Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => South Western services => Topic started by: JayMac on December 14, 2012, 00:48:00



Title: London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Post by: JayMac on December 14, 2012, 00:48:00
In aid of The Samaritans, South West Trains have announced via twitter that actor Brian Blessed will be doing station announcements at London Waterloo on 18th December 2012.

https://twitter.com/SW_Trains/status/279268210388393987

Brian is a famously sweary bloke (plenty of youtube evidence for that) so I hope he will stick to his script on the day!


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on December 14, 2012, 06:35:08
Now that I would love to see - err - I mean hear !


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: trainer on December 14, 2012, 09:06:47
WILL HE NEED TO USE THE SPEAKER SYSTEM AS HE CAN BE VERY LOUD? 

(Sorry got into character when writing this.   ;D)


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on December 14, 2012, 09:20:24
WILL HE NEED TO USE THE SPEAKER SYSTEM AS HE CAN BE VERY LOUD? 

(Sorry got into character when writing this.   ;D)

Thanks for posting what I was thinking!


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: Thatcham Crossing on December 14, 2012, 10:58:38
Would be great to hear some recordings....or You Tube clips from the Station of these being done :-)


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: BerkshireBugsy on December 14, 2012, 11:03:52
Would be great to hear some recordings....or You Tube clips from the Station of these being done :-)

Actually if the "please wait behind the yellow line" announcer at Reading P7 was not available, I would recommend Brian Blessed be hired on a temporary basis to make the announcements..

I can just hear it now "will be idiot on platform 7 who has 5 suitcases and 15 kids stop getting in everyones way"...mind you the intended recipient probably would hear it unless they take their earphones out :)


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: inspector_blakey on December 14, 2012, 22:30:19
Sick as a dog that I'm on annual leave on Tuesday...!!


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 16, 2012, 03:56:35
Surely 'youtube'TM will be the answer?  ;D

One of my favourites is Stephen Fry doing Brian Blessed impressions on QI ...  ::)


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: Brucey on December 20, 2012, 19:48:22
It is such a shame that during this attempt to raise money for the Samaritans, a person was hit by a train at Earlsfield which resulted in the cancellation of all services from Waterloo during the evening peak.


Title: Re: Brian Blessed to be station announcer at Waterloo on 18th December 2012.
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 21, 2012, 09:44:06
Sad, and rather ironic ...  :-X


Title: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 13, 2013, 14:00:58
From a SWT email.  Anyone travelling Thursday or Friday evening will probably have already felt the effects of this track defect.
Quote
Major Emergency Engineering at London Waterloo affecting the South West Trains Network Sunday 14th April 2013

A rail defect was identified between London Waterloo and Vauxhall on Thursday afternoon. The nature of the defect has meant that a temporary speed restriction has had to be imposed which has resulted in a reduction to the number of trains we are able to run across the affected area.

Our engineers have been conducting regular inspections of the area and have advised us that the defect needs to be repaired as quickly as possible, before it deteriorates. We have looked at all possible options to carry out the work in a manner that will have the least amount of impact to our customers.

The engineering team will require 16 hours of access to the track to allow them to remove a rail crossing and replace it with a brand new one. The access required by the engineers will mean that platforms 1 to 10 at London Waterloo will be out of use on Sunday 14th April until approximately 16:00hrs. A very limited train service will run out of London Waterloo as a result of this work.

Please see below for a summary of train services affected by this work. Check here for  engineering improvement work that is already planned to take place aound the network.

West of England

Crewkerne to London Waterloo services at 22 minutes past each hour will terminate at Woking. The 13:22 service from Crewkerne will be the first train to run through to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures from Crewkerne).

London Waterloo to Crewkerne services will start from Woking (at 46 minutes past each hour). The 17:15 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

A train service will run between London Waterloo and Woking in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Suburban - Ewell West

Buses will replace trains between Ewell West and Wimbledon until approximately 15:00. Customers should change at Wimbledon for an onward train service. The times of the first trains to run between Ewell West and London Waterloo are listed below:

14:50 Ewell West to Waterloo
16:32 London Waterloo to Ewell West

All subsequent departures after these times will be trains services (not buses).

Until approximately 15:00 Buses will depart Wimbledon bound for Ewell West at 2 & 32 minutes past each hour, and Ewell West bound for Wimbledon at 19 & 49 minutes past each hour.

Suburban - Guildford (via Cobham)

London Waterloo to Guildford (via Cobham) services will start from Surbiton (at 32 minutes past each hour). The 17:00 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent trains).

Guildford to London Waterloo (via Cobham) services at 50 minutes past each hour will terminate at Surbiton. The 14:50 service from Guildford will be the first train to run though to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures). A train service will run between Surbiton and London Waterloo in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Suburban - Chessington South

London Waterloo to Chessington South services will start from Wimbledon (at 10 & 40 minutes past each hour). The 16:51 service will be the first train to start from London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

Chessington South to London Waterloo services at 10 & 40 minutes past each hour will terminate at Wimbledon. The 15:10 service will be the first train to run through to London Waterloo (as will all subsequent departures).

A train service will run between London Waterloo and Wimbledon in both directions however we expect these services to be very busy.

Windsor & Eton Riverside

An hourly service will run between London Waterloo and Windsor & Eton Riverside in both directions until mid-afternoon. Trains will depart London Waterloo at 44 minutes past each hour. Trains will depart Windsor & Eton Riverside at 01 minute past each hour. A twice hourly service will resume between London Waterloo and Windsor & Eton Riverside by mid-afternoon.

Kingston

Kingston to London Waterloo services at 11 minutes past each hour will not run until 15:11 (and all subsequent trains). Alternative train services are available from Kingston to London Waterloo via Richmond.

London Waterloo to Kingston services at 56 minutes past each hour will not run until 15:56 (and all subsequent trains). Alternative train services are available from London Waterloo to Kingston via Richmond.

We are sorry for the inconvenience the additional work this Sunday will cause  while you travel on our network. We are working to repair the fault at the earliest possible opportunity to enable us to deliver our full service again from Monday 15th April.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/03/2013
Post by: Oxman on April 13, 2013, 16:07:45
You might like to correct the date in the topic heading.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 13, 2013, 16:12:23
You might like to correct the date in the topic heading.
Thanks Oxman.  Clearly not thinking correctly today. :D


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: bobm on April 13, 2013, 19:24:32
It could have been worse - had it occured on either of the two previous weekends when FGW were using Waterloo for WoE services.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: ChrisB on April 14, 2013, 14:39:27
Or next Sunday - the London Marathon....


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 14, 2013, 14:43:21
Person hit by a train at South Croydon earlier resulted in considerable delays on all routes from London to Southampton and Portsmouth.  That is in addition to the engineering work already planned between Haslemere-Petersfield.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: MrC on April 14, 2013, 17:20:51
Or next Sunday - the London Marathon....

Oops. Work not carried out due to on-site equipment failure and currently proposed to be re-scheduled for 20/21.......


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 14, 2013, 17:29:14
B****r.  I am making several tight connections through Waterloo on both Saturday and Sunday next week.

Here is the official info from SWT: http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/MEW.aspx

Copied here, for when the website is updated:
Quote
Work was due to take place on 13/14 April to repair a rail defect in the Waterloo area. This was a major piece of work that needed around 16 hours to complete and this work had been scheduled to take place at the earliest possible opportunity.

Unfortunately due to a problem with the technical equipment being used by our external contractors carrying the work, the work could not be completed over the weekend. These technical equipment problems were only uncovered as the work commenced.

We are extremely disappointed that this work could not take place as planned and we are following this up with our external contractors as a matter of priority.

The work is now being planned to take place at the next possible opportunity and to ensure the least amount of impact on our customers.  The work is currently scheduled to take place over the weekend of 20/21 April.  We will confirm more details about the impact this major engineering work will have on our services early next week.  In the meantime, our dedicated team of engineers will continue to monitor the area to enable us to continue to deliver our normal train service.

At this stage, we are not expecting this to have any impact on any of our services over the coming week, and we are planning to run our full train service on Monday 15 April.   We will keep you informed of any further changes needed to facilitate this major engineering work.
Laughable is an understatement.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: ChrisB on April 14, 2013, 19:47:20
And how many 000's of marathon runners wont niw be able to use the trains to get into London. Reckon there's going to be trouble ahead....


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 14, 2013, 22:09:40
It will be interesting to see the revised timetable.  One would hope the bulk of the work will be done overnight.


Title: Re: Major Emergency Engineering at Waterloo - Sunday 14/04/2013
Post by: Brucey on April 16, 2013, 14:08:39
The amended timetable has been released at http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/MEW.aspx

I won't copy the entire timetable here, just the summary is included below:
Quote
Work was due to take place on 13/14 April to repair a rail defect in the Waterloo area. This was a major piece of work that needed around 16 hours to complete.

Unfortunately due to a problem with the technical equipment supplied by our external contractors, the work could not be completed on 13/14 April.

The work has now been planned to take place on Sunday 21st April. Customers with advance tickets that are booked to travel on specific trains are able to use other services as  fare restrictions have been lifted on Sunday 21 April.  A normal Saturday train service will run on Saturday 20th April.

The access required by the engineers will mean that platforms 1 to 10 at London Waterloo will be out of use on Sunday 21 April until approximately 16:00hrs.

A very limited train service will run out of London Waterloo as a result of this work.

Once the work has been completed at 1600hrs a full Sunday service will operate with some trains formed of more coaches than normal.

This work will be taking place in addition to our regular programme of engineering improvement work. Please check here to see how these works may also affect your journey.

London Marathon Participant / Spectator Advice

We strongly advise customers travelling on our services to check before you travel and allow more time to complete your journey. This is due to a significant reduction in the number of trains we can run into and out of London Waterloo until 1600hrs due to the work taking place; we expect all services running into London Waterloo will be extremely busy.

Alterations to your Train Service

Please use the expandable links below for more details about the service on Sunday 21 April. Please also note that our timetable is being amended to reflect these alterations and this information is currently not showing in the online Journey Planners. This will be available on Thursday 18 April.


Title: London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Post by: johngreg on July 05, 2013, 14:15:49
Given the fact that Platform 20 is apparently coming back into use next year, what is the difference with this platform to the others?

http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/Historic-journey-marks-the-first-anniversary-of-the-South-West-Trains-and-Network-Rail-Alliance.aspx


Title: Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Post by: stuving on July 05, 2013, 15:14:55
I think it can be accessed on the level from 19. For the others they would need to rebuild what is now access from underneath.


Title: Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Post by: Andrew1939 from West Oxon on July 05, 2013, 16:25:22
Why is it necessary to rebuild? It was always easy enough to move to and from domestic and the international trains in the days of Eurostar use. Most people arriving or departing Waterloo go to or from the outside world simply because it is a terminus. There can be some domestic transfer traffic but how much is that of the total movements?


Title: Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Post by: Brucey on July 05, 2013, 16:59:50
The international platforms (except 20) all require access via an escalator or stairs to the concourse below.

Being a Waterloo commuter, I can imagine the chaos if you tried to fit as 12 coach Class 450 of passengers (over 1000 people, all of whom are in an unnecessary rush) down the few escalators that are there at present.


