Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Fare's Fair => Topic started by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 01:53:26



Title: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 01:53:26
From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33008010):

Quote
End of the line for rail compensation vouchers

Millions of rail passengers who suffer travel delays will soon be able to claim refunds in cash, after a major policy change, the BBC has learned. Up to now most train companies have only offered vouchers as compensation.

The voucher system has long been criticised by consumer groups, as vouchers cannot always be used online or to access the cheapest fares. The Rail Delivery Group, representing train operators and Network Rail, said the change would come in this summer.

"Planned changes to the National Rail Conditions of Carriage will enable passengers to claim their compensation in cash, instead of rail vouchers," said a spokesman. "This will be a welcome move for passengers."

It is not yet known whether customers with existing vouchers will be able to swap them for cash.

'Our money'

The move marks a major change in policy, as the current voucher system has been in place for around 20 years.

The news was welcomed by Transport Focus, which has campaigned on the issue for some time. James Daley, a consumer expert with Fairer Finance, called it "a victory for common sense".

It was also welcomed by Budd Shenkin and his wife Ann, two Californian tourists who were frustrated by the voucher system. After paying for first-class tickets on a train from Inverness to Edinburgh last month, they boarded the train to find no first class available. When they tried to get a refund at the ticket office, they were told they could only have vouchers - of little use to a couple only in the UK on holiday.

"They sold us seats that didn't exist - and then wouldn't give us our money back," said Ann, a retired lawyer.

But her husband Budd said he was pleased to see that good sense had now prevailed. "Implementation is always an issue, however," he told the BBC. "Nothing short of putting a credit onto the customer's credit card without a physical visit to the office should be acceptable."

After being approached by the BBC, ScotRail eventually agreed to refund their money.

Delay Repay

However, Transport Focus is still concerned that too few people claim refunds when their trains are delayed. In a survey published in 2013, it found that 88% of passengers entitled to compensation did not bother to ask for it.

And that's despite the fact that the rules on compensation have been widely toughened up. Nearly half of the 26 train operators have adopted the so-called Delay Repay guarantee, which means passengers are entitled to redress after a delay of as little as 30 minutes. Furthermore, those train companies cannot get out of paying by claiming that the delay was not their fault, because they, in their turn, can claim compensation from Network Rail if the delay was caused by signalling problems or other network issues.

The companies not signed up to Delay Repay usually offer compensation when a train is at least 60 minutes late.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33008010 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33008010)

Somewhat out of the blue is this announcement. Very welcome it is too. Implementation and logistics will be interesting. Particularly when it's one TOC receiving the request for compensation and another TOC responsible for compensating for the delay. Will it be cheques issued by post? A requirement for card/bank details to process payments? Vouchers exchangeable for cash?* Or multiple options? The devil will be in the detail.


*The Southern Railway brand of Govia Thameslink Railway already offer this.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 09:02:08
Cheque where payment made by that method/cash & credit to same card that was used for payment seems logical.

Frankly I wouldn't want a cheque. The hassle in paying it in outweighs the usefulness of this change. Would hope the option for vouchers continues. I'm likely to be buying tickets far more oftrn that I visit a bank branch.

Can't see cash being an option, too much admin


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 09:04:23
And what happens if you don't have a bank account?...some don't...


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TaplowGreen on June 06, 2015, 09:33:17
Good news - if I pay for something in cash/by card, why shouldn't I receive it back in the same way?

I


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: NickB on June 06, 2015, 09:55:15
Tfl moved to refunding directly to bank accounts last year, which saved me accumulating 100+ vouchers from them each year. Works much better in my view.

I will miss peeving the ticketing staff by turning up with several hundred vouchers to offset my annual season ticket purchase (takes over an hour to process) as it has become a tradition, but we have to roll with the times.

When do we get delay repay btw?


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 13:38:02
Delay Repay will be introduced on or by the first anniversary of the next franchise start date. So, on or before 20th September 2016.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Brucey on June 06, 2015, 16:02:24
I don't see why the claim forms cannot have an option for the customer to choose their repayment preference, either cheque or payment into bank account.  Maybe the cheque could be payable for cash at the drawing bank for those without bank accounts.

Refunding to a credit/debit card would add an extra complexity, especially where the ticket retailer is not the compensating TOC.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 16:09:26
I don't see why the claim forms cannot have an option for the customer to choose their repayment preference, either cheque or payment into bank account.  Maybe the cheque could be payable for cash at the drawing bank for those without bank accounts.

