Title: London Terminals Post by: Surrey 455 on April 29, 2014, 22:31:59 Today's tube strike has made me rethink about how I get to work. I currently use SWT from Bookham and change at Waterloo to the Waterloo and City line.
Today I changed at Waterloo to a South Eastern train from Waterloo East to London Bridge and walked from there. It was a pleasant walk and didn't take too long. I was able to get a seat on every train both there and back which mirrors my experience on the last strike. So my question is, when I renew my SWT season ticket next year can I give up using the tube by having a ticket to "London Terminals"? Can I get off my SWT train, leave the barriers at Waterloo, walk to Waterloo East and catch a South Eastern train to London Bridge using this ticket? If I can that will save me a lot of money for only an extra 15 minutes or so travelling time. Any advice would be gratefully appreciated Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: paul7575 on April 29, 2014, 22:59:12 So my question is, when I renew my SWT season ticket next year can I give up using the tube by having a ticket to "London Terminals"? Can I get off my SWT train, leave the barriers at Waterloo, walk to Waterloo East and catch a South Eastern train to London Bridge using this ticket? Yes most definitely. 'London Terminals' for a ticket from Bookham, and most areas southwest of London, is quite flexible, and as well as Waterloo, includes Victoria, Charing Cross, London Bridge, and less obviously Cannon St, Blackfriars and City Thameslink (but no further). Historically these stations correspond to a ticketing group formerly known as 'London SR'. The ticket barriers at Waterloo are programmed to pass tickets through to allow this onward travel. Paul Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Southern Stag on April 30, 2014, 00:21:40 Historically these stations correspond to a ticketing group formerly known as 'London SR'. The ticket barriers at Waterloo are programmed to pass tickets through to allow this onward travel. But bizarrely will swallow tickets with the destination of London St Pancras, which are also valid through Waterloo and onwards via Waterloo East and London Bridge to St Pancras via the Thameslink route. For anybody who is ever buying tickets from South of the Thames travelling to Kings Cross/St Pancras it's always worth checking if National Rail only tickets are available to St Pancras. It's a little slower having to go via Thameslink but often much cheaper.Paul Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: paul7575 on April 30, 2014, 09:15:53 But bizarrely will swallow tickets with the destination of London St Pancras, which are also valid through Waterloo and onwards via Waterloo East and London Bridge to St Pancras via the Thameslink route. For anybody who is ever buying tickets from South of the Thames travelling to Kings Cross/St Pancras it's always worth checking if National Rail only tickets are available to St Pancras. It's a little slower having to go via Thameslink but often much cheaper. Might that be because a ticket to St Pancras has different route restrictions, and although it might be routed something like 'not underground' it is intended to be valid via an FCC through service only? I know from other forums that such fares are also queried at Victoria, even if people point out they intend to use other means to cross London. One of those completely grey areas about routing. I'm aware that many TVMs in the south will just provide a ticket to London Terminals if you try and get to somewhere like St Pancras, Kings Cross or Euston, but of course these are not valid for cross London travel and ought not to be sold for that purpose, the correct fare being to 'London U1'... Paul Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Fourbee on April 30, 2014, 11:03:29 Interesting about the St Pancras fares, never knew they existed, may come in useful one day.
I had a look at the London U1 fares in NFM 18. Maybe I imagined it, but off-peak day returns no longer seem to exist with that destination. Kentish Town as a destination can also be a useful one in this scenario if e.g. Waterloo-St Pancras via tube is required (also works by selecting NR stations close to other London Termini as desired). I think that quite often works out cheaper than 2 x Oyster singles added on to a London Terminals fare. Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Southern Stag on April 30, 2014, 12:39:18 But bizarrely will swallow tickets with the destination of London St Pancras, which are also valid through Waterloo and onwards via Waterloo East and London Bridge to St Pancras via the Thameslink route. For anybody who is ever buying tickets from South of the Thames travelling to Kings Cross/St Pancras it's always worth checking if National Rail only tickets are available to St Pancras. It's a little slower having to go via Thameslink but often much cheaper. Might that be because a ticket to St Pancras has different route restrictions, and although it might be routed something like 'not underground' it is intended to be valid via an FCC through service only? I know from other forums that such fares are also queried at Victoria, even if people point out they intend to use other means to cross London. One of those completely grey areas about routing. I'm aware that many TVMs in the south will just provide a ticket to London Terminals if you try and get to somewhere like St Pancras, Kings Cross or Euston, but of course these are not valid for cross London travel and ought not to be sold for that purpose, the correct fare being to 'London U1'... Paul Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Fourbee on April 30, 2014, 15:09:12 I generally buy most of my tickets online now if the TVM wont sell what I want. It is less rigmarole than trying to obtain exotic ticket(s) at the booking office.
SWT TVMs do not allow a change of origin station (nor FGW for that matter) which is particularly annoying as it can be done (e.g. Southern). Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Surrey 455 on April 30, 2014, 21:50:00 Thank you, Paul for your contribution. I calculate that I can save up to ^650 a year by choosing this ticket. It'll probably be less because there will be times when for work or for leisure I'll need to pay for a bus or tube.
I'm also seriously considering the bike for work scheme. I can save another ^250 per year by cycling to Leatherhead instead where I would also benefit with a doubled frequency of SWT trains plus Southern as well. Obviously I have not factored in the price of a bike in the first place. In fact I might just see if my old 30 year old bike is worth servicing and skip the bike4work. Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: SDS on April 30, 2014, 21:54:36 I think London St Pancras tickets get printed as London Thameslink now (4452)
Title: Re: London Terminals Post by: Southern Stag on April 30, 2014, 22:04:55 London Thameslink is the rough equivalent of St Pancras for destinations of the northern section of the Thameslink route. London St Pancras is used for destinations south of the Thames.
This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |