Title: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on December 29, 2007, 11:18:55 Half a century after Kingskerswell bypass - linking Torbay to Newton Abbot - was first planned, Devon County Council and Torbay Council have put forward a funding scheme bid (link below.)
http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=143632&command=displayContent&sourceNode=142719&contentPK=19388152&folderPk=91672&pNodeId=201778 The project was submitted for approval to the Department for Transport this week, with a revised cost expected to be as high as ^129.9 million. One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this : Quote ^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^ "Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added. The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it. Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each. Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol. Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ " Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Btline on December 29, 2007, 16:44:06 Half a century after Kingskerswell bypass - linking Torbay to Newton Abbot - was first planned, Devon County Council and Torbay Council have put forward a funding scheme bid (link below.) http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=143632&command=displayContent&sourceNode=142719&contentPK=19388152&folderPk=91672&pNodeId=201778 The project was submitted for approval to the Department for Transport this week, with a revised cost expected to be as high as ^129.9 million. One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this : Quote ^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^ "Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added. The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it. Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each. Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol. Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ " No, no, no!!!!!!!! The delays!!!! Cars braking down!!!!!!! They would then shut the line!!! Why not reopen the station at Kingskerwell? This must not happen! The bypass- don't care! The "railroad" NO! Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on December 29, 2007, 21:15:53 Thank god. Countless times have i sat in traffic along that stupid road!
Its the traffic lights at the pub that cause the mega problems. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Graz on December 30, 2007, 19:54:12 I've been down this way myself caught up in serious congestion, stuck in a queue trying to head out of Torquay for at least half an hour. However I don't feel the dual route is such a good idea, as people like to travel on trains to avoid traffic. Trains caught behind queues of cars would do nothing except put people off and cause bad delays for those from Exmouth, too. And there are safety issues to consider like broken down cars, and people on the track. Buses only may not be such a bad idea though.
If it is those lights causing the issues, could there be another alternative such as a roundabout? Also, reopening the station there may not be a bad idea at all as it seemed a fairly big place.... Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: vacman on December 30, 2007, 22:14:51 If it is those lights causing the issues, could there be another alternative such as a roundabout? Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on December 31, 2007, 09:53:43 I would have said that a few months ago, but the service with the pacers is cheap and shabby. A relative commented on the poor state of the trains!
Get more people onto the 12/12A as it runs every 7 or so minutes. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on December 31, 2007, 10:39:25 Here is a link with further info on the HoldFast method.
http://www.rubberhighways.com/ This can also be used to convert railway lines into guided busways (link below.) http://www.rubberhighways.com/transport_benefits.html So far, I know of only one user/campaign group who thinks this is a good idea. Interestingly, its the Abbey Line Community Rail Partnership. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Btline on December 31, 2007, 14:25:50 How can they be thinking of this.
The beauty of the railway is that you are separated from traffic!!!!! Only tramways should share, and then with buses only. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: zebedee on January 24, 2008, 12:19:18 Sounds like madness to me. I am not sure about the whole by-pass there anyway, yes the traffic at Penn Inn is very busy especially in the morning and evenings and it's a pain trying to get out of our house as we are just off the Penn Inn but it would be a huge construction and I am just not convinced Newton Abbot needs it.
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on January 24, 2008, 17:30:20 Sounds like madness to me. I am not sure about the whole by-pass there anyway, yes the traffic at Penn Inn is very busy especially in the morning and evenings and it's a pain trying to get out of our house as we are just off the Penn Inn but it would be a huge construction and I am just not convinced Newton Abbot needs it. Torbay does though, either that or we ban grockels from coming here!! Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devonian on January 28, 2008, 15:18:29 I read somewhere that Kingskerswll station is to be reopened as part of the plans with an additional station at Kerswell Gardens. Might be a mamouth task tracking it down but will look for the article. It was a council or DfT article as well rather than a news report.
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on January 28, 2008, 16:49:36 I saw that in the Herald Express
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devonian on January 29, 2008, 10:49:12 They should! Kingskerswell is walking distance for me - would also mean I didn't have to drive to Newton Abbot everyday - one less car clogging up Penn Inn! I can't be the only one to whom this applies either
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: zebedee on January 29, 2008, 14:58:28 Hmmm, not sure if this would be quicker for me or not....I am just off the Penn Inn roundabout on the edge of the notorious Buckland estate (which seems mostly harmless in the four years we've been there).
Although the only trains going this way would be slower trains stopping at every station I guess? Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on January 29, 2008, 15:24:18 Quote from the article link below on the Regional Spatial Strategy.
http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=135239&command=displayContent&sourceNode=135077&contentPK=19528401&folderPk=79060&pNodeId=134831 Quote The report supports improvements to road links through Kingskerswell, but does not specifically back the bypass. There is also a call to consider re-opening the derelict railway station at Kingskerswell. Richard Younger-Ross (Teignbridge Liberal Democrat MP) commented: "I certainly would be in favour of a feasibility study being carried out into the provision of a railway station in Kingskerswell. Whether the former station site is the best location now is something that would need to be looked at." There are three Kingskerswell bypass plans, according to the link below. http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=135239&command=displayContent&sourceNode=135077&contentPK=19552855&folderPk=79060&pNodeId=134831 Interesting Wikipedia link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disused_railway_stations_(Newton_Abbot_to_Kingswear_Line)#Kingskerswell Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: zebedee on January 29, 2008, 15:31:36 Interesting reading - the best bit is the "single carriageway" over Penn Inn - like DUR, how stupid is that? They might as well not bother.
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: smokey on January 29, 2008, 19:30:41 Now I just wonder hom much compensation the Train Company would want from the motorist's insurers when a broken down, or crashed bus/car holds up train services.
Would as likely as not put car insurance up. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on January 29, 2008, 20:35:52 What would the road have to do with the railway, it currently runs parrallel to the line, no LCs on the line!
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on January 29, 2008, 21:21:03 Now I just wonder hom much compensation the Train Company would want from the motorist's insurers when a broken down, or crashed bus/car holds up train services. Would as likely as not put car insurance up. What would the road have to do with the railway, it currently runs parrallel to the line, no LCs on the line! smokey may (perhaps he can clarify) be referring to the HoldFast proposal : One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this : Quote ^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^ "Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added. The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it. Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each. Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol. Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ " Here is a link with further info on the HoldFast method. http://www.rubberhighways.com/ This can also be used to convert railway lines into guided busways (link below.) http://www.rubberhighways.com/transport_benefits.html So far, I know of only one user/campaign group who thinks this is a good idea. Interestingly, its the Abbey Line Community Rail Partnership. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on January 30, 2008, 16:36:54 Ok thanks for clearing that up. Funny thing is, the Torbay rly line is well used and shouldn't take second place behind cars|!
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Btline on January 30, 2008, 17:57:36 Ok thanks for clearing that up. Funny thing is, the Torbay rly line is well used and shouldn't take second place behind cars|! Quite right! This must not happen! Keep road and rail separate. As BR said, "there's the wrong way and the railway!" Mix these together (road and rail) and we will end up with no way! Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: smokey on February 09, 2008, 11:46:32 [/quote] smokey may (perhaps he can clarify) be referring to the HoldFast proposal : I was referring to the CRAZY HoldFast proposal ::) Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: woody on February 21, 2008, 11:02:43 One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this : Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: smokey on February 24, 2008, 14:11:50 One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this : Can't expect much more from the Road Lobby led DfT (Department for Tarmac). Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on February 29, 2008, 22:15:59 The Campaign For Better Transport view (link below.)
http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/system/files/Response_Kingskerswell_business_case.pdf Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on June 18, 2008, 01:33:08 The Kingskerswell bypass has moved a step closer to reality. Devon County Council is advertising for potential contractors interested in building the new link road (link below.)
http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=141507&command=displayContent&sourceNode=257390&home=yes&more_nodeId1=257393&contentPK=20884419 The Department of Transport is still considering Devon County Council and Torbay Council's application for funding, submitted at Christmas, and warns that any involvement from contractors at this early stage, without guarantee of funding, would be 'at their own risk'. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 24, 2008, 22:02:30 South Devon has been given ministerial backing for its Kingskerswell bypass."It has dragged on for quite long enough," declared South West Minister Ben Bradshaw.
And during his first official visit to Torbay the minister called on the anti-lobby to 'see the bigger picture' and see the toll the lack of a bypass has taken on the local economy. http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=141507&command=displayContent&sourceNode=257390&home=yes&more_nodeId1=257393&contentPK=20934994 Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Btline on June 24, 2008, 22:16:33 Hang on, I hope this "bypass" is not the idea of running cars on the railway!!
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on June 24, 2008, 22:50:38 No, its not.
The current road is a joke. Sitting in traffic all the way in the middle of a weekday :( :( Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on June 24, 2008, 23:02:27 I find it fascinating just how pro-road some of the minister's comments were :
Quote from: Ben Bradshaw The minister said he was 'very hopeful' that the road would get the go-ahead: "Not least because the region had the sense to put it very high on its priority list, because the Government is investing record amounts over the next few years in road building, and the South West has got the biggest increase in allocation," "I would appeal to them to see the bigger picture. The absence of this road has caused real historic problems for Torbay and the wider Devon economy. Modern road building is done in a very environmentally sensitive way and this has dragged on for quite long enough." Doesnt exactly inspire confidence regarding the government's priorities/commitment to public transport, does it? Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on June 24, 2008, 23:11:53 Public Transport would also benefit from the road though. Buses have changed in the are a lot recently.
Before May on the Newton Road 15 Minutes 12 service to Brixham 15 minutes 12A service to Brixham/St Mawes Dr via South Devon College Bus every 7.5 mins Post May 10 minutes 12 service to Brixham Cut in frequency and also loss of link to large college and also cut in frequency on my 12A/C route which now goes to a far less useful Teignmouth/St Marychurch Why? Because the buses get so delayed along the Newton Road that buses across the whole of Torbay were late, overcrowded and slow. The rail line would be more useful perhaps if it stopped at Kingskerswell but it is not as convenient as the car or bus. The bypass is also vital for Torbays crumbling economy. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devonian on June 25, 2008, 09:36:22 Does anyone know where they would site the Kingskerswell station should it ever reopen (which it should!)?
I walked past the old site the other day and whilst the platforms are there, I believe the building and access have gone. Very easy to add access in though. A station here would mean people from KK also wouldn't have to drive to Newton Abbot/Torquay/Exeter etc should they choose to train it. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Super Guard on June 25, 2008, 10:28:13 Doesnt exactly inspire confidence regarding the government's priorities/commitment to public transport, does it? More roads = more cars = more car tax + speeding fines + duty/vat from petrol = More financial benefit to Government than getting more people on trains. (Mr. Bradshaw doesn't mind travelling on XC 1st Class though ;)). Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Lee on October 21, 2008, 20:49:57 Alternative proposals to the Kingskerswell bypass, including a tunnel under the Penn Inn roundabout and a reopened Kingskerswell railway station, have been dismissed as "a load of old cobblers" by Torbay Mayor Nick Bye (link below.)
http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/news/Alternative-bypass-load-cobblers/article-415192-detail/article.html Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: chopper1944 on December 02, 2011, 16:04:23 Trainbuff is correct. I live in Kingskerswell and the proposed bypass(a misnomer as it bypasses nothing but goes through Kingskerswell) is a waste of money. It is amazing how both Torbay and Devon County Council can find money when they are cutting back both services and staff. The proposed ^100 million plus cost would have been better spent on improving rail sevices throughout Devon
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: devon_metro on December 02, 2011, 19:32:50 I can't wait for the bypass. Whilst I sympathise with Kingkerswell residents, i'm sure a large proportion of Torbay will appreciate not having to sit on that bloody road in the swealtering summer heat when the region is overrun with grockels.
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: trainbuff on December 03, 2011, 13:52:43 I can't wait for the bypass. Whilst I sympathise with Kingkerswell residents, i'm sure a large proportion of Torbay will appreciate not having to sit on that bloody road in the swealtering summer heat when the region is overrun with grockels. I can understand what you mean. however if the experience of the A386 is anything to go by which is one of the reasons that the reopening proposal has such a good business case, is that dualling sections of the road merely moves the congestion or gives extra queueing space! So i guess when all the Grockles are down they will just be queueing somewhere else nearer to Torbay! I do feel that this has got us somewhere off thread but it did need to be mentioned. Imagine what ^100 million could do for the railways locally. Extra vehicles over and above the massive 2 extra we have coming! Also additional rail mileage. I would trade the 3 miles of road for that, wouldn't you Devon Metro? Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: woody on December 04, 2011, 10:29:55 The point about simply moving the bottleneck further down the A380 is a very valid one.I remember when the dual A30 ended at Bodmin before the onward Goss Moor section was finally dualled.Miles of traffic would tail back down the A30 at busy times because the then single lane A30 beyond Bodmin could not cope.I fear that the same is going to happen on the newly dualled Kingsteignton by-pass at the Torquay end turning it into another huge car park at busy times.It not going to do local rail use any favours either.If public money is really that tight better the money was used towards the cost to say sling up a few more wires beyond Bristol down to Exeter or Plymouth.In the South West it seems the coalition government seems to be reverting to the 1980s formula when spending on roads was regarded at investment but rail spending regarded as subsidy.Sad really but that mentality is why we in Devon and Cornwall have the the oldest and slowest main line railway in England.
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 13, 2012, 20:15:36 From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-19931255):
Quote Demolition work has started to make way for the Kingskerswell bypass in South Devon. Local people have campaigned for a bypass for more than 50 years. The Department for Transport (DfT) is paying ^76m towards the cost of the road, while Devon County Council and Torbay Council will contribute ^33m and Teignbridge District Council a further ^500,000. The new road will take three years to build, but when it is finished residents hope the scheme will ease peak time traffic jams. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: John R on October 13, 2012, 21:06:40 Is this a record for the oldest resurrected thread, just a few days under 4 years? (I can't believe it's that long.....)
Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 13, 2012, 21:10:01 I know, John! :-[
I've merely merged the topics here, in the interests of continuity and completeness, for those who want to research the subject. ;) Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 25, 2013, 11:28:07 From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-25496870):
Quote Kingskerswell bypass: Bridge demolition work on Christmas Day (http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/60291000/jpg/_60291484_60291483.jpg) The dual carriageway is expected to remove about 95% of the traffic that currently goes through Kingskerswell A railway bridge demolition that is part of the ^110m South Devon Link Road construction was starting first thing on Christmas Day. Builders of the 3.4 mile (5.5km) dual carriageway will also be carrying out flood alleviation work. Devon County Council said the work would affect the main train line and therefore has to be carried out when trains do not run. The road will link Torbay and Newton Abbot, bypassing Kingskerswell. Other works will also be taking place over the festive period on the Torbay line. The council said the building contractor Galliford Try would "take possession of the railway" at the accommodation bridge on Torquay Road, Newton Abbot, and Aller Orchard, Langford and Manor Drive, Kingskerswell, between 25 and 29 December. There will be no trains running to or from Torbay and Newton Abbot on 27 and 28 December. Replacement bus services will be provided by Network Rail. The council said users of the A380 would be unaffected and pedestrians would be redirected. About 800 residents received letters earlier in the year warning them of the demolition and culvert work. Galliford Try said it was undertaking a number of measures to minimise the impact on local residents, including erecting acoustic barriers to reduce the level of noise. Jim Watson, project director at Galliford Try, said: "We know that some residents may find this construction work disruptive around the Christmas period but this activity is a fundamental part of the flood relief programme and the construction of the South Devon Link Road." The link road - which is expected to remove 95% of traffic away from Kingskerswell - is due to be completed by December 2015. Title: Re: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic) Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 19, 2014, 01:50:06 From the Torquay Herald Express (http://www.torquayheraldexpress.co.uk/South-Devon-rail-travel-warning-Kingskerswell/story-20788319-detail/story.html):
Quote South Devon rail travel warning as Kingskerswell roadworks brought forward (http://www.torquayheraldexpress.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276409/Article/images/20788319/5891639-large.jpg) Kingskerswell bypass Flood relief work has been brought forward as part of the South Devon Link Road project following the severance of the line at Dawlish. The works will be done ahead of schedule in order to minimise disruption later on for travellers but will mean changes to train services through South Devon. By timing them to coincide with the works at Dawlish, both programmes will finish in time to open the main rail route on April 4. The South Devon Link Road project team have worked closely with First Great Western, Cross Country and Network Rail on the planning of this operation to minimise disruption for passengers. During the works, contingency arrangements are in place for the rail services affected. The works include the installation of a large culvert at Keyberry, near Sainsbury^s at Newton Abbot. The culvert is part of vital flood prevention measures to carry water away from the low lying flood plain, reducing the risk of flooding in the area. Contractor Galliford Try is due to take possession of the railway to install the culvert, which will involve 24 hour working for approximately 6.5 days. The work will begin on Saturday March 15 at midnight and will conclude on Friday March 21 at 4pm. As a result there is likely to be an increase in the level of construction noise during due to the machinery being used to undertake the work. Measures to minimise noise include arranging for deliveries within normal working hours where possible, and ensuring machinery is turned off when not in use. Whilst deliveries may mean extra traffic, this is not expected to affect motorists in the area. Jim Watson, Project Director at Galliford Try said: ^Although work on the South Devon Link Road is making good progress despite the recent weather events, it has had an impact on our construction activities, with a huge amount of water on site causing issues with earth moving and so certain activities have had to be reprogrammed. ^Initially, we had planned to do this work later on in the schedule, which would have caused some delays to the travelling public, although we would always seek to minimise any impact. ^d like to apologise in advance for any inconvenience this may cause: our Public Liaison team will be on call at all times during this works programme should residents have a need to raise any questions.^ Gordon Oliver, Mayor of Torbay, said: ^Although this activity will cause some disturbance it is a critical piece of work and working this close to the railway constrains when the activity can take place. ^We are pleased that First Great Western and Network Rail are doing all they can to minimise the impact on travellers and improve their journeys at this time. ^ Andrew Leadbetter, Cabinet Member for Economy and Growth at Devon County Council, said: ^The decision to bring this work forward has been made following extensive discussions with Network Rail. Doing the work now ^ whilst the line is already experiencing a high degree of disruption ^ will avoid interrupting services later on during holiday time." Further information on the works is available on the South Devon Link Road website: www.southdevonlinkroad.co.uk This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |