigns so I presume this is to ensure the drivers aren't looking for some other alternative.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on June 30, 2009, 19:24:21
Simply because in many cases, military vehicles (particularly the big heavy ones) are sent on different routes to those on the roadsigns so I presume this is to ensure the drivers aren't looking for some other alternative.

I could understand  it - if to get to RAF Lyneham you had to follow the signs for Oxford or Plymouth or Nagasaki, but as they they are they just state the "bleedin obvious". 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Not from Brighton on June 30, 2009, 20:55:06
The voice on the SWT Desiros is a bit odd, anyone heard it try to say "Portsmouth"? It's almost as if it has a slight German accent...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on June 30, 2009, 22:40:19
train manager contact the guard?

can he not talk to himself without an announcement?

Oops. Replace guard with driver ;)

We all know Guards really run things...  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on July 02, 2009, 22:03:25
Was killing time at Newport (Gwent) today and listening to the Welsh/English station announcements. (and then trying to emulate the Welsh to myself!) There must have been some gremlins in the auto annoucing system because I heard five "The train now standing......" announcements broadcast after the trains in question had just departed. Initially I though this maybe a system timing error, but 3 of these trains were running late!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Jez on July 04, 2009, 12:13:15
I like the Welsh announcements! Ive noticed at Cardiff Central if a train is starting there they often give the announcements "the next train to depart from platform x is" 3 times - once around 5-6 mins before, again at around 3 mins before and then just before departure (often the train has departed by the time the last announcement is given).  If a train is arriving from anothe station tho its usually the standard 3 mins before it arrives "the next train to arrive at plaform x" and then when its approaching "the train now approaching platform x" - usually quite well timed at Cardiff.

Whilst in Birmingham New Street I noticed there is a man giving the announcements


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 07, 2009, 23:09:58
Indeed we do, Donkey Guard ... ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on July 08, 2009, 18:55:41
This one may be apocryphal. I've heard from another forum of an announcement that went thus:

"22 minutes late, due to escaped puma, Chessington North"

Anyone know if there's any truth to this?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 08, 2009, 20:02:13
This one may be apocryphal. I've heard from another forum of an announcement that went thus:

"22 minutes late, due to escaped puma, Chessington North"

Anyone know if there's any truth to this?

Hmm ... I rather think that it is apocryphal: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4658.msg41469#msg41469  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on July 08, 2009, 20:56:53
This one may be apocryphal. I've heard from another forum of an announcement that went thus:

"22 minutes late, due to escaped puma, Chessington North"

Anyone know if there's any truth to this?

Hmm ... I rather think that it is apocryphal: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=4658.msg41469#msg41469  ;) :D ;D

Hehe.....thanks for redirecting me. I'm a little too young to remember TFARO Reginald Perrin, however I did rather enjoy the recent remake; despite the geographical anomolies ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on July 09, 2009, 00:06:21
im 24 and i know him as rigsby.... im not that old am i???


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on August 09, 2009, 19:34:52
Well ok - its only a footnote!

"The earache now arriving...
A tiny revolution, perhaps, but important nonetheless. People have started to complain about the increase in public announcements on trains.
They are non-stop. Unlike the actual trains. On the Tube you are now told to take a bottle of water. What next, take vitamins? Eat your greens? Learn Ancient Greek?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1205233/SUZANNE-MOORE-Sambuca-Girls-patch-Harriet-Harman.html#ixzz0NiDUWXRH"




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on August 10, 2009, 16:24:03
For once, I must side with the Daily Wail !

Last week I went to Plymouth, I sat in the "quiet" coach for a bit of "peace and *****" - what did I get - non-stop verbal diarrhoea, all the way.

"Read the safety leaflet", "mind the gap", "don't forget your luggage or kids", "the buffet will close in 2 hours", "the buffet sells food and drink", "shut the door behind you when you get off ", "If you are going on to Barnstaple, your train will leave from platform 99 at 2105!" - and of course " don't use your phone or iPod in the quiet coaches, which are located .................... "
Arrrgghhhh !!

Mind you, I don't think FGW are quite as bad as SWT - yet - but they are working on it.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on August 10, 2009, 17:08:58
Its not so much the number of anouncements that annoys me it is the length of each one.  In Munich their are automatic anouncements on the frequently stopping S-Bahn and even on the trams.  However each anoucemnt is short "This train is for X" shortly after leaving a station/tram stop , and "next stop Y" just before each arrival so they never become annoying.  The only long anouncemnt an the entire network is a bilinugualone at the airport explaining which terminal to use)

The problem with Uk annoucemnets is that they are too long.  This is partically true when they are automatic (why say "buffet" when you can say "Refreshca Cafe-bar").  You can excuse an imperfect human anouncement up to a point after all staff are only human but if it is recorded it really ought to be as good as it can be. 

Safety anoucements are stupid.  Rail is now safer than any other form of transport and twice as safe as it was a decade or two ago.  More people due every year on the roads than have been killed on the railway ever.  The railway kills far more people by driving folk into dangerous cars due to expensive fares and distrubing peoples sleep with unneccesary anouncements than it does by failing to point out the "safety information provided adjacent to your seat" (augh! "adjacent", what is wrong with "next")

Anoucements of anything that can be provided in a sign (no-smoking, quiet carriage, buffet this way) ought to be abandoned.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on August 10, 2009, 17:46:10
Its not so much the number of anouncements that annoys me it is the length of each one.  In Munich their are automatic anouncements on the frequently stopping S-Bahn and even on the trams.  However each anoucemnt is short "This train is for X" shortly after leaving a station/tram stop , and "next stop Y" just before each arrival so they never become annoying.  The only long anouncemnt an the entire network is a bilinugualone at the airport explaining which terminal to use)


Now Munich is not perfect - on the u-bahn you are also helpfully told which side of the train to get off!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: caliwag on August 10, 2009, 20:11:35
Yup...and station announcements which you cannot here with any clarity anyway. At York, if there is a change of platform, a member of staff warns the assembled throng that it is now on 5 etc etc.
I know the systems need to be there in case of fire or terrorist attack, but it has just got silly and damned irritating...airports just announce when the last drunken fools haven't bothered to check the monitors...so?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: XPT on August 10, 2009, 20:48:23
Anoucements of anything that can be provided in a sign (no-smoking, quiet carriage, buffet this way) ought to be abandoned.

There should allways be audio announcements about the Quiet Carriages.  Since some people take no notice of the Quiet Zone signs, and use their mobiles!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on August 10, 2009, 21:22:07
The serious point behind announcements is they are there for the non-regular travelers, to assume everybody on the train knows exactly what's going on is very foolish. 

The PA is a safety system,

I seem to remember not that many years ago trains didn't have a PA system. The railway network didn't appear to be clogged up with people looking for the buffet car, falling down the gap, etc, etc.................. In fact, I used to travel on my own at the age of about 13 from Salisbury to Waterloo, then out to my Aunt's at Northolt. I never got lost or highjacked.

The PA is not a safety system - it has become (in Naval parlance) a "yardarm clearing" tool ! plus,I am sorry to say, SOME train staff seem to like the sound of their own voice !
 ;D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: willc on August 10, 2009, 23:40:13
Since you're all so busy whingeing - how come none of you have whinged about when there are no announcements of any kind, even when the train is late, or standing at a signal in the middle of nowhere, because I find that pretty annoying.

The issue here is striking a balance - yes, some crew are over the top, but others don't say enough, not even bothering to announce stations. And just saying if there's a sign then you don't need to bother is plain silly. As FGW quiet coaches prove over and over again, signs often don't work.

As Flamingo says, not everyone uses trains that often, so to say "Safety anoucements are stupid" is er, stupid. Have you forgotten Southall, Ufton Nervett and the fire at Maidenhead in 1995? The GW area has probably had more than its share of such incidents, so better safe than sorry. It's a good job some of you don't live in Canada - the Via Rail onboard crews do a full airliner-style safety routine.

And how many of us can actually put our hands up and say we know exactly where the emergency alarm, window hammers, etc are in each coach on an HST or a dmu?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on August 10, 2009, 23:59:24

And how many of us can actually put our hands up and say we know exactly where the emergency alarm, window hammers, etc are in each coach on an HST or a dmu?

And how many of these announcements have made us regulars kow exactly where they are?  And on a long journey how many passengers are going to remember two hours into it?  Or are they expected the read the safety leaflet every stop.

I posted on another thread the sufficient and necessary conditions woud require:

1. We are now stopping at XYZ
2. There is a safety leaflet
3. G and A are quiet |(debatable whethere this is necessary)
4. Get off out of carriages ABCD etc
5. This is the X train to Y

ENd of.......- I think I included the existence of a buffet before - I've removed it in favour of a different one.  The new signs at platforms - the LED scrolly things - now indicate if there is a buffet or not (and the visually impared to the extent they cant read them usually have assistance so that not an argument).

The one that gets me is - do not leave you items of luggage unattended at any time. 

YES - we know that - if you've had to wait more than a couple of minutes on a platform - you've been told several times.  but as I once asked a TM - how can I not leave my luggage uattended - every time I go to the loo or the buffet on a 3.5 hour journey - do I have to pack everything up and drag it to the loo?

Announcing t every station, for example, there is a buffet, where it is, a detailed list of its offerings and (especially at 630 in the morning) that it has a fuly licenced bar is ridicuous





Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on August 11, 2009, 00:13:45
Don't get me started on - don't leave your bags unattended!

As if anyone - esp in the C21 - is going to think: "Oh I'll nip to Smiths, but I'll leave my bag with my important documents/ money in it on the platform."

For God's sake can someone stop them!!!!!!

*Smoking - not needed, it's the law. If you don't realise it's the law, you deserve to be arrested. If you're foreign, you won't understand the English anyway, and you should have read a guidebook. Or - shock horror - seen at the signs! They have a nice clear picture of a fag with a red line over it!

*Wet weather - not needed, if you don't realise it's wet, you deserve to slip over.

*Mind the gap - not needed, if you don't check, you deserve to fall down the gap; if you are disabled, you should have assistance.

*Safety cards - not needed, they're in front of you. And as Fallen Angel says, people just won't read them whatever.

Sorry, this nanny state needs to stop. Gosh - how has Great Britain coped over the last few millenia?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on August 11, 2009, 00:45:15
Don't get me started on - don't leave your bags unattended!

As if anyone - esp in the C21 - is going to think: "Oh I'll nip to Smiths, but I'll leave my bag with my important documents/ money in it on the platform."

For God's sake can someone stop them!!!!!!

*Smoking - not needed, it's the law. If you don't realise it's the law, you deserve to be arrested. If you're foreign, you won't understand the English anyway, and you should have read a guidebook. Or - shock horror - seen at the signs! They have a nice clear picture of a fag with a red line over it!

*Wet weather - not needed, if you don't realise it's wet, you deserve to slip over.

*Mind the gap - not needed, if you don't check, you deserve to fall down the gap; if you are disabled, you should have assistance.

*Safety cards - not needed, they're in front of you. And as Fallen Angel says, people just won't read them whatever.

Sorry, this nanny state needs to stop. Gosh - how has Great Britain coped over the last few millenia?

BT?  you sure you havent been remotely possessed by me?  All of that could have come from my fingers

I salute you!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 11, 2009, 01:20:29
In so many ways I agree with you both. However you won't be the ones paying out hefty sums after ridiculous law suits. That's the way the world has been heading over the last couple of decades. It'll get worse and FGW are powerless to prevent it.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on August 11, 2009, 09:05:50

*Safety cards - not needed, they're in front of you. And as Fallen Angel says, people just won't read them whatever.


Actually -  On an FGW HST with airline seats, the safety leaflets are fitted into a purpose built holder on the back of the seat in front.

On the cover of the leaflet it says quite clearly "Do Not Remove" - how am I meant to read it ?   ??? ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Tim on August 11, 2009, 09:10:04

The PA is a safety system, we have to inform control and signaler if it's not working.  A lot of the announcements are TRANSEC, or Disability Act required.  If they are skipped, both the TOC and the individual guard will be in a lot of doggie-doo.


I wasn't criticising the Guards who make the anouncements, you can only do what you are told.  It TRANSEC or DDA requires anouncements then those rules and laws are stupid and need to be scrapped. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: FarWestJohn on August 11, 2009, 11:14:27
How I agree with all these comments about the never ending on board announcements. There are so many that they are self defeating. My brain switches off and I just do not take any notice of them any more. If they announced a real emergency I would most likely ignore it as yet another bit of trivia. On some trains they are still droning on after leaving Penzance half way to St.Erth.

The same goes for warning signs. How many are on or around a FGW MK 3 door?

The only train I have been on recently that impressed me was a Southern unit from Crawley to Arundel where the announcement was identical to the display and just before the stop. Nothing more nothing less and very sensible.

If we have large scale cuts coming up then there must be a lot of Government staff that can be removed making all these crazy so called H&S decisions. We should all be responsible for our own actions and not need all this nonsense.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on August 11, 2009, 20:20:19
If we have large scale cuts coming up then there must be a lot of Government staff that can be removed making all these crazy so called H&S decisions. We should all be responsible for our own actions and not need all this nonsense.

Whilst agreeing with your sentiments about "our own actions" I must defend (to a certain degree) H & S. In general, applied properly this is a fairly sensible, and not particularly onerous, regime, where it goes wrong is when people are appointed by their Company as "the H & S man" (sorry, Harriet - person !) without FULL training. Usually they have absolutely no concept of risk assessment, as a result every single thing is deemed to be an unacceptable risk, so must be warned against or, if possible, banned altogether. How many people actually fall down the "gap" - or was the slip actually caused by those b****y stupid six inch high heels ?

After complaining about the pounding my ears took last week, today's trip was a pleasure. Warminster to Soton, and back. Only announcments were like this: "Next stop will be Salisbury. Salisbury next stop". Are 158s that much safer than HSTs ?, are their passengers much more sensible ?  Somebody must think so, judging by the lack of ear bashing you get on them. OR, perhaps the guard has better things to do ?

I am going to Penzance next week; now, if I get really bored with the scenery...................!  Perhaps we should run a sweep stake - how many announcements between Westbury & Penzance ?

On a different (catering) tack, my return train today from Soton (Brighton to Worcs), did have a trolley - which according to the timetable it shouldn't have had.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on October 08, 2009, 08:44:00
It appears that after a short silent period following the Daily Mail story SWT have re-started their assault on our ears.

I had the misfortune to travel on the 1920 from Waterloo to Warminster yesterday. I boarded the train at about 1905, from then until several minutes after departure we were subjected to a non stop barrage of announcements about where the train was going, where it was going to divide, which bit you had to sit in ............. all in an over-loud, mechanised, shrill, female voice. This was repeated after each stop during the journey, plus a few extras about reading safety notices and "suspicious" items - however nothing about the "gap" or leaving things on the train - wasn't time to fit those in I suppose !
I did try to mention it to the guard - but he couldn't hear me !





Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: plymothian on October 09, 2009, 12:22:25
You'll have noticed that the announcements and signage has increased significantly since the Great Western franchise has been involved in some of the more high profile incidents in recent years and since the DDA's introduction.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on October 09, 2009, 15:18:52
You'll have noticed that the announcements and signage has increased significantly since the Great Western franchise has been involved in some of the more high profile incidents in recent years and since the DDA's introduction.

I don't think they have generally. It's just the odd trains where they seem to go completely overboard. It is even more annoying where there is visual display as well.
The only announcements on the train to Waterloo that day were "next station is.........", didn't even get the "Front 6 coaches for Clapham Jct" one.

Generally the FGW 158s operating through Warminster are very reasonable as well.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on November 20, 2009, 09:34:26
Daily mail would have had a field day this morning.

There is one TM who the minute the train departs wos and you hear is dulcit tones, your heart sinks and if its the start of the week you give up on the idea of getting any sleep.  If it happens on friday, you just hope you are comatose enough to ignore it.

Every dog house, hen house and out house the train stops at is announced along with detailed instructions of how to alight the train.  Can just about live with that.

But we got told three times that the ticket machine at hanborough would be re-instated shortly but it will credit cards only.

Six times after six different stations frequent travellers were reminded it might be cheaper to get a seven day season ticket which can be bought from the ticket machines or from the train manager.  And that if we needed underground cards that we could always get them from the station, machine or the manager to save the crush at Paddington.  This was at the same time as being told that if we needed to renew out season tickets, we could do so from noon today.

And on the approach to every station we were asked to please please check behind the seats and in those overhead racks to make sure we had all our personal belongings.  We were also reminded at every station that since it had been raining earlier in the journey we may have an umbrella with us so we needed to make sure we had that as well.

I got off at Reading but i bet as soon as it passes slough the litany of not using the toilets on the approaches to Paddington will have started.

I admit, after Oxford when he didnt say anything for all of ten minute I did suggest to the host that she go check for signs of life as he seemed to have expired. (what I really wanted to do was suggest he shove his tannoy hand set some where the sun don't shine!)

it is enough to almost make me make sure I get to 0535 rather than the later train just to avoid the possibility.  If Guantanamo ever wants someone to help the prisoners lose the will to live.....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Cornish Traveller on November 20, 2009, 10:38:23
 :o No time left to check tickets then I take it !!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on November 20, 2009, 10:57:26
:o No time left to check tickets then I take it !!!

Thats left to the ticket examiner type thingies who get on at Charlbury


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on November 20, 2009, 11:24:25
I got off at Reading but i bet as soon as it passes slough the litany of not using the toilets on the approaches to Paddington will have started.
Which is probably when most people use them to avoid paying 30p at Paddington station.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: James Vertigan on November 20, 2009, 21:13:27
You want to hear the announcements on the Toronto subway (TTC) -

"The next station is Dundas, Dundas station". "This is Dundas, Dundas station"... every stop the name of the station is repeated twice by the automatic voice.

Speaking of automatic voices, London's Circle/Hammersmith & City tube trains seem to be being fitted with new announcements in preparation for the Circle line extension from mid December. Heard one driver the other day having to apologise as he had the new automatic announcements on which said the Circle line train would terminate at Edgware Road - but of course it didn't!

Also on the announcements front - I love this edited Youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6WTiDr8yI4 (yes I have an immature mind!)  ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on November 23, 2009, 06:32:28
No no no please no - can't take it anymore

left wos 2 minutes ago - already been advised to stand away from the doors whilst train is in motion and that if you are getting off at pershore then a-c are platformed but he suggests using b as it closest to the building and saves us getting wet


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: grahame on November 23, 2009, 08:32:11
No no no please no - can't take it anymore

You're probably not going to like this idea ...

"Hello and Welcome to the 06:50 service from Worcster Shrub Hill to Paddington.  It's Monday, 21st December and as we've new customers on board today who are going to London to do their Christmas Shopping, I thought I would give you some extra information about the railway line you'll be travelling on, the train itself, and the beautiful Cotswolds and Thames Valley that we pass through ...




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 23, 2009, 14:44:26
I got off at Reading but i bet as soon as it passes slough the litany of not using the toilets on the approaches to Paddington will have started.

For real...? Since when has that been happening?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on November 23, 2009, 15:51:22
I got off at Reading but i bet as soon as it passes slough the litany of not using the toilets on the approaches to Paddington will have started.

For real...? Since when has that been happening?

Its only the one guy - the same TM every time - very distinctive west country/brizzle accent.  I have since found his name but for obvious reasons I'm not going to say.

As I have not been working in London since Feb 08 I cannot say for certain he's still doing it however, back then whilst he announced every shack, stop etc, he did not give us the ticketing advice, ask us to check for "pesky brollies behind the seats" or specifically tell us how to avoid getting wet.  Since he's added to his repertoir not decreased it, I cannot believe he has dropped the Paddington loo instructions. 

In saying that, once we got past Evesham, he did shut up this morning (relatively that is -he was quiet for him) - suspect someone else did what I was tempted to do which was threaten GBH with the announcer handset!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on November 23, 2009, 15:58:14
All Guards are being issued with an announcement book soon (apparently after getting feedback from customers who don't like inconsistencies with announcements), so if Guards are following the new announcement laws ( :D), FA's complaints may be a thing of the past.  I don't have an ETA though as to when these will be distributed to staff.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 23, 2009, 16:34:48
I remember a train back from Bristol to Didcot one Sunday evening a while ago where the train manager made a long announcement after every stop with threats about the dire consequences that would befall those with advance tickets who were on the wrong train, then the customer host would join in and warn of the dire consequences that would befall those in first class who didn't sow their ticket before ordering complimentary items. It felt like we were all being given a pre-emptive b*ll*ck*ng after each stop! Given that Bristol TM/Bath/Chippenham/Swindon/Didcot are all 10-20 mins apart, these clowns were on the air virtually the entire time.

The irony was that the train manager was so busy making threats to those with invalid tickets on the PA he never actually got round to checking any of them.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on November 23, 2009, 17:37:51
It felt like we were all being given a pre-emptive b*ll*ck*ng after each stop! Given that Bristol TM/Bath/Chippenham/Swindon/Didcot are all 10-20 mins apart, these clowns were on the air virtually the entire time.

The irony was that the train manager was so busy making threats to those with invalid tickets on the PA he never actually got round to checking any of them.
:D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: moonrakerz on November 23, 2009, 20:45:49
We were also reminded at every station that since it had been raining earlier in the journey we may have an umbrella with us so we needed to make sure we had that as well.

I was at Sheffield a few weeks back and it was p*****g down - the station announcer kept telling us every 5 minutes that the platforms MIGHT be wet !!!!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: James Vertigan on November 25, 2009, 04:50:14
For some reason, I've just been reminded of an FGW train manager I had on a journey once - might have been one of my usual journeys to Tiverton Parkway - he seemed pretty posh (maybe Oxford educated) and when giving amounts of time would always say something along the lines of "we will be arriving at Reading in 30, figures three zero minutes" - never heard the word figures used like that before or since!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on November 27, 2009, 17:48:24
I was at London Victoria earlier this week and was stood near the platform for the Gatwick Express.  The automated announcements were awful - how many times can you say Gatwick in one announcement!?

"Platform 14 for the xx:xx Gatwick Express service to Gatwick Airport, calling at Gatwick Airport only.  A trolley service of drinks and light refreshments is available on this train.  Platform 14 for the xx:xx Gatwick Express service to Gatwick Airport."

Then "The train now stood at Platform 14 is the xx:xx Gatwick Express service to Gatwick Airport, calling at Gatwick Airport only.  Platform 14 for the xx:xx Gatwick Express service to Gatwick Airport."

