Title: All full up and then some Post by: welshman on December 19, 2012, 22:41:46 Moderator note: This topic has been moved from a route specific board to 'The Wider Picture' as the overcrowding figures cover other operators, not just FGW. Also merged with another topic on the same subject. bignosemac
Here's a squash (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20783986) Title: FGW is number one, two, three, four.... Post by: gpn01 on December 19, 2012, 22:54:44 ...in fact takes ALL TEN places in the latest top 10 list of the most overcrowded train services. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/aug/12/train-services-overcrowding-data for details
A remarkable achievement! Title: Re: FGW is number one, two, three, four.... Post by: JayMac on December 19, 2012, 23:07:02 That was the data from Autumn 2010 and has now be superceded with data published today from services operating in Autumn 2011.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-20783986 FGW are still top of the list though. Title: Re: All full up and then some Post by: gpn01 on December 19, 2012, 23:13:24 Whoops! Well spotted bignosemac. My fault for looking at the BBC site, searching for the underlying data, coming across the Guardian link and not noticing it's for the previous year.
Title: Re: All full up and then some Post by: inspector_blakey on December 19, 2012, 23:23:44 What's the methodology for these surveys? Looking at the two SWT services, for example, at what point in the journey is the load factor calculated? I can't believe that the Alton service mentioned has that load factor from the start of its journey. I *can* believe that it would represent the loading between Woking and Waterloo, but that's only about a 25-min journey at worst and not too much of a chore to stand (done it many times).
Likewise the 0732 Woking - Waterloo is a semi-fast service, only 47 minutes origin to terminus. No-one in their right mind would travel on it the entire distance from WOK to WAT as it's overtaken by many faster trains en route so there's no chance it's that heavily loaded leaving Woking. Between Surbiton and Waterloo I don't doubt it is full and standing, but that's only a 10 - 15 minute hop. I'm deeply suspicious of the methodology used here, and the way it's reported... Title: Re: All full up and then some Post by: thetrout on December 20, 2012, 02:04:48 I'm deeply suspicious of the methodology used here, and the way it's reported... Here you go! It's the 2010 Data, but explains exactly that. (PDF Document) ;) :) http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/london-south-east-overcrowded-train-services/overcrowded-trains-south-east.pdf (http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/london-south-east-overcrowded-train-services/overcrowded-trains-south-east.pdf) Title: Re: All full up and then some Post by: swrural on December 20, 2012, 12:12:17 It would be good if they said where the count took place (obvious for a non-stopper e.g. Reading to Paddington, of course).
It always seems to me that you have these satellite towns, Reading, Luton, Watford, and so on, where Inspector Blakey's point is relevant. I suppose the same goes if Crossrail was extended to Reading one day. Is that why it wasn't? What would you do if you travelled from Maidenhead to Tottenham Court Road in 2020 at 0730? Title: Re: All full up and then some Post by: paul7575 on December 21, 2012, 12:51:54 I'm deeply suspicious of the methodology used here, and the way it's reported... Here you go! It's the 2010 Data, but explains exactly that. (PDF Document) ;) :) http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/london-south-east-overcrowded-train-services/overcrowded-trains-south-east.pdf (http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/london-south-east-overcrowded-train-services/overcrowded-trains-south-east.pdf) Basically the same explanation is given for this new 2011 data: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/34894/top-ten-overcrowded-trains-2011.pdf I guess Google will eventually get this document to the top of the list... Paul This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |