Title: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 23, 2015, 07:18:32 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-deal-for-rail-passengers-in-west-of-england-and-wales
Quote More seats, more services and 2 new fleets of modern trains for passengers across the west of England, Thames Valley and South Wales. First Great Western Plans to give rail passengers in the west of England, Thames Valley and South Wales more seats, more services and 2 new fleets of modern trains were announced by Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin today (23 March 2015). The government has reached an agreement with First Group plc for First Great Western (FGW) to continue to operate trains between London Paddington, the Cotswolds, South Wales and the south west until April 2019. The new deal will include a host of extra benefits for passengers including: around 3,000,000 additional seats per year by 2018 across the franchise 4000 more morning peak seats into London every day by December 2018 proposals for a brand new fleet of privately funded trains more trains into Devon and Cornwall the introduction of 369 new carriages through the roll-out of new hi-tech Intercity Express Programme trains built by Hitachi the introduction of 58, 4-car electric trains for Thames Valley services faster journeys between Penzance and Paddington and London to South Wales, Oxford and Bristol a ^30 million investment to improve stations and car parks, introducing 2000 more car park spaces (plus additional funding from partners) a ^3.5 million station development match fund a ^2.5 million accessibility fund Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Lee on March 23, 2015, 07:30:07 Transport Secretary statement to Parliament - https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/rail-franchising-great-western
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ellendune on March 23, 2015, 08:16:18 First Great westerns interactive page seems a little more informative https://content.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/greater-west/?utm_source=BAGWDM&utm_medium=DM&utm_campaign=BAGWcrm (https://content.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/greater-west/?utm_source=BAGWDM&utm_medium=DM&utm_campaign=BAGWcrm)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: PhilWakely on March 23, 2015, 08:46:04 Have I missed something here?
Quote from: FGW Interactive Map Exeter St David's Brand new electric trains for journeys into and out of London whereas Quote from: FGW Interactive Map Tiverton Parkway More modern trains for journeys between London and Devon and Cornwall (my highlighting!) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 08:59:55 The BBC TV South local news this morning was saying that there is to be a new fleet of privately-funded trains (i.e. not the SETs) for the South-West, which is a surprise. So it would be, but of course that can't realistically be done within this mini-franchise. Paul Clifton explained that, being non-electric, they need bigger engines so will be very expensive. So, if it is true, where does it come from? Their on-line piece does not say that:
From the BBC: Quote 23 March 2015 Last updated at 08:29 FirstGroup's Great Western rail deal extended to 2019 (http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81837000/jpg/_81837034_hitachi.jpg) The new Intercity Express Trains will replace trains from the 1970s Transport company FirstGroup has extended its deal with the government to run services on the Great Western rail network until 2019. The new franchise covers a period in which a series of upgrades will take place along the Great Western network. Those improvements include electric train services for the first time on the network, starting with services in the Thames Valley. Upgrades will also include additional train capacity at peak times. First Great Western will pay the government about ^68m to operate the franchise from September 2015 until April 2019. The Department for Transport (DfT) said passengers would benefit from the addition of three million extra seats across the network by 2018. It also said more services to Devon and Cornwall would be added to the timetable, and 369 new train carriages introduced to the network. The DfT added that capacity during the morning rush hour commute to London would increase by 4,000 seats by December 2018. FirstGroup will also be responsible for introducing the new Hitachi Intercity Express Trains between London, Bristol and South Wales and the Cotswolds from summer 2017. FirstGroup chief executive Tim O'Toole said the rail operator was already working with the DfT and Network Rail to deliver the initial phases of the ^7.5bn Great Western mainline modernisation programme. The franchise award was long expected. FirstGroup is the longest serving of the train operating companies. In 1996, it joined a bid for one of the first railway franchises of the privatisation programme, which began under John Major's Conservative government. It has operated the Great Western network on its own since 1998 when it took 100% ownership of the franchise. What the statements both say is this: Quote Government will also work with FGW to improve the performance and quality of the rolling stock serving the south west of England, particularly for intercity services, during this direct award. Which is vague, but doesn't sound like a new brand-fleet of anything. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: PhilWakely on March 23, 2015, 09:09:50 I did notice this in the DfT document
Quote from: DfT Interactive map Paddington to Plymouth and Penzance The benefits are: ..... Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) cascade ..... In other words, you can have our cast-offs to replace our previous cast-offs that we shoved your way :) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 09:12:32 There was another mention in the BBC TV piece, of a fleet of new EMUs in addition to ones handed on from Thamesllink. Presumably that explains this:
Quote
Note that the local news insert at 9:00 didn't repeat what was said at 8:30 (or indeed say anything about it!). Back in the edit suite? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 09:23:44 Here is the full entry for Truro:
Quote More seats as part of our programme to deliver three million additional seats across the network by December 2018 More frequent stopping services More modern trains for journeys between London and Devon and Cornwall More modern, local trains on local services Free on-train wifi Upgraded Sleeper services with new, more comfortable interiors and an on-board lounge bar New lounge for Sleeper passengers So the long-distance trains are newer, but not new ... Mk IVs pulled by something or other? As noted elsewhere, it's not the interiors of the sleepers that are the real problem at the moment (except when it turns into an HST). Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on March 23, 2015, 09:30:52 Have I missed something here? Tiverton Parkway says both:Quote from: FGW Interactive Map Exeter St David's Brand new electric trains for journeys into and out of London whereas Quote from: FGW Interactive Map Tiverton Parkway More modern trains for journeys between London and Devon and Cornwall (my highlighting!)
------------------ The map says "No benefits for this station in current improvement plan". That sounds rather ominous to me, as it leaves open the possibility that the draft IEP diagrams (with a notable reduction in seats for Swansea, and a small one for Cardiff) are still the way the DfT is thinking. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 09:42:16 This bit of text:
Quote Brand new electric trains for journeys into and out of London is used for all places due to get SETs, including bi-modes running off-wire. So it's there on the Cotswold Line, but not the line from Newbury to Cogload. There, and past Exeter, it says: Quote More modern trains for journeys between London and Devon and Cornwall It is, however, uses from Bristol to Exeter - suggesting some services (maybe not all) will be bi-modes. Given there did not seem to be enough of them in the contract to run the previously promised service, it will be interesting to see how that will be done. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ray951 on March 23, 2015, 09:52:59 I had a tweet via Railways Illustrated that said
"Hitachi have been named by First as preferred supplier for 29 extra IEP trains for FGW subject to approval by the DfT." Had another tweet via Rail magazine that said "Proposed FGW Hitachi AT300 fleet will have more powerful engines than IEP sets to cope with hills in Devon and Cornwall". I am now confused because I thought IEP was based on AT300 and i have also seen mention that 360 AT300 vehicles have been ordered. Also I guess we should remember that we are only weeks away from a General Election ;) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 10:02:25 Railway Gazette (http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/policy/single-view/view/first-great-western-plans-at300s-to-cornwall.html?) has more:
Quote The franchise will also deploy 58 four-car EMUs on Thames Valley suburban services from London Paddington. These will include 21 Class 365 units coming off-lease at Great Northern under the Thameslink Programme, the 29 Class 387/1 units currently entering service at Thameslink as a stopgap measure pending delivery of Siemens Class 700s and an extra eight Class 387s to be ordered from Bombardier as an option on Govia Thameslink Railway^s current order for Gatwick Express Class 387/2 units. FGW hopes to conclude negotiations with the Department for Transport by the end of June for the introduction of seven 9-car and 22 five-car inter-city trainsets to replace its IC125 High Speed Trains on routes between London and Devon and Cornwall from the summer of 2018. FirstGroup has already selected Hitachi Rail Europe as preferred bidder to supply 200 km/h AT300 bi-mode trains, which would be similar to the IEP sets but with an enhanced diesel rating to cope with steeper gradients in Devon and Cornwall. They will run as electric trains between London and Newbury, and have larger fuel tanks to cater for the longer journeys to Plymouth and Penzance. According to the franchisee, these could cut journey times from London by 5 min to Exeter, 6 min to Plymouth and 14 min to Penzance. That's almost the end of the mini-franchise, and doesn't sound like what's meant by "more modern trains". Nor does it explain what is being shown for Bristol-Exeter. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on March 23, 2015, 10:16:38 The map says "No benefits for this station in current improvement plan". That sounds rather ominous to me, as it leaves open the possibility that the draft IEP diagrams (with a notable reduction in seats for Swansea, and a small one for Cardiff) are still the way the DfT is thinking. That seems the standard line for any station for which FGW are not the operator. As an example of its inaccuracy, Bramley and Mortimer report EMU operation of services, but Basingstoke, (there destination) shows 'no benefits' - presumably because it is an SWT station... Weird that they can't say anything about the Basingstoke service then, as its obviously going to get EMUs. Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Richard Fairhurst on March 23, 2015, 10:20:44 FGW appear to be sending out emails to local stakeholders with more details. Here's the one for the Cotswold Line:
Quote There is some great news for the North Cotswolds building on the timetable changes that we are introducing this May, which include an earlier and faster morning peak service arrival for customers from Hereford and Worcester into Paddington, a new morning service from Moreton-in-Marsh to London, two additional direct services from Worcester to Paddington and another direct Paddington to Worcester service (with a two hour journey time). From May 2017, the deal will mean: ^ New services to and from Great Malvern, and between London and Worcester ^ New Super Express Trains, introduced as part of the Government^s Intercity Express Programme, providing a significant improvement in rolling stock quality and passenger comfort. These will appear in summer 2017 ^ Ten carriage trains on peak services will have 15% more standard class seats than on the High Speed Trains on the route today In December 2018, the deal will mean: ^ A major timetable change, with hourly intercity services over the route to/from Worcester (and extensions to/from Hereford in certain hours) ^ Journey time reductions with times from Worcester to London typically 7 minutes quicker and the fastest journey to the capital taking only 2 hours The franchise, which runs from September 2015 through to at least April 2019, also includes ^50 million investment with our partners to improve stations including 2,000 new car park spaces across the network, customer information improvements and improved PA systems. This includes: ^ a new car park extension at Kingham offering over 100 additional spaces, which we aim to have in place before the start of the new franchise ^ Further car park extension plans subject to consents at Charlbury and Hanborough. ^ New ticket vending machines at Evesham and Moreton-in-Marsh We will also continue to work in close partnership with Network Rail, the Department for Transport and local stakeholders on Worcestershire Parkway station, the raising of line speeds and the case for redoubling further sections of the North Cotswolds line. All our trains will be equipped with free wifi, we will be adding 100 more customer-facing colleagues on long-distance trains and the deal also sets up a ^2.2 million fund to target station and train service improvements around areas of social need and lower income communities; along with more apprenticeships, a community work placement scheme, and a ^Get into Railways^ mentoring programme with the ^Prince's Trust^. We will also be expanding the use of the GWR brand, currently used on our long distance First Class carriages and will begin a rebrand before the start of the new franchise. Until such a time as the actual agreement gets published, perhaps we could collate these emails here in the Coffee Shop? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 10:21:42 On Oxford, it states
Quote Continued funding for the local Community Rail Partnership to help improve services (sic) and encourage local rail travel Local CRP? News to me..... Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on March 23, 2015, 10:23:31 That's almost the end of the mini-franchise, and doesn't sound like what's meant by "more modern trains". Nor does it explain what is being shown for Bristol-Exeter. I'd have thought that the 387/1s (the final few only just entering service) and the small number of additional units to follow on from the 387/2s (387/3s perhaps, but brand new to GW) are definitely 'more modern trains' than current. I agree the 365s may be debatable though, aren't they just electric versions of 165? But a mix of 386 and 365 has been predicted in certain forums for a few months now, and it's a definite improvement on the original plan for a big part of the 319 fleet. Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: NickF on March 23, 2015, 11:10:05 http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/11872796.First_Great_Western_extend_franchise_until_2019/?ref=mr of note: TransWilts services, boosted by remarkable growth since new services were introduced in 2013 by First Great Western with the support of Wiltshire Council, will continue to run. Single carriage trains will be doubled to two carriages from May 2017. The trains will be equipped with free wi-fi Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 11:10:43 165s then.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 11:13:04 Smart Ticketing in the Thames Valley
Quote Progressing the opportunities of introducing smart ticketing with the Department for Transport as part of the SEFT intitiative Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 23, 2015, 11:31:54 I had a tweet via Railways Illustrated that said "Hitachi have been named by First as preferred supplier for 29 extra IEP trains for FGW subject to approval by the DfT." Had another tweet via Rail magazine that said "Proposed FGW Hitachi AT300 fleet will have more powerful engines than IEP sets to cope with hills in Devon and Cornwall". I am now confused because I thought IEP was based on AT300 and i have also seen mention that 360 AT300 vehicles have been ordered. Also I guess we should remember that we are only weeks away from a General Election ;) See press release / front page of Hitachi web site ... from a very we'll informed source - NOT IEP trains for Devon / Cornwll but similar - bigger fuel tanks to reach Penzance and bigger engines to climb the banks, for example. And working out a clever way to do long term stuff from within a short term franchise ;) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 11:39:36 There's a DfT interactive map (http://maps.dft.gov.uk/first-great-western/index.html) linked from the press release. It say something a bit different, or at least with different emphasis, from FGW's and does cover services through non-FGW stations. For example:
Quote Paddington to Plymouth and Penzance The benefits are: additional services from May 2017 and further extra services from December 2018 timetable improvements from May 2017 with further improvements from December 2018 new trains or upgraded high speed trains introduced ... Quote Reading to Basingstoke The benefits are: Electrical Multiple Unit (EMU) introduced South Eastern Flexible Ticketing introduced Quote Reading to Gatwick Airport The benefits are: additional services from May 2017 and further extra services from December 2018 timetable improvements from May 2017 with further improvements from December 2018 South Eastern Flexible Ticketing introduced closed circuit television (CCTV) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 11:50:44 See press release / front page of Hitachi web site ... from a very we'll informed source - NOT IEP trains for Devon / Cornwll but similar - bigger fuel tanks to reach Penzance and bigger engines to climb the banks, for example. And working out a clever way to do long term stuff from within a short term franchise ;) AT300s - aren't they what Scotrail have ordered? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 11:54:58 See press release / front page of Hitachi web site ... from a very we'll informed source - NOT IEP trains for Devon / Cornwll but similar - bigger fuel tanks to reach Penzance and bigger engines to climb the banks, for example. And working out a clever way to do long term stuff from within a short term franchise ;) From the Hitachi press release (http://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/hitachirail-eu/pressreleases/hitachi-rail-europe-named-as-firstgroup-s-preferred-supplier-to-provide-fleet-of-new-at300-trains-for-the-south-west-1133384): Quote London, 23 March, 2015^ Hitachi Rail Europe announced today that it has been named by FirstGroup as preferred supplier, subject to contract, for the supply of 29 trains for the new First Great Western franchise.This is subject to approval by the Department for Transport. The fleet of 29 bi-mode AT300 trains would run primarily from London Paddington to Plymouth and Penzance, replacing 40-year-old High Speed Trains on the key intercity route to the south west. Made up of seven nine-car and 22 five-car trains, with an option for 30 more, the mixed fleet would allow for flexible use, including 10-car formations (two five-cars coupled together) for through-services to/from the capital. Mark Hopwood, Managing Director of First Great Western said: ^Following the direct award of the franchise announced by the Department for Transport today, I am delighted that we have selected Hitachi Rail Europe as our preferred supplier for new intercity trains, should the DfT approve our plans. The fleet currently running on routes in the South West of England, is nearly 40 years old, and passengers would greatly benefit from brand new, highly comfortable trains. FirstGroup has conducted a competitive procurement exercise for these trains and we are close to securing private financing for the deal shortly. The DfT will be making a final decision by the end of June^. Andy Barr, Chief Operating Officer, Hitachi Rail Europe said: ^The Class 800 bi-mode trains were initially designed for the Great Western and East Coast main lines and we have refined the design further for the challenges of the route to Plymouth and Penzance. We have put a lot of thought into ensuring a passenger environment that is comfortable for short and long-distance journeys, incorporating feedback by passenger groups. ^Today^s announcement cements our already strong relationship with FirstGroup and we are looking forward to working closely to progress negotiations and start building the trains, ready for use in the South West of England from 2018 onwards.^ The fleet of AT300 trains will be closely related to the Class 800 bi-mode trains designed for the Department for Transport^s Intercity Express Programme, but will utilise higher engine operating power to cope with the gradients in Devon and Cornwall. They will run as electric trains between London and Newbury, and are equipped with bigger fuel tanks to cater for the long distance journeys to Plymouth and Penzance. So I think AT300 does apply to the family of design variants, with a class number each. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 11:58:27 One wonders whether the 800s/AT300s will be able to swap over power while on the move? Otherwise all stopping at Newbury will be a pain....
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: John R on March 23, 2015, 12:03:38 Assuming a transition on the move is possible, it's possible that this could enhance the business case for extending beyond Newbury, even if only to Bedwyn. As the cost benefit analysis would then include the additional running under the wires of the long distance services. Eurostars managed to "pan up" whilst on the move so it is possible.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 12:06:12 Further from the press release - notes to Editors
XC-style seat reservations included Quote Key train features for passengers: ^Additional leg room in standard class airline style seats ^More seats per train (9-car or 10-car formations) ^Passenger Wi-Fi ^Power sockets accessible from every seat ^Increased reliability ^LCD seat reservation displays with sophisticated traffic light vacancy notification at every seat ^Air conditioning ^Fully pressure-sealed vehicle for passenger comfort when entering tunnels at high speed ^Increased height in overhead luggage racks to accommodate airline-style hand luggage About AT 300 trains The AT300 trains are a train platform developed by Hitachi Rail. Their most famous relatives in the UK are the Class 395 Javelin^ train currently in service in Kent and the Class 800/801 train for the Intercity Express Programme. This family of trains is designed for intercity travel, with speeds of up to 140 mph for the Class 395 Javelin and 125 mph for the Class 800/801 trains for electric operation and 100 mph for bi-mode operation. The Class AT300 has larger fuel tanks than the Class 800 bi-mode trains and engines that operate at a higher power output. About bi-mode trains: Bi-mode trains are trains with a dual electric and diesel propulsion capability.The trains can run on electrified routes using the catenary as power source, allowing for a smooth transition to non-electrified routes, where diesel powerpacks provide tractive power. Seems to answer my question above. Smooth transition I take to mean on the move. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ray951 on March 23, 2015, 12:17:26 See press release / front page of Hitachi web site ... from a very we'll informed source - NOT IEP trains for Devon / Cornwll but similar - bigger fuel tanks to reach Penzance and bigger engines to climb the banks, for example. And working out a clever way to do long term stuff from within a short term franchise ;) Thanks that makes sense now. :) So we have 100% electric IEP, Bi-mode IEP and Bi-mode AT300 (with more powerful engines) all based on AT300. I assume that means that there will be no HST's running on FGW after all these have been delivered? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 12:20:40 I've seen mention of 'upgraded' HST somewhere in the documentation. Don't think they've gone yet (in this Direct Award, anyhow - but they're days on the GW must be numbered now)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 12:21:22 Further from the press release - notes to Editors XC-style seat reservations included Well, they were required in the IEP spec, so why would they be taken out? Seems to answer my question above. Smooth transition I take to mean on the move. I'm not sure the words do suggest that - more that it does not need a locomotive to be (un)coupled. Remember that the bi-mode was competing as a solution with loco-hauled electrics. But it should be technically feasible to start the engines, raise the pantographs, and swap power all on the move (or the inverse). Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 23, 2015, 12:23:13 ... even if only to Bedwyn. ... In amongst all the news this morning, the feedback I'm hearing from Bedwyn is - err - somewhat downhearted. Follow up on this to come; very much caught between a rock and a hard place on those services. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 12:24:39 Indeed, I see nothing in this for them - turbos to Newbury/Reading stoppers it's looking like. Hope their fares reduce as a consequence