Title: Re: Eurostar platforms at Waterloo
Post by: Electric train on July 05, 2013, 17:46:49
Number of factors.
The concourses below platform level were constructed as separate arrivals and departures apparently its not easy to link them together, also they exit at low level all of which were not built to the passenger density of commuter trains
The throat for the international platforms was built for 4 per hour arrival and departure to make use of all the international platforms will require extensive throat remodelling.
There are also longer term plans being expressed by the land owners of the office buildings along York Road which could incorporate the international platforms, its likely the international station will be demolished in the longer term


Title: London Waterloo - station, services, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Post by: broadgage on August 02, 2013, 17:23:39
Due to emergency engineering work, dont know if it is heat related or something else.
Many cancellations, and other services running only part of the route.

Details on SWT website.


Title: Re: Major disruption at Waterloo tonight (02/08/2013)
Post by: Brucey on August 02, 2013, 20:31:47
There were two issues, one at Waterloo and the other somewhere between New Malden and Surbiton on the down fast.

This was the second day of disruption for many Waterloo commuters.


Title: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Post by: ChrisB on October 23, 2013, 15:04:32
First test train - a 5car 485, I think - in & out of Platform 20 this morning.

RealTime Trains has it thus (http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/Q48572/2013/10/23/advanced)


Title: Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Post by: paul7575 on October 23, 2013, 15:33:37
It was apparently just a normal in service 455 diverted into P20 as it's been declared available for public use.  Testing and train crew familiarity runs using various stock has been going on for some months, and is still planned, looking ahead in realtime trains; but there doesn't seem to be any regular passenger services in the short term.

Photo from Paul Bigland here:  http://paulbigland.zenfolio.com/p368327642/h39272067#h39272067

The 458/5s are are not yet in passenger service, I wouldn't expect them to be accepted for a few weeks yet.  With the second only arriving this week I'd expect they've still got multiple working to test, and mileage accumulation etc etc.

Paul


Title: Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Post by: ChrisB on October 23, 2013, 15:40:48
Yes, it was Paul Bigland's tweets that alerted me.

There are some photos of the 458/5s in his photo set too


Title: Re: Domestic Trains start to use Waterloo International Platforms
Post by: Brucey on October 23, 2013, 19:12:42
Regular use of this platform is much needed.  There is often a queue for platforms during the peaks (mainly built into the timetable, so journey times may reduce).

The design of Waterloo's tracks also means that one simple problem can put four platforms out of use immediately and over half the station whilst it is being repaired.


Title: London Waterloo - station, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Post by: stuving on March 23, 2016, 23:29:02
Network Rail and SWT have officially announced the start and schedule for the planned work to increase capacity at Waterloo. They have headlined it as costing ^800 million, which sounds a lot for stretching platforms 1-4 a bit and reopening 21-24. I'm sure they are counting the Class 707 order in that, and probably other things too. I'm also a bit puzzled why it would take nearly two years (ending December 2018) to make Waterloo International operation again, unless they are going to do a lot to the track.

The BBC's report (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-35882068) in this case confuses things somewhat - I can't see platforms 1-4 serving Reading! But NR's statement (http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2016/mar/investment-over-%C2%A3800m-Waterloo-upgrade/), as well as SWT News (http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/waterloocapacity.aspx), are a bit more factual:
  • Rebuild the former Waterloo International Terminal, allowing platforms 20-24 to be brought back into use with modern facilities, new track and signalling and a layout suitable for thousands of domestic passengers.
  • Extend platforms 1-4 to allow longer ten-car trains to run to London suburban stations. This work will take place during August 2017 and requires significant changes to the usual passenger timetable.
  • Create a spacious, modern and accessible station concourse near platforms 20-24.

There should be a DfT announcement too, but I can't see one (apart from a similar sounding one about new platforms and trains from 2011!)


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on March 24, 2016, 06:50:41
Network Rail and SWT have officially announced the start and schedule for the planned work to increase capacity at Waterloo. They have headlined it as costing ^800 million, which sounds a lot for stretching platforms 1-4 a bit and reopening 21-24. I'm sure they are counting the Class 707 order in that, and probably other things too. I'm also a bit puzzled why it would take nearly two years (ending December 2018) to make Waterloo International operation again, unless they are going to do a lot to the track.

There is a lot of trackwork required to make the former International platforms work for domestic services; the International platforms were designed for I think 8 tph (4 in and 4 out) and have very limited connections to the domestic network.  There is also quite a bit of structural work to alter the old International station internal layout.

This announcement may also include the re-signalling already going on in the Waterloo area an perhaps the forthcoming Feltham re-signalling.

Its about time the owner of the International station (DfT) got their fingers out, if it had been anyone else leaving a major asset like that used in such a key transport hub there would have been questions in the House and much feet holding to flames in Select Committees.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: IndustryInsider on March 24, 2016, 07:45:23
I heard this is causing problems for GWR as a planned diversion into Waterloo might not be able to happen.  Last I heard was a rumour they were investigating the possibility of HST's into Victoria!


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Timmer on March 24, 2016, 08:14:14
I heard this is causing problems for GWR as a planned diversion into Waterloo might not be able to happen.  Last I heard was a rumour they were investigating the possibility of HST's into Victoria!
Interesting. Here's a challenge for someone, has an HST ever visited Victoria before?


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on March 24, 2016, 10:17:06
The BBC's report (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-35882068) in this case confuses things somewhat - I can't see platforms 1-4 serving Reading! But NR's statement (http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2016/mar/investment-over-%C2%A3800m-Waterloo-upgrade/)...

