Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to the West => Topic started by: bobm on March 20, 2014, 20:23:35



Title: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: bobm on March 20, 2014, 20:23:35
This news release  (http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/Media-Centre/2014/March/tornado-steam-engine-on-night-riviera-sleeper)has appeared on the FGW website to rebut suggestions elsewhere that a night time run with Tornado was being planned.

Quote
Tornado Steam Engine on Night Riviera Sleeper
Tuesday 18th March 2014

First Great Western supports the use of heritage traction on the national network, including steam, Indeed we are working closely to facilitate one such operation in May, but the challenges that would need to be overcome to use a steam engine with the sleeper are frankly enormous

It would require considerable planning, right at a time when our efforts remain fully focused on getting services back to normal after the flooding and looking after our customers.

We will be doing a number of things to celebrate the opening of the Dawlish line and supporting the return of rail services to and from Devon and Cornwall. A steam hauled sleeper is not one of them however.

Even if it was possible to find a safe way to do it, and this is by no means straightforward, most people on the sleeper want to be in bed. It is not therefore the passenger spectacle that a steam service by day provides. We might well look at a steam service in Devon and Cornwall later this year, but this will not involve the sleeper.

The sleeper is all about giving customers a good night^s sleep, rather than providing an exciting outing in the middle of the night. Not that we oppose exciting outings, we have done more than any other TOC to support steam runs on our network.

We appreciate this will be disappointing but this is not something we are going to offer on the sleeper train, especially when we are working to get business back to normal.
 
Prior to the sea wall collapse we had been seeing significant growth in passenger numbers on the sleeper, . We will continue to focus our energy on encouraging this important group of customers back to the sleeper when it returns in April. With support from Cornwall Council and the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership, we have also secured under this franchise extra seasonal capacity for leisure and business passengers on our Night Riviera Sleeper. This will mean one additional sleeping car and another seated carriage introduced to the service


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: SDS on March 20, 2014, 22:20:03
Plus I bet NeR would not allow it.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: broadgage on March 21, 2014, 02:54:38
I would agree, that steam is not very suitable for the sleeper.
Not much to see from the lineside as it would be dark for much of the trip.
Those on board would no doubt prefer to sleep than to admire a steamer.
The water stops are likely to be more disruptive than the usual station stops.

I do hope however that one or more steam hauled daytime trains could be arranged.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: TonyK on April 07, 2014, 17:28:44

Quote
Even if it was possible to find a safe way to do it, and this is by no means straightforward, most people on the sleeper want to be in bed.

And I thought they wanted to get hammered in the bar...


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 07, 2014, 21:32:37
I would agree, that steam is not very suitable for the sleeper.


Why???  I can remember travelling to Newcaste-upon-Tyne from Swindon in, um, 1958,  on a family outing.  Lovely journey!  Not that I can remember much of it, as once darkness fell I was lulled into my slumbers by all the wonderful sounds of the railway.  Ah!  Those were the days!


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: trainer on April 08, 2014, 12:00:44
Not that I can remember much of it, as once darkness fell I was lulled into my slumbers by all the wonderful sounds of the railway.

I think that's the answer to your question, Cynthia.  Everyone's asleep and to go to all that expensive trouble for a sentimental feeling is probably not the best use of money for the national railway or the heritage people.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: broadgage on April 08, 2014, 17:43:21
Indeed, steam used to be used for virtualy all trains including sleepers.
But these days steam haulage is rather an expensive undertaking, and it seems more sensible to use it for daylight runs when it may be best appreciated.

I hope that we will see steam on the GW, preferably in the form of a charter to Minehead :)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 08, 2014, 21:30:59
Yes of course, when I was a little one, it was steam or nothing, so strange to think now that this mode of transport is thought of as a luxury!  I must say, to go off-topic slightly, I'm surprised the green lobby hasn't tried to ban the use of steam engines, as I assume they're pretty dirty machines in terms of CO2 output.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: ellendune on April 08, 2014, 21:35:04
I must say, to go off-topic slightly, I'm surprised the green lobby hasn't tried to ban the use of steam engines, as I assume they're pretty dirty machines in terms of CO2 output.

Not just CO2, also sulphur and particulates.

Nevertheless the number of steam engines in use does not amount to much in the global sum of things.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 09, 2014, 20:49:35
I must say, to go off-topic slightly, I'm surprised the green lobby hasn't tried to ban the use of steam engines, as I assume they're pretty dirty machines in terms of CO2 output.

Not just CO2, also sulphur and particulates.

Nevertheless the number of steam engines in use does not amount to much in the global sum of things.

The trouble with journeys undertaken on a steam heritage line, they are not really carbon off-set-able (a clumsy term, but can't think of a better one at present!) as the passengers are mostly what I think you call 'bashers'? Just there for the ride.  I noted last year though, that on the West Somerset Line there seemed to be a number of locals using the Line for a specific journey, it being a reasonable distance, from Bishops Lydeard to Minehead.  Similarly, on the North Norfolk heritage railway, there seemed to be some passengers going to Holt (or indeed, Sheringham) for a purpose.  How many other steam lines are being used as regular travel routes, does anyone know? 


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 09, 2014, 21:02:22
The South Devon Railway into Totnes connects fairly easily with 'the big railway', so is used by many wishing to travel rather wider ...  ;)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: JayMac on April 09, 2014, 21:11:40
I'd argue that the worst carbon footprint for many heritage railways is the fact that the vast majority of visitors have to use road transport to get to the attraction.

In many cases (West Somerset Railway being a classic example) it is so only for want of a permanent connection to the national rail network.

Others are more fortunate. The Severn Valley Railway has just walking distance between its station at Kidderminster and its namesake on the national network. Dartmouth Steam Railway is next door at Paignton.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on April 09, 2014, 21:13:50
... and the Bodmin & Wenford ...  ;)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 09, 2014, 21:35:29
I'd argue that the worst carbon footprint for many heritage railways is the fact that the vast majority of visitors have to use road transport to get to the attraction.

In many cases (West Somerset Railway being a classic example) it is so only for want of a permanent connection to the national rail network.

Others are more fortunate. The Severn Valley Railway has just walking distance between its station at Kidderminster and its namesake on the national network. Dartmouth Steam Railway is next door at Paignton.

I had an interesting conversation with the folk running the rail museum at Holt, who were talking about the difficulties of connecting to a main line, I think due to all the safety regulations and other rules, that obviously heritage railways have to abide with as much as any other TOC.  I think the difficulties arise because so many of the heritage railway staff are volunteers, I imagine it must be a nightmare trying to get everyone concerned trained up.

CfN:  Bodmin & Wenford?  That doesn't connect with the main line now, does it?  It was a very short, there-and-back journey last time I was down that way.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: JayMac on April 09, 2014, 21:37:56
Yep. Cross platform (or footbridge if coming from the Plymouth direction) interchange to the B&WR at Bodmin Parkway.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 09, 2014, 21:47:46
Whoo Hooo!

(Puts Cornwall on rail travel itinerary for 2014........)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: John R on April 09, 2014, 21:52:29

I had an interesting conversation with the folk running the rail museum at Holt, who were talking about the difficulties of connecting to a main line, I think due to all the safety regulations and other rules, that obviously heritage railways have to abide with as much as any other TOC.  I think the difficulties arise because so many of the heritage railway staff are volunteers, I imagine it must be a nightmare trying to get everyone concerned trained up.


Running adjacent to a Network Rail line isn't so bad (although even that has some restrictions). But as soon as you go onto Network Rail tracks the whole post privatisation bureaucracy takes over. You have to register effectively as a TOC (train operating company) or get another one to run the train for you. You need (quite rightly) to abide by all the main line safety regulations, and much more.

The best example is the North York Moors, who run daily services over the branch to Whitby. It's been so successful that they are currently reinstating a second platform at Whitby to enable more services to run. At the opposite end of the country, the Swanage Rly will likely extend into Wareham station next year.  The railway you were at (North Norfolk) has had an end to end connection with the national network at Sheringham for around 3 years, used for main line excursions onto the NNR, and for loco movements to the railway. But they have an aspiration to run services from Sheringham to Cromer, which is where they have the experience of all the difficulties in getting something like this off the ground.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Puffing Billy on April 09, 2014, 21:57:38
Yes of course, when I was a little one, it was steam or nothing, so strange to think now that this mode of transport is thought of as a luxury!  I must say, to go off-topic slightly, I'm surprised the green lobby hasn't tried to ban the use of steam engines, as I assume they're pretty dirty machines in terms of CO2 output.

Cue the "Great Western locomotives not green" headlines


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: grahame on April 09, 2014, 22:04:14
I had an interesting conversation with the folk running the rail museum at Holt, who were talking about the difficulties of connecting to a main line, ....

Surely not "our" Holt, between Trowbridge and Melksham, where the Devizes branch left the Wilts, Somerset and Weymouth main line - now divided into "TransWilts" and "Heart of Wessex" sections ...?


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: John R on April 09, 2014, 22:08:26
Ah, and I assumed Holt, which is the western terminus of the North Norfolk Railway.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Cynthia on April 09, 2014, 22:32:51
Ah, and I assumed Holt, which is the western terminus of the North Norfolk Railway.

John  R, you were right, I was referring to Holt, in Norfolk.

I assumed they must already have a link with the main line, as last summer, when I was visiting the area, the steam engine "Oliver Cromwell" came into Sheringham.  I was absolutely amazed by the numbers of tourists crowding around to have a look at this beautiful sight (oh, sorry; bootiful...).  Not just people of my generation, who grew up with steam, but people from all walks of life and from all age groups.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: Southern Stag on April 10, 2014, 00:35:12
Running adjacent to a Network Rail line isn't so bad (although even that has some restrictions).
The Spa Valley Railway has a rather unusual restriction because of the section at Eridge where the line runs adjacent to the London-Uckfield line. All the doors on the NR side of the train have to be manually locked between Groombridge and Eridge to prevent passengers opening slam doors onto the Network Rail line. I'm not sure where else being locked in the train would be acceptable.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: grahame on April 10, 2014, 07:01:59
I'm not sure where else being locked in the train would be acceptable.

I recall being rather uncomfortable being locked in to a carriage on the Ffestiniog railway many, many years ago.  Rather worrisome in terms of emergency escape routes, but it would appear that there's no law / regulation that says that train operators can't do it.  We get locked in every day these days, but with systems that give alternative emergency escape methods ...


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: bobm on April 10, 2014, 08:38:40
Indeed - and just to prove it here are the rear of two engines meeting at Bodmin Parkway....  ;D

(http://www.mbob.co.uk/rforum/bod1004.jpg)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: trainer on April 10, 2014, 09:21:45
I recall being rather uncomfortable being locked in to a carriage on the Ffestiniog railway many, many years ago.

You will still be locked in on older passenger stock of the Ffestinog where there are outward opening doors because of the tight clearances in many places.  All their modern vehicles have inward opening doors.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: The Tall Controller on April 10, 2014, 17:21:10
Indeed - and just to prove it here are the rear of two engines meeting at Bodmin Parkway....  ;D

What a lovely station!  ;D


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: TonyK on April 14, 2014, 18:45:39
... and the Bodmin & Wenford ...  ;)

... not to mention the Isle of Widget Steam Railway interchange at Smallbrook Junction ...;)


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: JayMac on April 14, 2014, 20:04:25
Isle of Widget Steam Railway interchange at Smallbrook Junction ...;)

The only National Rail station in the UK with no pedestrian or vehicular access. You can only interchange between Island Line and the aforementioned Isla White Steam Railway.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: grahame on April 14, 2014, 20:18:53
The only National Rail station in the UK with no pedestrian or vehicular access.

Isn't Norton Bridge still technically open?


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: JayMac on April 14, 2014, 20:32:34
Good call.  :P

However, you can't access the platforms at Norton Bridge (same goes for nearby Wedgwood and Barleston Stations) whilst you can at Smallbrook Junction, albeit only from trains.


Title: Re: FGW says no to steam on the Night Riviera
Post by: ellendune on April 14, 2014, 20:39:19
Berney arms comes to mind, but that does at least have pedestrian access



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net