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 12:44:09 I've seen mention of 'upgraded' HST somewhere in the documentation. Don't think they've gone yet (in this Direct Award, anyhow - but they're days on the GW must be numbered now) If you look at the DfT words, the choice between the IEP with go-faster stripes and a life-extended HST (mainly by picking the best ones, perhaps?) hasn't been made yet. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 23, 2015, 12:47:44 That's almost the end of the mini-franchise, and doesn't sound like what's meant by "more modern trains". Nor does it explain what is being shown for Bristol-Exeter. I'd have thought that the 387/1s (the final few only just entering service) and the small number of additional units to follow on from the 387/2s (387/3s perhaps, but brand new to GW) are definitely 'more modern trains' than current. I agree the 365s may be debatable though, aren't they just electric versions of 165? But a mix of 386 and 365 has been predicted in certain forums for a few months now, and it's a definite improvement on the original plan for a big part of the 319 fleet. Paul My comment was about the boosted IEPs - that's where the 'more modern trains' comes from. However, I was probably reading to much into wording that has gained in confusion as it has been edited down. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on March 23, 2015, 12:48:09 I'm not sure the words do suggest that - more that it does not need a locomotive to be (un)coupled. Remember that the bi-mode was competing as a solution with loco-hauled electrics. But it should be technically feasible to start the engines, raise the pantographs, and swap power all on the move (or the inverse). One of the original IEP technical specifications was: Quote TS1577 It is an essential requirement that a bi-mode IEP train shall be capable of switching between modes whilst at any speed from stationary up to line speed. Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Tim on March 23, 2015, 14:03:04 One wonders whether the 800s/AT300s will be able to swap over power while on the move? Otherwise all stopping at Newbury will be a pain.... The ability to do that was included in the original specification back in the day it was called HST2. I have no idea if it survived. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on March 23, 2015, 14:38:43 The ability to do that was included in the original specification back in the day it was called HST2. I have no idea if it survived. It survived until IEP's train technical spec of 2008, therefore after HST2, hence my recent post. Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 23, 2015, 14:39:12 Railway Gazette (http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/policy/single-view/view/first-great-western-plans-at300s-to-cornwall.html?) has more: Quote The franchise will also deploy 58 four-car EMUs on Thames Valley suburban services from London Paddington. These will include 21 Class 365 units coming off-lease at Great Northern under the Thameslink Programme, the 29 Class 387/1 units currently entering service at Thameslink as a stopgap measure pending delivery of Siemens Class 700s and an extra eight Class 387s to be ordered from Bombardier as an option on Govia Thameslink Railway^s current order for Gatwick Express Class 387/2 units. So for the Thames Valley that's 232 electric carriages replacing (or part replacing) 156 Turbo/Sprinter carriages. That seems quite a lot, even for an interim period before Crossrail fully begins? Bodes well for capacity for commuting from the suburban stations out of London and it looks like we can finally forget about trains older than Turbos replacing them in the form of Class 319s! I would guess that the 365s will only be in operation on Thames Valley services until Crossrail is up and running when they will move elsewhere. South Wales possibly. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on March 23, 2015, 14:47:50 Does your total number of Turbos include those that will have to remain for the North Downs line?
So the EMU fleet will be proportionately even larger in comparison to the Turbos it replaces? Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 14:54:53 And the couple needed for Bedwyn presumably - and Oxford-Banbury and the Cotswold Line stopper. (maybe the same units for the latter two services, I guess)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 23, 2015, 15:02:51 Does your total number of Turbos include those that will have to remain for the North Downs line? So the EMU fleet will be proportionately even larger in comparison to the Turbos it replaces? No it doesn't, hence my 'part replacing' comment, so yes indeed it would be and even larger increase. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Adelante_CCT on March 23, 2015, 15:11:41 Don't forget the Greenford to West Ealing shuttle.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Lee on March 23, 2015, 15:14:25 Specification for the Great Western second direct award and a summary of consultation responses - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-western-franchise-response-to-the-2014-consultation
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: didcotdean on March 23, 2015, 15:15:58 Seat-wise though, won't it not be as big an increase as it seems since these are 2+2 layout throughout?
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 23, 2015, 16:17:28 Indeed there will be a reduction in the number of seats per carriage as both the 387s and 365s are all 2+2 seating as far as I know (plus these EMUs are all nominally 20m long rather than the 23m long Turbo vehicles). 2+2 seating will of course will be a bonus for travellers as 2+3 seating isn't great as we've discussed many times. That's another plus as many of the 319s still have a 2+3 layout.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: didcotdean on March 23, 2015, 16:45:57 With 12 and 8 carriage formations to be the normal configuration through the Thames Valley (main and relief lines respectively) someone with more knowledge than me can add everything up to see how it fits :)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: PhilWakely on March 23, 2015, 17:25:45 The Western Morning News view of the announcement (http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/EXCLUSIVE-New-train-fleet-replace-Devon-Cornwall/story-26212611-detail/story.html)
Quote EXCLUSIVE: New train fleet to replace Devon, Cornwall and Somerset's ageing inter-cities (http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276272/Article/images/26212611/9713181-large.jpg) EXCLUSIVE: First artist's impression of the AT-300 Hitachi trains First Great Western wants to run from London to Penzance. Ministers will decide by June whether to go ahead A fleet of 29 new trains is to replace the ageing British Rail 125s running between London and Devon, Cornwall and Somerset by the end of 2018. Branch lines in the far South West will also get more modern trains ^ spelling the end for little-loved "cattle truck" commuter trains ^ in what is being hailed as the "biggest fleet upgrade in a generation". The major overhaul of inter-city and local trains is the centrepiece of First Great Western's (FGW) proposal to run the rail franchise for the wider South West and much of Wales until 2019. Full details of the package were revealed in this morning's Western Morning News. The franchise until 2019 was confirmed with the Government when Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin visited the region this morning, and will mean much more comfortable trains, quicker journey times and a big increase in services to the far South West. FGW is proposing newly-built "off-the-shelf" Hitachi trains as its preferred option for the new fleet, which would get from London to Penzance 14 minutes quicker than at present. Arguably more significant is the timetable overhaul ^ allowing trains from the capital get to Exeter before 9am, to Plymouth before 10am and to Penzance before 11.40am. From 2018, there will be more direct trains into Devon and Cornwall ^ doubling the number of trains into and out of Cornwall. Chancellor George Osborne's Budget last week signalled new trains were potentially on the cards ^ but details were limited to the point of confusion. But, as reported by the WMN, the 35-year-old 125s that most Westcountry commuters were familiar with appeared to be doomed. Significantly, the new trains, which are still subject to contract and Department for Transport approval, would be a new order and separate from the 50 trains the Great Western line was already due to get from 2017 under the Government's ^4.5 billion Inter-city Express Programme. Those trains, also made in Japan by Hitachi, are a hybrid of diesel and electric, or "bi-mode", but were only ever destined for the Great Western line between the capital and Bristol and Wales. One of the problems was they lacked the power to get up the hilly terrain west of Exeter ^ meaning Devon and Cornwall missed out. FGW's franchise recommends privately-financing a new set of AT-300 trains made by Hitachi. They, too, would be "bi-mode" but would be fitted with more powerful engines and bigger fuel tanks to deal with the far South West's geographical shortcomings. It means the lack of electric lines west of Berkshire will not be a problem as the new trains will simply switch to diesel. The deal's outstanding issue is whether the Government opts to go with FGW's proposal of Hitachi trains, or refurbish the 1970s high-speed trains. A decision will be made by June after the general election. But Transport Secretary Patrick McLoughlin indicated a new fleet ^ rather than giving the old HSTs another face-lift ^ was on the cards in the far South West. He said: "I am determined that passengers in the west, Thames Valley and South Wales get a railway that is fit for the 21st century. This is a fantastic deal which will give them more seats, more services and brand new fleets of modern trains." Local services are also to be upgraded. New commuter trains in the Thames Valley commuter belt to London will also have positive effects for the far South West. So-called "turbo" trains deployed in the east of the franchise area will be shunted over to the Bristol and Bath commuter area, and a small number to Devon and Cornwall. The peninsula's local commuters will benefit more, however, from the 158s inherited from Bristol and Bath. Most importantly it marks the end of the detested carriages serving branch lines often likened to "cattle trucks". Other local improvements include: * The "cascade" of 90mph trains will help "transform" local services between Bristol and Penzance and on the Barnstaple line in North Devon. * Almost 60% more seats on suburban commuter services in the Exeter area and two trains per hour between Exmouth and Paignton. The Government has previously announced it wants First Great Western to continue running services in the region until 2019, but today's announcement marks the first time plans have been made public. It was also revealed for the first time FGW will pay the government around ^68 million to operate the franchise from September 2015 until April 2019. Last year a ^150 million package announced included the upgraded London-Penzance sleeper, which is guaranteed to stay in the franchise. Wi-fi is also now on all inter-city trains and branch lines are set to get wireless broadband access too. Mark Hopwood, managing director of First Great Western, said the proposal of new trains was the "most compelling solution we could recommend to Government". "The railway is central to the connectivity and economic prosperity of the region, and I am delighted we have been able to work with the Department for Transport to develop a privately funded deal that will deliver for our customers in Devon and Cornwall and begin to challenge some of the perceptions of rail. I am confident it will get the support and approvals it needs to go ahead. "The Great Western network is already seeing the biggest investment since Brunel, and this deal has been designed to match that investment and ambition. It gives passengers newer trains, faster, more frequent services and importantly, given the growth this franchise has seen in recent years, more seats." The announcement comes as campaigners work with the Government on a ^7 billion rail package for the peninsula, which could include two new railway lines to avoid the snaking coastal route at Dawlish. Nothing has been promised, however. "The final piece in the jigsaw". Reaction to the announcement St Ives Liberal Democrat MP Andrew George said: "Train passengers have had to endure unacceptable standards in recent months. These upgrades are long overdue. "If the Government can commit multi-billion pound funds for high speed services from London to the North then it's not too much to ask that we receive improvements which tackle the problems of comfort, reliability, overcrowding and competitive ticket pricing on routes to and through Cornwall." Sarah Newton, Conservative MP for Truro and Falmouth, welcomed the "final piece of the jigsaw" in transformation of Cornish rail services. "Thirty minute services through Cornwall will make life much easier for local people travelling about Cornwall. The reduced travel time from Plymouth to London, to three hours, is great news too. All together, the package of investment will lead to more frequent, reliable and faster train services. Too often in the past Cornwall has had the hand me downs from up country. Now we will be getting the very latest trains and thanks to signalling investment, more reliable and faster services." But Luke Pollard, Labour's parliamentary candidate for Plymouth Sutton and Devonport, said: "The South West desperately needs new trains. "What's hugely disappointing is that the decision to buy new trains could be taken today by the Government. Ministers do not have to wait until June when all the votes have been counted from the general election." So, reading this, the displaced Turbos will probably be used on the Bristol/Cardiff to Portsmouth, whilst 158s will cover Exeter to Bristol, Swindon to Westbury and the Devon and Cornwall branches (??) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Timmer on March 23, 2015, 17:34:22 That is correct Phil. Cardiff-Portsmouth will be increased to five carriages with a 165/166 combination. Wonder if they will keep the First class section of the 166 reintroducing First to this route?
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on March 23, 2015, 17:41:42 So, reading this, the displaced Turbos will probably be used on the Bristol/Cardiff to Portsmouth, whilst 158s will cover Exeter to Bristol, Swindon to Westbury and the Devon and Cornwall branches (??) Yep, regional express units taken off a regional express service and put on branch line stoppers while the regional express route is landed with suburban stopper rolling stock. ::) >:( I've already exploded on hearing the news of yet more 'Sardine Midgets' being planned for the Great Western, and now I have yet another reason to be furious. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( Next I guess will be confirmation that Pembroke Dock is to be reduced to single Pacers on Summer Saturdays... Anyone seen the new service level commitments?Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 17:49:14 Quote The "cascade" of 90mph trains will help "transform" local services between Bristol and Penzance and on the Barnstaple line in North Devon. Turbos running on the Branches/Barnstable/Exmouth/Paignton, with 158s on the longer distance Bristol/Cornwall & Weymouth/Cardiff's I reckon Quote The announcement comes as campaigners work with the Government on a ^7 billion rail package for the peninsula, which could include two new railway lines to avoid the snaking coastal route at Dawlish. Nothing has been promised, however. No chance whatsoever of two.... Quote "competitive ticket pricing on routes to and through Cornwall." And they aren't already?.....fares are likely to rise to pay for this, not reduce. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: thetrout on March 23, 2015, 17:53:42 Just to consider also. In Rail Technology Magazine regarding the new Abellio Award for Scot Rail Franchise: (http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/hitachi-to-supply-scotrails-new-electric-fleet-for-abellio-)
Quote In addition to the new electric train fleet, Abellio has committed to introducing 27 refurbished HST diesels by December 2018 for inter-city services between Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Inverness. These could be cascaded stock from the Great Western Main Line, when the new ^Super Express^ Class 800/801s ^ also built by Hitachi ^ replace that fleet. Emphasis on the word "could" ... But with the annoucement of a speculative suggestion to order enhanced Bi-mode AT300 and this annoucement in 2014 then 2+2 does seem to = 4 on this case. I've also read somewhere (can only pass this on as Hearsay) that HSTs were also being considered for Portsmouth Harbour - Cardiff Central. But again this is only a rumor and could only be for a certain amount of HSTs. Any HST sets with Long Swing Link Bogies (LSL) in the consist being unusable due to the risk of striking the 3rd Rail. Short Swing Link Bogies (SSL) don't have this problem and can operate over 3rd Rail Railways. (http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276272/Article/images/26212611/9713181-large.jpg) Now I must say... That does look very smart! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 23, 2015, 17:57:12 Quote In addition to the new electric train fleet, Abellio has committed to introducing 27 refurbished HST diesels by December 2018 for inter-city services between Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Inverness. These could be cascaded stock from the Great Western Main Line, when the new Super Express Class 800/801s also built by Hitachi replace that fleet. Do we know how many GW HSTs are SSL and LSL? I wonder if Abellio are taking all of one type & whether this is possible to Portsmouth H Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: PhilWakely on March 23, 2015, 18:00:52 Quote Other local improvements include: * The "cascade" of 90mph trains will help "transform" local services between Bristol and Penzance and on the Barnstaple line in North Devon. * Almost 60% more seats on suburban commuter services in the Exeter area and two trains per hour between Exmouth and Paignton. I read elsewhere in the Coffee Shop about the Devon Metro proposals whereby two through services would criss-cross Exeter..... Exmouth to Paignton and Barnstaple to Axminster. I know FGW doesn't currently cover the East Devon local service and it is not shown in their interactive map, so I guess this is still TBA (??) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: thetrout on March 23, 2015, 18:11:16 Portsmouth Harbour in an HST is almost certainly possible and has been done many times before.
Although the acceleration in the Avon Valley section with the frequent Warminster, Westbury, Trowbridge, Bradford-on-Avon and Bath Spa stops would probably hurt the timetable a little bit. Although with say a formation of the following 43-TGS-TSD-TS-TS-TFRB-43 43-TGS-TSD-TS-TSMB-TC-43 Might significantly help acceleration like the Virgin Trains Challenger Project. However maybe having a calling pattern of HST with say Cardiff Central, Newport Gwent, Bristol Temple Meads, Bath Spa, Westbury, Salisbury, Southampton Central, Fratton, Portsmouth & Southsea and Portsmouth Harbour. Would significantly ease overcrowding on the route by calling at Stations with significant journey connection opportunities and make better use of frequent stopping trains for the "last mile" But this is again pure speculation! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: patch38 on March 23, 2015, 18:11:27 Quote (from the WMN article) the far South West's geographical shortcomings. Interesting turn of phrase. A lot of people would regard remoteness and upland terrain as a positive. Maybe they should have just said 'geographical situation'? :) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 23, 2015, 18:14:24 That is correct Phil. Cardiff-Portsmouth will be increased to five carriages with a 165/166 combination. Wonder if they will keep the First class section of the 166 reintroducing First to this route? Timmer, can you confirm your source for this cascade plan as nothing I've yet seen has been that specific regarding the Cardiff<>Portsmouth service? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Lee on March 23, 2015, 18:20:35 It's in the spec I posted earlier:
Quote from: Lee lilnk=topic=15535.msg173096#msg173096 date=1427123665 Specification for the Great Western second direct award and a summary of consultation responses - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-western-franchise-response-to-the-2014-consultation Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 23, 2015, 18:29:18 Many thanks, Lee - hadn't had chance to give that more than a skim read.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: old original on March 23, 2015, 19:51:33 Doesn't anyone else find it slightly gauling that all these promises of new trains are tainted by the fact that we (Britain, inventor of the railways) have to go oversea to find a builder of said new trains..
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: chuffed on March 23, 2015, 19:54:54 Like the French malaprop in the previous post...lol!
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Timmer on March 23, 2015, 19:59:02 It's in the spec I posted earlier: Yup that was my source regards 165/166s on Cardiff-Portsmouth II. Regards HSTs on this route, as much as I would like to see this I don't think it will happen. Turbos have been on the agenda for this route for quite sometime now.Quote from: Lee lilnk=topic=15535.msg173096#msg173096 date=1427123665 Specification for the Great Western second direct award and a summary of consultation responses - https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/great-western-franchise-response-to-the-2014-consultation Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rapidash on March 23, 2015, 20:55:58 It's going to be a long three years waiting for the 150's to replace the Pacers on the Metro.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 05:27:30 Eh? Pacers are 150s aren't they?
Do you mean 165s? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ellendune on March 24, 2015, 07:29:03 Eh? Pacers are 150s aren't they? Do you mean 165s? Pacers are the 140's Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on March 24, 2015, 08:00:27 Pacers are the 140's And the 141s, 142s, 143s and 144s. Only 142-144 still in service in this country.For ChrisB:
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Red Squirrel on March 24, 2015, 09:20:12 I thought they were called 'Printers' and 'Spacers'... shows what I know.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 14:06:00 Looking at the proposed journey times for Plymouth/Penzance I note that even with new stock, they are slower than the fastest journeys today even though it is proposed for them all to be non-stop between Reading and Taunton. It would seem that this would mean all trains will be stopping at Reading, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids, Newton Abbot and Totnes. If this is the case then any gain from not stopping between Reading and Taunton and better acceleration from the new trains is lost due to the need to make so many stops on all trains between Taunton and Plymouth. The benefit of this is of course that it would result in a simple clockface timetable but I'm not sure if this is the best idea. Will the busiest services from Penzance cope with the extra passengers due to the additional calls?
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 14:27:16 If they all stop at each station, surely that would result in a more even spread, with few being 'busiest'
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 14:36:02 If they all stop at each station, surely that would result in a more even spread, with few being 'busiest' I'd have still thought certain trains will be busier than others. For example I'm not sure many people will want to spend the morning hanging around in Penzance so they can get a later train.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 14:43:41 5car will run up to Plymouth & they'll add another 5Car there.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 14:47:06 5car will run up to Plymouth & they'll add another 5Car there. Yes but if the loadings at more popular times of the day from Plymouth and Cornwall remain constant or even increase, will there not be overcrowding east of Plymouth due to additional stations calls between there and Taunton? I understand that some of the HSTs can be very busy when leaving Plymouth. It also doesn't seem to be much of an improvemet to give slower journey times from Cornwall to London compared to some of the current fastest services.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 14:53:30 The press releases say a small 13 minute gain in times PNZ-London. So peanuts when recognising the higher acceleration times away from stations.
