Great Western Coffee Shop

Sideshoots - associated subjects => Campaigns for new and improved services => Topic started by: Oberon on March 30, 2016, 08:31:02



Title: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: Oberon on March 30, 2016, 08:31:02
At long last a decision appears to have been made regarding the route of the Oxford-Cambridge Varsity Line. Perhaps, if we're lucky, and if we believe the govt. will support Andrew Adonis' infrastructure committee's recommendations, something might happen in CP6?

http://www.bedfordtoday.co.uk/news/business/business-news/bedford-sandy-rail-link-gets-the-go-ahead-1-7301673


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2016, 09:43:11
Not sure why the subject line mentions Bristol - this is confirmation of Bltechley-Cambridge.

There are many restrictions as to why Bristol - Cambridge won't happen for at least a decade.


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: paul7575 on March 30, 2016, 10:13:26
Yet again a news outlet uses the phrase 'gets the goahead' for what is only an early single step in the process.  The NR announcement is a 'preferred corridor' and IMHO is basically a way of ruling out some of the fantasy suggestions.    It isn't a mapped route yet, as is plain from NR's whole statement.

It won't seriously be the goahead until someone funds it.

Paul


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2016, 10:14:43
And that only comes after the route is defined. CP6? someone's dreaming


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: Oberon on March 30, 2016, 17:51:22
Alright - perhaps CP8...


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: IndustryInsider on March 30, 2016, 18:10:18
With momentum and Adonis and his big hitters behind it, I predict it'll be rushed through.  So, end of CP7 - which won't actually exist by then as Hendy/Carne/DfT will have changed the whole Control Period structure to better reflect longer term investment strategy.


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2016, 18:12:40
A decade or so hence, I'd agree


Title: Re: Bristol-Cambridge
Post by: John R on March 30, 2016, 21:06:02
I have a particular interest in this proposal, having lived in the early 90s in a property built on the former trackbed in Sandy. Indeed I still have a study published by the EWR Consortium dated Jan 96 which looks remarkably similar to the current proposal (except that it proposed no new line east of Sandy).

So 20 years on, and we haven't even started the massively difficult task of reinstating a line which was only taken out of use in 1993 and is still broadly intact (Claydon to Bletchley).

Given the challenges that now exist, firstly in Bedford, then the development to the north of Sandy in the last 20 years, and the need to cross the ECML, I wouldn't bet on the line being started within the next 10 years.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net