Great Western Coffee Shop

(http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/64982000/jpg/_64982693_screen_dft.jpg)
The sets of screens will hide the scenes of accidents on motorways

More than 3,000 screens have been bought by the Highways Agency to stop drivers in England rubbernecking when passing motorway accidents.

The partitions will be put up to deter drivers who slow down to look at crashes on the opposite carriageway and therefore slow down the traffic behind. They form part of a Department for Transport initiative to improve accident clear-up times. The government said the screens would "keep the motorways flowing".

The DfT's CLEAR - collision, lead, evaluate, act and reopen - initiative was launched last year to help ensure motorways and roads reopen quickly following major accidents. As part of this scheme, 105 sets of incident screens will be made available for use by the Highways Agency next year.

Each set has 30 screens which are loaded onto purpose-built trailers and can screen up to 75m if used end-to-end. The individual screens are approximately 2.1m by 2m high. The total cost of the purchase was ^2.3m, with each set costing ^22,000.

Roads minister Stephen Hammond said: "This will be another great advantage to hopefully clearing up collisions but also getting the roads moving rather more quickly afterwards. People will recognise these screens, recognise that something's happening behind it, but actually realise it won't impact on their motorway - there's nothing to see, and we want to keep the motorways flowing."

RAC Foundation director, Stephen Glaister, said the use of the screens should be welcomed. "Incident screens reduce disruption to traffic following an incident [and] assist the emergency services," he said. "Ensuring that motorists not involved in an incident complete their journeys safely and on time is important. The economy relies on an efficient road network. Traffic jams following incidents increase frustration and the risk of low speed collisions."

The total cost of the purchase was ^2.3m, with each set costing ^22,000.

I absolutely wish I could afford an Audi like the white one on the right in your picture BNM

It's only a car RW!  ;D .  Our two cost me ^100 and ^500 (respectively a Peugeot 106D and a Mercedes 260E).  They are both 20 years old or more, and because I have them maintained them properly (cost about ^250 per year each on average) they (touch wood) run me all over the place faultlessly (touch wood).

One of my favourite film sequences features Steve Martin in a spoof movie where he is a cop at the scene of an explosion in a fireworks factory. As fireworks explode everywhere, he urges the crowd to "move along, there is nothing to see here!".

Whenever I see a mass of blue flashing lights, I slow down. Its a natural reaction to a potentially hazardous situation. Then I react to the situation as needed.

I don't slow down to rubberneck. I slow down because there is a mass of dazzling, flashing blue lights.

I don't like being branded a rubbernecker because I slow down.

It strikes me that it would be equally effective and a lot cheaper if the emergency services were to reduce the number of flashing blue lights - they can't all be needed!

One of my favourite film sequences features Steve Martin in a spoof movie where he is a cop at the scene of an explosion in a fireworks factory. As fireworks explode everywhere, he urges the crowd to "move along, there is nothing to see here!".