There will be more trains in the timetable = more seats. If overcrowding does occur, there just won't be (m)any advances, and that'll concentrate minds. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 15:04:39 The press releases say a small 13 minute gain in times PNZ-London. So peanuts when recognising the higher acceleration times away from stations. That may well be the case when compared with the current average journey time but the times shown in the document are still slower than some of the current fastest services. The current Up Cornish Riveira reaches London from Penzance in 5 hours 0 minutes, Plymouth from 3 hours 0 minutes and Exeter form 2 hours 2 minutes. The propsed times are Penzance from 5 hours 8 minutes, Plymouth from 3 hours 12 minutes and Exeter from 2 hours 9 hours 9 minutes. If the DfT decide that HSTs should be retained then from reading the document it seems that the trains would still be making the additional station and the timings will be even worse.Quote If overcrowding does occur, there just won't be (m)any advances, and that'll concentrate minds. Which in some cases may well result in people going by car rather than travelling at a time which isn't convenient for them. Not something to be encouraged.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 15:07:50 There are more seats going forward than currently, so I'm not sure what your concern is? There won't be a full 5car between Plymouth and Penzance
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 15:14:20 Zoe - Industry Insider has just agreed with me in another thread - see here (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14894.msg173185#msg173185)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 15:17:09 There are more seats going forward than currently, so I'm not sure what your concern is? There won't be a full 5car between Plymouth and Penzance The concern is that with all the extra station calls the trains will be overcowded by the time it reaches Taunton. You are saying that a 5 car train from Penzance will never be full before it reaches Plymouth but I have heard reports that some HSTs arrivng into Plymouth from Cornwall are very busy and even more so leaving Plymouth. You say more trains is more seats but the frequency seems to be remaining roughly the same from Plymouth. Yes there will be a semi-fast service from Exeter but I doubt many people from Exeter are going to be using that when it will be significantly slower.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 15:18:19 They will if the (Advance) price is right!
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 15:30:47 They will if the (Advance) price is right! Will they? You can get some very cheap fares from Exeter to London with SWT and I have seen some quite cheap Exeter to London advance fares on the semi-fast Berks and Hants services but you still get quite a few people using the much faster FGW services to Paddington. I expect there's quite a bit of business travel from Exeter and so people are more likely be able to accept the higher cost of walk-up fares.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 15:33:53 Have you read II's post that I linked to above? Does that not allay your fears? If not, why not?
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Zoe on March 24, 2015, 15:37:51 Have you read II's post that I linked to above? Does that not allay your fears? If not, why not? Yes I have and I have posted in that thread. Regarldess of any overcrowding though, is it realy a great idea to be slowing down the headline journey times? Yes some journeys will be much quicker than now but it seems they will still be slower than the current headline times.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 24, 2015, 15:49:35 Those are minimum franchised times you're looking at - I reckon you'll be pleased when the actual timetable emerges.....
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Adelante_CCT on March 24, 2015, 18:04:03 I notice from the consultation that at least 3tph will be missing out Reading. I along with many others will have to get out of the habit of catching the first fast train out of Paddington.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 24, 2015, 18:21:44 Those are minimum franchised times you're looking at - I reckon you'll be pleased when the actual timetable emerges..... I didn't realise the franchise included minimum - I think you mean maximum - journey times. Even if it does, that's not how that table was presented, and it's a pretty meaningless figure anyway. The IEP spec. says both electrics and bi-modes have to be able get to Bristol in 69 minutes (stopping BPW only) or 75 minutes (all the usual stops via Bath). I showed the figures to an area manager at the manager-bothering session at Reading this afternoon, and said he had no idea where DfT had got them from. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: TonyK on March 24, 2015, 22:27:08 I'm glad I didn't have time to analyse this as soon as the announcement was made - all my questions have been answered, and the debate started for me! It came as a bit of a surprise to me.
It seems it is the beginning of the end for HSTs and Pacers in FGW land. The cascade from Bristol area will be as welcome as the 165s will be in Bristol. This will be especially so on the Tarka Line, much refurbished with new CWR, but still with overcrowded old stock, although the Avocet and Riviera lines will rejoice too. meanwhile, the Bristol Post (http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/say/story-26218258-detail/story.html) gives us its own considered opinion, and the benefit of its intensive research into the changes, in an editorial headed We Say (http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/say/story-26218258-detail/story.html): Quote The outdated facilities, seating and technology of the HSTs will be replaced by modern "Turbo" trains, bringing more services, faster journey times, more capacity, better comfort and even free wifi. Helpfully, it adds: Quote Bristol is a modern city in technology, if not in accuracy of reportage. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 25, 2015, 11:31:40 What I don't think we've recorded here yuet is that the Award runs until 1 April 2019 guaranteed, with an option for a further year.
Haven't yet discovered on whose side this option lies though. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 25, 2015, 11:48:19 At the sole discretion of the SoS for Transport I believe.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 25, 2015, 15:51:47 The announcement from Patrick McLoughlin (https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/rail-franchising-great-western) confirms this:
Quote The direct award secures an operator for the franchise for the 3 and a half years from September 2015 (with an optional 13 period extension at the Secretary of State^s sole discretion) ... Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: TonyK on March 25, 2015, 18:31:57 The announcement from Patrick McLoughlin (https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/rail-franchising-great-western) confirms this: Quote The direct award secures an operator for the franchise for the 3 and a half years from September 2015 (with an optional 13 period extension at the Secretary of State^s sole discretion) ... Probably to give leeway in case of slippage in electrification and IEP. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 26, 2015, 10:24:29 Indeed.
Do we know what stock is allocated for the Weymouth & Portsmouth services, or is still conjecture? Can anyone point me to anything concrete in the various announcements? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Timmer on March 26, 2015, 16:34:55 Indeed. 165/166 as a five car combination for Portsmouth-Cardiff services. No mention of what will be on the Weymouth line. My guess will be a continuation of 150/158s and of course the HST 'Weymouth Wizard'!Do we know what stock is allocated for the Weymouth & Portsmouth services, or is still conjecture? Can anyone point me to anything concrete in the various announcements? You will find a link to my source on the bottom of page 4 of this thread. Posting this on a mobile device. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 26, 2015, 16:44:06 Thank you! - I knew it was on this thread somewhere.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: thetrout on March 26, 2015, 19:32:46 I do have concerns about smaller but more frequent trains...
It's a well known fact that if people see a train coming into a station that's going where they want. They get on it. I've seen it time and time again when a Class 150 leaves Bath Spa or Bristol Temple Meads absolutely rammed full and standing. Then 3 minutes later the (slightly delayed) HST right behind it leaves half empty... ::) Makes me laugh that all the people on that 150 moan about overcrowding... Nah I'll wait for the HST thanks ;D Also Class 150/1 are completely unsuitable for Weymouth - Bristol Temple Meads. 3+2 Seating for a 2 hour journey?! Yuck! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 26, 2015, 20:39:28 On the other hand, thetrout, many of those boarding such a 150 at Bath Spa will possibly want to get off at Oldfield Park or Keynsham - which isn't an option if they wait for the HST. :P
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 26, 2015, 20:53:10 It's a well known fact that if people see a train coming into a station that's going where they want. They get on it. "A train in hand is worth two on the departure board" It's excellent that the peak evening train from Swindon via Chippenham to Westbury (1 car 153 at present) leaves right after the Taunton express (8 car HST) so that the space on the West Wilts service is available for those going beyond the point where the routes divide. There's a couple of occasions during the week that a Westbury service leaves not-too-far ahead of a Bristol service and it's noticeable the extra Chippenham flow on there. On the Weymouth Wizard, I (and Dad) did drop back from a 15x unit train - and somewhat regretted it as the HST journey seemed somewhat slower and lost us precious time in Weymouth. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: stuving on March 27, 2015, 16:49:25 The CP5 Enhancements Delivery Plan (http://www.networkrail.co.uk/cp5-delivery-plan/cp5-enhancements-delivery-plan.pdf) has been updated for March 2015 (same link, new document).
It lists these projects as being changed: Quote
Despite the inclusion of some of the GW electrification projects, the entry into service milestones have not been changed. Presumably that happens next time. I can see some minor internal changes (e.g. GRIP 3 and GRIP 4 for Swansea), but in other cases I can't see anything. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rapidash on March 28, 2015, 19:13:49 According to the chaps over at RailUK (http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=113684&page=21), we can be expecting the following cascade, in theory.
Quote SPM is getting 108 Class 16x vehicles. I don't know the 165/166 split. The remainder stay at Reading. The Bristol 'Metro' services formed no part of the calculation for this franchise. Could end up being a mix of DMU/EMU combined with South Wales orders / cascade. The 16x fleet do not have the fuel range for current types of West diagrams so will remain on Bristol axis. That is an increase of 5 vehicles on the current SPM allocation. Looks like the 08s will go elsewhere or be scrapped. A road/rail battery shunter taking their places. 150/0, 150/1, 153 and 143 going 'off lease'. All 150/2 and 158 will be Exeter based. Exeter is getting a new, much larger purpose built DMU depot with more staff in Riverside Yard. Penzance is expanding slightly. Laira is contracting but staying open. SPM likewise. All HST work at SPM stops in 27 months. If AT300 does not get approved by DfT, 21 HSTs will need to be made PRM compliant. Given the AT300s do not come from taxpayer funds, approval is very likely. Landore and OC are closing, but in the case of the latter Crossrail and North Pole Depots opening. In Landores case FGW is working with the Welsh Assembly to see if Landore could become a DMU depot for the Welsh franchise. Annnd (http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=113684&page=22) Quote The total number of Turbo vehicles at Bristol in December 2018 should be 106. The fleet should be 12 x 166, 16 x 165/1 3 car and 11 x 165/1 2 car. Exeter should be 2 x 150/0 3 car, 20 x 150/2, 14 x 158 2 car and 5 x 158 3 car. The retention of the 150/0 after they came off the Basingstokes was a late decision in the bid process, so I have been told, to allow the last 150/1 to go off lease. The DfT were keen to get these available for use elsewhere. The 150/0 are not being offered elsewhere, at the moment, so it looks as if they are staying. I asked about the Weymouth services - they will be 165/1 3 car, apparently. Now let's see how much of this changes between now and 2018! Personally as someone who commutes into Exeter all day, erryday, I can't wait to see these changes happen. Exeter TMD is gonna need a bigger shed! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 29, 2015, 09:08:52 So, given there's a 2 unit discrepancy in the quotes above, how many 165/6s are likely to remain at Reading? I can't remember total numbers
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: anthony215 on March 29, 2015, 11:15:18 Did read somewhere that the first turbo's will arrive in Bristol next spring and are likely to be deployed on the Bristol- Avonmouth/Severn Beach services first.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Adelante_CCT on March 29, 2015, 12:16:14 Did read somewhere that the first turbo's will arrive in Bristol next spring and are likely to be deployed on the Bristol- Avonmouth/Severn Beach services first. This would only happen if Newbury or Oxford electrification was up and running and EMUs had already been displaced to the Thames Valley area. Next spring may be to soon. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: a-driver on March 29, 2015, 13:42:15 If Laira is contracting rather than build a new depot at Exeter would it not make more sense to relocate the work to Laira, if there's sufficent capacity??
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ellendune on March 29, 2015, 13:52:50 If Laira is contracting rather than build a new depot at Exeter would it not make more sense to relocate the work to Laira, if there's sufficent capacity?? also need to consider the no of ECS workings that would generate. there are also benefits in a depot doing all the maintenance on a single fleet (as at Salisbury on SWT). Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 29, 2015, 14:55:19 That applies similarly to the turnos. I can't see them going to Bristol piecemeal - they'll go en-bloc. Yes, a few remain stabled at Reading, but I suspect all maintenance will transfer
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 29, 2015, 15:16:05 That applies similarly to the turnos. I can't see them going to Bristol piecemeal - they'll go en-bloc. That may be the case maintenance-wise, but if the plan's to turn on the electricity in stages (London to Reading, to Newbury, to Oxford, Crossrail services, branches) and bi-modes for Worcester / Hereford are another stage, or if that turns out to be how it happens, it really wouldn't make sense to lay up the 165s / 166s and wait for them all to be available to shift. Can you imagine how popular a government / rail industry would be if people were being crowded off trains in the Wessex area while people were seeing pictures of trains that could be used parked up? This: (http://www.wellho.net/pix/eastl1.jpg) was a bit of a PR disaster ... Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 29, 2015, 19:22:46 More likely is that the EMUs will show up all together, or at least in the types all together. Reading won't want to maintain 3 types of stock. Thete won't be the space either
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on March 29, 2015, 19:54:10 More likely is that the EMUs will show up all together .... Like this attachment ;D .... should be fun in Reading. Sorry - been a long day! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 29, 2015, 23:25:37 More likely is that the EMUs will show up all together, or at least in the types all together. Reading won't want to maintain 3 types of stock. Thete won't be the space either I disagree. Reading will have to maintain the three types anyway as Turbos are staying in some capacity and Reading depot has a lot of redundant capacity deliberately built into it. Also, phased introduction is almost always how these things happen (see Class 319s slowly being released to the North-West), as their replacements often come on stream bit by bit and a slow introduction allows crew (and just as important, the maintenance teams) to become trained and familiarised with them before diagrams are released en-masse. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: JayMac on March 29, 2015, 23:37:42 So, more like this then:
(http://cvcia.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/emu_mcf.jpg) ;D Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2015, 09:59:07 Turbo maintenance will eventually all transfer to St Phillips Marsh, meaning ecs moves for exams & faults.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on March 30, 2015, 10:10:25 Exams and heavy maintenance may well do, but I'll happily wager that light maintenance faults, stabling, refuelling, and emptying of CET's will remain at Reading for those sets that stay behind, as will the first two of those at Oxford.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2015, 10:20:59 Oh yes, I was referring to medium & Heavy maintenance, not nightly work
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on March 30, 2015, 10:40:57 From the FGW Press Release, not as I can see picked up by any outlet...
Quote The company will expand the use of the GWR brand, currently used in its long distance First Class carriages and will rebrand before the start of the new franchise in September. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: JayMac on April 01, 2015, 23:37:28 Forgive the continued light relief, but I spotted two EMUs in Somerset today. And there were overhead wires in place.
(http://i598.photobucket.com/albums/tt68/bignosemac/DSC_0037_zpserdhnqpw.jpg) And the overhead wires... (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/Washford_Cross_-_geograph.org.uk_-_687209.jpg) Washford transmitting station (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washford_transmitting_station). Also home to a small zoo. :P ;) ;D Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: bobm on April 02, 2015, 21:19:43 I knew telling him to get out more was a mistake....
Title: Capacity Cuts? - and no MPs... Post by: Rhydgaled on April 19, 2015, 12:34:26 I very nearly started a new topic for this, but changed my mind...
I am frequently trying to remind pepole about the potential IEP Capacity shortfall (http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=14894.0), especially with regard to the South Wales routes and the Cotswold Line, because I am hugely concerned about this and feel something needs to be done. We now have a new 'direct award' agreement but I cannot find the service level commitment detailing the service FirstGW will provide. Prior to the direct award announcement, I read rumours on another fourm that the requirement for First Great Western to operate crowd-busting services to provide extra summer Saturday services to Tenby and Pembroke Dock could be dropped under the new contract. This would mean four years with the already streched no-growth Wales & Borders having to cover services. The line requires three diagrams (ATW cover one with a class 150 2-car unit, the other two with 2-car 'Pacer' DMUs) whereas FirstGW provide two 8 coach IC125s... Can anyone find the new service level commitment and settle the matter one way or the other. A critical decision over Intercity rolling stock is supposed to be made in June by the DfT, but with no MPs at present I cannot use that channel to try and obtain all the facts before having to write to the new transport minister via my new MP. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on April 19, 2015, 12:53:35 Shouldn't you (also) be writing to the Welsh Goverrnt about their lack of service spec to ATW Then? Why is it purely a FGW issue?
Title: Re: Capacity Cuts? - and no MPs... Post by: Richard Fairhurst on April 19, 2015, 12:59:40 Can anyone find the new service level commitment and settle the matter one way or the other. That should be FOIable, no?Title: Re: Capacity Cuts? - and no MPs... Post by: Rhydgaled on April 22, 2015, 13:29:16 Can anyone find the new service level commitment and settle the matter one way or the other. That should be FOIable, no?Shouldn't you (also) be writing to the Welsh Goverrnt about their lack of service spec to ATW Then? Why is it purely a FGW issue? The ATW franchise does not expire until 2018, and was let on a no-growth basis (by Westminster I believe, not the Welsh Government who I think didn't have devolved responsibility for specifying the franchise at the time). As far as I understand it (and I may be wrong since I do not know the details and haven't read the franchise agreement) ATW have no obligation to provide additional services/capacity if other franchises (eg. ICWC or GW) withdraw services in the Wales & Borders franchise area. Additional services outside ATW's base obligations (Fishguard and Holyhead-Cardiff services) have come at a high cost to the Welsh Government, eg. ^1.4m for Fishguard. Admittedly I do not have an understanding of the costs involved, but I get the impression ATW is in a position to charge what they like for increments and I wouldn't be supprised if that ^1.4m is the full cost of providing the service, meaning any and all additional fares revenue from the service is pure profit for ATW.Even if they do have an obligation to cover withdrawal of FirstGW services, where can they obtain the necessary additional rolling stock by May 2016? In the longer term, you could argue that the new W&B franchise should be given responsibility for providing the additional summer capacity instead of FirstGW, but withdrawl of the FirstGW service before the end of the current ATW NO-GROWTH franchise is, I think, a different matter. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on April 22, 2015, 13:36:37 With hourly bi-modes (except for the all-stations stoppers) - some of which will be 10car - I think you'll find it's a net gain of seats on the North Cotswold...
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on April 22, 2015, 14:06:18 With hourly bi-modes (except for the all-stations stoppers) - some of which will be 10car - I think you'll find it's a net gain of seats on the North Cotswold... Did you read IndustryInsider's post that I linked to above? The analysis of the diagrams DfT used to calculate how many units to order (yes, yes, I know they are not actually what will be implemented, but they are the asumption used to order the stock) showed reductions in seats compared to current services at all of the following stations:
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on April 22, 2015, 14:13:21 The bi-modes (apart from that Hereford 10car) are only scheduled to trip as far, I believe, as Shurb Hill in Worcester - hence the drop in seats to Foregate Street, Malvern & Hereford - but those stations don't need the capacity currently - have you seen the empty HSTs going to Hereford from Worcester? You could get them all easily in a 2car turbo.
Somewhat surprised at the 20.2% drop in seats at Moreton, and can't see how they worked that out. Every train is stopping there in the future timetable, so a glaring error methinks Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on April 22, 2015, 17:02:58 I think we may have mentioned this before, but are the numbers of seats here counted as "number of seats departing to London"? If so, and the train calls at multiple stations, you're double or treble counting.
Lets take a hypothetical example 3 trains run from A calling at B and C to London, each with 500 seats. So that's 1500 seats from A, 1500 seats from B and 1500 seats from C. 3 new trains with 600 seats take over. The first train calls at A and B, the second at A and C, and the third starts from B and calls at C. So that' 1200 seats from each of them - "20% fewer seats". Except .. total capacity from A B and C has risen by 20%! Don't you just love statistics. The example is pertinent - there are plans to skip Swindon, for example, and to make trains have fewer stops - so my logic may be more that just statistics! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on April 22, 2015, 17:41:49 Pershore is losing two stops...all the others remain, so the seat count increases at all main stations, including Moreton
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on April 23, 2015, 10:11:53 The bi-modes (apart from that Hereford 10car) are only scheduled to trip as far, I believe, as Shurb Hill in Worcester - hence the drop in seats to Foregate Street, Malvern & Hereford - but those stations don't need the capacity currently - have you seen the empty HSTs going to Hereford from Worcester? No, there are bi-modes planned to Hereford all day, not just the 10-car working. The draft (and, I am told, impossible) timetable those figures are based on shows an hourly service between Worcester Foregate Street and London Paddington, with roughly one train every two hours extending to Hereford.I think we may have mentioned this before, but are the numbers of seats here counted as "number of seats departing to London"? If so, and the train calls at multiple stations, you're double or treble counting. Not sure I entirely understand, but in the case of Swansea (SWA) and Cardiff Central (CDF) the train frequency is the same (hourly PAD-SWA plus hourly PAD-CDF workings to make a half-hourly service) and all SWA trains will continue to call at CDF, so I don't think your comment applies. Similarly, I don't think it applies to PAD-Worcester.Lets take a hypothetical example 3 trains run from A calling at B and C to London, each with 500 seats. So that's 1500 seats from A, 1500 seats from B and 1500 seats from C. 3 new trains with 600 seats take over. The first train calls at A and B, the second at A and C, and the third starts from B and calls at C. So that' 1200 seats from each of them - "20% fewer seats". Except .. total capacity from A B and C has risen by 20%! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: chrisr_75 on April 23, 2015, 11:19:13 I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP?