Coo, when disd you last see an uncrossed cheque? Not possible, and hasn't been for years.

Quote
Refunding to a credit/debit card would add an extra complexity, especially where the ticket retailer is not the compensating TOC.

Agreed - and the card processing companies fine you for holding onto card details beyond, I think, a few weeks anyway....


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Brucey on June 06, 2015, 16:16:34
I don't see why the claim forms cannot have an option for the customer to choose their repayment preference, either cheque or payment into bank account.  Maybe the cheque could be payable for cash at the drawing bank for those without bank accounts.

Coo, when disd you last see an uncrossed cheque? Not possible, and hasn't been for years.
Crossing a cheque with "account payee only" makes it non-transferable (s81A, Bill of Exchanges Act 1882 as amended).  There is nothing stopping the TOC and their bank arranging a system to allow the cashing of such an instrument.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 16:23:08
Sorry, I think your wrong.

"Account Payee only" means what you say it does.

Crossing a cheque (or any instrument like a postal order, means it has to be paid into an account & is not encashable.

Both means it can only be paid into an account in the name of the payee.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TaplowGreen on June 06, 2015, 16:44:39
........surely a facility can be put in place whereby the customer could just present their tickets with a claim form at "any manned station" and get a refund via cash or card?

If it's a different TOC then they can have the discussion with each other afterwards and recharge as necessary.............customer is supposed to come first, remember? Especially where something has gone wrong?


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 16:46:58
Sorry, I think your wrong.

"Account Payee only" means what you say it does.

Crossing a cheque (or any instrument like a postal order, means it has to be paid into an account & is not encashable.

Both means it can only be paid into an account in the name of the payee.

Less than six months ago I received a cheque from British Gas for which I had the option to cash it at any branch BG's bank, HSBC. I did just that rather than wait for clearance.

It can be done.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 17:11:00
It can - likely it was uncrossed....


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 17:12:11
........surely a facility can be put in place whereby the customer could just present their tickets with a claim form at "any manned station" and get a refund via cash or card?

If it's a different TOC then they can have the discussion with each other afterwards and recharge as necessary.............customer is supposed to come first, remember? Especially where something has gone wrong?

The TOCs, quite rightly, would want paying for the staff involved in this....


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TaplowGreen on June 06, 2015, 17:19:33
........surely a facility can be put in place whereby the customer could just present their tickets with a claim form at "any manned station" and get a refund via cash or card?

If it's a different TOC then they can have the discussion with each other afterwards and recharge as necessary.............customer is supposed to come first, remember? Especially where something has gone wrong?

The TOCs, quite rightly, would want paying for the staff involved in this....

....the savings they will be making from not having to constantly send out vouchers will help with that.

Why not suggest solutions rather than constantly flagging up problems?


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 17:30:22
Coz I can't see one that works for the same cost as that contracted currently.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 17:30:55
It can - likely it was uncrossed....

There is nothing stopping a TOC doing the same, ChrisB.

You said Brucey was wrong on that point though. You also said it's not possible for a cheque to be uncrossed any more and then, a few posts later, say my cheque was likely uncrossed. Make up your mind.  ::)

Along with my British Gas cheque, I've seen other cheques issued by HMRC that are cashable at banks or post offices.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 17:34:42
I will research further when I have time, looks as though the banks have developed something reasonably recently.

I know I'm right around Postal Orders though - crossing them makes them uncashable & A/C Payee means being paid into an account in the payee's name - so it's only cheques that appear to have changed.

Maybe they have reintroduced uncrossed cheques.

I can't see them issuing cashable vouchers though. too much chance of fraud. I hope they retain the vouchers too, although that would bump up the cost of having both schemes - I suspect an easing of the 'cheque available over ^30' that they have now.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 06, 2015, 17:45:06
Coz I can't see one that works for the same cost as that contracted currently.

I can't see them issuing cashable vouchers though. too much chance of fraud. I hope they retain the vouchers too, although that would bump up the cost of having both schemes - I suspect an easing of the 'cheque available over ^30' that they have now.

So, it's vastly more expensive for Southern Railway to allow their RTVs to be cashed at their stations? And they have continued to offer this facility despite your assertion that there is too much chance of fraud.