How many times do they need to remind us that the Gatwick Express goes to Gatwick Airport?  Surely its obvious from its name?

Then once I was on my train, I was told at every stop "Welcome aboard the Southern Service to Southampton Central and Bognor Regis, calling at xxxxxxxxx.  This train will split at Horsham  Coaches 1-4 will cotinue to Southampton Central, Coaches 5-8 will continue to Bognor Regis.  This is coach 2 of 8."

Every so often, I was reminded that I was sitting in coach 2 of 8 and that the train would split at Horsham.

Are people really stupid enough to need to be molly cuddled by the TOCs like this?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on November 27, 2009, 17:57:09
I should add this is my opinion

As far as I know its disability laws gone mad. I appreciate the need for announcements for blind people for example - however how many blind people make a spur of the moment decision to travel. I rather suspect they plan out their journey so they don't get lost or alternatively take a companion.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Electric train on November 27, 2009, 18:33:04
Are people really stupid enough to need to be molly cuddled by the TOCs like this?
Quite simply yes, I do agree it can be annoying. I use the Southern, Southeastern and Southwest services a lot and the amount of people who ask is this part of the train going to Y while its on route to Z 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on November 27, 2009, 21:07:58
It would be good to switch off the coach numbers once they have split down to a single unit though.  ::)

One point not mentioned is that on Southern the SDO is automatic, and can deal with individual coaches, so off the mainlines you'll also get messages explaining which doors will be usable at the next station.

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: eightf48544 on November 28, 2009, 11:37:16
Christian Wolamr in a recent article in Rail complained about the announcemnts on the Javelin service to AShford. Apparently once they left Ebbsfleet there were several announcments of "The next stop is Ashford where the train will terminate" or words to that effect. If you're on teh wrong train from Ebbsfleet it's too late you're not going to be getting off at 140 mph so you're on it to Ashford whether you like it or not.

Prehaps there should be one announcment after Ebbsfleet. "Next stop Ashford where the train terminates. Sit back enjoy the ride we'll wake you when we get there.".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on November 28, 2009, 18:06:43
The onboard SN announcements are appalling.

What makes matters worse is that the guards have to repeat announcements at places like Ford, Barnham etc, to give a list of connexions. Why can't they programme it in?

They need to REDUCE the amount of repetition.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on November 29, 2009, 00:00:44
The onboard SN announcements are appalling.

appalling

appalling

appalling

appalling

This is appalling.

appalling

appalling

appalling

They need to REDUCE the amount of repetition.

Sorry, what?   8)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on November 29, 2009, 13:06:33
;D :P

I'll put my hands up! :o


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on November 29, 2009, 21:13:37
You've got to love this one on the old FGW ex-Wessex services:

"Welcome aboard, please listen to the following announcement for your safety.  Please familiarise yourself with the safety information located on posters in the passenger saloon.  Emergency door opening procedures are located close to the doors.  Please make sure all luggage is safely stowed in the overhead rack and when you leave the train please mind the gap between the train and the platform.  And take care when you alight.  Thank you."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on November 29, 2009, 22:25:01
"displayed" is missing ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on November 29, 2009, 23:17:29
Rather OT, but BTline will be pleased to hear that Phil has invaded Plymouth...  ::)  Now I know which Station Manager has a thing for Phil ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on November 29, 2009, 23:38:10
Rather OT, but BTline will be pleased to hear that Phil has invaded Plymouth...  ::)  Now I know which Station Manager has a thing for Phil ;D
;D

Apparantly he may be coming to Marylebone.

AND he's back on the concourse at New Street!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 30, 2009, 04:43:42
Btline, if you're not careful I'll do a TJ-style analysis on your use of the words "Phil" and "Sayer"  ;D ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on November 30, 2009, 09:08:23
Sorry, I'll try to resist.

...f...f...f...f...

PHIL SAYER!

Sorry, it just came out!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on February 12, 2010, 21:07:15
Sorry for dragging this up, but I was on the 1000 Pad - Paignton earlier and an automated announcement was played on approach to Paignton (twice).

It went along the lines of
"Thank you for travelling with First Great Western... [some stuff] ...please assist us in closing the door behind you when alighting and mind the gap"

Apparently they are controlled from the buffet and there is a whole host of different announcements, all in the voice of Alison Forster!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: readytostart on February 12, 2010, 21:13:08
surly the public address system on trains needs to be working not just for customer services but also for h&s?

The only rule book requirement in service for the PA to be working is for trains with automatic doors when the hustle alarm isn't working, however if practicable passengers should be moved to a coach where it is working.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Mookiemoo on September 25, 2010, 20:28:49
On the tube from oxford circus into paddington there was an announcement as we approached.

"please note, due to planned enginneering works, there is no service on any other under ground line through paddington"

Followed by

"passengers are advised they cannot interchange with any other underground station due to planned engineering work"

Erm - what's the point of repeating yourself - the first means the second


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: SDS on September 25, 2010, 22:22:12
Thats more then likely for the benefit of the tourists (and weekend travellers) who don't understand basic underground.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on September 25, 2010, 22:31:41
If you think the tube is bad try south west trains!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on September 25, 2010, 23:33:48
Thats more then likely for the benefit of the tourists (and weekend travellers) who don't understand basic underground.

Is there a Basic Underground <-> English/French/German/Esperanto dictionary out there?  ::) :P ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 31, 2012, 13:20:46
Following a shocking incident at Kings Cross station, commuters are to be bombarded by further safety announcements warning of the dangers of attempting to board a train just before it leaves.

Drivers are also to be given further training after horrified commuters pulled the communication chord but the oblivious driver carried on to the next stop unaware of the panic in the carriages.

Quote
Horror on the 5.53! Commuter dragged 200 feet after getting hand trapped on train
A woman cheated death after getting her hand trapped in a train door as it pulled away in front of horrified commuters.

Station staff were powerless to stop the train and the passenger only managed to free herself at the last second.

Rail safety chiefs today revealed the sequence of events which could easily have proved fatal.

The woman, a regular commuter who is not named, was aiming to catch the 5.53 pm First Capital Connect from platform nine at King^s Cross to Royston.

Thinking she had time to spare she passed the first carriages and walked towards the front of the train. She heard the door closing alarm but thought at first that was for an adjacent train.

Realising it was her train about to depart she went to step on board, her hand in front, just as the doors closed.

The door closed with the rubber edge trapping the fingers of her left hand while she was still on the platform.

The train dispatcher saw the woman but was unaware her hand was trapped and signalled the train away.

As the train started to move off the woman was forced to walk and then run alongside it.

The train dispatcher realised what was happening but by that time had no means of stopping the train.

After more than 60 metres the woman managed to pull her hand free - possibly aided by unknown passengers on board who were tugging at the door trying to force them open.

They also operated the on-board passenger alarm but the driver did not stop immediately and continued to Finsbury Park.

The woman was left standing shaken on the platform as staff rushed to give first-aid. She later attended hopsital where her fingers were found to be badly bruised but not broken.

In a report of the incident, which happened last October, the investigating Rail Accident Investigation Board (RAIB,) concluded:

The train dispatcher did not carry out a full safety check before allowing the train to depart;
The passenger attempted to board the train while the doors were closing;
The passenger alarm was operated after the train had travelled about 17 metres; under rules the driver should have stopped if part of the train was in a station - which it was. Instead he continued to the next station.
His actions, nowever, the RAIB stress, had ^no effect^ on what happened but his action could have under different circumstances ^resulted in a more serious outcome.^

The RAIB make a number of recommendations to prevent anything similar happening again.

Renewed training is being given to train and station staff. There will be more frequent public address announcements warning passengers of the dangers of trying to board trains when the doors are closing.

Drivers are also being told to stop immediately if the alarm is raised while they are in or have just left a station.

Source: http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/transport/horror-on-the-553-commuter-dragged-200-feet-after-getting-hand-trapped-on-train-7807118.html


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 31, 2012, 15:00:45
Ahem.  ::)

For those readers who prefer rather less hyperbole in their reading material, the full Rail Accident Investigation Branch report (http://www.raib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/120530_R092012_King's_Cross.pdf) is available on their website:

Quote
Summary

A passenger became trapped in a train door and was pulled along a platform, for a distance of approximately 20 metres, at London King^s Cross station on 10 October 2011. She suffered bruising to the fingers of her left hand.

The passenger^s hand became trapped when she attempted to board the train while the doors were closing. The train started to move before the passenger^s fingers were released because a member of staff on the platform did not fully check the train doors before signalling that the train could depart. The requirement to check doors is given in the railway Rule Book.

It is possible that the passenger could have withdrawn her fingers from the doors, before being pulled along the platform, if alternative door edge seals had been fitted on the Class 365 train involved in the incident.

When the passenger alarm was operated during the incident, the train did not stop immediately because the driver decided to continue to the next station. This decision had no effect on the incident but was contrary to the railway Rule Book and, in slightly different circumstances, could have increased the severity of the accident.

The RAIB has identified two learning points from this accident:

- the importance of fully checking train doors before trains depart; and

- the need for drivers to stop trains immediately if the passenger alarm is operated when any part of the train is within a station.

The RAIB has also recommended that, the design of door edge seals on Class 365 trains is reviewed, and if appropriate modified, when the seals are renewed as part of a mid-life refurbishment due in 2013.

The full RAIB report is 21 pages, and gives a rather more balanced view than the press item quoted above.  :-X

Btline, you really should consider whether all that hyperbole is doing your blood pressure any good at all.  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: dog box on May 31, 2012, 15:05:57
A couple of points the train was  obviously DOOP therefore if a guard was provided and a two person dispatch process was used the incident would not have happened, as a verbal warning would have been given to move away and a lookout kept as the train was moving away
.also if the doors were provided with soft edge closing anything trapped in the door should have prevented the driver getting brake release and taking power


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Southern Stag on May 31, 2012, 15:30:49
I think the fact that just one despatcher was provided to despatch an 8-carriage train at a major London terminal is quite bad.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on May 31, 2012, 16:52:47
I just think it's ridiculous that we're going to get MORE pointless announcements to go with Smoking, wet weather, luggage, etc. Most people would use their common sense and not board a train when the alarm is sounding.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on May 31, 2012, 17:24:43
Most people take chances, i'd try and board with the alarm sounding, slightly suprising that the doors managed to gain interlock with a hand in there though.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 31, 2012, 17:28:23
Hmm. ::)  You clearly still haven't read that Rail Accident Investigation Branch report, have you?

See page 17:

Quote
Summary of conclusions

48 Passenger A was pulled along the platform due to:
- the passenger trying to board the train after the doors started to close, and expecting that the doors would reopen when her hand was trapped between them (paragraph 18, action to be taken (paragraph 50));

See page 18:

Quote
Actions reported that address factors which otherwise would have resulted in a RAIB recommendation

50 FCC intends to run another poster campaign covering the risks associated with passengers attempting to board trains after the doors start to close. It also proposes wider use of public address systems to educate passengers about the correct use of train doors.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on May 31, 2012, 18:12:47
I know it's just a point of detail in the overall context, but how the heck does the Standard justify converting the RAIB's 'about 20 metres' into 200 feet?

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on May 31, 2012, 18:16:13
Most people take chances, i'd try and board with the alarm sounding, slightly suprising that the doors managed to gain interlock with a hand in there though.

Explained why in the report isn't it?  They note the gap required to prevent closed detection, and that the typical adult woman's figures are significantly smaller than that gap.

Probably tested on a load of big blokes by BR...

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: woody on July 12, 2012, 09:30:23
Does the growing dialogue of on-train announcements these days annoy you.Then you will find the following Mail online article very amusing.I certainly did,enjoy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2172178/Your-train-delay-delayed-future-delays.html


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: XPT on September 13, 2012, 23:05:28
I've noticed a number of these annoucements pronouncing station names wrongly.

Keynsham - one of the female announcers pronounces this as Key-nsham, rather than Kay-nsham.

Trowbridge - One of the  new female announcers is pronouncing the row part of the name in the same way that you would pronounce cow, rather than  the correct pronounciation.

Salisbury - The same female as above is pronouncing this as Sal-sbury, rather than the correct pronounciation of Sole-sbury.

Can anyone else name any other stations which are pronounced incorrectly on the prerecorded announcements?

Why are these annoucements recorded with the incorrect pronounciations of some of the stations?

Also something else worth mentioning.  When at Gloucester today, the annoucement for the 1351 (HST) service to Cheltenham Spa was announced as ".....The 1351 Cheltenham Spa Express service, calling at Cheltenham Spa ONLY.".  Why is this announced as an express service calling at Cheltenham ONLY when there are no intermediate stations between Gloucester and Cheltenham anyway??  Any service between the two stations is pretty much the same duration, whether it be a Class 153, 158, 170, Voyager, or HST!  So don't really know where the "express service" comes into it!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Louis94 on September 13, 2012, 23:08:17
Can anyone else name any other stations which are pronounced incorrectly on the prerecorded announcements?

Why are these annoucements recorded with the incorrect pronounciations of some of the stations?

Also something else worth mentioning.  When at Gloucester today, the annoucement for the 1351 (HST) service to Cheltenham Spa was announced as ".....The 1351 Cheltenham Spa Express service, calling at Cheltenham Spa ONLY.".  Why is this announced as an express service calling at Cheltenham ONLY when there are no intermediate stations between Gloucester and Cheltenham anyway??  Any service between the two stations is pretty much the same duration, whether it be a Class 153, 158, 170, Voyager, or HST!  So don't really know where the "express service" comes into it!

Firstly the new PA system is cheap, awful rubbish, so please don't expect it to be anything like what it replaced at big stations like Bristol TM, Bath, etc. FGW went for value instead of quality when getting the new system.

Secondly the way it says 'Cheltenham Spa Express' is referring to the train name, and is NOT in any way a description of the service.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: XPT on September 13, 2012, 23:27:15
Yes these new PA systems across FGW region, are the voices actually computer generated?

As for the Cheltenham Spa Express announcement, can't say I've ever heard announcements before which actually refer to the train name.  Is this commonplace?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bobm on September 14, 2012, 06:32:29
It is at Swindon. The only problem is you get a burst of what sounds like static after each name.  I've heard both the Merchant Venturer and the Torbay Express announced at Swindon.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on September 14, 2012, 07:35:54
Unfortunately other TOCs have also installed this system in recent years.  I find the voice to be very unclear and the messages do not flow as the pauses are in all the wrong places.

One that is particularly bad is Northallerton, which is pronounced so badly it could be mistaken for Northampton.

Strangely, the only messages that seem clear are "Tickets marked x trains only are not valid on this train".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on September 14, 2012, 07:44:48
The onboard announcments on the North Downs line seem to regard "North Camp" as "North C" but on the whole the announcments are generally clear.

I may be dreaming but it seems the announcments at Reigate for FGW services are still done by Phil. The new recordings on some of the other stations I use have a new voice with new spacing which has been discussed before on these forums. I really find these announcments depressing....life, don't talk to me about life!

42

Dave


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on September 14, 2012, 07:46:16
I may be dreaming but it seems the announcments at Reigate for FGW services are still done by Phil.
Reigate station is managed by Southern.  As far as I am aware, for the time being anyway, they are retaining the existing system.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on September 14, 2012, 07:50:21
I may be dreaming but it seems the announcments at Reigate for FGW services are still done by Phil.
Reigate station is managed by Southern.  As far as I am aware, for the time being anyway, they are retaining the existing system.

I did wonder if it was anything to do with being a non-FGW station. Thanks for that Brucey!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Southern Stag on September 14, 2012, 12:19:14
It is at Swindon. The only problem is you get a burst of what sounds like static after each name.  I've heard both the Merchant Venturer and the Torbay Express announced at Swindon.
The names are announced at all FGW stations. There are a couple of the newer names that aren't announced though. All the names done by the female voice have that static sound, but none of the names done by the male voice do.

Mispronounced places I can think of are Lostwithiel by the female voice. She now says Lost-with-e-el rather than Lost-with-e-l. She did use to say Lost-withel, which was even worse. The male voice also says Chelt-en-ham with a clear en and ham rather than Chelt-nam.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on September 14, 2012, 12:21:07
..and let's not forget St. Germans...which is now pronounced differently that it used to be.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Cruithne3753 on September 27, 2012, 00:24:49
I've heard "Kaynsham" at Worcester Foregate Street.

There's also a couple of  nuances in automated announcements I've heard:-

"...calling at Bristol Temple Meads, Parson Street, Nailsea and Backwell, YATTON! Weston Super Mare, Highbridge and Burnham, Bridgwater and... ...Taunton.

There's an emphasis on Yatton, as if to say "Oooh! Look! Yatton! That's worth knowing!"

Also, a slight pause before Taunton as if it's having trouble remembering:-

"Town in Somerset... You know, the cider place... what is it again? (slaps head and snaps fingers a few times)  "That's it, Taunton!"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on September 27, 2012, 09:21:10
I recall seeing a TV programme about the announcements. The guy, whose name eludes me, recorded every station name three times, with three different inflections, to cover the first station in a list, one in the middle, and the last in a list, along with all the other things that need to be said. I assume a computer program clips the relevant bits together, then plays them? The wrong "YATTON" must be in the one Cruithne3753 heard. I heard similar in Alicante airport, where the announcement in English had a shouted "LONDON".
We had a similar system years ago in an office I worked in, linked to a queuing system. The technology was a bit beyond the computer  it was connected to. So occasionally, you would hear "Ticket number One hundred" and see someone stand up. Moments later, it would say "and forty", causing our man to sit down, and someone else stand, before, after a pause for comic effect that Eric Morecambe would have been proud of, saying "Seven! Room number..", then crashing.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Temple Meads on September 27, 2012, 16:15:42
There are numerous problems with the new systems, although they do seem to have improved recently (or am I just used to them now?), the first mistake that springs to mind, is the pronunciation of "Plymouth" as "Plymuff"...  :o

I just don't think that "Anne's" voice (the new female voice) is really suited to railway announcements...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Kernow Otter on September 27, 2012, 17:39:48
'Lostwithiel' was a bit of a tounge twister for the announcer recently.  Not heard it for a while but it may have changed..


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: eightf48544 on September 28, 2012, 10:49:28
Not station names but came across a strange announcement at Taplow last night about:

"Not boarding the train whilst the doors are closing as it delays the train."

Presumably because the driver has to press the open button again.

It came quite out of the blue no trains about. Is it on a timer?

Was going to post it in the lighter side but this seems appropriate as it wasn't all that clear and might have been computer generated..


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on September 28, 2012, 11:57:41
Is it on a timer?


Yep, probably spliced in just after the one about not leaving your baggage, or any other member of your family, unattended.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on September 28, 2012, 12:07:02
I once heard a manual announcement on board a Virgin service, where the train manager reminded folk not to forget their belongings, including granny or the children. He said that any unattended luggage may be destroyed by the security services and any unattended grannies or children would be sold into slavery!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: mjones on September 28, 2012, 12:10:25
The railways make far too many announcements, on trains and at stations, and this is likely to make people switch off and be less likely to pay attention to the ones that are really important. I gather from a colleague who used to work in the aviation industry that airports have deliberately greatly reduced their use of announcements for this reason. I think the railways ought to learn from this and do a bit of research into how people respond to announcements and what information they retain from them, and only make announcements where they can be shown to be effective.

For example, I find it highly unlikely that many passengers ever read the safety cards, or ask for the Braille version, despite having to put up with the tedious exhortation to do so after every station!  If there is a genuine safety reason for getting this information to people, then it needs to be provided by methods that shown to be effective, otherwise there is the suspicion that it is a box ticking exercise...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on September 28, 2012, 12:58:24
And the one reminding people to alight on the correct side of the train (particularly at Chippenham).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on September 28, 2012, 13:53:38
An the one reminding people to alight on the correct side of the train (particularly at Chippenham).

In slam-door days, my colleague, with poor eyesight, was the only man on the train who did not hear the conductor tell everyone that because of engineering work, the train would stop on the opposite platform to usual at Yatton. It's a long way down, and very dirty, he told me later.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on September 28, 2012, 14:27:57
The current station wide safety announcements at Bristol Temple Meads definitely need sorting out.

For some reason they are slightly out of sync and use both the male and female voice. So you'll get the "Please do not leave your luggage unattended..." pre-recorded announcement which will start in the male voice on platforms 1-4, then a second or two later the female voice will kick in on platforms 5-8 making the same announcement. Finally the male voice will start the same announcement, with a further one or two second delay on platforms 9-15.

If you are on platforms 5-8 in the middle of the station you get a cacophony of out of sync announcements which really hurts the ears.  ::)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Southern Stag on September 28, 2012, 23:29:32
That's a pretty common problem at stations which are using both voices, and it does sound terrible.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 11, 2012, 23:17:35
There's been a bit of a Twitter campaign in the last few days about Brian Blessed, who has apparently offered to record the announcements for Waterloo if his fee is donated to the Samaritans. I would love to think that this might happen!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on November 12, 2012, 12:24:27
Barbara Windsor was recently to be heard across the rail network's public address systems with a pre-recorded message urging people to donate for the Royal Bristish Legion's Poppy Day. I heard her last week at Swindon.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chrisoates on November 12, 2012, 22:33:41
St Ives branch on arriving at St Erth....
"Over the bridge to platform 1 for services to Penzance, Platform 2 for the rest of the World."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on March 13, 2013, 18:00:56
From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21773741):

Quote
Transport minister Norman Baker has said the number of computer-generated announcements on trains has got out of hand and needs to be reduced.

Many of the speaker messages were irrelevant to passengers and spoiled their journeys, he told the BBC.

It was unnecessary, for example, to tell people they were on a non-smoking train when it was banned on all trains.

The Association of Train Companies said many passengers found announcements useful but a balance must be struck.

Mr Baker told Radio 4's The World at One that firms should differentiate between essential announcements - such as imminent station arrivals and explaining reasons for delays - and ones which were "simply unnecessary".

"Telling people they are in a quiet carriage when you have chosen to be there, telling people they are in a no-smoking train when all trains are non-smoking, telling you if you see something suspicious to see a police officer when there aren't any on the trains. There are so many announcements which get in the way. People do not want every single moment of their journey filled with someone saying something... the sadness is that the unnecessary announcements dilute the value of the important ones."

'Playing incessantly'

Announcements by on-board train staff "were not that bad" and it was automatic ones which were most annoying, the Lib Dem MP suggested.

"Someone has designed a computer program somewhere in a dark cellar and they have put it into the train and plays incessantly and no-one has the power, it seems, to stop the program playing."