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: didcotdean on April 23, 2015, 12:01:32 The 'Proposed Weekday Class 800/801 Service Pattern' has the off peak trains to Cardiff and Swansea being as they are now, ie one each hour, both stopping at Swindon. The Cardiffs continue to stop at Didcot but miss out Reading. The Swanseas miss out Didcot.
The additional peak service to Cardiff runs non-stop from London to Bristol Parkway, then onto Cardiff (off peak this train runs from Bristol Parkway to Temple Meads). Swindon in this plan has five trains an hour off peak to London, starting points Bristol TM (*2), Cardiff, Cheltenham & Swansea. Peak adds in the EMU shuttle stopping at Reading and Didcot. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on April 23, 2015, 12:03:39 I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP? Yes, but that has no effect on the number of seats through south Wales between Newport and Swansea.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: didcotdean on April 23, 2015, 12:06:44 Yes oddly the plan diagram does show any intermediate stations between Bristol and Cardiff, nor Cardiff and Swansea, but this can't be the planned stopping pattern (or lack of one).
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on April 23, 2015, 17:08:11 I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP? Yes, but that has no effect on the number of seats through south Wales between Newport and Swansea.Those seats are, however, no longer all available at Swindon too and re-counted as a part of the Swindon total. Now: Two trains an hour Cardiff to London - each with 500 seats, both calling at Swindon where there's a call for 400 seats. Effective seats from Cardiff - 600. Future: Two trains an hour from Cardiff to London - each with 450, one calling at Swindon where there's a call for 200 of those seats (the other 200 seats being catered for by twice the number of services from Bristol to London, and twice the number of services from Cheltenham to London. Effective seats from Cardiff - 700. 1000 seats reduced to 900. But effective seats having removed double counting increased from 600 to 700. Numbers are purely illustrative ... I'm sure someone can give me the right numbers. It makes sense in that it increases the seat occupancy at the outer end of the train's runs away from London, and thus balances supply better to demand. And that should help to keep costs / prices down with seat provision, members suggest, being very expensive. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on April 24, 2015, 09:21:02 Yes oddly the plan diagram does show any intermediate stations between Bristol and Cardiff, nor Cardiff and Swansea, but this can't be the planned stopping pattern (or lack of one). You seem to have different planned diagrams. The DfT IEP diagrams spreadsheet I have shows the Neath, Port Talbot Pwy and Bridgend stops.I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP? Yes, but that has no effect on the number of seats through south Wales between Newport and Swansea.Those seats are, however, no longer all available at Swindon too and re-counted as a part of the Swindon total. Now: Two trains an hour Cardiff to London - each with 500 seats, both calling at Swindon where there's a call for 400 seats. Effective seats from Cardiff - 600. Future: Two trains an hour from Cardiff to London - each with 450, one calling at Swindon where there's a call for 200 of those seats (the other 200 seats being catered for by twice the number of services from Bristol to London, and twice the number of services from Cheltenham to London. Effective seats from Cardiff - 700. 1000 seats reduced to 900. But effective seats having removed double counting increased from 600 to 700. Numbers are purely illustrative ... I'm sure someone can give me the right numbers. It makes sense in that it increases the seat occupancy at the outer end of the train's runs away from London, and thus balances supply better to demand. And that should help to keep costs / prices down with seat provision, members suggest, being very expensive. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: broadgage on April 24, 2015, 10:21:59 When full length loco hauled trains and HSTs on cross country routes were about to be replaced by new shorter DMUs. I recall some similar complex arguments regarding numbers of seats, service frequencies, stopping patterns, and how many passengers would use which services.
The proponents of the new shorter DMUs stated that in most cases that they would be adequate, and that they could run in multiple to give a "double length train" Cynics like me stated that the trains were too short and that many services would be overcrowded. The shorter trains duly arrived, and in a great many cases were overcrowded from day one, are still overcrowded some years later, hardly ever run in multiple to give a full length train, and are now widely accepted to be unsuitable for longer journeys. I feel a repeat coming on ! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: grahame on April 24, 2015, 10:36:30 So, more seats from Cardiff if travelling from there to London, but less seats for travel within Wales. I take it your 'each with 450' (seats) is an average, or just an illustrative number. Indeed - just illustrative of how the numbers can work. It's often struck me as not very efficient use of seats on certain services that they're packed at one end of the route and rather thin at the other. In extreme cases, there can be trains which are so overcrowded that not everyone who wants to travel can get on board at the start of the journey ... with space taken up by short distance passengers who could have waited no more than 20 minutes for the next train denying travel to longer distance / less frequent station passengers who have to wait an hour or more. (I saw that the other day ... not a South Wales example, but something we are very conscious of on the TransWilts) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: chrisr_75 on April 24, 2015, 10:49:01 I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP? Yes, but that has no effect on the number of seats through south Wales between Newport and Swansea.FGW are only responsible for a maximum of 2 tph on the S.Wales mainline, ATW I think is around 4 or 5 tph if my memory serves me right about the service pattern. In my logic, it would be much more beneficial to increase train length of the ATW services by 1 or 2 coaches which would then spread available seats more evenly through each hour and would address the issue of a reduction in FGW seats in South Wales. I guess this will likely be seen as electrification makes progress in South Wales (will hopefully also improve the timings of the stopping services), as it would be crazy to buy a bunch of 2 car EMU's to replace the current DMU fleet. Are there any specifications for South Wales EMU's as yet? I assume they're likely to be 4 car units? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on April 24, 2015, 19:27:53 It's often struck me as not very efficient use of seats on certain services that they're packed at one end of the route and rather thin at the other. Indeed, but that is generally unavoidable on services which require speeds above 110mph without making compromises which I feel are unacceptable. However, which end is packed can vary throughout the day. Using PAD-SWA as an example, a westbound train arriving in Swansea at around 8am might be fairly lighted out of PAD but heaving into SWA, whereas an eastbound service into PAD at 8am will be packed into PAD and quieter at the Swansea end. This means both ends of the service need full-length trains at exactly the same time of day.I thought a number of the South Wales services were planned to run non-stop RDG-NWP? Yes, but that has no effect on the number of seats through south Wales between Newport and Swansea.FGW are only responsible for a maximum of 2 tph on the S.Wales mainline, ATW I think is around 4 or 5 tph if my memory serves me right about the service pattern. In my logic, it would be much more beneficial to increase train length of the ATW services by 1 or 2 coaches which would then spread available seats more evenly through each hour and would address the issue of a reduction in FGW seats in South Wales. I guess this will likely be seen as electrification makes progress in South Wales (will hopefully also improve the timings of the stopping services), as it would be crazy to buy a bunch of 2 car EMU's to replace the current DMU fleet. Are there any specifications for South Wales EMU's as yet? I assume they're likely to be 4 car units? I don't know where you get 4-5tph from, Cardiff-Swansea has a base service of 2tph (1tph FirstGW from PAD, 1tph ATW Manchester-Carmarthen/Milford Haven) plus a stopper every two hours. There's also an hourly stopper between Cardiff and Bridgend only, continuing to Maesteg, and there are plans to double that. I'd really like to see a Carmarthen-Cardiff express DMU, avoiding the huge time penalty of going via Swansea, after electrification, but those Maesteg stoppers and the freight traffic mean it will be very hard to path. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: chrisr_75 on April 25, 2015, 00:48:41 I don't know where you get 4-5tph from, Cardiff-Swansea has a base service of 2tph (1tph FirstGW from PAD, 1tph ATW Manchester-Carmarthen/Milford Haven) plus a stopper every two hours. There's also an hourly stopper between Cardiff and Bridgend only, continuing to Maesteg, and there are plans to double that. I'd really like to see a Carmarthen-Cardiff express DMU, avoiding the huge time penalty of going via Swansea, after electrification, but those Maesteg stoppers and the freight traffic mean it will be very hard to path. On inspecting the timetable it appears I have counted the FGW services in with that number of tph, sorry! I still think that increasing capacity on the ATW services would represent a substantial improvement on the SWA-CDF section, even with a slight reduction on seats to and from London. Fully support your point that far west wales services could do with beefing up! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: MartinH on April 30, 2015, 08:47:00 Yes oddly the plan diagram does show any intermediate stations between Bristol and Cardiff, nor Cardiff and Swansea, but this can't be the planned stopping pattern (or lack of one). You seem to have different planned diagrams. The DfT IEP diagrams spreadsheet I have shows the Neath, Port Talbot Pwy and Bridgend stops.As didcotdean says, there are a number of intermediate stations, including Chippenham and Bath Spa towards Bristol, and Newport, Neath, Port Talbot Parkway and Bridgend towards Cardiff and Swansea, which do not appear on this diagram. There are a few differences between this calling pattern and the one the DfT had been proposing in the peak and off peak. For those which have not seen this the core service pattern is as follows: Off peak pattern 1tph to Bristol Temple Meads calling at Reading, Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa with certain hour extensions to Weston Super Mare and Exeter St Davids. 1tph to Bristol Temple Meads calling at Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa. 2tph to Bristol Temple Meads only calling at Bristol Parkway. 1tph to Cardiff Central calling at Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Bristol Parkway and Newport. 1tph to Swansea calling at Reading, Swindon, Bristol Parkway, Newport, Cardiff Central, Neath, Port Talbot Parkway and Bridgend with certain hour extensions to Camarthen. 1tph to Cheltenham Spa calling at Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Kemble, Stroud, Stonehouse and Gloucester. 1tph to Worcester Shrub Hill calling at Reading, Oxford and stations to Worcester with certain hour extensions to Hereford. Peak pattern & variations 1tph to Bristol Temple Meads calling at Reading, Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa with certain hour extensions to Weston Super Mare and Exeter St Davids. 1tph to Bristol Temple Meads calling at Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa. 1tph to Bristol Temple Meads calling at Chippenham and Bath Spa (calls assumed as these stations are not shown). 1tph to Cardiff Central calling at Bristol Parkway and Newport. 1tph to Cardiff Central calling at Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Bristol Parkway and Newport. 1tph to Swansea calling at Reading, Swindon, Bristol Parkway, Newport, Cardiff Central, Neath, Port Talbot Parkway and Bridgend with certain hour extensions to Camarthen. 1tph to Cheltenham Spa calling at Reading, Didcot Parkway, Swindon, Kemble, Stroud, Stonehouse and Gloucester. 1tph to Worcester Shrub Hill calling at Reading, Oxford and stations to Worcester with certain hour extensions to Hereford. 1tph to Worcester Shrub Hill calling at Didcot Parkway, Oxford and stations to Worcester. The main differences between this pattern and the one previously stated by the DfT off peak is that the Swansea service now additionally calls at Swindon and Bristol Parkway, the Cardiff services now skips Reading running non-stop to Didcot Parkway, and services extended to Weston Super Mare from Bristol are now the one via Chippenham and Bath. In the peak the 2 tph that run via Bristol Parkway to Bristol instead has one running to Cardiff Central running non-stop between London and Bristol Parkway. The other runs via Chippenham and Bath to Bristol in the peak, not calling at any stations between Paddington and Chippenham. Also in the peak an additional service is shown running to Worcester, giving stations between Oxford and Worcester 2tph in the peak, and runs non-stop between London and Didcot Parkway. The use of the term "certain hours only" is interesting for the extensions of services to Hereford, Weston Super Mare, Exeter St Davids and Camarthen, as this doesn't give as clear a frequency that these stations will be served. This particularly applies to Western Super Mare which in the DfTs pattern was going to be served hourly from London, and Hereford that the DfTs pattern showed as being served 2 hourly from London. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 30, 2015, 21:33:45 Many thanks for posting that very useful information here, MartinH - and welcome to the Coffee Shop forum! :)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: MartinH on April 30, 2015, 23:35:41 Many thanks for posting that very useful information here, MartinH - and welcome to the Coffee Shop forum! :) Thank you Chris. I hadn't seen this really mentioned or discussed anywhere, so when I saw it briefly mentioned on here, I thought I post the details and see what people think of what FGW is now proposing.Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: JayMac on May 15, 2015, 19:11:21 The Department for Transport have now published the Greater Western Franchise Agreement for September 2015 to April 2019:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/first-great-western Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: paul7575 on May 18, 2015, 11:48:02 Interesting table giving the 387 cascade dates into the GW franchise from GTR. Given that the last ones have not entered service yet, GTR will only have all 29 units available for 9 or 10 months at the most:
Quote 29 Class 387 units (116vehicles) are delivered in four distinct phases: - 6 units by end of March 2016; - 4 units by end of April 2016; - 8 units by end of February 2017 - 11 units by end of March 2017 The first 6 units being timed to coincide with the start of the previously discussed EMU shuttle between Paddington and Hayes & Harlington... Paul Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on August 12, 2015, 10:22:33 The Department for Transport have now published the Greater Western Franchise Agreement for September 2015 to April 2019: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/first-great-western You'll now find the Service Level Commitment to go with this on that page too. SLC3a is the first (of three) I believe that will run through this new franchise. 3A runs from the Dec18 TT - while the current one runs up to that date. Direct link to pdf here https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/452229/first-great-western-service-level-commitment-3a-22032015.pdf Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: JayMac on August 12, 2015, 11:01:51 There are actually 3 separate Service Level Commitments during the Direct Award period. The current one does not run to December 2018. Neither is SLC3a the first of three. It is the third of three.
From start of Direct Award (20th September 2015) to May 2017 (SLC1): https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/452224/first-great-western-service-level-commitment-1-22032015.pdf From May 2017 to December 2018 (SLC2): https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/452225/first-great-western-service-level-commitment-2-22032015.pdf From December 2018 to end of Direct Award (April 2019) (SLC3a): https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/452229/first-great-western-service-level-commitment-3a-22032015.pdf Also on the FGW Franchise Agreement page (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/first-great-western) is Service Level Commitment 2a (https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/402719/RED_FGW_SLC2b_Direct_Award_updated_May_2015__1_.pdf), updated in May 2015. This is the current SLC running to September 19th 2015. Well done DfT for some very confusing numbering. What happened to SLC3? ::) Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on August 12, 2015, 11:16:39 There were going to be 3a, 3b & 3c originally.....not sure what happened. Would make sense to have followed 2a. Which is what confused me.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Chris from Nailsea on August 12, 2015, 19:57:43 Hmm. The words "Department for Transport" and "clarity" are not ones I'd expect to see in any one phrase - unless the words "lack of" also appeared. ::)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on August 13, 2015, 08:44:38 Wasn't SLC 3 (Dec 2018 onwards) broken into (a) and (b) versions because the passenger-foresaking proposal to turn the PAD-Penzance route over to slightly-glorified regional express DMUs hadn't yet been approved?
From the franchise agreement document: Quote SLC 3(b) Public Register Version 91 (a) The parties acknowledge that SLC3(b) was still under development by the Franchisee at the date of this Franchise Agreement. (b) The Franchisee shall deliver a draft of SLC3(b) to the Secretary of State by no later than 30 April 2015. Such draft shall be consistent with: (i) the principle that SLC3(b) shall be a development of SLC3(a) providing for improved outputs consequent upon the implementation of the West of England Rolling Stock Procurement Process; and (ii) the draft public timetables supplied by the Franchisee to the Secretary of State on 21 January 2015 with filenames ^Dec18 T135A new 200115.doc^ and ^Dec18 T135 new 200115.doc^. (c) The Franchisee and the Secretary of State shall act reasonably and in good faith in seeking to agree SLC3(b). If agreement is not reached by 31 May 2015 the Secretary of State shall have the right to reasonably determine it. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Andrew1939 from West Oxon on August 14, 2015, 12:02:24 According to one of the official documents Coombe station has moved from Cornwall to Oxfordshire. Rather poor proof reading for an offical document.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Ollie on August 14, 2015, 12:19:42 According to one of the official documents Coombe station has moved from Cornwall to Oxfordshire. Rather poor proof reading for an offical document. Wonder if they meant Combe in Oxfordshire? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ellendune on August 14, 2015, 20:09:09 According to one of the official documents Coombe station has moved from Cornwall to Oxfordshire. Rather poor proof reading for an offical document. Wonder if they meant Combe in Oxfordshire? You mean https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/your-journey/at-the-station/combe-oxon (https://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/your-journey/at-the-station/combe-oxon)? Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Ollie on August 14, 2015, 22:51:29 Yeah that one.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Kernow Otter on August 24, 2015, 10:47:27 From December 2018 to end of Direct Award (April 2019) (SLC3a): https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/452229/first-great-western-service-level-commitment-3a-22032015.pdf I wonder if anyone could shed a little clarity on the specific wording in part of this document please. For example from the link above, pages 99 - 100, limited stops Cornish Mainline. Some of the specific stations have details of the travel direction of stopping services ie: 3.5 Menheniot. The next sub paragraph 3.6 Lostwithiel is less detailed, and it simply states '10 services shall call'. Is that 10 in each direction per day or 10 in total for both directions per day ? Any clarification would be much appreciated. Many thanks Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on August 24, 2015, 11:00:55 I read that as a total.....as a minimum. Of course the TOC can stop more often.
And that may mean uneven up & down too - so 6 up & 4 down complies. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on August 24, 2015, 11:34:47 I read that as a total.....as a minimum. Of course the TOC can stop more often. And that may mean uneven up & down too - so 6 up & 4 down complies. I don't think that's correct, as the document's 'interpretation' section says (with my italics added): 3.3 Except where expressly indicated to the contrary, all services are to run in both directions and the requirements of the Service Level Commitment (including any interval between services, frequency of service or stopping pattern) are to apply in each direction. Also, there's a total of 23 stops currently by FGW services (including the down sleeper), so 20 seems a much more likely number than 10 in terms of not causing uproar in Cornwall. These SLC's really aren't ever set in stone anyway and I predict several amendments before this current version is actually initiated. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on August 24, 2015, 11:40:07 I agree, thanks for finding that interpretation, seems pretty clear when read with that in mind.
But I don't agree that the SLC from September 2015 will get changed. Too late for that, with timetables for December likely set in stone, except for timing tweaks. The others beyond, possibly. Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on August 24, 2015, 12:20:50 Yes, I agree. I meant the current version, as in that version of SLC3a linked to by Kernow Otter, to commence in Dec 2018, not the Sept 2015 SLC.
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: ChrisB on August 24, 2015, 12:24:00 It was your use of "current" that confused me....
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Kernow Otter on August 26, 2015, 18:11:20 Many thanks for the feedback. Somewhat happier with 10 each way, than 10 in total as anyone would be !
And as a minimum service provision, there is nothing to hinder an evidence based campaign to stop more services. Happy days ! Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: IndustryInsider on August 26, 2015, 18:13:54 Don't forget the two each way that XC operate as well. ;)
Title: Re: Franchise Announcement Post by: Rhydgaled on August 30, 2015, 11:15:19 These SLC's really aren't ever set in stone anyway and I predict several amendments before this current version is actually initiated. It is the 3a SLC that was refered to anyway. I believe this is the one that would apply had the AT300 order for Plymouth/Penzance services not gone ahead. I don't think SLC3b (which I think is the AT300 timetable from Dec 2018) has been released yet.This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |