Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => South Western services => Topic started by: stuving on April 05, 2014, 13:24:11



Title: TVB LEP Study on "Reading Waterloo Line and Southwest Rail Access to Heathrow"
Post by: stuving on April 05, 2014, 13:24:11
The Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (with its members: Bracknell Forest, Reading, and Wokingham Councils) has commissioned an Economic Impact Study on "Reading Waterloo Line and Southwest Rail Access to
Heathrow" (http://thamesvalleyberkshire.co.uk/Portals/0/FileStore/StrategicInfrastructure/Reading-Waterloo%20Economic%20Impact%20Report.pdf). This was released, coincidentally, just before the Crossrail to Reading announcement.

It's purely economic - it estimates benefits, but not costs. it's the choice of options that I find a bit odd. This summarises the results, in terms of the capital equivalent of the supposed general economic benefit:

Scenario Description Maximum
Benefits
(^million)
Low Benefits
(^million)
Magnitude of
Capital
Investment
(^million) 
Scenario B1 -25% JT 1,7421,262625 ^ 875
Scenario B2 -15% JT 1,017 742 375 ^ 500
Scenario C1 4tph 1,365 828 425 - 675
Scenario C2 3tph 771 482 250 - 375
Scenario D1 -25% JT / 4tph    3,487 2,322 1,150 ^ 1,750
Scenario D2 -15% JT / 3tph 1,713 1,262  625 ^ 850

The options are two levels of journey time reduction, and two levels of service frequency increase. There are also some options for access to Heathrow:

Scenario Description Maximum
Benefits
(^million)
Low Benefits
(^million)
Magnitude of
Capital
Investment
(^million) 
Scenario E1 Heathrow Loop 508 297 150 ^ 250
Scenario E2 Heathrow Spur
- without rail service improvement   
(352) *
(-605)
(211) *
(-348)
n/a
(no gain)
Scenario F1 Loop + 2tph 3,059 2,041 1,025 ^ 1,525
Scenario F2 Spur + 2tph 1,683 1,102 550 ^ 850
Scenario G1 F1 + Guildford Link 3,150 2,081 1,050 ^ 1,550

They looked at two kinds of link - spur and loop - but without defining where these lines would be. Then the current 2 tph are routed via Heathrow, unless there are additional trains in which case the current ones go direct. They do not consider just extending Heathrow trains to Staines.

There is a mention of the level crossing issue that Airtrack never solved, but it is not part of the assessment - presumably it comes on the engineering/infractructure cost side of the equation that they have not estimated at all.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net