Title: The perils of predictive text Post by: TonyK on March 21, 2013, 16:21:53 Wouldn't the plans for a new station in okehampton hinder any chance left to rest abolish the link between Tavistock and okehampton? Ah, the penny drops at last! "Re-establish", not "Rest abolish". Oh the perils of predictive text. Although once you master it, it's a piece of coke. Title: The perils of predictive text Post by: swrural on March 21, 2013, 18:39:32 Never mind, FTN, as Ronnie Barker said when imitating the Rev. Spooner, 'god bless the queer old dean'.
Title: The perils of predictive text Post by: JayMac on March 21, 2013, 18:47:14 Although once you master it, it's a piece of coke. Surely you meant 'peas of cake'? ;) Title: The perils of predictive text Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on March 21, 2013, 19:05:39 No comment I am kong of predictive text
Title: The perils of predictive text Post by: TonyK on March 21, 2013, 20:18:34 Never mind, FTN, as Ronnie Barker said when imitating the Rev. Spooner, 'god bless the queer old dean'. Never use a phobile moan to post sensitive stuff, exactly because of the productive features. My post from Shirehampton came out as Showjumping, to BNM and others' amusement. The Reverend Spooner, who enthralled his flock by telling them that "the Lord is a shoving leopard", is thought to have referred to me as a shining wit. Pass the Bucks Fizz, sweetie. Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 22, 2013, 01:21:44 I have, err, taken the liberty perhaps of moving these particular posts here to 'the lighter side'. ;)
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: trainer on March 22, 2013, 08:56:31 That was predictable!! ;D
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: bobm on March 22, 2013, 09:19:41 For some reason my phone, which claims it learns from what I type, has a habit of changing busy to busty.....
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: grahame on March 22, 2013, 09:34:36 For some reason my phone, which claims it learns from what I type, has a habit of changing busy to busty..... Careful what you write, Bob ... I've heard that predictive text often re-uses words that have been used in previous conversations Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: LiskeardRich on March 22, 2013, 18:27:08 I saw some screen prints of some of the perils. One that made me laugh was a girl sent a message saying "I'm lesbian now" to her boyfriend. Should have read "I'm leaving now"
I've seen another which should have said "locking you out" but the locking was replaced with licking. Fortunately I have never been caught out I dont think. Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: JayMac on March 22, 2013, 18:40:56 <pedant alert>
I don't think this a predictive text fail richwarwicker, but I note that you, along with a large part of the English speaking internet community use the term should of (and also could of, would of) in place of should/could/would have. Language is a dynamic thing and this usage may become an acceptable norm, but to me it just does not read right. In speech it sounds okay because of the similarity with the contraction. For example, should have is contracted to should've. Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: swrural on March 22, 2013, 19:04:55 It doesn't read 'as correct English' either. :D
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: trainer on March 22, 2013, 19:16:04 2 rite m8 i'm wiv u ;D
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: chuffed on March 22, 2013, 20:06:53 Oh my sainted aunt ! A pensioner using txtspk !. 'Whatever' (followed by obligatory shrug of the shoulders) will the younger generation think ?!.
I had a text once.... inviting me to a 'hot sax ( as in jazz) session'. Unfortunately the vowel in sax got changed ...and no, it wasn't at six either..... ::) Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: LiskeardRich on March 23, 2013, 09:54:09 <pedant alert> I don't think this a predictive text fail richwarwicker, but I note that you, along with a large part of the English speaking internet community use the term should of (and also could of, would of) in place of should/could/would have. Language is a dynamic thing and this usage may become an acceptable norm, but to me it just does not read right. In speech it sounds okay because of the similarity with the contraction. For example, should have is contracted to should've. I have now modified my post to keep you happy ;D For people who hadn't seen my post, I had typed "should of" instead of "should have". Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: thetrout on March 23, 2013, 11:16:05 One of my friends had a brilliantly bad one last year. We had arranged to meet at the ODEON in Bath. So when the bus dropped him off outside he text me saying:
"I'm hard where are you?" Which should have read: "I'm here, where are you?" Needless to say, he will not live that one down. Ever. Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 25, 2013, 22:50:01 For some reason my phone, which claims it learns from what I type, has a habit of changing busy to busty..... Careful what you write, Bob ... I've heard that predictive text often re-uses words that have been used in previous conversations Bob's ongoing interest in that particular subject is confirmed: It led to the immortal occasion when a lady driver shouted out of her cab window to the Town Centre inspector "What am I?" "36C" came the reply, much to the amusement of passing shoppers.... ;D ;) :D ;D Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: bobm on March 26, 2013, 07:37:09 Such amazing powers of recall you have CfN. Its almost as if you were taking an interest! ;D
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: trainer on March 26, 2013, 09:06:56 I'm finding it difficult to keep abreast of this thread, so I'm giving up on it.
Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: BerkshireBugsy on March 26, 2013, 12:42:37 I wish my mamory was as that of cfns
:) Title: Re: The perils of predictive text Post by: TonyK on March 27, 2013, 21:31:28 Predictive text isn't the only modern-day peril. Voice activated software should also not be relied on when sending e-mails. May be apochryphal, but the story abounds of the man who e-mailed restructuring proposals to his sceptical staff. He concluded it "I want your input on this", which appeared as "I want urine put on this".
This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |