Title: Price alone? How franchises have been awarded! Post by: grahame on September 20, 2013, 06:54:10 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/10321801/Dearest-rail-fares-to-be-capped-but-will-still-cost-more-than-a-US-flight.html
Quote Mr Baker has also bowed to pressure from consumer groups to give the needs of passengers greater weight in how franchises are allocated in future, with train operators being judged not only on how much they bid for the contract but also what service improvements they offer. Is he telling us that previous franchises have been awarded purely on price ... ? Title: Re: Price alone? How franchises have been awarded! Post by: stuving on September 20, 2013, 09:50:20 Is he telling us that previous franchises have been awarded purely on price ... ? If you go to the DfT looking for the announcement, you find a press release. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-backs-raft-of-schemes-to-improve-ticketing (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-backs-raft-of-schemes-to-improve-ticketing) This starts off: Quote Rail passengers are set to benefit from a raft of initiatives that will improve ticketing and help them get a better deal on travel, Rail Minister Norman Baker announced today (19 September 2013). These include: and in the list of items there is: Quote
Further down are two paragraphs given as direct quotes, suggesting that the item above is not in his words. I wondered whether there was a full text of the announcement somewhere, though there is no link to one (as sometimes happens). So I rang DfT - on their public enquiry number. I was put through to the press office, where a guy tried very hard not to answer as I was not press. However, as I kept asking, he did tell me there is no full text of this "announcement" - the press release is all you get. And he half agreed that the flurry of "announcements" from Baker and the Lib Dem conference happening this week might not be a coincidence. He ducked the question as to whether the item on franchising misrepresents DfT policy up to now. However, that does seem to be the case. Surely that kind of sloppy wording would not have been issued even a few years ago? You have a choice of explanations - such as a general lowering of standards in the civil service, press officers becoming more influential and so no longer subject to departmental discipline, or how this coalition is being managed. In short - you are reading too much into the way it is worded. This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |