Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to the Cotswolds => Topic started by: Lee on December 21, 2007, 15:21:30



Title: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Lee on December 21, 2007, 15:21:30
Quote from the latest Train Fellows post (link below) :
http://trainfellows.blogspot.com/2007/12/genuinely-new-experience.html

Quote
The irony is that the train was really quiet today. This goes to prove my understanding and indeed FGW's understanding or the railways - This railway would always run on time if it weren't for the passengers.

Or more literally translated: It's not the fault of FGW that the trains are late. It's the customers who don't shut the doors that delay the trains.
 
Damn these customers..


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Timmer on December 21, 2007, 15:45:22
It does help when travelling on an HST to close the door behind you if no one is boarding/leaving the train.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Conner on December 21, 2007, 16:02:13
It does help when travelling on an HST to close the door behind you if no one is boarding/leaving the train.
But then there is those idiots who get up as the train pulls into the station and can't open the doors.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Btline on December 21, 2007, 19:34:56
Simple solution:

Put springs on the doors so they slam shut by themselves.

Or order "Mark 4" or new "Mark 5" coaches to replace the Mk 3 ones. The doors are automatic.

Or keep the Class 180s. The doors are automatic.

Gosh, in two minutes I have come up with three solutions. I must be good....


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: devon_metro on December 21, 2007, 19:44:15
Simple solution:

1)Put springs on the doors so they slam shut by themselves.

2)Or order "Mark 4" or new "Mark 5" coaches to replace the Mk 3 ones. The doors are automatic.

1) What happens when somebody with heavy luggage cannot get it off the train without the door closing on them, also bear in mind considerable force is needed to close the doors so the chance of them hurting somebody is quite high.

2) Does the Daft/FGW really have the dosh to splash out on new stock when the Mk3s are perfectly fine, and much safer than the mk4s along with having a better ride quality.

I don't see why everybody is incapable of closing the bloody doors!!!


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Mookiemoo on December 21, 2007, 22:47:13
It does help when travelling on an HST to close the door behind you if no one is boarding/leaving the train.
But then there is those idiots who get up as the train pulls into the station and can't open the doors.

Or those who cant open the doors full stop!

I am 5' 2'' and have short arms - I physically cannot reach the outside handle through the windows that dont open fully.

And at Foregate street - I have to crawl onto the train as the step is so high above the platform I physically cannot step up to it with a 24 inch inside leg!

I am NOT disabled - I am a 31 year old reasonably fit female - but sometime I feel I should be disabled


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: vacman on December 22, 2007, 12:39:51
Simple solution:

1)Put springs on the doors so they slam shut by themselves.

2)Or order "Mark 4" or new "Mark 5" coaches to replace the Mk 3 ones. The doors are automatic.

1) What happens when somebody with heavy luggage cannot get it off the train without the door closing on them, also bear in mind considerable force is needed to close the doors so the chance of them hurting somebody is quite high.

2) Does the Daft/FGW really have the dosh to splash out on new stock when the Mk3s are perfectly fine, and much safer than the mk4s along with having a better ride quality.

I don't see why everybody is incapable of closing the bloody doors!!!
Sliding plug doors should have been fitted to MKIII's when built!


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Graz on December 23, 2007, 11:01:28
Silly question that there's probably an obvious answer for- why isn't there a door handle on the other side of the door so people don't have to reach out the window?


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: devon_metro on December 23, 2007, 11:06:14
Even with CDL locked operation of the door handle will take the door off latch and if it is inside, it may get knocked.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: John R on December 23, 2007, 14:24:26
The Mk3s don't have handles on the inside because as built they didn't have CDL. So it would be easy to open the door when the train was moving, with the inevitable consequences. When CDL was introduced a few years ago, because there were a number of fatalities when the door "mysteriously" opened from the inside, the upgrade bolted the doors shut with a mechanism that I believe is independent of the handle. So there was no need to change the handle, and to do so would have added considerable cost to the project.

   


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Btline on December 23, 2007, 18:57:13
Sliding plug doors should have been fitted to MKIII's when built!



Why weren't they? Was the technology around?

That is the only fault with the Mk3s (except the lack of tilt), and I hope the new Mk5 (HST2s) are just like the Mk3/4s with just these functions added.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: vacman on December 23, 2007, 21:28:12
The Irish MKIII's have sliding plug doors and so do the "Wessex electrics" which are a MKIII body.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: moonraker on December 23, 2007, 22:10:08


I am 5' 2'' and have short arms - I physically cannot reach the outside handle through the windows that dont open fully.

And at Foregate street - I have to crawl onto the train as the step is so high above the platform I physically cannot step up to it with a 24 inch inside leg!

I am NOT disabled - I am a 31 year old reasonably fit female - but sometime I feel I should be disabled

Is it only HST's that are too high ? at Freshford (Wilts BTM - WSB) after years of campaining the platform height has been raised, one dear lady before the work was done used to bring her own stool.......


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Jim on December 23, 2007, 22:55:58


I am 5' 2'' and have short arms - I physically cannot reach the outside handle through the windows that dont open fully.

And at Foregate street - I have to crawl onto the train as the step is so high above the platform I physically cannot step up to it with a 24 inch inside leg!

I am NOT disabled - I am a 31 year old reasonably fit female - but sometime I feel I should be disabled

Is it only HST's that are too high ? at Freshford (Wilts BTM - WSB) after years of campaining the platform height has been raised, one dear lady before the work was done used to bring her own stool.......

Was Freshford that was raised, due to units being too much of a step.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: devon_metro on December 24, 2007, 11:53:49
Me thinks, with the 142s, that Starcross needs rasing, I was thoroughly astonished at the step.


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 24, 2007, 12:37:04
Quote from: devon_metro
Me thinks, with the 142s, that Starcross needs rasing, I was thoroughly astonished at the step.

Have you tried Newton St Cyres?


Title: Re: Train Fellows - Shutting Doors Keeps The Train On Time
Post by: Btline on December 24, 2007, 15:24:23
Raising Platform 1 at Worcester Foregate Street is not possible- there are buildings on the platform, so the track would have to be lowered instead. This is not going to happen. This is awful, because the step is huge, and as for the gap!!!!!!! A child (eg one of the many school children who use the station) could easily fall down!

One other solution would be to install some scissor crossovers east of Foregate Street station (and re-signal the Worcester area), to allow FGW trains to use platform 2- this would also add extra capacity to the station and increase flexibility. Obviously, the long term plan has to be completely re-do the Worcester track layout, installing full dual track and turning the two single lines section into a one double line section- Beeching did not see the traffic increases that came when he got out his axe.

PS- platform 2 has much less of a gap/step- but it is still there. Virgin Pendalinos would be quite good with their folding out step.

But, again, this is not going to happen, it is not linked to the 2012 Olympics, so is unlikely to get funding!!!!!!!

In my opinion, Foregate Street needs new bay platforms added, so that trains that terminate at Shrub Hill can be extended.

Of course, when the Shrub Hill closes (a long term aspiration of BR/NR, coinciding with "Norton/Worcester Parkway" opening) this will have to happen, possibly requiring a full rebuild to cope with the extra trains.

Of course I am now talking about developments that will happen when I am in my grave!!!!!!



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net