Title: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: grahame on December 22, 2012, 09:32:10 From Journey Check:
Quote Line problem: between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple. Owing to flooding between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple all lines are blocked. Impact: Train services running through these stations may be cancelled at short notice. Disruption is expected until 09:00 29/12. Today's 22nd December ... are they really suggesting it will be a week before services are back to normal, or is that a typo? FGW's disruption page says Quote Services between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple are suspended in both directions, with no replacement road transport available. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 22, 2012, 10:07:59 If its Flooding at Cowley Bridge Junction again that is probably about right. They can do nothing to get the line open again until the water goes down except stand and watch an get materials together for the rebuild. Then they have to put the embankment back which will allow them to do a limited service on the main line and then finally they have to rebuild the signalling again before they reopen the branch.
Some serious resilience measures are required here. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 22, 2012, 11:10:00 Today's 22nd December ... are they really suggesting it will be a week before services are back to normal, or is that a typo? Sounds about right. The really annoying thing is that if you only look at the Live Departures Boards you could be fooled into thinking the trains are still running... http://www.livedepartureboards.co.uk/fgw/summary.aspx?T=BNP Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 22, 2012, 11:51:19 And, just up the road, this was taken at the old level crossing at Braunton Station.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Southern Stag on December 22, 2012, 12:22:25 Last time when Cowley Bridge flooded the reason the Barnstaple line was closed for so long was because of the destruction of the signalling equipment on the mainline. That meant the points allowing access to the Barnstaple line were clipped only allowing trains to run along the mainline with temporary block working set up. Once the Barnstaple track was repaired a shuttle service was ran from Crediton to Barnstaple with units running from Exeter to Crediton at the start and end of service with the point manually changed to allow access. If the signalling equipment is less damaged than before the line might not be closed for so long.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: phile on December 22, 2012, 12:45:32 Today's 22nd December ... are they really suggesting it will be a week before services are back to normal, or is that a typo? Sounds about right. The really annoying thing is that if you only look at the Live Departures Boards you could be fooled into thinking the trains are still running... http://www.livedepartureboards.co.uk/fgw/summary.aspx?T=BNP Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 22, 2012, 12:49:08 spout oit rubbish acrually Info should be provided by a human being ot a facility for text on a screen. Yeah, because information supplied by humans is always perfect, isn't it? ::) Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: macbrains on December 22, 2012, 12:50:24 In the last flooding chaos, station announcements and departure boards at Cheltenham kept announcing trains that had long been cancelled, confusing the hell out of intending passengers. I (politely!) asked station staff why this was and they said they couldn't do anything about it!
rgds macbrains ::) Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 24, 2012, 20:53:59 A video news report (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20833610), from the BBC:
Quote Devon floods woman rescued after clinging to tree In Umberleigh, near Barnstaple in north Devon, a woman was swept away from her car in the early hours of Sunday after becoming stuck in fast-flowing flood water. A police helicopter found her clinging to branches of a tree - where she had been for 50 minutes - on the banks of the swollen River Taw. She was rescued by a RNLI lifeboat, and treated for exposure to the water. Her husband told the BBC that he "never thought I would see her again". John Henderson reports. Also from the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20834577): Quote Floods: Woman saved from Devon river A woman was "lucky" to survive after she was swept from a stricken car as floods wreaked havoc in the south-west of England. Vanessa Glover managed to cling to an over-hanging branch as the River Taw burst its banks at Umberleigh in Devon. Meanwhile more than 20 people had to flee homes near Exeter as flood waters rose and a severe flood warning remains in place in Cornwall. Travel disruption also continues as a rail junction in Devon is blocked. Although flood waters were starting to recede during the day, forecasters warned that more rain could bring fresh hazards on Sunday night and into Christmas Eve. For hundreds of people across Devon and Cornwall, a mopping up exercise was beginning as residents returned to homes which were damaged by rising waters. (http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/64928000/jpg/_64928289_64922643.jpg) Plastic dams were set up to protect the railway line at Exeter But for Mrs Glover the floods came close to ending in tragedy. She and her husband Paul and seven-year-old son Silas became stranded as the River Taw began to rise around their Ford Ranger pick-up in the early hours of Sunday. Mr Glover and Silas managed to scramble out of the cab into the back of the truck but as Mrs Glover was attempting to follow them, she lost her footing and was swept away. Mr Glover said: "I never thought I'd see her again. I looked around and she was gone." She managed to grab branches and hold on against the rushing water for 50 minutes. A police helicopter using thermal imaging equipment found her about 200 metres away. Robin Goodlad, from the RNLI, who helped in the rescue, said: "She's extremely lucky. How she managed to hold on in that flow for that amount of time, I have no idea." Mrs Glover was treated for exposure and her son and husband were rescued from the pick-up by firefighters. Elsewhere in Devon, 25 people were led to safety by emergency services in Stoke Canon, Exeter, after the River Exe burst its banks. In Cornwall, a severe flood warning remains in place at Helston, where on Saturday the River Cober flowed into streets and homes. Meanwhile rail problems were set to continue as part of a junction near Cowley Bridge in Devon has crumbled away under the force of flooding. The line is the link between London Paddington and Penzance but engineers said the problem could last for five days. Plastic dams were used to prevent water from reaching a nearby signals box which, if flooded, could have led to several weeks of repairs. Flooding at Cowley Bridge means trains are unable to run between Tiverton and Exeter. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: LiskeardRich on December 24, 2012, 21:06:56 TV news reports said they expect at least 7 days before able to reopen at Cowley Bridge. Has the railway flooded regularly at Cowley Bridge previously, as I dont recall seeing much about it before this year.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TonyK on December 24, 2012, 21:58:02 The Illustrated London News on 27 January 1866 carried pictures, sketched by locals, of the flooding at Cowley Bridge. Apart from being broad gauge, it looks pretty much like it does today.
You can see it at http://www.exetermemories.co.uk/em/19thcentury/flooding1866.jpg It's been a fairly regular occurence, although not on such a scale. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 24, 2012, 23:45:34 Thanks for your contributions to this topic! :)
My only comment is on the question of whether something happens 'regularly' or 'frequently': if it happens every one hundred years it is 'regularly', or every time there is heavy rain in the South West of England it is 'frequently'! ::) :o ;D Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 25, 2012, 19:58:20 Cowley Bridge 1960
http://www.exetermemories.co.uk/em/_events/pics/floodcowley.jpg (http://www.exetermemories.co.uk/em/_events/pics/floodcowley.jpg) Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: IndustryInsider on December 25, 2012, 22:18:40 Looks strikingly similar, except I expect all the signals worked OK after the water receded!
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 25, 2012, 22:27:47 ...and in 2000 (half way down the page here...http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/64969-heavy-rain-in-devon-flooding-on-the-railways/page-2?
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: swrural on December 26, 2012, 10:43:42 May I suggest we merge this topic to the flooding thread?
The strategic answer would appear to be that the GW line is taken across (following the M5 trajectory) to the LSWR one before it descends as far as Stoke Canon. This would be a reversal of the gauge war period when the LSWR considered going round the back of Exeter. Central (Queen St) still has a lot of capacity despite building over the goods area and there is just the short run down the hill (Could St Davids be then closed?). The line would be retained to Cowley Bridge and elevated over the Exe more than it is now. Then the line would be reinstated via Tavistock as a strategic option against the problems via Dawlish. There you are Strategy in one paragraph! As a footnote to Super Guard, (see his post), please accept my sympathy as you are an ex-resident of Stoke Canon. I noticed an awful lot of new bungalows etc, down in the flood plain there. What were these hopeless planners thinking? Stoke Canon is sandwiched between the Exex and Culm rivers, both meanderers. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 26, 2012, 11:30:53 Looks strikingly similar, except I expect all the signals worked OK after the water receded! I much suspect that the signalling equipment was working under the water........ ;D ;D ;DTitle: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 26, 2012, 16:13:43 May I suggest we merge this topic to the flooding thread? Hmm. :-\ On this occasion, I'm rather more inclined to leave things as they are: this particular discussion is more specific to a shorter journey in Devon than the more general discussion about the wider disruption caused by the flooding to travel 'across the West'. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 26, 2012, 16:39:42 The strategic answer would appear to be that the GW line is taken across (following the M5 trajectory) to the LSWR one before it descends as far as Stoke Canon. This would be a reversal of the gauge war period when the LSWR considered going round the back of Exeter. Central (Queen St) still has a lot of capacity despite building over the goods area and there is just the short run down the hill (Could St Davids be then closed?). The line would be retained to Cowley Bridge and elevated over the Exe more than it is now. Then the line would be reinstated via Tavistock as a strategic option against the problems via Dawlish. There you are Strategy in one paragraph! I think you need to add another (vertical) dimension to your strategy to take into account Stoke Hill which presents quite an obstacle to going that way round. The M5 goes through a very deep cutting. Given Fitting enough platforms in at Central might also be a challenge. St Davids has 5 through platforms Central only has 2. It would need a major rebuild to get 4 and I am not sure more would be possible in the constrained site. I am also not sure how easy it would be to do a west facing curve to get from Central to Plymouth. When I start to consider the cost a viaduct on the existing alignment starts to sound cheap. Apart from Cowley Bridge, are there any other locations along there where the railway has flooded? If it is just there then a short viaduct on both lines for about 50 metres where the tributary joins may well fix it possibly slightly raising the alignment, at worst that might need a replacement bridge for the A377. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: John R on December 26, 2012, 18:37:20 When I start to consider the cost a viaduct on the existing alignment starts to sound cheap. But how long would the route be closed for whilst it was constructed? Many months at least, if you really mean on the same alignment. Surely the level of disruption during this period would outweigh the long term benefit. I'm inclined to think that a tactical upgrade of the lines between Exeter, Yeovil and Castle Cary would be the most cost effective solution. A couple of passing loops to enable a basic FGW service could be slotted in, which would probably be of use anyway if the service to Waterloo continues to grow. Prepare a contingency timetable and ensure enough crews have route knowledge, maybe by routing one off peak service a day along the line. That would still leave the Cross Country service to cater for. Presumably it becomes logistically much easier to source adequate buses with fewer passengers to cater for, and the option of a diversion via Westbury and Yeovil would also exist, though would possibly be unattractive due to the added journey time. Edited by Brucey to fix quotes Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 26, 2012, 19:50:34 When I start to consider the cost a viaduct on the existing alignment starts to sound cheap. But how long would the route be closed for whilst it was constructed? Many months at least, if you really mean on the same alignment. Surely the level of disruption during this period would outweigh the long term benefit. It depends how much you needed to lift the track by. It is not as easy as building it to one side and sliding it in as you have the river on one side and the pub on the other. You could probably put it together in the sidings and move it along the track into position. However with a good design that is optimised for rapid installation and some careful preparation of the site to build new piled foundations during a series of overnight or weekend possessions a week-long blockade might be enough. There is never going to be a good time for it but a Christmas break might be enough. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: John R on December 26, 2012, 20:29:32 That sounds optimistic to me, although I'm certainly not an expert on the subject. But a viaduct to me implies a series of support pillars, which support beams, which then support the base on the viaduct on which the track is laid. That would certainly take months, so maybe you are looking at something which raises the track but stops short of a full scale viaduct?
For anyone interested in how to construct a viaduct (maybe slightly larger than the one we are talking about here) there is an interesting website on the Hitchin viaduct construction hitchingradeseparation.blogspot.com Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Southern Stag on December 26, 2012, 23:09:41 I'm inclined to think that a tactical upgrade of the lines between Exeter, Yeovil and Castle Cary would be the most cost effective solution. A couple of passing loops to enable a basic FGW service could be slotted in, which would probably be of use anyway if the service to Waterloo continues to grow. Prepare a contingency timetable and ensure enough crews have route knowledge, maybe by routing one off peak service a day along the line. There are paths and crews with route knowledge available now though, it just seems that NR haven't offered any paths for FGW via Honiton.Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 27, 2012, 08:56:25 That sounds optimistic to me, although I'm certainly not an expert on the subject. But a viaduct to me implies a series of support pillars, which support beams, which then support the base on the viaduct on which the track is laid. That would certainly take months, so maybe you are looking at something which raises the track but stops short of a full scale viaduct? For anyone interested in how to construct a viaduct (maybe slightly larger than the one we are talking about here) there is an interesting website on the Hitchin viaduct construction hitchingradeseparation.blogspot.com But for Cowley bridge we are not talking about anything on that scale. The supports would be installed before the closure. They could be installed, for example, either side of the track, with a beam installed between them during the closure, before the bridge is intalled on the top. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 27, 2012, 13:42:08 That would seem to be a very simple and inexpensive answer to all of the construction issues, ellendune; is there any precedent for such an innovative engineering approach?
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: JayMac on December 27, 2012, 13:58:37 The approaches to such a structure (which need ruling gradients suitable for the rail traffic using the line) would require some major civil engineering and the connecting of each end of this bridge/viaduct to the existing lines will not be a quick fix and would require a fairly lengthy possession I suspect.
Then there is the issue of just where you site the junction for the Barnstaple line. This would also need raising or re-routeing to connect with the main line. And what of the roads? Does the A377 go over or under this new rail structure? And what of its closely proximate junction with the A396? Finally there are the local property owners. What happens to the Chinese restaurant at the Cowley Bridge Inn? :P I honestly don't think there is an easy, cheap or quick solution to the problems at Cowley Bridge. All the civils, both road and rail would need major engineering solutions to raise them above a level where they won't be susceptible to flooding. Make do and mend will, I fear, be the only option going forward. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Tim on December 27, 2012, 14:05:31 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water?
That would be a start. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 27, 2012, 14:33:18 That would seem to be a very simple and inexpensive answer to all of the construction issues, ellendune; is there any precedent for such an innovative engineering approach? Its not that innovative, bridges are prefabricated and moved into position all the time and piled foundations are installed in advance on many occasions. Caversham Road and Cow Lane Reading were notable examples of whole bridge slides. Those were moved in sideways, which would not be practicable at Cowley Bridge. The bridge would therefore either have to be moved in length-ways, or lifted in. Probably a bit big for a lift in one piece. However if you could make the main-line and branch structures separate it might be possible for a steel structure. A slide would be easier if you separate them. It all depends on how much longer the span needs to be to provide the necessary flow area for the river, as from the photographs this seems to be the issue here. Raising the line would help a bit, particularly if the site has ever been flooded from the Exe, but flow width is probably the most importance point for the tributary. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: paul7575 on December 27, 2012, 14:56:31 There are paths and crews with route knowledge available now though, it just seems that NR haven't offered any paths for FGW via Honiton. I'd really like someone to quote an official source explaining exactly where all these spare paths are, I keep reading that a 2 tph service is possible, but I don't believe it. (I've also read that SWT won't allow it, because they are in charge of the alliance with NR - and I don't believe that either.) AIUI if the normal SWT service is running, all that can be added is either an additional train in one direction each hour, or alternate directions in alternate hours. A full 2 tph service is not possible west of Axminster - we know this already as the additional FGW additional Exeter - Axminster service (proposed in the new franchise ITT) is constrained to be two hourly by infrastructure limitations. Paul Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 27, 2012, 14:59:43 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water? That would be a start. That is done in my industry to keep electrical equipment from risk of flooding Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: paul7575 on December 27, 2012, 15:08:47 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water? That would be a start. Or on those 'steel grating' type structures supported by screw piles that they use on embankments or on the side of steep cuttings - already in use all over the place: http://www.fliscrewpiles.co.uk/markets-railways-reb-and-loc-platforms.php As long as all the cable terminations were also made on the raised deck, the cable runs themselves could stay along the trackside - assuming they weren't going to float away of course... Paul Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: swrural on December 27, 2012, 15:47:36 I am sure we all agree that setting up a small group in a quiet room to look at all options is strongly advised?
Could one not only re-dual the LSWR to Yeovil (needed anyway for development at new town at Cranbrook and planned local service Exeter to Axminster) but upgrade Castle Cary to Yeovil as well and start running a decent Bristol to Weymouth (or reverse at Dorchester to Bournemouth, thus connecting directly the Region's two largest cities)? Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: paul7575 on December 27, 2012, 15:58:56 Could one not only re-dual the LSWR to Yeovil (needed anyway for development at new town at Cranbrook and planned local service Exeter to Axminster)... It's not needed for Cranbrook though - the dwell time for the stop at the new station is already built in to the hourly service timetable. It's not needed for the currently planned local service to Axminster either - so it's all a bit chicken and egg isn't it. So you are left with the business case for more redoubling being based solely on a diversionary requirement - which basically isn't going to stack up... Paul Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: swrural on December 27, 2012, 16:15:34 My business case was not based on diversion. One should consider whether teh LSWR route was not a better one all along. :-)
In fact one is only re-instating what was there before and what is needed now if climate change and modal shift is to be addressed. Yes I know about Taunton to Exeter being needed in any event (see viaduct suggestions at Cowley bridge by colleagues) but we also need a South Coast service from Plymouth to Ashford via Bournemouth. We need connecting chords at Yeovil and Dorchester and something done at Brighton. We need that west chord down the hill at Exeter. Perhaps St Thomas could have a new role. It's no worse a location than St Davids. :-) The road people would bulldoze half of Britain with no more a 'business case' than theoretical time savings of motorists. What about modal shift benefits and safety benefits of shift to rail? My point has been there are various levels of action, strategic, tactical and operational. The latter is about 'begging for buses', the middle one is about raising the track at Cowley Bridge somehow (I can't see how easily) and the first is the sort of blue sky stuff above. All need attention and I suggest by different teams. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: paul7575 on December 27, 2012, 16:43:46 ... but we also need a South Coast service from Plymouth to Ashford via Bournemouth. We need connecting chords at Yeovil and Dorchester and something done at Brighton. We need that west chord down the hill at Exeter. You seriously think so? Can't think why. Paul Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: LiskeardRich on December 27, 2012, 17:16:52 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water? That would be a start. I'm sure I've seen this done elsewhere, but cant think where to now. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 27, 2012, 21:58:03 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water? That would be a start. I'm sure I've seen this done elsewhere, but cant think where to now. This is standard practice on embankments and in deep cuttings and has been done in other areas due to flooding risk. At Malton in Yorkshire the location cases are mounted high up (about 4 feet) on brick foundations. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 27, 2012, 22:25:10 People keep talking about the river Exe flooding but if you look at the video for example this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIuxDk7u0NY) it is clear that the water in the river Exe (on the side of the Barnstaple line) is still below the tracks, it is the water from the tributary, that cannot get through the underbridge that is spilling over the tracks and into the river Exe, washing the ballast and the embankment out in the process.
It seems to me therefore that it is possible that a modest enlargement of the span of the underbridge to increase the flow area might resolve the issue without the need to raise the track. That is why I see it as a relatively simple task that does not requires a long closure of the line. If at other times the Exe has been the cause then further work would be necessary, but none of the photographs I have seen suggest this. The work might include a modest raising of the line or a barrier wall along either side of both lines. Edited to correct spelling Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: JayMac on December 27, 2012, 22:41:32 It seems to me therefore that it is possible that a modest enlargement of the span of the underbridge to increase the flow area might resolve the issue without the need to raise the track. That is why I see it as a relatively simple task that does not requires a long closure of the line. You were however suggesting earlier in this thread raising the lines. I'm more inclined to go with this later idea of yours. It may well indeed be easier (disclaimer: I'm not an engineer) to alter the course/improve the flow of the River Culm by concentrating the engineering solution on the river rather than the permanent (or rather semi permanent at the moment!) way. That said, water has a nasty habit of taking the line of least resistance, so any alteration to the flow needs very careful consideration. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Southern Stag on December 27, 2012, 23:53:55 There are paths and crews with route knowledge available now though, it just seems that NR haven't offered any paths for FGW via Honiton. I'd really like someone to quote an official source explaining exactly where all these spare paths are, I keep reading that a 2 tph service is possible, but I don't believe it. (I've also read that SWT won't allow it, because they are in charge of the alliance with NR - and I don't believe that either.) AIUI if the normal SWT service is running, all that can be added is either an additional train in one direction each hour, or alternate directions in alternate hours. A full 2 tph service is not possible west of Axminster - we know this already as the additional FGW additional Exeter - Axminster service (proposed in the new franchise ITT) is constrained to be two hourly by infrastructure limitations. Paul I didn't suggest an hourly FGW service necessarily, although some people believe it to be possible. It may just about be if it ran fast. The Exeter-Axminster stopping services would be calling at all stations which may be a limiting factor. An FGW service every two hours is certainly possible, as 3tp2h was ran over the line on Weekends early in 2011. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 28, 2012, 09:24:10 It seems to me therefore that it is possible that a modest enlargement of the span of the underbridge to increase the flow area might resolve the issue without the need to raise the track. That is why I see it as a relatively simple task that does not requires a long closure of the line. You were however suggesting earlier in this thread raising the lines. I'm more inclined to go with this later idea of yours. It may well indeed be easier (disclaimer: I'm not an engineer) to alter the course/improve the flow of the River Culm by concentrating the engineering solution on the river rather than the permanent (or rather semi permanent at the moment!) way. That said, water has a nasty habit of taking the line of least resistance, so any alteration to the flow needs very careful consideration. I have looked at more video and photographs. Its the river Culm is it. That's good to know. I am very weary about altering or restricting the course of rivers for the very reason you say - that water has a nasty habit of taking the path of least resistance. I fear that building the railway has restricted the course of the river buy putting it through a culvert that is too small. What I am suggesting is replacing this with a much wider one to restore the capacity the river had before the railway was built. None of the photographs I have seen show the level in the river Exe above the railway, it has always come from the river Culm, so unless there is other evidence that the river Exe has flooded the railway there does not appear to be a need to raise the level of the railway. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: swrural on December 28, 2012, 10:39:57 It's Barnsta- P- le please. >:(
Both the Exe and Culm are meanderings (see GE). One would need the strategic study, for which I pleaded, before any long term decisions are made. Stoke Canon is in the middle of the join between the rivers, and as I wrote when I commiserated with Super Guard (who hails from there) it is surprising how many very modern bungalows have been allowed to be built there (see SV) and take a wander around the village). In similar vein, any proposal to divert or constrain water courses should be examined by experts from the EA (and NE and EH). (SV is Street View, GE is Google Earth. I suppose GM would be Google Maps but that is a homonymous acronym unfortunately.) Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 28, 2012, 11:30:48 It's Barnsta- P- le please. >:( Both the Exe and Culm are meanderings (see GE). One would need the strategic study, for which I pleaded, before any long term decisions are made. Stoke Canon is in the middle of the join between the rivers, and as I wrote when I commiserated with Super Guard (who hails from there) it is surprising how many very modern bungalows have been allowed to be built there (see SV) and take a wander around the village). In similar vein, any proposal to divert or constrain water courses should be examined by experts from the EA (and NE and EH). (SV is Street View, GE is Google Earth. I suppose GM would be Google Maps but that is a homonymous acronym unfortunately.) Apologies late night spelling of Barnstaple - error corrected now. In my defence I got it right earlier this morning. I am not proposing to constrain or divert a watercourse, but to unconstrain it. Undoubtedly the Environment Agency EA would have to be involved, though 'daylighting' culverted rivers (opening them up) is considered good environmental and flood management policy these days. The weir in the Exe seems to constrain where the two rivers join these days, though another flood span on could be inserted further upstream on both lines if the modelling showed it to be necessary. A separate flood span would make little difference hydraulically, but would probably help keep disruption to a minimum. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 28, 2012, 11:56:10 The National Rail website now showing:
Exeter St Davids - Barnstaple Trains between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple are suspended. Road transport is in place but because of flooding on local roads may not serve all stations. This line will remain closed for the foreseeable future. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 28, 2012, 12:11:31 FGW website now showing: Exeter St Davids - Barnstaple Trains between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple are suspended. Road transport is in place but because of flooding on local roads may not serve all stations. This line will remain closed for the foreseeable future. Where does it say this? http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/disruption (http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/disruption) says "The line is expected to be closed until at least 29th December", while http://www.journeycheck.com/firstgreatwestern/ (http://www.journeycheck.com/firstgreatwestern/) says "Disruption is expected until 09:00 01/01". Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on December 28, 2012, 12:51:10 Whoops too much xmas drinkies ;D. I meant to say the National Rail website says..........
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TerminalJunkie on December 28, 2012, 17:24:33 FGW website now showing: Exeter St Davids - Barnstaple Trains between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple are suspended. Road transport is in place but because of flooding on local roads may not serve all stations. This line will remain closed for the foreseeable future. Where does it say this? http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/disruption (http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/disruption) says "The line is expected to be closed until at least 29th December", while http://www.journeycheck.com/firstgreatwestern/ (http://www.journeycheck.com/firstgreatwestern/) says "Disruption is expected until 09:00 01/01". Whoops too much xmas drinkies ;D. I meant to say the National Rail website says.......... I see @NDevonCouncil have now tweeted that the Barnstaple line is "set to reopen on Saturday", based on the JourneyCheck information. FFS... Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 28, 2012, 17:44:00 From ThisIsSouthDevon (http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/story-17701010-detail/story.html?):
Quote Devon railway weather damage 'worst for 25 years' Damage caused by the weather to one of Devon's railway lines is the worst in 25 years. Network Rail this afternoon issued their latest update on services in the county, with the main lines in and out of Devon re-opened at Cowley Bridge near Exeter at 1.15pm today. The up and down lines had been out of action over Christmas after damage caused by flooding. Speed restrictions of 40mph have been imposed in both directions. However, there is no estimate for the re-opening of the Exeter to Barnstaple branch line. The rail operator says there are a total of 25 washout sites on the Barnstaple line and industry experts say they have never known it suffer so badly in 25 years. The Topsham to Exmouth branch line remains closed. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TonyK on December 28, 2012, 18:42:19 It seems to me therefore that it is possible that a modest enlargement of the span of the underbridge to increase the flow area might resolve the issue without the need to raise the track. That is why I see it as a relatively simple task that does not requires a long closure of the line. I'm more inclined to go with this later idea of yours. It may well indeed be easier (disclaimer: I'm not an engineer) to alter the course/improve the flow of the River Culm by concentrating the engineering solution on the river rather than the permanent (or rather semi permanent at the moment!) way. That said, water has a nasty habit of taking the line of least resistance, so any alteration to the flow needs very careful consideration. People keep talking about the river Exe flooding but if you look at the video for example this (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIuxDk7u0NY) it is clear that the water in the river Exe (on the side of the Barnstaple line) is still below the tracks, it is the water from the tributary, that cannot get through the underbridge that is spilling over the tracks and into the river Exe, washing the ballast and the embankment out in the process. It seems to me therefore that it is possible that a modest enlargement of the span of the underbridge to increase the flow area might resolve the issue without the need to raise the track. I'm pretty sure the Culm has joined the Exe just south of Stoke Canon, some distance before Cowley Bridge. The Exe meanders a fair bit, and follows two or three channels (or one flaming great big one!) by the time it reaches Cowley Bridge. There, it meets with the Creedy, after which Crediton is named. The one part of the topography that did not decide its own course is the railway. Which river is which is pretty much academic by here, and the big problem seems to be caused by the damming effects of the various embankments works, once Cowley Bridge becomes too small to let all the water drain away. I am also no engineer, but wonder if replacing some of those raised works with a low span bridge - without raising the level of the railway - would help. It wouldn't stop the railway from being submerged occasionally, which would likely mean a suspension of services, or at least a severe restriction of speed. But once the river level fell, it would be business as usual again much more quickly than at present, as the line would emerge unscathed, with no need to replace 2000 tonnes of ballast. It may be that something on these lines would be a good solution, but would cost more over a period of time of say 50 years than repairing the embankments a couple of times annually. Or it may be that all the other flooding in the area might mean that trains wouldn't run over Cowley Bridge anyway. It may even be that National Rail is already asking the government for money to do it. I too sympathise with people in Stoke Canon, flooded twice so close to Christmas. I think, though, that it will serve as a practical demonstration of the folly of building on flat ground between two rivers. My home in Devon is atop a hill, about 100 ft above the level of the nearest rivers. It's a pain if I have to walk back up it after a walk to the pub, but very reassuring. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 28, 2012, 20:02:05 I'm pretty sure the Culm has joined the Exe just south of Stoke Canon, some distance before Cowley Bridge. The Exe meanders a fair bit, and follows two or three channels (or one flaming great big one!) by the time it reaches Cowley Bridge. There, it meets with the Creedy, after which Crediton is named. You are right about the Culm, the river I talking about runs parallel to the main (Taunton to Exeter) line and to the south of it. I cannot see where it is coming from. The one part of the topography that did not decide its own course is the railway. Which river is which is pretty much academic by here, and the big problem seems to be caused by the damming effects of the various embankments works, once Cowley Bridge becomes too small to let all the water drain away. I am also no engineer, but wonder if replacing some of those raised works with a low span bridge - without raising the level of the railway - would help. It wouldn't stop the railway from being submerged occasionally, which would likely mean a suspension of services, or at least a severe restriction of speed. But once the river level fell, it would be business as usual again much more quickly than at present, as the line would emerge unscathed, with no need to replace 2000 tonnes of ballast. That is pretty much what I was trying to describe. And I am an Engineer with some experience on flood risk management, although I am only able to go on what I see from the photos and the video. In the video and photos I have seen the water in the Exe is not high enough to flood the line so with the low span bridge the railway may not be submerged that often. Though if it is, as you say there should be no need to replace 2000 tonnes of ballast. It may be that something on these lines would be a good solution, but would cost more over a period of time of say 50 years than repairing the embankments a couple of times annually. Or it may be that all the other flooding in the area might mean that trains wouldn't run over Cowley Bridge anyway. It may even be that National Rail is already asking the government for money to do it. I suggest that on recent experience it would probably pay for itself over 50 years! Especially if all those delay minutes, are taken into account. I too sympathise with people in Stoke Canon, flooded twice so close to Christmas. I think, though, that it will serve as a practical demonstration of the folly of building on flat ground between two rivers. My home in Devon is atop a hill, about 100 ft above the level of the nearest rivers. It's a pain if I have to walk back up it after a walk to the pub, but very reassuring. Can only agree. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 29, 2012, 22:35:33 From ThisIsDevon (http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/Tarka-Line-remains-closed-pending-inspection/story-17711235-detail/story.html):
Quote Tarka Line remains closed pending inspection The Tarka Line - which connects Exeter to Barnstaple, via Crediton - remains closed following bad weather and flooding, which may have affected the foundations of the track. Network Rail reports that train services are cancelled and that a replacement bus service is running instead. An inspection by helicopter took place on Thursday this week and will be followed up by a walk-through along the track. (http://www.thisisdevon.co.uk/images/localpeople/ugc-images/275779/Article/images/17711235/4433619.jpg) Peter Craske, spokesman for the Tarka Rail Association, told ThisIsDevon "The lines will be inspected by Network Rail tomorrow [Sunday 30 December]" and explained that there have been issues with ballast being washed out from beneath the tracks. Commenting on the operator of the line, he said "First Great Western are doing a good job of keeping people informed via their website" and emphasised that "We haven't seen disruption like this in living memory." The Tarka Line is named after Tarka the Otter, from the book by Henry Williamson. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: TonyK on December 29, 2012, 23:32:18 Fair comment about FGW's information stream. Some will always complain that they were kept in the dark, but FGW's social media folks have shown the value of electronic methods of disseminating alterations to services. I follow the Twitter stream, as well as glancing occasionally at the map at top left, where red lines direct me to FGW's website. Before any train journey, often booked online, I check these, plus the live departure boards.
Recently, following the landslip at Westerleigh, I noticed tweets from someone else I follow, whose journey home from Birmingham wasn't going to plan. He was on a CrossCountry train, and if they have an equivalent service, I couldn't find it. FGW's website showed what the cause of the problem was, and from there, I was able to tell my acquaintance when he could expect to get home. Delays are bad, lack of information makes it much worse. I look forward to the reopening of the Tarka line. In very few years, it has gone from embarassing to indispensible, and like its cousin the Severn Beach line is an example of what can be done on branch lines if the will is there. But how did it all work before the advent of the internet? Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: LiskeardRich on December 30, 2012, 10:03:37 Fair comment about FGW's information stream. Some will always complain that they were kept in the dark, but FGW's social media folks have shown the value of electronic methods of disseminating alterations to services. I follow the Twitter stream, as well as glancing occasionally at the map at top left, where red lines direct me to FGW's website. Before any train journey, often booked online, I check these, plus the live departure boards. Recently, following the landslip at Westerleigh, I noticed tweets from someone else I follow, whose journey home from Birmingham wasn't going to plan. He was on a CrossCountry train, and if they have an equivalent service, I couldn't find it. FGW's website showed what the cause of the problem was, and from there, I was able to tell my acquaintance when he could expect to get home. Delays are bad, lack of information makes it much worse. I look forward to the reopening of the Tarka line. In very few years, it has gone from embarassing to indispensible, and like its cousin the Severn Beach line is an example of what can be done on branch lines if the will is there. But how did it all work before the advent of the internet? FGW often post photos of their problems on their twitter feed as well I've noticed. Gives a better idea than 140 characters ever give of the problem. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: smokey on December 30, 2012, 19:07:48 Looks strikingly similar, except I expect all the signals worked OK after the water receded! I much suspect that the signalling equipment was working under the water........ ;D ;D ;DOne Big thing between 1960 and Cowley Bridge today, is that back in 1960 it was BEFORE the Railway altered the course of the river!!!! Never a good move as water will always try to get back to it's earlier course! Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: smokey on December 30, 2012, 19:19:58 How about putting the signalling cabinets on little mounds to keep them out of the water? That would be a start. Been done before, Dovey Junction in Mid Wales often floods at High Tide and the Signaling ccabinets stand on legs to keep connections from getting wet! ;D Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: ellendune on December 30, 2012, 19:38:06 Looks strikingly similar, except I expect all the signals worked OK after the water receded! I much suspect that the signalling equipment was working under the water........ ;D ;D ;DOne Big thing between 1960 and Cowley Bridge today, is that back in 1960 it was BEFORE the Railway altered the course of the river!!!! Never a good move as water will always try to get back to it's earlier course! Can you explain which bit of the course of which river was altered? I cannot see any obvious change on my old map. Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 31, 2012, 14:47:16 An update, from First Great Western JourneyCheck:
Quote Line problem: between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple. Owing to flooding between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple all lines are blocked. Train services running through these stations may be cancelled at short notice. Disruption is expected until 09:00 02/01. Road transport is operating between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple, however because of flooding on local roads this may be limited, and may not be able to serve all intermediate stations. Latest indications are that the line will not reopen to trains for several days although this is subject to revision at short notice as remedial work progresses. Message Received: 31/12/2012 13:48 (My highlighting: CfN) Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: smokey on December 31, 2012, 16:33:53 When the Barnstaple Line was altered at Cowley Bridge (late 60's) the River was diverted under a New Bridge, may well have been done when the line was reduced to a single line.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: des5564 on December 31, 2012, 19:18:42 Work in progress today, I delivered lorry load of ballast to Portsmouth Arms. Some being being taken to Umberleigh as well.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 31, 2012, 20:02:07 Thanks for your (weighty) contribution towards resolving these flood damage problems, des5564! :)
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 31, 2012, 22:37:09 A further update, from First Great Western JourneyCheck:
Quote Line problem: between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple. Owing to flooding between Exeter St Davids and Barnstaple all lines are blocked. Train services running through these stations may be cancelled at short notice. Disruption is expected until 09:00 02/01. Road transport is operating between Exeter St David's and Barnstaple, however because of flooding on local roads this may be limited, and may not be able to serve all intermediate stations. It is expected that the line will be open from Exeter St David's to Crediton from the start of service on Tuesday 1st January 2013. Customers travelling beyond Crediton to Barnstaple will be required to change at Exeter St David's for replacement road transport. Further work is required to repair the line between Crediton and Barnstaple and this is expected to take several days, although this is subject to alteration as work progresses. Message Received: 31/12/2012 21:22 Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on January 01, 2013, 13:18:34 Latest update, from First Great Western JourneyCheck:
Quote Line problem: between Exeter St David's and Barnstaple. Owing to flooding between Exeter St David's and Barnstaple all lines are blocked. Train services running through these stations may be cancelled at short notice. Disruption is expected until 09:00 04/01. Train services are operating between Exeter St David's and Crediton. However, road transport will remain in operation between Exeter St David's and Barnstaple and may not be able to serve all intermediate stations should local road conditions deteriorate. Customers travelling to / from stations Yeoford - Barnstaple (inclusive) from / to Exeter St Davids, and beyond, are advised to use the road services through from / to Exeter St David's. Whilst those starting or finishing their journey at Crediton, travelling to / from the Exeter St Davids direction, or beyond, should use the reintroduced train services. Further work is required to repair the line between Crediton and Barnstaple and this is expected to take several days, although this is subject to alteration as work progresses. Message Received: 01/01/2013 12:42 Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: SandTEngineer on January 04, 2013, 14:21:43 It would appear that two river bridges may have been damaged and are planned to be inspected by divers today before a tamper can proceed further to complete that track fettling.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: DavidBrown on January 04, 2013, 22:53:47 From what the North Devon Journal website has said, there's nothing as yet to suggest that the bridges have been damaged, the problem is that the river flow is still too fast for engineers to dive in and investigate. It's just a waiting game until the river is safe enough and only then can a date for reopening be set.
Title: Re: Barnstaple for Christmas? Post by: Chris from Nailsea on January 05, 2013, 14:56:02 Another update, from the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-20911155):
Quote Devon Tarka branch line expected to reopen by Monday (http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/65089000/jpg/_65089037_65089036.jpg) The Tarka line runs for 39 miles (63km) between Exeter and Barnstaple A branch line in Devon which was closed because of flooding is expected to reopen by Monday. The train service between Barnstaple and Crediton, which is part of the Tarka Line, was expected to reopen on Saturday. Network Rail said two bridges had to be inspected by specialist divers before the stretch of line could be reopened. The section has been closed since December's heavy rain which caused flooding across England. The Tarka line runs for 39 miles (63km) between Exeter and Barnstaple. Trains between Exeter St David's and Crediton are running. In Cornwall, the Liskeard to Looe line, which had also been shut at Christmas following flooding, reopened on Tuesday. This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |