Title: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: grahame on July 26, 2013, 08:22:57 From http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23451290
Quote Twenty-six of the UK's "rarest" railway signal boxes have been granted Grade II listed status by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. Culture minister Ed Vaizey said interest in trains and railways was one of the country's "most endearing and enduring national preoccupations". The joint venture, between English Heritage and Network Rail, is part of a 30-year plan to modernise the railways. Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: eightf48544 on July 26, 2013, 10:06:54 Whilst I think it's a good idea in principle, it is quite difficult to put into practice.
Signal boxes by their nature are on railway premises so limited access in some cases. They are basically either single story huts or 1 up on 1 down structures and are often quite small so alternative users are diffcult find. Therefore, they sit and decay whilst incurring continuing maintenance charges. Maybe, as most wooden boxes are kit built they should be moved to various heritage railways complete with lever frame and instruments. Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: ChrisB on July 26, 2013, 11:57:09 I'm sure English Heritage would consider any request like this sympathetically.
The listing just preserves them, and requires NR to do so maintenance wise. Might even convince them to find them homes rather than simply demolish them.... Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: 81F on July 26, 2013, 17:35:15 I travelled through Dawlish yesterday and there is just a large nothingness where until recently there was a pretty signalbox swathed in bubblewrap. Still, I suppose in a few months we'll forget that it was ever there.
Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: grahame on July 26, 2013, 17:46:23 I travelled through Dawlish yesterday and there is just a large nothingness where until recently there was a pretty signalbox swathed in bubblewrap. Still, I suppose in a few months we'll forget that it was ever there. Sad ... there's another thread on this at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=12467.0 Further details of new listings at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about/news/englands-railway-signalling-heritage-recognised/ These are the boxes: Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire Hensall, North Yorkshire Bournemouth West Junction, Dorset Lostwithiel, Cornwall Marsh Brook, Shropshire Par, Cornwall Totnes, Devon Brundall, Norfolk Bury St Edmunds Yard, Suffolk Downham Market, Norfolk Skegness, Lincolnshire Thetford, Norfolk Wainfleet, Lincolnshire Wymondham South Junction, Norfolk Aylesford, Kent Canterbury East, Kent Cuxton, Kent Eastbourne, East Sussex Grain Crossing, Kent Littlehampton, West Sussex Liverpool Street, City of London Maidstone West, Kent Rye, East Sussex Shepherdswell, Kent Snodland, Kent Wateringbury, Kent Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: Lee on July 26, 2013, 18:19:02 I guess I find the passing of Dawlish signalbox sadder than most, simply because I love the area so much. It's certainly where you will find me ambling along the sea wall should I make it as far as retirement, and it's a shame that it wont be a feature of my future wanderings.
Of course, the sea wall, railway and Dawlish itself should still all be there to act as my waiting room for the great CoffeeShop in the sky, but one can never know for sure... Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: eightf48544 on July 27, 2013, 20:23:04 Liverpool Street, do they mean the box tucked away in the dark under the East Wall just at the end of the platforms. I didn't think it had any archtectural merit.
The current IECC is an anonmous office block from which you can't even see a train. Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: paul7575 on July 27, 2013, 20:39:25 I read somewhere at the time:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/about/news/englands-railway-signalling-heritage-recognised/ ...that the Liverpool St box they've listed belongs to London Underground? Presumably that will be on the Met/Circle platforms somewhere? ...Dug around for a few minutes and found it pictured on page 42 of this: http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/028-2012WEB.pdf Paul Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: trainer on July 27, 2013, 23:38:53 What an interesting document the second one is, Paul. Thanks for posting that.
Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: LiskeardRich on July 28, 2013, 11:33:33 Hate to say it, but being listed no doubt will mean should the railway want them demolished, they'll be left to run down beyond repair or they'll magically combust, with nobody ever found guilty of it.
Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: grahame on July 28, 2013, 11:48:34 Hate to say it, but being listed no doubt will mean should the railway want them demolished, they'll be left to run down beyond repair or they'll magically combust, with nobody ever found guilty of it. I had a somewhat different concern ... as of about a year ago, there were said to be some 500 signal boxes - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19435464 - of which some such as Dawlish were already listed. WIth adding another 26 to the listings (making how many?), does that signal permission for hundreds of others to be demolished with the signal being given to the planning process that it's OK to sweep them away? Is there a "tit for tat" deal here between English Heritage - "keep these 26 and we'll let you get rid of others". I'm not saying that every box should be preserved for posterity Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: paul7575 on July 28, 2013, 12:09:44 If I understand your point correctly, I don't think there is any 'planning process' involved in demolishing an unlisted signal box. Their removal would be a permitted development under the original Act setting up the railway - it would come under normal maintenance activities.
Paul Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: ellendune on July 28, 2013, 13:34:17 If I understand your point correctly, I don't think there is any 'planning process' involved in demolishing an unlisted signal box. Their removal would be a permitted development under the original Act setting up the railway - it would come under normal maintenance activities. Paul Unless a building is listed or in a conservation area I do not believe any planning permission is required to demolish - only to build something else. Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: ChrisB on July 28, 2013, 13:41:39 correct. That of course is a Conservation Area.
Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: ellendune on July 28, 2013, 13:42:49 correct. That of course is a Conservation Area. Sorry my brain does not work on Sundays - I have amended it now Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: ChrisB on July 28, 2013, 13:55:30 I know that feeling!!
Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: grahame on August 02, 2013, 18:26:38 I had a somewhat different concern ... WIth adding another 26 to the listings (making how many?), does that signal permission for hundreds of others to be demolished with the signal being given to the planning process that it's OK to sweep them away? For example http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2013/08/01/historic-wem-signal-box-will-be-demolished/ Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: Red Squirrel on August 02, 2013, 18:55:55 I had a somewhat different concern ... WIth adding another 26 to the listings (making how many?), does that signal permission for hundreds of others to be demolished with the signal being given to the planning process that it's OK to sweep them away? For example http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2013/08/01/historic-wem-signal-box-will-be-demolished/ Sadly that must be the case - a building without a use can't last, and the majority of signalboxes can't be re-used. I don't imagine the listed ones are necessarily safe either; for example Severn Bridge Junction signalbox is listed but has no access - so how can it survive? Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: Rhydgaled on August 05, 2013, 09:33:06 I don't imagine the listed ones are necessarily safe either; for example Severn Bridge Junction signalbox is listed but has no access - so how can it survive? Find a way to access it? The signallers must have some way of getting to it. More of a problem would be finding a use for it.Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: eightf48544 on August 05, 2013, 11:14:51 Find a way to access it? The signallers must have some way of getting to it. More of a problem would be finding a use for it. Route for signalmen probably involves track access making other uses even more problematic. A box like Severn Bridge deserves preserving complete with frame, interlocking, instruments etc. somewhere else (Bids?). It would need quite a big site. It would be possble to interface it with a computer to simulate how it worked. Title: Re: Listed Signal Boxes Post by: Red Squirrel on August 05, 2013, 11:27:15 Sorry if I wasn't clear: By 'access' I meant 'public access'.
This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |