Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to the Cotswolds => Topic started by: Worcester_Passenger on March 03, 2013, 19:45:33



Title: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Worcester_Passenger on March 03, 2013, 19:45:33
From JourneyCheck this evening
Quote
16:35 Hereford to London Paddington due 20:10
This train will be terminated at Oxford.
Service full and standing from Worcester Shrub Hill.
This train will no longer call at Didcot Parkway, Reading, Slough and London Paddington.
This is due to a member of train crew being unavailable.

The 16:35 is an HST (it's certainly not reported as anything else in the 'formations' part of JourneyCheck).

Impressive to see such loads on the Cotswold Line on Sundays...


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Southern Stag on March 03, 2013, 22:22:56
It was booked for a Turbo today because the inbound working started at Oxford because of engineering work this morning.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: johoare on March 03, 2013, 22:41:24
Journeycheck wrong then?


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Southern Stag on March 03, 2013, 22:41:52
No, it was always planned to be Turbo today.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: johoare on March 03, 2013, 22:56:32
Oh ok.. so Worcester_Passenger is wrong then? I was just assuming he knew... sorry  ::)


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Worcester_Passenger on March 03, 2013, 22:57:51
I may be missing something here.

How, as a passenger, can I tell that it was "booked for a Turbo today"?

Other than by looking at JourneyCheck, that is.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: johoare on March 03, 2013, 22:59:37
Which was also my point..


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: bobm on March 03, 2013, 23:17:47
This point was brought up at the Travelwatch South meeting at the weekend.

In days gone by FGW brought out timetable booklets which provided the full, revised, timetables when services were disrupted.  Now too much reliance is placed on Journey planners which show the times of trains but not always the type of train being used.

There are exceptions - the Easter blockade around Reading has prompted the issue of timetable booklets.

Mark Hopwood, FGW MD, did say they would look at the provision of information after it was suggested that printed booklets might not be possible but PDFs on the website would be an alternative.

This would then, I assume, show which trains were Turbos and which HSTs.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: johoare on March 03, 2013, 23:23:11
But meanwhile.. We have journeycheck... If the train is usually an HST and that it isn't hasn't been communicated in another way (from what I've read here).. no harm putting it on Journeycheck surely?

And in general...if a train is turbotised for just one day..would that not have to appear on journeycheck then (that has happened lots of times...to be honest)..  Sounds like maybe not from this thread?


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: IndustryInsider on March 03, 2013, 23:38:25
I quite agree with Jo and Worcester Passenger - how would anyone not in the know, know?

I had the dubious honour of being at Oxford as the first through train to London departed at 16:00 today.  Usually a HST from Hereford, today it arrived as a 3-Car Turbo full and standing and left as a 5-Car Turbo totally choc-full.  Must've been at least 500 on board and that was before it picked up at Didcot, Reading and Slough.  Perhaps a 6-Car might have been slightly better, but even then people would have been faced with no option but to stand for well over an hour?


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Southern Stag on March 04, 2013, 00:21:34
The problem is it never would have been flagged up as a short formation to be put on JourneyCheck. There should have been some information about printed in the alterations information. A simple note under the alterations that certain services would be Turbos instead of HSTs would have solved the problem.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: grahame on March 04, 2013, 09:22:28
I quite agree with Jo and Worcester Passenger - how would anyone not in the know, know?

I had the dubious honour of being at Oxford as the first through train to London departed at 16:00 today.  Usually a HST from Hereford, today it arrived as a 3-Car Turbo full and standing and left as a 5-Car Turbo totally choc-full ...

From Journey Check this morning

Quote
09:21 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street due 11:41
This train will now be formed of the usual number of coaches.
This is due to a train fault.

Yeah ...


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Worcester_Passenger on March 04, 2013, 12:44:42
Earlier this morning it was shown as being 2 cars instead of 5.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Worcester_Passenger on March 05, 2013, 07:24:45
Sounds like this one could be quite cosy today:

Quote
05:28 Hereford to London Paddington due 08:51
This train will be started from Oxford.
Will be formed of 2 coaches instead of 8.
This train will no longer call at Hereford, Ledbury, Colwall, Great Malvern, Malvern Link, Worcester Foregate Street, Worcester Shrub Hill, Pershore, Evesham, Honeybourne, Moreton-In-Marsh, Kingham, Charlbury and Hanborough.
This is due to a train fault.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: grahame on March 05, 2013, 07:32:29
Sounds like this one could be quite cosy today:

But then that's 14 pickups cancelled and just 2 left ... 4:1 ratio on train length, 7:1 ratio on places served. And, ironically, there are more alternatives from Oxford and Reading that from any of places where it's cancelled.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: Southern Stag on March 05, 2013, 08:24:43
2 carriages in the morning peak, even though it's the end of the morning peak, into London won't be fun though.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: swrural on March 05, 2013, 08:43:37
I notice that in the case of some stations from Hereford to Worcester you could be better off going via Newport (0525) or New St (even if the 05 28 had run).  From Hereford itself, via Newport (0525) was a better choice anyway.  I assume pax at Hereford would have been shepherded onto that one???   

Are tickets typically available by any of the three possible routes?  I put in TCR as my London destination which ends up with Beardy Rail being better than FGW as you arrive 0900 which is better than 0851 arrival at PAD.

So it shews how useful it is to know where you are going to in London.  (That's before you start looking at prices).


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: IanL on March 05, 2013, 08:56:23
It may be end of peak into Paddington, but it is one of the busier trains for people commuting into Oxford or Reading, so this train is cancelled for a large number of people for which the replacement is the stopping service 20min later which will be very cosy!


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: charles_uk on March 05, 2013, 09:41:48
The "halts" train this morning was indeed very cosy. Problem was made worse as bicycles were allowed on further down the line so when it pulled into Hanborough we had to negociate a barrier of these before we were able to squash our way down the carriage.


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: grahame on March 05, 2013, 11:05:11
I put in TCR as my London destination ...

Abbreviations and codes!  :-\

TCR?  New one on me

And is the SW in SWRural an abbreviation for South West  :D ;D


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: swrural on March 05, 2013, 11:52:10
Tottenham Court Road.  Is that not official then?   >:(

SW, yes South West.  Stretches from Tewkesbury to Christchurch and (recently) Gibraltar.   ;D


Title: Re: Standing loads on HSTs
Post by: swrural on March 05, 2013, 11:55:40
It's amazing what using TD (another abb. of mine) throws up (or is it threws up?).  You get far more choices but of course at different prices, ergo my query on via Newport from Hereford at 05 25 as substitute for the 0528.  I would have hoped that there was a reciprocal arrangement but who knows?



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net