Cashable vouchers is a solution that many other TOCs could implement. Not a total solution mind you - other options will be needed for the likes of CrossCountry and Serco Caledonian Sleeper who do not operate stations. Uncrossed cheques perhaps?  :P

Direct payments to a bank account (you provide the details when claiming delay compensation) would be the best and least administratively complex solution in my opinion. I can't see that being more costly to administer than raising and issuing RTVs. Foreign tourists may need another solution, but then the current offer of RTVs is hardly suited to them any way.

As for the current option of a cheque 'if over ^30'. Not all operators currently explicitly offer this.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 18:00:06
So, it's vastly more expensive for Southern Railway to allow their RTVs to be cashed at their stations? And they have continued to offer this facility despite your assertion that there is too much chance of fraud.

Cashable vouchers is a solution that many other TOCs could implement. Not a total solution mind you - other options will be needed for the likes of CrossCountry and Serco Caledonian Sleeper who do not operate stations.

I wasn't aware that Southern allowed their vouchers to be cashed - presumably only at the stations they operate?

They will need a complete 'one size fits all' solution. As we all agree, customers see the railway as a single operator generally & won't understand any differences in obtaining 'cash' compensation. It'll be cheques, whether they will be cashable, and where, will be the sticking point. If it's coming in this year, I suspect it'll simply be the 'ordinary' cheque. In which case, they need to keep the vouchers for those of us that buy tickets more often than they go to their bank....


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Brucey on June 06, 2015, 21:21:30
Cashable vouchers is a solution that many other TOCs could implement. Not a total solution mind you - other options will be needed for the likes of CrossCountry and Serco Caledonian Sleeper who do not operate stations. Uncrossed cheques perhaps?  :P
Cashable vouchers would also prove a problem for those claiming from TOCs which are not local to them.  I'm not going to make a trip to Scotland just to cash a voucher from ScotRail, for example.  Uncrossed cheques clearly a good solution for non-bank account holders :p

Foreign tourists may need another solution, but then the current offer of RTVs is hardly suited to them any way.
I claimed a refund for a delay from a Swedish bus (yes, bus) operator due to a road traffic incident.  They refunded my fare, paid up to 300SEK (about ^23) for taxi/petrol and offered to transfer the money to any bank account in a SEPA (Single Euro Payments Area) country.  Although the form was in Swedish, the helpdesk at the bus station were incredibly helpful in filling out this form, even providing service with a smile.  I can just imagine the service one would receive in this country if you were to ask for help filling in a delay repay form in English at a station, let alone in a foreign language.

On the subject of British Gas cheques, I think the attached letter answers the A/C payee only scenario...


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 21:45:07
But what's the point of 'A/C Payee' then? Crazy & odd


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Brucey on June 06, 2015, 21:47:01
But what's the point of 'A/C Payee' then? Crazy & odd
It stops the cheque being transferable.  British Gas require ID to be shown at HSBC to cash the cheque, alternatively it can be paid into an account in that name.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 06, 2015, 21:49:11
Yeah, sorry, I meant being crossed....which absolutely definitely prevented encashment back a decade ago for sure.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 07, 2015, 19:21:18
Ah, you cannot live in the past, ChrisB ...  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 07, 2015, 21:08:51
But that doesn't explain why postsl orders still operste that way


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on June 07, 2015, 22:08:59
The what do what?  ::)

I'm at a loss as to whether you are agreeing that some cheques can be cashed at the issuing bank. At a loss as to what Postal Orders have to do with the price of fish. At a loss that you think British Gas (and HMRC for that matter - no doubt others) are crazy and odd for issuing such cashable cheques.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: LiskeardRich on June 07, 2015, 23:49:00
I had a cheque from ecotricity that could either be paid into my bank the traditional way, or taken to a post office with proof of ID and proof of address to swap for cash not too long ago so certainly seems a popular choice still.

With the growing cost of postage, I imagine BACS transfer to be the cheapest option.
Have an electronic claim form online, which the majority of customers in this day and age would use. Scan, or add a photo of your tickets to the site (I'm assuming their is a unique way of verifying a ticket from what is visible?) An admin team approve, and issue a BACS run. An electronic notification is then issued to the customer.
Will save the cost of running a cheque facility, as well as 2 x lots of postage (once for the customer, once for the TOC) and will likely reduce admin time, as cheques often have to be signed by certain named employees, where as any member of staff could in theory be given a mandate for BACS refunds.
From a business point of view cheques are extremely expensive to issue compared to other methods. Bruceys scanned letter would of cost them more to issue than the cheque is worth.

Edit- just checked a HSBC banking business fees tariff I have lying around. With HSBC for those with electronic business banking there is an 80p per cheque paid fee chargeable, whereas a BACS payment is free. For non electronic business banking 68p charge per cheque paid, and 23p per BACS payment.
Take the electronic account option and time we print a cover letter or compliment slip to go with the cheque probably easily looking at ^1.50 cost per refund, yet free to issue the BACS refund, a cover letter would be polite but not necessary.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: stuving on June 08, 2015, 00:17:38
For my "Huzar v Jet2.com" payment of ^250, BA said this:

Quote
The fastest and most secure way to settle your claim is by bank transfer to a UK account.  I will be happy to arrange this for you.  Please provide the following information so I can set up your bank transfer:

    Bank name
    Branch name
    Sort code (6 digits)
    Account number (8 digits)

If you would like to fax us your details our fax number is ... or you can send your details by email.  Please feel free to send more than one email or fax if you are concerned about providing all your information at once, and include your case reference number on all correspondence.

I'm not sure what they would offer instead if you declined BACS. It does lack any error-checking, for which reason BIC/IBAN is better (but much longer). I imagine that the reason for asking for the bank's name and branch (not needed for BACS) is to let them check that at least.

In principle there should be no risk in making account numbers public, but only if banks will promise never to use them as ID. I did send part of the data by fax, but BA lost it.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: thetrout on June 08, 2015, 00:31:54
Postal Orders can still be purchased uncrossed


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 08, 2015, 09:37:46
Indeed they can - and if left uncrossed, cashed.

However, if crossed, they *have* to be deposited to a bank account - and if A/C Payee added, into an account in the payees name (ie not transferable)

I was saying that cheques used to operate in the same way....it appears they no longer do, although still printed with A/C Payee & crossed. Seems to be odd that these rules don't apply to cheques any longer.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: stuving on June 08, 2015, 09:46:25
Indeed they can - and if left uncrossed, cashed.

However, if crossed, they *have* to be deposited to a bank account - and if A/C Payee added, into an account in the payees name (ie not transferable)

I was saying that cheques used to operate in the same way....it appears they no longer do, although still printed with A/C Payee & crossed. Seems to be odd that these rules don't apply to cheques any longer.

I think that misses the point. Look at it this way:

BG send you a letter, on part of which is printed a cheque. That can be paid into an account, as determined by statute. BG and their bankers HSBC offer an extra facility, whereby if you bring back the whole letter they will take back the cheque (and in effect cancel it) and treat it as a cash voucher. Nothing to stop them doing that if they want to - and it does not involve the law about cheques at all.

As it happens, they demand the same ID as would be suitable for opening a bank account (perhaps with some limitations) in any case. So you might say they have opened and account, paid in the cheque, and closed the account paying you out the money. However, I don't suppose they could really do that without even telling you about it.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on June 08, 2015, 09:51:50
yes, that makes sense


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Tim on June 08, 2015, 10:00:43
I don't see why the claim forms cannot have an option for the customer to choose their repayment preference, either cheque or payment into bank account.  Maybe the cheque could be payable for cash at the drawing bank for those without bank accounts.

Refunding to a credit/debit card would add an extra complexity, especially where the ticket retailer is not the compensating TOC.

As the person in my firm responsible for compliance with the anti-money laundering rules, I can see very well why a ToC would want to insist that repayment was made to the same card/account that payment was received from. 


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TonyK on June 08, 2015, 17:10:47
But what's the point of 'A/C Payee' then? Crazy & odd

It establishes the principle that the cheque is a non-negotiable instrument of payment. More importantly to the law, it protects the person with the true entitlement to the money from "conversion" of that entitlement by another by fraud. If you are not the proper payee, it doesn't matter how the cheque got into your account, the money ain't yours.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on July 02, 2015, 20:05:55
Compensation for delays will be available in 'money' from 19th July 2015. On this date a new National Rail Conditions of Carriage comes into effect. This specifies that the choice of how compensation is paid rests with the passenger: 'Money' or Rail Travel Vouchers. How 'money' compensation is paid will depend on the payment method used to purchase the ticket.

From the National Rail Conditions of Carriage (http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/static/documents/content/NRCOC_effective_from_19_July_2015.pdf#page=20) (from July 19th 2015):

Quote
Compensation will be paid in rail travel vouchers or, at your request, in money. This will be by means of a refund to the debit or credit card used to pay for your ticket or, at the Train Company^s discretion, in notes and coins, a cheque or a bank transfer payment (usually referred to as a BACS payment).


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TonyK on July 03, 2015, 16:06:56
Compensation for delays will be available in 'money' from 19th July 2015. On this date a new National Rail Conditions of Carriage comes into effect. This specifies that the choice of how compensation is paid rests with the passenger: 'Money' or Rail Travel Vouchers. How 'money' compensation is paid will depend on the payment method used to purchase the ticket.


Refund to my credit card will do me fine. Just don't ask for my 3% cashback back.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on July 19, 2015, 06:42:43
From today compensation is available in 'money'. Cash, cheque, direct bank transfer, or refund to credit/debit card.

Rail delays: Passengers to get cash compensation - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-33583904

That article has incorrect information about minimum levels of compensation. The new National Rail Conditions of Carriage mandates a minimum of 50% of the cost of the effected portion of the journey for delays of an hour or more. Many TOCs are more generous than this though.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: TaplowGreen on July 19, 2015, 09:20:29
Good news indeed.

Is there any news yet on compensation for season ticket holders in respect of the recent strikes?


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: bobm on July 19, 2015, 10:51:20
As I use my business account to buy tickets and therefore get charged for each debit and credit entry I would rather have vouchers IF only they could be used on line.

Having already paid to use my card to buy them and then been charged for the credit back I would rather not pay charges AGAIN to purchase a second ticket.

However as vouchers can currently only be used at booking offices I guess the money I pay in bank charges would be offset by not having to go to the station with vouchers which cannot be used on line.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Brucey on July 19, 2015, 20:43:02
Do any TOCs (other than Southern) exchange their RTVs for cash?  I have a few at home from a variety of operators but never use a booking office any more (my usual station is TVM only and advance fares are bought online).


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: sanfrandragon on July 20, 2015, 09:33:16
Good news indeed.

Is there any news yet on compensation for season ticket holders in respect of the recent strikes?

As of 13th July Maidenhead ticket office told me comp was yet to be decided.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on July 20, 2015, 10:22:42
Do any TOCs (other than Southern) exchange their RTVs for cash?  I have a few at home from a variety of operators but never use a booking office any more (my usual station is TVM only and advance fares are bought online).

As far as I'm aware vouchers issued both prior to and post changes to the Conditions of Carriage remain non exchangeable for cash, excepting those issued by Southern.



Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on July 20, 2015, 11:35:41
Good news indeed.

Is there any news yet on compensation for season ticket holders in respect of the recent strikes?

As of 13th July Maidenhead ticket office told me comp was yet to be decided.

I understand that if you enquire again, you'll find that monthly & longer NON L&TV seasons have been granted two void days.


There was sufficient a service on L&TV such that only delay compensation on the advertised amended-in-advance timetable is on offer


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on July 21, 2015, 22:55:24
First Great Western have decided that if you want a cash refund it will be at the rates published in the National Rail Conditions of Carriage. If you opt for Rail Travel Vouchers it will be at the rates published in their Passenger's Charter. By my reckoning that means:

High Speed Services If you are delayed by more than an hour on a long distance service you can have 100% of the cost of your single ticket in RTVs or 50% in RTVs if it's a return ticket. If you want cash it's 50% of the cost of a single ticket and 50% of the cost of the relevant portion of a return ticket. That means 25% of the price paid for a return ticket.

London & Thames Valley On LTV services you can get compensation in RTVs that is 50% of the cost of your ticket (single or return) if your journey is of an hour or more and you are delayed by an hour or more, or if your journey is less than an hour and you are delayed by over 30 minutes. If you want cash, as per the NRCoC, your delay has to be over an hour regardless of scheduled journey length and it's 50% of the cost of a single ticket and 50% of the cost of the relevant portion of a return ticket. That means 25% of the price paid for a return ticket.

West Services On local and suburban services in the west, south west and south coast (former Wessex Trains), if your journey is delayed by more than an hour you can get compensation in RTVs to the value of 50% of the cost of your single ticket and 25% if a return ticket is held. You'll get the same if you want cash. If your journey is delayed in excess of two hours you can get compensation in RTVs for the full cost of your ticket, but if you want cash compensation for a two hour plus delay it'll only be 50% of a single, 25% of a return.

Quote
Compensation - payment method

As per our Passengers Charter compensation is paid in the form of Rail Travel Vouchers or via an e-voucher, which will show as a credit on your First Great Western online account, we will always ask which you prefer. From the 19th July 2015 passengers can also request to receive compensation in cash and this will be paid, via a cheque at the rate set down in the National Conditions of Carriage.
https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/about-us/customer-services/compensation

Well done FGW for making the compensation arrangements even more difficult and anti-passenger. Why couldn't you just match the cash compensation arrangement to those in your passenger charter? Oh, I see, because the NRCoC is less generous in most cases and it just isn't good customer service in your eyes to go above and beyond.  >:( >:( >:( ::) ::) ::)


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on July 22, 2015, 10:04:32
I wasn't aware that they were offering a credit to your e-account.....


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Timmer on July 22, 2015, 10:17:22
I wasn't aware that they were offering a credit to your e-account.....
I would like it if they did.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: ChrisB on July 22, 2015, 10:21:27
Something else that comes in the same changes to NRCoC that failed to get a mention in the press.

From Network Rail (http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2015/july/Rail-passengers-to-benefit-from-new-compensation-arrangements/)

Quote
The changes also offer improvements for passengers who lose their season ticket. Previously, passengers could only have their season ticket replaced once, but from today this limit has been removed. This covers existing and newly issued tickets.

Passengers with duplicate season tickets who no longer require them can also now receive a refund, whereas previously they could not. Train companies can still refer or refuse applications for issuing or refunding duplicate season tickets if there are grounds to suspect fraud.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: IndustryInsider on July 22, 2015, 10:24:53
Given the value of many season tickets, they are both very welcome developments.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on July 22, 2015, 10:41:11
Something else that comes in the same changes to NRCoC that failed to get a mention in the press.

From Network Rail (http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2015/july/Rail-passengers-to-benefit-from-new-compensation-arrangements/)

Quote
The changes also offer improvements for passengers who lose their season ticket. Previously, passengers could only have their season ticket replaced once, but from today this limit has been removed. This covers existing and newly issued tickets.

Passengers with duplicate season tickets who no longer require them can also now receive a refund, whereas previously they could not. Train companies can still refer or refuse applications for issuing or refunding duplicate season tickets if there are grounds to suspect fraud.

The press may have failed to pick it up, but I didn't.  ;)

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=15897.0


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: Oxonhutch on July 22, 2015, 11:03:12
Given the value of many season tickets, they are both very welcome developments.
Indeed. I was looking into how I could insure mine if I had to get a duplicate early in its validity.  It was a serious liability.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: didcotdean on August 20, 2015, 20:41:44
First Great Western have decided that if you want a cash refund it will be at the rates published in the National Rail Conditions of Carriage. If you opt for Rail Travel Vouchers it will be at the rates published in their Passenger's Charter.

...

Well done FGW for making the compensation arrangements even more difficult and anti-passenger. Why couldn't you just match the cash compensation arrangement to those in your passenger charter? Oh, I see, because the NRCoC is less generous in most cases and it just isn't good customer service in your eyes to go above and beyond.  >:( >:( >:( ::) ::) ::)

Money Saving Expert  (http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/travel/2015/08/first-great-western-forced-to-backtrack-over-50-cash-compensation-for-delays-after-mse-challenge)complained to the DfT about FGW paying differential rates of compensation for cash rather than vouchers. FGWs response to the DfT is that it was all an 'error', and they will pay the same and anyone previously shortchanged can claim the difference.

Now I wonder whose 'clever' idea this all was because the outcome is a humiliation to FGW.


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: JayMac on August 20, 2015, 20:47:11
Victory!  ;D

That is excellent news. Looks like I wasted a stamp complaining to Transport Focus after FGW confirmed in writing to me that the different compensation arrangements were correct. 

I was expecting another fob off from Transport Focus as they can often be toothless. So it's great to learn that Money Saving Expert were on the case. Martin Lewis has a lot more clout than me.

I've actually got an outstanding delay compensation claim with FGW. I opted for RTVs because of the aforementioned differential. I'll be sending them back and requesting a cheque.

I also don't buy FGW's excuse that this was an error. It was a conscious decision. It must have been as it was consistently reinforced by customer services and FGW's social media team. It only became an 'error' when a consumer organisation and the DfT got involved. Funny that.  ::)


Title: Re: Rail Travel Vouchers to be replaced by cash refunds/compensation. - BBC News
Post by: bobm on August 20, 2015, 20:53:15
Martin Lewis has a lot more clout than me.

Oh I don't know - he has never persuaded me to buy him a pint.   ;D ;D



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net