Asked what he was going to do about the issue, Mr Baker said trying to regulate what could be said would be "completely over the top" and train operators should simply use their common sense about what was appropriate or not.

"What I am saying to the train companies is often you are running really good services but you are spoiling the journey for people by the excessive announcements."

The Association of Train Companies (ATOC) said that, according to research by consumer watchdog Passenger Focus, the vast majority of people were satisfied with information they get on trains and at stations.

"Passengers want concise and relevant announcements, such as what the next station is so that they get off at the right stop," it said.

"Train companies know there's always a balance to strike - they need to keep passengers informed without irritating them with too many announcements."

Train operators are expected to adhere to industry guidelines on all aspects on passenger information, including on-train announcements, although they are free to implement the guidance in different ways. ATOC said the guidance was under constant review.




Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 13, 2013, 20:42:59
If on board announcements go on all the time, people tend to treat them as a load of drivel abd don't bother  to listen to them and miss the important ones, i.e. train running ones.   Some stink too much of the nanny state and I feel quite insulted when being told how to alight from a train as though I can't be trusted.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: trainer on March 13, 2013, 21:56:52
As one who has left more hats on more trains than I care to remember over many years, I can testify that exhortations to take all my belongings with me fall on deaf ears if you are terminally forgetful and fail to retain in your brain all the items you boarded with until an unpleasantly cold wind hits your unprotected head after the train has started to pull out.  Save your breath, dear Train Manager/computer, I am a hopeless case.

I'll just get my coat...did I bring it in?  :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Oxman on March 14, 2013, 00:06:23
It would be wise for the Minister to remember that some of the messages are a requirement laid down by an agency for which he is responsible.

Security announcements (like the one about reporting anything strange to a police officer) are mandated by Transec. TOCs must ensure they are broadcast at the Transec recommended intervals. On a large station, that is twice every hour, and the CIS system is programmed to do this. I don't know what the required frequency on trains is, but you can be sure TOCs will do all in their power to comply with a Transec requirement. Transec regularly conduct unannounced inspections of station and train security, and have draconian powers if a TOC is seen to be failing. Its inspections are treated very seriously by responsible managers - those who don't, do not remain in their jobs for very long. So, Physician Baker, go heal yourself.

Some of the other announcements, like remember to take all your belongings and mind the gap as you step down to the platform, are probably wasted on the vast majority of passengers, particularly the regular ones. But, if it prevents a few people from leaving luggage, or having an accident, then it has to be worthwhile. The hassle or, indeed, serious injury that might be avoided make it well worthwhile.

And as for smoking announcements, well, as the Minister says, everyone knows that smoking is banned throughout the railway network. So, how come so many people try to smoke on stations and trains? Its a good idea to remind passengers - airlines do it on every flight!

Why does ATOC have to be so woolly about this? TOCs don't harass passengers with announcements for fun - they would love to reduce the number of non-service related announcements. Getting Transec off their back would be a start!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on March 14, 2013, 02:20:30
I think the security announcement is supposed to be every 30 mins on long-distance... every 20 mins on local services, before departing origin station and arriving at the terminating one.

As Oxman says, if he wants to blame someone speak to Transec!  ???

Never any police on trains?  Occasionally there are...  ::)

Some stink too much of the nanny state and I feel quite insulted when being told how to alight from a train as though I can't be trusted.

In this day and age of every trip/fall being someone elses fault and ending in a lawsuit, you can be sure "I was given no warning about the gap..." would come out pretty quickly.

In my view, no-one may listen, some such as yourself find them insulting (thanks for listening though), but it may end up covering me and my employer from a ridiculous lawsuit.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: trainer on March 14, 2013, 09:18:30
I agree that the fear of a lawsuit is the main driver for the 'safety' announcements and that is led not only by the Law industry, but those people who believe they have a right not only to blame someone else for their own genuine errors, but that every accident must be financially valuable.  The 'security' announcements may be something that the minister can do something about.  They are so frequently heard that they've even stopped creating paranoia.

One point I failed to make earlier: I enjoy the personalisation of announcements most times, especially when I can tell the speaker is sharing our pain or has a dry sense of humour.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on March 14, 2013, 11:11:30
"Please remember to take care in these adverse weather conditions" really annoys me especially when used for light drizzle somewhere else on the network (probably near Waterloo in SWT's case).  They must think no-one has ever been out of their house before, and secondly they must not realise how localised the weather can be - so using the 'all stations' option on the PA is ridiculous...

Any PA announcement to do with no smoking enforcement, either on trains or stations, is a waste of time - the people who still blatantly smoke on station platforms are clearly not doing it because they are unaware - as can be seen by the attempts to try and hide out of sight... 

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: grahame on March 14, 2013, 11:54:47
In my view, we're overannounced and overregulated and oversignposted - there's scope for a lot of things to be swept out leaving the important stuff more prominent, and more room for useful announcements / signs ... and perhaps a change for a bit of peace and quiet too.  The current set's made worse inmy pedants' mind at times - I'll tell you what I think (I ashamed to admit) when I hear the standard announcements

Keep your luggage with you at all times
   - Hard if going to the buffet or loo and travelling alone
   - Hard if using end of carriage luggage racks

Coaches A and G are the quiet carriages
   - So why are YOU making a noise announcing that in those carriages?

Please take all your belongings with you
   - I can't; I left some of my belongings at home

Please report anything suspicious to a police officer or ...
   - Is there a police officer even on this train?

Please show tickets for your entire journey
   - I can't; I have yet to buy my Chippenham to Melksham bus ticket when I get onto the bus at Chippenham


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swrural on March 14, 2013, 16:32:37

Any PA announcement to do with no smoking enforcement, either on trains or stations, is a waste of time - the people who still blatantly smoke on station platforms are clearly not doing it because they are unaware - as can be seen by the attempts to try and hide out of sight... 

Paul

Perhaps some of you are too young to remember this, but the tube trains used to have one smoking coach one removed from the driving end (each end? I can't remember).  Although I was a smoker then, I never smoked while travelling. So i sought out the NS coaches in the middle that smelt of perfume and after shave and in any case was where any eye candy was likely to be sat....

Anyway those smoking coaches were an absolute pigsty.  Not just from smoking paraphernalia but an all-out stinking tip.

 

 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: IndustryInsider on March 14, 2013, 20:08:30
I'm all for cutting down on some of these bloody annoying announcements.  Alter the Transec guidelines, so that the information only has to be displayed on the internal information screens where trains have them (which will soon be the vast majority of those in service), and limit announcements to calling points, delay information and occasional general service information.

One that annoys me is the habit some staff have of announcing that the train is arriving at Reading and then waffling on for ages about changing there for just about anywhere.  If you're travelling to Gatwick, Twyford, Basingstoke, the west country etc. etc. etc., you likely know that you have to change trains at Reading anyway!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ellendune on March 14, 2013, 20:55:08
Who are Transec?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: grahame on March 14, 2013, 21:02:59
Who are Transec?

I think this particular Transec is probably the one described at http://wiki.intellectuk.org/sr/index.php/TRANSEC (took a bit of finding!)  "TRANSEC is the Department for Transport's Transport Security and Contingencies Directorate"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on March 14, 2013, 21:15:47
They are a bit secretive and I struggled to find any primary legislation that forces TOCs to make the security announcements. It seems to be guidelines only.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 14, 2013, 22:36:41
Imagine going into a John Lewis store and hearing all the time:-
  Take care round the cosmetics counter in case any liquid has been dropped on the
   floor

  Take care when stepping on and off the escalators

  When leaving the door please note the doors are automatic

   Do not stop breathing to avoid dead bodies in the store

 Thet would soon lose customers.   


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: swrural on March 15, 2013, 10:47:42
Imagine going into a John Lewis store and hearing all the time:-
  Take care round the cosmetics counter in case any liquid has been dropped on the
   floor

  Take care when stepping on and off the escalators

  When leaving the door please note the doors are automatic

   Do not stop breathing to avoid dead bodies in the store

 Thet would soon lose customers.   

If that's the John Lewis in the Patchway Mall, then there is no chance of my ever giving them the trouble. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ray951 on March 15, 2013, 12:04:54
One of the many annoucements that  I find annoying is "Please note that train doors will close 40 seconds prior to departure".

Which seems reasonable if it ensurse that a train departs on time.

But it is meaningless as it is pretty much impossible to know when 40 seconds prior to departure is as trains rarely depart at exactly 0 seconds past their alloted time.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 15, 2013, 20:19:18
A passenger could turn up at 12 29 and 50 seconds to catch the 12 30 because that is the time the train is ADVERTISED to depart.   The timetable does not tell them they must be aboard by 12 29 and 20 seconds.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chuffed on March 19, 2013, 16:47:29

A train company will cut the amount of "tosh" announced on board after passenger research deemed it irrelevant.

First Great Western (FGW) said 40% of content was not useful, according to its survey of rail users.

"Mind the gap" will go, followed by no smoking announcements and informing people where first class is.

It comes after Transport Minister Norman Baker urged train operators to curb "excessive" announcements.

The changes will come into effect in May.

David Crome, FGW general manager, said: "Some of the things we do not need to say anymore - we have been through the announcement guide to rid it of all the tosh, the redundant, the irrelevant and the repetitive."

Continue reading the main story
^
Start Quote
Some of our colleagues have been saying the same thing for 20 years. It may take a little while for them to change habits^
End Quote
David Crome
 
FGW general manager
 
Research suggested passengers had psychologically trained themselves to tune out to all announcements.

"Change here for connecting services to ..." will be replaced with relevant information on departure times and platform numbers.

Mr Crome said: "Some of our colleagues have been saying the same thing for 20 years. It may take a little while for them to change habits."

But David Sidebottom, director at Passenger Focus, said the announcements were "vital".

He said: "On board announcements are important to many passengers to ensure, for instance, that they are aboard the correct train, have a valid ticket, or know when to prepare to alight.

"This repetitive information may be annoying to some passengers, but it is nevertheless vital for others."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 19, 2013, 18:10:05
Surprises me that Passenger Focus is taking that stance.   Some are vital and with which I agree, but there are too many useless and nanny state ones.    Many passengers regard them as a background noise due to the number of them.   There is already a thread on this topic on "The Wider Picture" Board  which had been moved from here due to it being a UK issue.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: broadgage on March 20, 2013, 15:05:01
Good, far too many announcements IMO, some of which are useless, pointless or simply wrong.

On HSTs at least, the location of first class is fairly clear and does not need anouncing. First class is already equiped with signs warning that a first class ticket is needed, it would a simple matter to replace these signs with ones that state in which direction standard class is to be found.
All areas of all trains have been non smoking for years, continual annoucments to this effect are not needed. A simple sign reading "no smoking in any part of the train" is all that is needed.

And on my favourite subject of dining, I can understand the desire to drum up trade for the restaurant if spaces remain, but what is the point in advertising it when already full ?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: mjones on March 20, 2013, 18:08:26
The article makes no mention of the pointless safety announcements (available in Braille upon request  ::) ). If this 'important information' really needs to be communicated, then surely the TOC has a duty to ensure that it is communicated effectively, and endlessly repeating a message that people simply switch off to is unlikely to fulfill that requirement. Which rather suggests that they don't really think it is important that people pay attention to it and are only doing it as a box-ticking exercise...



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 20, 2013, 20:38:24
There is already a thread on this topic on "The Wider Picture" Board which had been moved from here due to it being a UK issue.

Fair comment, phile.  I've therefore moved this topic and merged it with that existing discussion, in the interests of simplicity and continuity.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on March 20, 2013, 20:54:49
My impression is that this is very much a matter of personal preference, and whatever a train company does they'll always be on the receiving end of criticism.

As part of my training on the railway I've made my share of on-board announcements: the point I realized that the TOC can never win was on one particular train when after an announcement leaving the originating station, as I was walking through the train a couple of passengers thanked me for the helpful information. Then, a little further down, the passenger comment was "Was it you making that announcement?". "Yes," I answered, in the full and certain expectation that a compliment was on my way. "A f&*%ing deaf person could have heard that rubbish, turn the volume down or shut up next time." Charming...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 20, 2013, 21:03:05
For the benefit of those who haven't met him, our inspector_blakey can be rather noisy sometimes ...  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on March 20, 2013, 21:30:12
*cough*


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: inspector_blakey on March 20, 2013, 21:34:11
A passenger could turn up at 12 29 and 50 seconds to catch the 12 30 because that is the time the train is ADVERTISED to depart.   The timetable does not tell them they must be aboard by 12 29 and 20 seconds.

1230 is the advertised *departure* time. Departure time means wheels rolling. 40 seconds it probably verging on the excessive, but starting the train despatch procedure at T-30 seconds so that doors are closed and "rightaway" given in order that the wheels do start rolling at the advertised departure time is now virtually standard procedure.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 20, 2013, 21:43:43
There is already a thread on this topic on "The Wider Picture" Board which had been moved from here due to it being a UK issue.

Fair comment, phile.  I've therefore moved this topic and merged it with that existing discussion, in the interests of simplicity and continuity.
Thank you Chris.   I think this the second time it has been moved due to the UK wide issye.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: grahame on March 20, 2013, 21:54:24
A passenger could turn up at 12 29 and 50 seconds to catch the 12 30 because that is the time the train is ADVERTISED to depart.   The timetable does not tell them they must be aboard by 12 29 and 20 seconds.

1230 is the advertised *departure* time. Departure time means wheels rolling. 40 seconds it probably verging on the excessive, but starting the train despatch procedure at T-30 seconds so that doors are closed and "rightaway" given in order that the wheels do start rolling at the advertised departure time is now virtually standard procedure.

Indeed the timetable does state the departure time.  But it might be more logical to publish the last time that people can board, as is common practise with airline flights.  The time the wheels start to role is an operational matter, just as takeoff time with an aircraft is.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Southern Stag on March 20, 2013, 22:34:48
But what if tomorrow we decided that instead of all trains departing at the advertised time, that would be the time that doors were closed/locked. Effectively at the moment the process starts at 30 seconds before advertised departure time, and trains will leave as soon as the process is complete, even it is isn't quite on the minute exactly. If the whole process started 30 seconds later on all trains what would the difference be?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on March 21, 2013, 17:31:44
Unfortunately, the lay person may not be aware of the doors closing before departure time.   Should there not be a blanket warning on Timetables ?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: The Tall Controller on March 21, 2013, 18:20:14
As a train dispatcher in Cornwall I can say that 40 seconds is certainly needed on HSTs and especially Voyagers as it is the driver that has to close the doors so you need the time for the TM to buzz through.

For the smaller trains, I wait for 30 seconds before departure as the process is slightly quicker.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: trainer on March 21, 2013, 18:46:18
I'm not the most frequent of travellers, but I have seen clear announcements at all the main stations on posters on the platforms, scrolling displays and at barriers.  It is true that having arrived at the station it may be a bit late to read that you should have been there 40seconds ago, but another exhortation many seem to ignore is to arrive in plenty of time. 

I wonder if the time given for connections at stations should also be extended to include the time you should arrive at the station if starting there.  It can take quite a while to get from the bus stops or car park outside the two big Bristol stations to the relevant platform, especially if a ticket needs to be purchased.  Even Yatton needs an allowance if arriving in the car park on the opposite side from the departure platform.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TerminalJunkie on March 21, 2013, 19:05:32
As a train dispatcher in Cornwall I can say that 40 seconds is certainly needed on HSTs

Nobody's disputing it takes time to close the doors; there's just no need to do it before the advertised departure time.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: SandTEngineer on March 21, 2013, 21:19:15
If you look here http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/search/advanced and select any FGW station and then any train schedule you will often see a 30 second (in some cases more) difference between the Public departure time and the Working Timetable departure time so there is plenty of slack in the timetable for dispatching most trains (Note: this time is not recovery time which is separately recorded in another column).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: trainer on March 21, 2013, 22:26:10
Most interesting, SandT, and it seems to support Terminal Junkie's point.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Kim on May 13, 2013, 18:15:36
On board the 18:00 from Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington:

"First stop Bristol Spa" :D If only FGW could invent carriages in the same way, maybe Melksham would have a better service and passengers boarding at Keynsham wouldn't be paying to stand for 99 days out of 100.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on May 14, 2013, 01:37:54
I was on a CrossCountry Class 170 from Gloucester to Cardiff today (13/05/2013)

The noise in the carriage was almost unbearable. That was down to various loose panels rattling and squeaking at a frequency that was impossible to tune out of.

However, the only interruptions from the PA were the following Train Manager announcements:

"Approaching Chepstow"
"Arriving at Newport"
"Cardiff. All change"

I kid you not. That is all he said. And there were no automated announcements whatsoever. Nobody fell into a gap. The security services didn't destroy any baggage. Nobody was warned of dire consequences if they failed to retain their tickets or travel documents. Suspicious persons had free rein as we weren't told to look out for them and report them to member of staff or the British Transport Police. Nobody was told not to smoke.

Equally though, nobody was thanked for travelling with CrossCountry...

It it wasn't for the fact that the unit I was on appeared to be shaking itself to bits, the journey may have been almost enjoyable due to the lack of verbal diarrhoea over the PA.



As an aside. Was watching a British film from the mid 80s the other night (The Whistle Blower (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Whistle_Blower)) and there's a scene filmed at Cheltenham Spa station. The broad Westcountry accent over the PA made I laff. "This is Cheltenham Spar, Cheltenham Spar."

Got me thinking. No it's not. The Spar is over the road. Although it's now a Co-op.  :D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chuffed on May 14, 2013, 08:50:15
For true Wess Vinglun announcements you need sumwun loike  Dirk Robson of 'ow ter speak brizzle' fame, me luvver. Then we can all hear such delights as in are aerial  are Barf Sparrrr, Chipnum and Cheltnum, Xsturrr, Brigwough'er, wessun soooper mehr.

My favourite was the poster outside the Bristol Hippodrome some years ago. which said that 'Eva Turner, prima donna of the Carl Rosa Opera Company would be starring in Cavalliera Rusticana'. Then the BBC found some true Bristolians to read it aloud........


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Red Squirrel on May 14, 2013, 08:55:27
I rather miss the days when a real person would announce 'Bresta Tempa Meaze, thes es Bresta Tempa Meaze'. Gave the lie to them as thinks we call the place 'Bristle'; blow-ins every one of them. ;)

Does every TOC have its own announcement system, by the way? I always find myself rather irritated at Worcester when they announce trains calling at 'Keensham'; from it's location between Bristol and Bath I can only assume they mean 'Keynsham'...


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on May 14, 2013, 10:44:19
One that I often hears mispronounced is the stayshun between Doorlish and Newt'n Abbert.

Variously, Tayn-mouth, Tin-Mouth, Tayn-muth. My understanding is that it is, Tin-moof (rhymes with 'woof').


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bobm on May 14, 2013, 11:21:12
I was told by locals it is Tin-Muth but then again I have heard various different versions too.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: devon_metro on May 14, 2013, 11:40:33
I say "Tin-Muth"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: CLPGMS on May 14, 2013, 11:50:03
Oh for a return of the days when the announcer at Reading used to say "Red Ink, Red Ink".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: stuving on May 14, 2013, 12:22:56
I'm not sure right and wrong apply here: it's often more a case of what's appropriate for you given where you come from and your normal speaking accent. Imitating the local's version can be resented, as imitating their accent usually is. However, I reckon that some compromise is usually possible.

For example, I worked for many years in Linlithgow. There is a local version of this, "Lithgae" - but it's only used when talking (or versifying) in full dialect. No outsider would ever be expected to use it. I was living in Bo'ness, which is said with a strong stress on the 'e', and the 'o' almost disappearing. Imitating that stress pattern, rather than saying "Bowness", is quite OK, I think.

Likewise, I noticed ages ago I had subconsciously started saying Glasgow and Newcastle with a short (stressed) 'a', I imagine because the full southern English version sounds not only very foreign but rather posh too.

I can think of examples where the rules appear to be a bit different, though. I knew some people from the little village of Glassford, near Linlithgow, who called it "Glassurt". They were adamant that was just for the inhabitants, and even folk from Linlithgow - who might have exactly the same accent - were not expected to call it that.

Then there are places like East Anglia (my Mum came from Suffolk) or Aberdeenshire (where my Dad cam from), where they do far worse things to names. The differences there are bigger than just an accent, so most people end up with the locals' name but not in their accent: names like Happisburgh or Benachie can't really be correct if pronounced as spelled.

Don't most of us adapt our pronunciation (not just of names, either) to whoever listening - especially if they are outsiders or not native speakers of English (or Brizzle)? That involves shifting towards the standard (i.e. educated London) version, or even to be more like the spelling. Can an announcer do that? Arguably they should do, rather than try to sound like a local.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Red Squirrel on May 14, 2013, 12:27:28
I know nothing of 'Brizzle' - where might that be? ???

I take the point that there are places with 'just for locals' names, but Keynsham isn't one of them.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on May 14, 2013, 12:46:46
I say "Tin-Muth"

I think the odd pronunciations are probably done to avoid people accidentally ending up here:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/allan5819/4583143173/

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: stuving on May 14, 2013, 12:50:31
"To return to the question of the volume of announcements..."
Post was meant to go in thread \London to the West \Announcement volumes\ at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=12404.0, so I have moved it.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: chuffed on May 14, 2013, 12:54:23
I have also heard Teen=muff....thought that's what the local yokels aged between 13 and 19 wore round their neck when the wind whistles in off the English Channel. When it drops a bit ...the muff not the wind....don't they call it a snood ??
Needless to say they NEVER wear any sort of a coat.....


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Kim on May 14, 2013, 20:24:48
I know nothing of 'Brizzle' - where might that be? ???

I take the point that there are places with 'just for locals' names, but Keynsham isn't one of them.

Brizzle is Bristol.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: NickB on November 19, 2013, 18:11:24
Apologies if this question has already been asked and answered, and double-apologies because I feel like such a pedant for asking this, but...

Why is the announcement "there is express cafe aboard this service" and not "there is an express cafe aboard this service" ?

Isn't the name of the facility an 'Express Cafe'?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on November 19, 2013, 19:20:23
It is railway vocabulary. And, yes, it is pedantic to point it out, but it grates with me also.  :P

Rather like the police. Syntax mangled it gets.

My personal announcement bugbear, "...arriving into..."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bobm on November 19, 2013, 19:24:03
"...last and final call...."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on November 19, 2013, 19:47:51
"the next station stop".....

the next station call maybe, or the next stop, but the next station stop sounds so clumsy.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ChrisB on November 20, 2013, 10:32:48
The pedants took that apart when trains kept stopping at signals twixt stations....:-)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on November 20, 2013, 17:55:37
"Now arriving at London Paddington where this service will terminate"

Well done Train Manager Obvious... If the train tried to go any further there would be a dreadful mess and alot of awkward questions to answer... :-[


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: paul7575 on November 20, 2013, 18:08:08
"Now arriving at London Paddington where this service will terminate"

Well done Train Manager Obvious... If the train tried to go any further there would be a dreadful mess and alot of awkward questions to answer... :-[

It might have been a useful reminder at Chester this morning though...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-25016996

New bikes all round please...  ;D

Paul


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on November 20, 2013, 18:36:51
It might have been a useful reminder at Chester this morning though...

I've only just heard about that... Oh the irony at the timing of my post ;D Exactly that has happened :-X :-[

Thankfully no-one seriously hurt...!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Timmer on November 20, 2013, 18:47:05
Virgin trains have two spare driving cars to hand so the set involved in the incident today won't be out of service for long.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Ian01 on November 21, 2013, 10:02:50
Only one person was annoyed by this announcement.

This was on the London Underground early last year, on the Northern Line, and about to pull out of Old Street station.

The usual "please stand clear" announcement was issued, and the doors closed. Almost immediately, they flung open again.

After a short time they closed again, and almost immediately they opened yet again.

After a small delay they closed again, and the following announcement issued from the loudspeakers:

"Oi you. You in the grey coat, and the hat. Yes, you. Can you see those big red slidey things attached to the side of the train? You can? Good. Those slidey things are what the announcement "please stand clear of the closing doors" is referring to."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on November 21, 2013, 17:26:16
"Now arriving at London Paddington where this service will terminate"

Well done Train Manager Obvious... If the train tried to go any further there would be a dreadful mess and alot of awkward questions to answer... :-[

Train Manager Obvious here... I've been asked on the platform at Paddington which direction the train will go and also while on board is London the final station call, so not all of the travelling public may think it is obvious.

Having said that, I was travelling once and it grated me when it was continually announced "...we are now on the final approach to xxx..."


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on November 21, 2013, 18:23:24
"Now arriving at London Paddington where this service will terminate"

Well done Train Manager Obvious... If the train tried to go any further there would be a dreadful mess and alot of awkward questions to answer... :-[

This made me smile because on an HST departure from Paddington last night a passenger asked me which direction the service would be leaving in . When I answered their question they then thought that was strange as the engine was at the wrong end.

They then apologised for their question but they were infrequent train travellers

I'd kind of worked that bit out!

The the observant amongst youill have noticed my careful use of words to arvo us being sexist and revealing what gender the lady was.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on November 21, 2013, 23:03:49
The the observant amongst youill have noticed my careful use of words to arvo us being sexist and revealing what gender the lady was.

In that case I think you meant to say "Person" ... Mind you, you could have said "Blonde" before "Lady" so it could have been much worse! Perils of typing on a Smart Phone on the 18:06 again? :P ;D

I am to assume this poor lady has not heard of Push-Pull Services then, where the loco does not have to run around the carriages when it terminates. Still used widely in the UK with:

  • Eastcoast (InterCity 225 Electra Sets)
  • Virgin Trains Pretendolino (Class 90+Mk3+DVT) - No specific diagrams, used when required
  • GreaterAnglia Class 90+Mk3+DVT - Norwich - London Liverpool Street Services
  • Chiltern Railway Class 67+Mk3+DVT - Silver Service Trains
  • Arriva Trains Wales Class 67+Mk3+DVT - Occasional Class 57 and Mk2 Carriage Used - Premier North/South Wales Service
  • Some services in Scotland are Loco Hauled I believe too?!
  • Sleepers Deliberately omitted as the loco changes ends or another loco arrives to collect it

On the subject of infrequent travellers. I was aboard a Class 150 unit earlier this week and a lady who had perhaps had a little bit to drink asked me if the small area I was sat in between Train Doors and Drivers Cab was First Class... As a joke I said yes... Didn't expect her to believe me as she went off and sat somewhere else! :o

Oh if only that would happen on GreaterAnglia Class 321's to Southend Victoria ::) ;D :P ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on November 22, 2013, 05:07:20
The the observant amongst youill have noticed my careful use of words to arvo us being sexist and revealing what gender the lady was.

In that case I think you meant to say "Person" ... Mind you, you could have said "Blonde" before "Lady" so it could have been much worse! Perils of typing on a Smart Phone on the 18:06 again? :P ;D

I am to assume this poor lady has not heard of Push-Pull Services then, where the loco does not have to run around the carriages when it terminates. Still used widely in the UK with:

  • Eastcoast (InterCity 225 Electra Sets)
  • Virgin Trains Pretendolino (Class 90+Mk3+DVT) - No specific diagrams, used when required
  • GreaterAnglia Class 90+Mk3+DVT - Norwich - London Liverpool Street Services
  • Chiltern Railway Class 67+Mk3+DVT - Silver Service Trains
  • Arriva Trains Wales Class 67+Mk3+DVT - Occasional Class 57 and Mk2 Carriage Used - Premier North/South Wales Service
  • Some services in Scotland are Loco Hauled I believe too?!
  • Sleepers Deliberately omitted as the loco changes ends or another loco arrives to collect it

On the subject of infrequent travellers. I was aboard a Class 150 unit earlier this week and a lady who had perhaps had a little bit to drink asked me if the small area I was sat in between Train Doors and Drivers Cab was First Class... As a joke I said yes... Didn't expect her to believe me as she went off and sat somewhere else! :o

Oh if only that would happen on GreaterAnglia Class 321's to Southend Victoria ::) ;D :P ;)

Lol - for once my apparent mistake was deliberate....and I was thinking of including
 a "blonde" reference but decided two stereotypes in one post was too much !

And I know it's early but I have just realised about your reference to Southend Victoria - you are mischievous TT - I make that a stereotype hattrick between us!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: slanted on November 30, 2013, 20:07:08
My favourite is the PA on the H&C/Circle line platforms at Paddington: "The next westbound train has just departed Paddington" not exactly the next train for people waiting on the platform ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: didcotdean on November 30, 2013, 22:44:55
Now my favourite there was an exasperated non automated announcement which went along these lines.

"Customers waiting for the Circle Line train I said five minutes ago would be here by now - this train was sent to Hammersmith instead. If I had been told it was going to go to Hammersmith I would have told you. The next train that may remain a Circle Line train has just left Great Portland Street."

Not something you will hear with today's service pattern.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on November 30, 2013, 23:08:46
My favourite is the PA on the H&C/Circle line platforms at Paddington: "The next westbound train has just departed Paddington" not exactly the next train for people waiting on the platform ;)

Indeed this has often caught my attention as potentially one of the more useless PA announcements :)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Rhydgaled on December 01, 2013, 09:18:32
"Now arriving at London Paddington where this service will terminate"

Well done Train Manager Obvious... If the train tried to go any further there would be a dreadful mess and alot of awkward questions to answer... :-[
Actually, I would suggest that a service could call at Paddington without terminating and not make a mess, trains call at Swansea and Carmarthen without terminating. Nobody's likely to put a reversal at PAD as an intermediate call though I suppose.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Boppy on December 05, 2013, 13:58:24
I've noticed the  "The next westbound train has just departed Paddington" message at the Paddington H&C Underground too but have since realised that it's an automated one sent to all stations along the Hammersmith-Paddington branch and not just Paddington.

That doesn't excuse the fact that it shouldn't be broadcast at Paddington though!

Boppy.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: thetrout on December 05, 2013, 16:06:16
On the front of c2c Class 357's I've often seen it say sometimes: "Empty to Depot"

Who's driving the thing?? ;D :P


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: stebbo on December 10, 2013, 20:39:19
Best one I heard was years ago at Oxford in the 1970s. A train from Portsmouth to Liverpool Lime Street (remember them?) was due and the platform indicator showed a train to Bradford Exchange. The announcer started to recite the stops until he realised the mistake with a sudden "Who the f..... put that......" The platform indicator then changed and and he proceeded to go through the correct announcement with no qualms.

Nearly surpassed by a late running Hereford - Paddington train at Oxford also in the 1970s when the platform attendant announced "Will you all get on the b..... train so we can get this service f..... moving".

Mind you the current automated announcements don't work if trains get cancelled. Last week at Kingham (see other post about leaves and ice) the 0718 was cancelled and the automated announcer kept telling everyone about it only then to say the delayed 0618 would be along shortly - but I and several other passengers had nearly left the station. They need to find a way to intervene properly when things get disrupted.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on December 11, 2013, 10:07:44
Years ago at a smaller London station, I was trying to get to Chiswick. The departure time for the train was approaching, when the announcement was made: "We apologise for the cancellation of the 8:15 service to Chiswick. This is because of a b...... cock-up".

One I read in the paper was an apology for delayed services "because of a failed Virgin at Watford".


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: broadgage on December 11, 2013, 10:41:55
One of the most entertaining I have heard on a train was "this is the service to XYZ, may I remind the gentleman wearing a checked jacket who has just boarded the rear coach, that you owe me twenty pounds -------long pause-------mate" !

A hand written notice at a small station, years ago announced that a tresspasser had been killed "by a good train" ! and that delays would result.

At Waterloo East it was once announced that trains from Charing Cross were delayed due to "passengers fighting among themselves" (football related)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ray951 on December 11, 2013, 11:30:02
As heard last week on a SWT service between Southampton and Winchester.

Would the passenger smoking in the first coach please stop smoking otherwise this service will be terminated at the next station.

I would like to have seen them terminating the said service without causing a riot given how late it was (22:30) and how busy it was.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Brucey on December 15, 2013, 21:17:18
On the DLR:
"The next station is Canary Wharf.  Change here for London Underground services."  Fine
"The next station is Beckton, where this train terminates.  All change please."  OK, but see further down
"The next station is Bank, where this train terminates.  All change here for London Underground services".  Am I not allowed to exit the station here?  Why MUST I change for a London Underground service?

And one of my pet annoyances..... "All change please."  Fair enough, this has been around for years, but change for what?  What if I'm arriving at a terminus station and not changing for another service?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 15, 2013, 21:32:23
I find the "All change please, all change" strangely nostalgic, in an era of announcements that include the most inelegant "next station sop".  I'm sure everyone knows what it means, and the alternative of "You all have to get off now" would irritate me far more.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ellendune on December 15, 2013, 21:39:57
I find the "All change please, all change" strangely nostalgic, in an era of announcements that include the most inelegant "next station sop".  I'm sure everyone knows what it means, and the alternative of "You all have to get off now" would irritate me far more.

I agree, but perhaps it is not so clear to a new generation.  Or maybe it would be if we carried on using it.  If preceded by ".. where this train will terminate." All should be clear.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ChrisB on December 16, 2013, 10:44:57
It's short for "All change to other means of transport, please"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on December 16, 2013, 21:01:00
"Time, Gentlemen, please!"


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: JayMac on December 16, 2013, 21:06:30
"Time, Gentlemen, please!"

At 9:01pm?

I've just opened a bottle of Shiraz. You don't expect me to finish it in the 10 minutes allowed for drinking up do you?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Surrey 455 on December 21, 2013, 19:19:28
You don't expect me to finish it in the 10 minutes allowed for drinking up do you?

Wasn't that extended to 20 minutes many years ago?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: bobm on December 21, 2013, 19:27:43
It was indeed extended to 20 minutes, but then abolished in 2003. 

Pubs/clubs etc can now use their discretion on how long to allow people to remain on the premises after the sale of alcohol stops.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ChrisB on December 21, 2013, 20:59:29
coz they don't have to close unless their licence says so.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2013, 12:12:46
A few months ago I read an article declaring that FGW had cut announcements down.
Unsurprisingly this has turned out to be PR spin.
My recent travels on FGW have been accompanied by constant announcements that drone on and on.

Have any regular commuter found a difference?

It really isn't difficult! You only need two.

*We are now arriving at X.
*This train is for X; the next station is Y.

And please, none of this "arriving into". You cannot arrive into a place. You arrive at a place. Drives me up the wall!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Southern Stag on December 23, 2013, 13:26:03
I've noticed a drop in announcements. Generally all you get now is a the calling pattern and the obligatory security announcement. Some guards still give more information, but that's the exception nowadays.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: John R on December 23, 2013, 14:46:25
I think it's reduced. At least, I don't get so irritated by them so often.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: TonyK on December 23, 2013, 18:13:13
"Time, Gentlemen, please!"

At 9:01pm?

I've just opened a bottle of Shiraz. You don't expect me to finish it in the 10 minutes allowed for drinking up do you?

No, but I wouldn't rule it out.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ChrisB on December 27, 2013, 12:26:59
I've noticed a drop too.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 28, 2013, 00:46:37
Wow - I must have had a few bad examples of trains then!
The safety ones need to be cut now. There are clearly no enforced rules as LM, ATW, Chiltern etc manage to cope without them.
(Although I better not say that in case a Eurocrat in Brussels reads this forum and decides to get out the box of red tape and set up a committee to "harmonise" train announcements across the EUSSR)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 28, 2013, 00:56:03
A few months ago I read an article declaring that FGW had cut announcements down.

Yes, you read it here, on this forum: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=1715.msg128841#msg128841  ;)


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 28, 2013, 01:02:28
Of course! ;D


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on December 28, 2013, 08:52:54
Wow - I must have had a few bad examples of trains then!
The safety ones need to be cut now. There are clearly no enforced rules as LM, ATW, Chiltern etc manage to cope without them.
(Although I better not say that in case a Eurocrat in Brussels reads this forum and decides to get out the box of red tape and set up a committee to "harmonise" train announcements across the EUSSR)

We are told the security announcement is still required, even with the reduced announcement changes. It's put in writing so guards will continue to make it.

If the DfT/TRANSEC do not have an issue with other TOCs not making the announcements then that's their business, but clearly the requirement has come from somewhere. Perhaps it is because we do not have PIS displaying it on HSTs?


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: grahame on December 28, 2013, 09:11:30
We are told the security announcement is still required, even with the reduced announcement changes. It's put in writing so guards will continue to make it.

Now I was told that one of the great ways to help ensure better security is to make its checking and enforcement stronger but more occasional. I have a hat here that I may be talking through, but I see open stations across many parts or Europe, and not-always but reasonably often checking on trains. Probably much less expensive to run - certainly a lot of equipment saved (and dare I say fewer people to do it?) and I suspect it's very effective.   It does need adequate ticketing facilities at places like Trowbridge where, incredibly, you can't buy a ticket after 14:50 on a Saturday, nor collect pre-purchased tickets, and that with a footfall of over 750,000 per annum.

How does this relate to security announcements?   Perhaps they would be more effective on one journey in 10 ... if the last digit of the train code coincides with the last digit of the day of the month.  So today - 28th - you'll have no security announcements on 1A77 and 1A79, but you will have them on 1A78.



Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: stebbo on December 28, 2013, 09:45:28
One that gets me is the "Mind the gap between train and platform edge" used regularly. OK so it's needed at places like Bank on the Central Line but not at other "normal" stations. Surely people don't need to be told the b...... obvious.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on December 28, 2013, 19:53:02
A gap is the norm and little different to stepping off some pavements to cross the road.    There would only be something abnormal if the train was wedged tight against the platform.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 28, 2013, 20:43:43
Look - they should be scrapped. End of.

People "zone out" of repetitive announcements, so they become of no use whatsoever. Not just commuters, the typical one off traveller will hear mind the gap several dozen times in one trip!

They also state the bleeding obvious. No-one leaves their bags around these days as they don't want it nicked! We need to get people to take responsibility for their own actions and shift it away from other people. The culture needs to change.

1) Mind the gap should ONLY be used if there is a significant gap - a la Worcester Foregate Street platform 1 (which, if boarding a train with doors 1/3 along the carriage, must be one of the biggest in the UK).

2) Take your belongings/ if you see anything suspicious/ security personnel tour this station etc... 100% pointless - scrap. It also lets terrorists win as we are "striking fear" into people.

3) Smoking. 100% pointless - scrap (I was on a station in Kent recently; a chav lit a fag, shortly after there was an auto no smoking announcement; shock horror, the chav ignored it!

4) Wet weather - scrap. It's insulting and common sense.

5) Fast trains through platform - I'll allow this (having changed at Dicot in the past 8) :o )

6) This is coach no - scrap, unless the train is going to split or there are short platforms. Otherwise, no-one cares.

7) The buffet sells - scrap, put a menu in each carriage, or make it brief (and done by the guard so we don't have 2 long announcements after each stop)

I'm sure there are more, but you get the picture. Trains and stations are fast becoming noise polluted areas.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on December 28, 2013, 21:17:58
No-one leaves their bags around these days as they don't want it nicked!

Any proof to back up your claim?  However, you are of course correct, and the lost property offices across the network will be closing in due course...  ;)

Quote
2) Take your belongings/ if you see anything suspicious/ security personnel tour this station etc... 100% pointless - scrap. It also lets terrorists win as we are "striking fear" into people.

While there is nothing funny about terrorism, the thought of terrorists sitting there laughing at the fact that rail passengers are being subjected to a security announcement and therefore they have "won" is unlikely...

Quote
4) Wet weather - scrap. It's insulting and common sense.

I agree it's common sense, but sadly in the world we live in, while it might be insulting to most/you, if it stops just one person being able to call 0800-SUE-FGW, then it's not going anywhere.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: phile on December 28, 2013, 21:58:19
Yes. There may be opinions in  favour of some announcements, but you only hear them in the Rail Industry.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on December 29, 2013, 11:37:40
Yes. There may be opinions in  favour of some announcements, but you only hear them in the Rail Industry.

Not sure which announcements you are referring to there? 

Security you get in aviation and many many other places.. Duty Free and other food/beverage offerings are announced on planes, as are smoking announcements too.  Fog warnings on motorways?  It's obvious there is fog, but people don't get insulted by being told the obvious do they?  Things like "Mind the Gap" you only hear on the rail industry because that situation is pretty unique to rail/underground.  If you asked anyone, "do you intend to fall down the side of the train and platform?", they will of course say no, yet there are still numerous injuries across the network, and sadly again, "well I wasn't warned!" would no doubt appear in a law suit...

To be clear, i'm all for "less is more", i'm just trying to get across the possible reasons why certain announcements refuse to go - the vast majority of us don't actually want to make endless announcements, and remember a lot of our more "senior" staff may find it tough to stop old habits, after decades of saying the same thing!


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Btline on December 29, 2013, 14:53:55
Yes. There may be opinions in  favour of some announcements, but you only hear them in the Rail Industry.

Indeed! Although it is spreading. At the end of an escalator in Birmingham Library there is a constant repetitive announcement warning people that they are near the end of the escalator! You couldn't make it up. I wish I was.

Your example re: lawsuits is a poor reason. If you do announcements to prevent lawsuits, then you end up in a never ending circle that gradually removes all responsibility from people and the Nanny State takes over.

There needs to be a change in the culture. At the moment it's "I know my right". It needs to be "I know my responsibilities".
Starting with fewer safety announcements. And then if somebody does sue after injure themselves by slipping over in wet weather, the judge needs to tell them to take responsibility for their own lives and throw the case out (unless it is clear negligence by the other party).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Super Guard on December 29, 2013, 15:00:51
Your example re: lawsuits is a poor reason. If you do announcements to prevent lawsuits, then you end up in a never ending circle that gradually removes all responsibility from people and the Nanny State takes over.

There needs to be a change in the culture. At the moment it's "I know my right". It needs to be "I know my responsibilities".
Starting with fewer safety announcements. And then if somebody does sue after injure themselves by slipping over in wet weather, the judge needs to tell them to take responsibility for their own lives and throw the case out (unless it is clear negligence by the other party).

I agree with your sentiment, the judges of this country have not helped matters in the slightest, but whether you think it's a poor reason or not, you may feel differently if it was your personal balance sheet that could take a hammering.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: ellendune on December 29, 2013, 15:36:43
Your example re: lawsuits is a poor reason. If you do announcements to prevent lawsuits, then you end up in a never ending circle that gradually removes all responsibility from people and the Nanny State takes over.

Unless you regard the Judiciary as the state, how can this be the Nanny State takes over.  The real Nannys are so called H&S reps who have never done a real job in  their lives and only know how to see a risk rather than assess it and decide whether it is reasonable and what it would be reasonable to reduce that risk if it is unacceptable. 


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: 4064ReadingAbbey on December 29, 2013, 16:35:34
Your example re: lawsuits is a poor reason. If you do announcements to prevent lawsuits, then you end up in a never ending circle that gradually removes all responsibility from people and the Nanny State takes over.

Unless you regard the Judiciary as the state, how can this be the Nanny State takes over.  The real Nannys are so called H&S reps who have never done a real job in  their lives and only know how to see a risk rather than assess it and decide whether it is reasonable and what it would be reasonable to reduce that risk if it is unacceptable. 

Part, at least, of the problem is that there seem to be too many people who can't distinguish between a 'hazard' (in the sense of a potential source of danger) and a 'risk' (a possibility of danger).


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: stebbo on December 31, 2013, 15:50:08
What's also needed is for the courts to be more robust. I was heartened a few years back to read of a judge that threw out a case where somebody sued a cafe because they burnt their lip on a hot cup of coffee. As the judge pointed out if the coffee had been cold the customer would soon have complained.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: martyjon on August 27, 2017, 19:01:09
I'm sure the first of my beefs have been mentioned before on this board ;-

Please stand clear on platform n, the next rain is not scheduled to stop, e.g. Weymouth.

Why not, the next train to arrive at platform n will form the hh:mm service to (destination).


Second beef, heard at Warminster yesterday waiting for a service post Imberbus event ;

For safety reasons passengers are requested to stand behind the yellow lines except when boarding or alighting from trains.

NO YELLOW LINES AT WARMINSTER ON EITHER PLATFORM.

Why not, for safety reasons passengers are requested to stand well back from the platform edge except when boarding or alighting from trains.

I agree the yellow line message is better than nothing at all but young children on the platform were asking mums and dads where the yellow lines were and were looking for them over the platform edge.


Title: Re: Station and on board train announcements - merged topic, ongoing discussion
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on August 27, 2017, 19:39:59
I agree the yellow line message is better than nothing at all but young children on the platform were asking mums and dads where the yellow lines were and were looking for them over the platform edge.

That is indeed counter-productive, and rather scary.  :o




This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net