I think the main NR article has been updated since yesterday.   It previously included a link to an earlier article that included a timeline for the works, but this timeline seems to now be included.   

The timeline actually first surfaced in January, and showed that they have separated the platform work for the international platforms to allow temporary use next summer to work on P1-P8, but they will then re-close the international side for its new concourse and retail work to be finished:  http://www.networkrail.co.uk/wcip/   That earlier piece also does include a false statement that P1-P8 would close for a period in August 2017 to allow for 10 car trains to run to Windsor and Reading.   

The current misleading info seems to be that the work will allow 10 car trains to run on the main suburban side for the 'first time', yet they already run in small numbers into higher numbered platforms, i.e. other than the short P1-P4.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on November 03, 2016, 10:04:57
From the Architects' Journal (https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/10014343.article?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=AJ_EditorialNewsletters.Reg:%20Send%20-%20Daily%20bulletin&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWmpVMk5qUmxaVFkzTWpVMCIsInQiOiJXMjhnRkJFcUVXV2RBYmw3QTlIVU1ZMjNUcVlLaHI2eE8yYmRnejNRTERwcnRrTHFBbUxcL21SSVY1U2tXcXdrU1prcmsya2JSMFhub05ZR2NJdGtZTmRIMUkyZGhCYUpuQmJ5VXJ2Z2pvT3c9In0%3D):
Quote
Council approves plans to convert Grimshaw's former Eurostar terminal into shops
2 November, 2016 By Colin Marrs

Corstorphine + Wright has won permission to transform part of the former Eurostar terminal at Waterloo into shops, restaurants, cafés and bars – after Historic England declined to consider the Grimshaw structure for listing

London Borough of Lambeth’s planning committee last night (1 November) gave the thumbs-up to the new scheme to overhaul the former international departures and arrivals lounges, creating 12,444m² of new facilities.

Work has already started on revamping the five platforms within the disused station - the landmark building with its lattice-work arches which sits above the proposed shopping and leisure complex - to increase the number of domestic train services into Waterloo.

In May the 20th Century Society applied for the entire structure to be Grade II listed, but this option has been rejected by Historic England.
...


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on November 03, 2016, 11:46:59
I don't see any architectural merit at all in the concrete box structures that exist below platform level.

The problem for me (with a range of similar articles over the years) is that they often don't adequately explain which area of the station they are going on about.   I wish they'd emphasise more that they are at the outside (York Rd) street level, and one floor above, and won't really be seen from the station concourse.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Surrey 455 on November 03, 2016, 21:27:49
A leaflet from Network Rail and SWT I was given a few weeks ago states that fewer trains will run into Waterloo between 5th to 28th August 2017 because platforms 1-9 will be closed so they can extend platforms 1-4 . These platforms are used for routes via Wimbledon.

Detailed information will be published later about how routes and stations are going to be affected.


Title: Delays and cancellations out of London Waterloo - 31 Jan 17
Post by: bobm on January 31, 2017, 16:10:15
A lot of disruption on SWT services after two people hit by trains in separate incidents at New Malden and Woking.

Warnings of delays up to two hours until the end of service.


Title: Re: Delays and cancellations out of London Waterloo - 31 Jan 17
Post by: ChrisB on January 31, 2017, 16:26:02
Kingston Loop & Haslemere services withdrawn for the day


Title: New voice at Waterloo
Post by: Surrey 455 on July 25, 2017, 23:12:27
I've been away for 2 weeks and when I got back to work yesterday I noticed that Phil Sayers announcements had been replaced by a new female voice. It wasn't Celia and it wasn't the voice at Paddington and others. I haven't heard that voice before. Don't yet know if it's being used at other SWT stations.

I presume the new voice has been commissioned because of the change of franchise coming up and that the name of the new franchise operator has already recorded. As Phil passed away last year it would not have been possible to announce the new name using the existing recordings.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on July 26, 2017, 10:04:29
It was announced at the beginning of July that platform 10 will be closed as well as 1-9. Supposedly this is to make sure the work can be finished in the time allowed. So, whatever you had been expecting, expect worse!


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on July 26, 2017, 10:55:35
It was announced at the beginning of July that platform 10 will be closed as well as 1-9. Supposedly this is to make sure the work can be finished in the time allowed. So, whatever you had been expecting, expect worse!

I think it's because the track layout (S&C) changes in the throat extend much further out than originally expected. So preventing trains reaching P10. This might be an indication that certain works that should have been completed in advance were not done when planned.  As well as the obvious lengthening of P1-4, P5-6 are being shortened, and the nose of P7-8 is being realigned.

It's surprising there's not yet been detailed 'before and after' track plans in the rail mags, it's been known that the former international platforms and approaches were finished some months back, test running started a few weeks ago.

Another news item is that for the last (short Tue-Fri) working week of August, while London Bridge area is closed, Southeastern are running a 2 tph Ramsgate service into P21/22.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on July 27, 2017, 20:44:53
Another news item is that for the last (short Tue-Fri) working week of August, while London Bridge area is closed, Southeastern are running a 2 tph Ramsgate service into P21/22.

To achieve this has take 8 months of prep work on the Linford Street Curve, since Eurostar ceased the line had been effectively mothballed, the electrification equipment had suffered severe damage due to lightning a number of years ago, the DfT agreeing to leaving it out of service, a temporary solution is being put in place for this August use and possible use at Christmas. 

Driver route training commence at the beginning of July


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on July 27, 2017, 21:24:15
Most of the material produced on this upgrade (both material and immaterial) has the logos of NR, SWT, and "funded by UK government". However, NR's animated video showing what they are doing (on SWT's upgrade site) ends with "in partnership with" LCR as well as the other two. Do they still have some form of ownership of the erstwhile international terminal?


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on July 27, 2017, 22:25:20
Most of the material produced on this upgrade (both material and immaterial) has the logos of NR, SWT, and "funded by UK government". However, NR's animated video showing what they are doing (on SWT's upgrade site) ends with "in partnership with" LCR as well as the other two. Do they still have some form of ownership of the erstwhile international terminal?

Yes LCR do as their web site says For over 20 years, LCR has been managing, developing and disposing of property assets within a railway context, and in particular assets associated with major infrastructure projects. As guardians of public land, we have a role to play in the Government’s drive for homes, jobs and economic growth.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: ellendune on July 27, 2017, 22:45:39
LCR are not really who you think they are. They no longer own the CTRL (HS1) and are essential another government owned property company.  For a full explanatiom see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_and_Continental_Railways (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_and_Continental_Railways)


Title: Re: New voice at Waterloo
Post by: Surrey 455 on July 27, 2017, 23:37:29
I noticed today both AM and PM and yesterday evening that the new automated announcements at Waterloo are suffering with teething problems. A platform announcement will be made and often there is either a long pause before continuing or a long pause whilst reading out a list of some stations served and missing out others.


Title: Re: New voice at Waterloo
Post by: Louis94 on July 28, 2017, 13:02:20
It is Celia, however she has re-recorded everything and sounds quite different. It is an upgraded system SWT have been slowly implementing, this is the latest addition however it is the first for a few months. It is at a number of other stations including Eastleigh, Winchester and Southampton Airport Parkway. It does seem to be a bit unreliable mind.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 14, 2017, 12:14:14
The traditional timelapse video of the 'orange army' of work so far completed can be viewed here:

https://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/news/timelapse-60-000-man-hours-in-60-seconds#


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: rogerw on August 14, 2017, 16:43:35
Off to have my own look on Thursday, at least as much as you can see from a train.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 14, 2017, 18:16:30
If you want to look at it all from your armchair, this link was posted on the WNXX Forum: http://sentry.og2.co.uk/waterloo


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Timmer on August 15, 2017, 07:52:09
Well what they hoped wouldn't happen has happened, an incident outside Waterloo station involving an engineering train and a passenger train having a coming together at a set of points.

SWT are saying 'avoid Waterloo'.

Judging by the pictures on Paul Clifton's Twitter feed there could be major disruption for quite sometime:
https://twitter.com/PaulCliftonBBC


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: GBM on August 15, 2017, 08:44:37
From the BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-40933704
Train derails outside London Waterloo station
5 minutes ago
Three people were checked over by London Ambulance Service but no-one was hurt
Passengers have been advised to avoid London Waterloo station all day after a train derailed outside the station.
The train partly left the tracks as it was pulling away from a platform at low speed at 05:40 BST, Network Rail said.
Three people were checked over by London Ambulance Service but nobody was taken to hospital.
Ten platforms are already shut as part of engineering works to enlarge the station's capacity.
The station is usually one of the busiest in the UK
Passengers were already affected by ongoing engineering works
Waterloo works: What you wanted to know
Emergency services including police, paramedics and fire crews were called to the scene.
Photos shared by passengers on social media suggest the passenger train had struck an engineering wagon.
Chris Denham, a spokesman for Network Rail, told the BBC the partially derailed train had blocked three of the platforms so only very limited services could run.
"If you don't have to travel to Waterloo today, please don't," he said.
Passengers are being advised to use alternative routes
South West Trains said there would be a very limited service running to and from Waterloo "which is expected for the rest of today".
Many of the trains running have been cancelled or are are stopping or starting short of the station, the rail operator said.
Passengers are being advised to use alternative routes and have been warned other stations in the area will be "very busy" with the possibility of queuing systems being put in place.
The ongoing £800m engineering project at Waterloo will prepare the station for longer trains and provide space for 30% extra passengers during the busiest times of the day.
The station is usually one of the busiest in the UK, with an average of 270,000 journeys made to and from it each day.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: BBM on August 15, 2017, 09:55:31
There appears to be some diversions of SWT West of England services into Reading. I've just spotted on Open Train Times a 1Z26 which has gone via Mortimer into P3 at RDG. It's not showing up on RTT but on LDB there's a 0945 arrival at Reading from Exeter St David's via Salisbury and Basingstoke. The next departure that way showing on LDB is a 1002 from RDG to Salisbury. That's then followed by a 1011 arrival from EXD departing back there at 1047. None of these currently appear on RTT at RDG.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 15, 2017, 10:24:30
Back to Waterloo.  You can see the position of the engineering train wagons and the derailed train here: http://sentry.og2.co.uk/images/ICE00012/2017-08-15/ICE00012-2017-08-15_102200.jpg

(http://sentry.og2.co.uk/images/ICE00012/2017-08-15/ICE00012-2017-08-15_102200.jpg)


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Timmer on August 15, 2017, 10:36:13
There appears to be some diversions of SWT West of England services into Reading. I've just spotted on Open Train Times a 1Z26 which has gone via Mortimer into P3 at RDG. It's not showing up on RTT but on LDB there's a 0945 arrival at Reading from Exeter St David's via Salisbury and Basingstoke. The next departure that way showing on LDB is a 1002 from RDG to Salisbury. That's then followed by a 1011 arrival from EXD departing back there at 1047. None of these currently appear on RTT at RDG.
Yes according to Journeycheck all Exeter to Waterloo services are being diverted to/from Reading. The Benefits of diesel powered trains.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 15, 2017, 11:10:27
That engineering train is in P10, isn't it? The very one that (with its approach line(s)) was made part of the possession by a late change in July? So, if there was something in the plans or instructions to signallers that wasn't changed then, so a train leaving P11 could use the line to P10 ...


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 15, 2017, 11:18:57
That engineering train is in P10, isn't it? The very one that (with its approach line(s)) was made part of the possession by a late change in July? So, if there was something in the plans or instructions to signallers that wasn't changed then, so a train leaving P11 could use the line to P10 ...

AIUI the engineering train has been in that position every day since the work started.  It ought to be impossible to set a route onto the line it is standing on.  Suggestions elsewhere that it is there as a physical barrier to protect the worksite.  So did it work?

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: broadgage on August 15, 2017, 11:39:42
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
The damage looks limited perhaps suggesting that the driver of the EMU had time to brake, but not time to stop.
The EMU was leaving the station, so it must have arrived safely.

Under normal circumstances, track circuits on the line occupied by the freight should be interlocked with the platform starting signal and thus prevent this sort of accident.
During large scale engineering work, it is possible that the equipment was defective or disconnected, or even that it was BELIEVED to be defective when in fact it was working correctly.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 15, 2017, 11:51:43
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
I've been in and out of Waterloo half a dozen times recently and that train has been an almost permanent feature, at the current length.  The line it is on is within the possession until well beyond the point of impact.

It can be seen present, (either with the cab just at the platform end, or just beyond) in a number of online images and videos taken at different times, e.g. this from 8th Aug by Paul Bigland: http://PaulBigland.zenfolio.com/p671909530/e92a8b12d

Paul



Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: ChrisB on August 15, 2017, 11:57:35
Causing horrendous problems getting into Waterloo from suburban stations now. A colleague's journey from Surbiton this morning kicked her out at Raynes Park, and eventually told to get a bus to Wimbledon & the tube from there. Expected at 0930, she's still on her way.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 15, 2017, 12:00:56
Looking at the pictures, it seems a possibility that the engineering train was longer than was expected, or it had been moved, and that the passenger train then collided sidewise where the lines converge.
I've been in and out of Waterloo half a dozen times recently and that train has been an almost permanent feature, at the current length.  The line it is on is within the possession until well beyond the point of impact.

It can be seen present, (either with the cab just at the platform end, or just beyond) in a number of online images and videos taken at different times, e.g. this from 8th Aug by Paul Bigland: http://PaulBigland.zenfolio.com/p671909530/e92a8b12d

Paul



But the engineering train shouldn't affect the signalling, should it? All track within the possession should be off limits, - I'm not sure whether that would involve screwdrivers and crocodile leads these days, but the effect should be the same. The issues concerns the boundary - all track entering the possession should appear "occupied" permanently, and be marked by sticky tape on the panel (or its soft equivalent on-screen).


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 15, 2017, 12:22:41
But the engineering train shouldn't affect the signalling, should it? All track within the possession should be off limits, - I'm not sure whether that would involve screwdrivers and crocodile leads these days, but the effect should be the same. The issues concerns the boundary - all track entering the possession should appear "occupied" permanently, and be marked by sticky tape on the panel (or its soft equivalent on-screen).

Quite right AFAIK, but my post was only intended to explain to the earlier poster that that particular engineering train shouldn't have caught anyone out, because this morning it appears to be not significantly different, in either length or position, to any other day.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Timmer on August 15, 2017, 14:37:06
SWT are now advising not to travel on their network tomorrow as well as the rest of today:
https://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/disruptions/96AF36FED17149D9BF98F22568F054DC/


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on August 15, 2017, 15:32:24
It will be interesting what the RAIB come up with as the underlying cause but the barrier train did exactly what it was supposed to do and probably prevented deaths or serious injuries on the ground in the work site. Good use of belt and braces against, what I can only presume, was a perceived risk of incursion - or, more likely, worker excursion.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: CyclingSid on August 15, 2017, 18:20:30
On the re-direct to Reading; last Saturday I went to Salisbury and found there was a direct train from Reading (P3).Very convenient. On the way back, it appeared that the train sat at Basingstoke for 30 minutes or so, presumably to allow the normal BSK-RDG and XTC services to maintain their timetable. Apparently there were positive comments from RDG passsengers, plus "you should bring back the Brighton service" (how long ago?).


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: PhilWakely on August 15, 2017, 21:29:48
From my very untrained eye, it looks to me that a set of points leading away from the platform from which the EMU was leaving had somehow been set so that the EMU went into the path of the engineering train
Quote from: photo from BBC report
(https://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/0E59/production/_97337630_mediaitem97337629.jpg)
The points must have somehow been set between the time the EMU entered the platform and left it.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Timmer on August 16, 2017, 05:56:36
Good news is that platforms 11 and 12 are back in use with just platform 13 closed.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 10:18:31
Good news is that platforms 11 and 12 are back in use with just platform 13 closed.

That looks like some evidence of their having been two issues (as was reported on SWT's website yesterday morning), perhaps the points giving access to P13 from the P14 approach track are a separate fault?  P13 is now showing NOGO on the opentraintimes map, and as you say P11 and P12 are seeing normal movements via yesterdays main incident site.

http://www.opentraintimes.com/maps/signalling/wat

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Timmer on August 16, 2017, 10:59:23
That looks like some evidence of their having been two issues (as was reported on SWT's website yesterday morning), perhaps the points giving access to P13 from the P14 approach track are a separate fault?  P13 is now showing NOGO on the opentraintimes map, and as you say P11 and P12 are seeing normal movements via yesterdays main incident site.

http://www.opentraintimes.com/maps/signalling/wat

Paul
Which is a bit of a shame that the advice given was not to travel today. I know with what was known at the time it was the best advice to give, but how many didn't make their journey today based on that advice? In the case of those who have to travel to work probably not many. Perhaps those who were planning a day out to London may have postponed doing so.

Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 16, 2017, 11:16:55
Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.

I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   ;)

First Group must be relieved it didn't happen just after they'd taken over, as that would no doubt have been a difficult start from which to recover.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on August 16, 2017, 11:31:24
Slightly sad that the last days of the SWT franchise will be remembered for the blockade at Waterloo that will benefit the new franchise and not all the many good things that SWT have achieved over the years. Not saying they were perfect but it has been one of the better franchises.

I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   ;)

First Group must be relieved it didn't happen just after they'd taken over, as that would no doubt have been a difficult start from which to recover.

How do you know it won't have?


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Timmer on August 16, 2017, 11:43:22
I'm guessing you're not a member of the South Hampshire Rail User Group then?   ;)
LOL Nope


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 12:04:54
I guess SHRUG will be wound down now, because he's been pushing the line that everything that ever goes wrong is down to SWT for years now. 

(I always assume there are very few members of SHRUG - and they don't deserve the coverage  they get.)

Obviously everything will be perfect again from Sunday, just like it was under BR...

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: ChrisB on August 16, 2017, 13:00:22
Further points failures affecting Pl 13....


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 16, 2017, 13:08:50
I guess SHRUG will be wound down now, because he's been pushing the line that everything that ever goes wrong is down to SWT for years now. 

(I always assume there are very few members of SHRUG - and they don't deserve the coverage  they get.)

Obviously everything will be perfect again from Sunday, just like it was under BR...

Their website, whilst being triumphant about the change, does state that it will take a while for First to unravel the years of bad work from Stagecoach.  I would expect, if it does continue, that positive news will actually get a mention and any negative news will be either not mentioned or they will claim it only happened because of the poor legacy left by Stagecoach.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 15:48:55
Further points failures affecting Pl 13....
To the best of my knowledge that has been the case all day, hence my earlier post. 

Looking at the track diagram, I suspect that if the "double slip (diamond) crossing", (which was the scene of yesterdays incident), is still defective, and it was secured in the 'normal' position for access into P11 and P12, then it would prevent use of P13.

Maybe one of our signalling gurus would like to offer a better opinion?

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: eightf48544 on August 16, 2017, 16:21:58
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 16, 2017, 16:54:51
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?

I think that's what Paul meant by securing the points in the 'normal' position.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 17:31:51
What ever happened to clipping, scotching and padlocking points in such circumstances?

I think that's what Paul meant by securing the points in the 'normal' position.
Yes - that's what I intended.   I'm sure the RAIB report will be interesting in due course.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 16, 2017, 18:25:09
SWT's excuses page has this:
Quote
What's Going On:
A reoccurred points failure affecting platforms 11 and 12, an earlier points failure affecting trains using platforms 20 to 24 at London Waterloo and a low-speed partial derailment yesterday has caused disruption to services. Points are sections of track that allow trains to change from one line to another.

Trains are now able to use platforms 11 and 12 at London Waterloo after engineers investigated a problem with a set of points.

Trains are still unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo for the remainder of the day following the derailment yesterday. Engineers will continue to make repairs today and overnight tonight so that this platform can be brought back into use.

That appears to say the the "unrelated" points failure yesterday was at the other side (though I can't see any trains that were affected), while this P11-13 issue has happened before. (Could that be what happened last week?) 

It gives the impression that work has been going on at the entrance to P13, though that seems a bit unlikely. More like sitting thinking and planning what to do later? Whether what needs mending at or near that crossing was the cause of the derailment, its result, or due to the rerailing operations is unclear, and may not be 100% clear to those on site.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 16, 2017, 18:38:32
It was obvious in an earlier post that I didn't know what technology was involved in signalling at Waterloo, more specifically in the interlocking which is what seems to have failed yesterday. The blurb about this upgrade programme said control was going to Basingstoke ROC, and even that this would be done starting last year. Yet the Sectional Appendix (June 2017) still says Wimbledon SC. That would still count as remote, I imagine, but what is it?


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 16, 2017, 19:10:58
Waterloo is a 1990 relay interlocking controlled from Wimbledon SCC by duplicated Time Division Multiplex (TDM) remote control and indication systems.  The interlocking is divided into 'Main Line' and 'Windsor' sides and each half is controlled by separate panels at Wimbledon.

I am aware of the possible cause of the incident and rest assured the RAIB report will be very interesting reading.......


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 16, 2017, 19:14:50

Looking at the track diagram, I suspect that if the "double slip (diamond) crossing", (which was the scene of yesterdays incident), is still defective, and it was secured in the 'normal' position for access into P11 and P12, then it would prevent use of P13.

Maybe one of our signalling gurus would like to offer a better opinion?

Paul
Yes Paul, although I don't know the exact reason, its quite likely that that is the cause as the only route to Platform No.13 passes through those points whereas all other (functional) platforms have alternative routes to/from them.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: IndustryInsider on August 16, 2017, 19:45:45
Do we know whether the derailment has caused any delays to the programme of works being undertaken?


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 21:21:05
Do we know whether the derailment has caused any delays to the programme of works being undertaken?

I think if anything the civils work is progressing anyway.  Someone suggested in another forum any knock on effects will more likely be to the stage work on the signalling alterations.

I was looking at various webcam pics over the last few days and (at least to my eye) the platforms and track alterations seem on the home straight now; I think they are about to start the top surfaces of the 3 modified islands.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 16, 2017, 21:33:45
Waterloo is a 1990 relay interlocking controlled from Wimbledon SCC by duplicated Time Division Multiplex (TDM) remote control and indication systems.  The interlocking is divided into 'Main Line' and 'Windsor' sides and each half is controlled by separate panels at Wimbledon.

Yes, I've seen the way the panels are currently split, and it suggests an interesting medium term problem because the station and approaches effectively operate now with a split down the middle, with the main line (fast and slow) side covering P1-14, and the Windsor side panel covering the rest including P20-24, and the two signalling diagrams only have limited overlapping information.   

However, in the post Dec 2018 set up, the mainline side spreads out from P1 as far as P18 - with the main suburban apparently having P1-6, and the longer distance trains P7-18.   The Windsor side services will use the same split of approach tracks through Vauxhall, but their trains will only normally use P19-24. 

IIRC this sort of horizontal split runs all the way through to Clapham Junction - which as most people know doesn't really operate as a junction, more of a 'coming together'...  ;D

Sounds like they might need some significant changes to the signallers MMI...

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 16, 2017, 21:47:41
IIRC this sort of horizontal split runs all the way through to Clapham Junction - which as most people know doesn't really operate as a junction, more of a 'coming together'...  ;D

Sounds like they might need some significant changes to the signallers MMI...

Paul
Yes, the split continues through Clapham Junction to Earlsfield on the Mains and to Putney on the Windsors.  There is a seperate 'Yard Shunters Panel' at Clapham Junction that interfaces to both Wimbledon panels and to signal a train, for example, from the Mains, through the Yard, and back out to the Windsors requires some complex electrical controls and the co-operation of the three signallers!  I know this because I was Project Engineer for the design team back in 1989-1992 ;) :P

I would guess that when the reconfiguration of the control centre to VDUs comes on stream that it will be easier to implement a different split.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Timmer on August 17, 2017, 07:59:40
Platform 13 remains out of use again today so would appear they couldn't fix the problem overnight.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 17, 2017, 08:30:20
On the WNXX Forum it was mentioned that the derailed train (once rerailed) was stabled in Platform No.13 so perhaps its still there?


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on August 17, 2017, 08:41:33
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 

Partial/complete replacement of the moving bits of the points may be necessary, which they may have decided to postpone for now.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 17, 2017, 09:39:16
On the WNXX Forum it was mentioned that the derailed train (once rerailed) was stabled in Platform No.13 so perhaps its still there?
I believe it ran to Clapham Yard yesterday morning about 0815, 5Z50 was the train ID mentioned elsewhere. I think I saw it in P11 on the opentraintimes map beforehand but cannot be sure.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 17, 2017, 11:06:48
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 
Not sure about this 'inward working to P13'?  The incident train was leaving P11, there have been various images online showing the majority of the train still in P11 after the event.  Another unit was trapped in P12 after the incident, and P13 was inaccessible, but IIRC empty at the time.

This Guardian article shows the aftermath, the barrier train being in the P10 approach:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/16/rail-passengers-second-day-delays-waterloo-derailment

Paul 


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: bradshaw on August 17, 2017, 11:07:40

from the SWT journey check

Quote
Following a low-speed partial derailment on Tuesday, we are unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo. Engineers attempted repairs overnight but were unable to complete them without causing significant disruption to morning services. As a result, the work to bring the platform back into use will take place overnight on Thursday 17 August.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 17, 2017, 11:40:11

from the SWT journey check

Quote
Following a low-speed partial derailment on Tuesday, we are unable to use platform 13 at London Waterloo. Engineers attempted repairs overnight but were unable to complete them without causing significant disruption to morning services. As a result, the work to bring the platform back into use will take place overnight on Thursday 17 August.

That's just as you'd expect, (as post #47) - hence P11 and P12 are in use, (trains in there as I write) which indicates that the affected crossing is presently out of action and must be locked in position for 'straight across' moves from P11 or P12 towards the Up Main Relief.

It doesn't mean the original incident concerned trains entering or leaving P13 at all.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Gordon the Blue Engine on August 17, 2017, 14:20:15
I wonder whether perhaps the points were set wrong when the inward working entered P13 some 20 minutes earlier.  This “trailing” of the points would not of course have caused a derailment, but would have damaged them and could have lead to the 0540 outward working derailing when passing over them. 
Not sure about this 'inward working to P13'?  The incident train was leaving P11, there have been various images online showing the majority of the train still in P11 after the event.  Another unit was trapped in P12 after the incident, and P13 was inaccessible, but IIRC empty at the time.

This Guardian article shows the aftermath, the barrier train being in the P10 approach:
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/aug/16/rail-passengers-second-day-delays-waterloo-derailment

Paul 

Sorry, my mistake, I should have said P11 not P13.

...[later]  and RTT shows the train in P12 arrived after the train in P11, so that's my theory blown out of the water!


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 17, 2017, 17:19:03

Sorry, my mistake, I should have said P11 not P13.

...[later]  and RTT shows the train in P12 arrived after the train in P11, so that's my theory blown out of the water!


No problem.  We are back on the same song sheet again...   :)

Paul...


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 23, 2017, 09:05:28
Interesting article on the Waterloo station changes here: https://www.londonreconnections.com/2017/back-future-relengthening-shortening-waterloo/ and how the new track layout was pre-constructed off-site here: https://www.railengineer.uk/2017/05/17/cemex-constructs-its-biggest-rail-crossing-for-waterloo-station/ with thanks to Paul7755 of this parish for posting that link on another forum.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 23, 2017, 15:19:25
In that London Connections piece, it says:
Quote
In the end, however, the additional closure of platform 10 was required, due to the need for a barrier train at the end of platform 10 and across the Up Main Fast.

I'd been thinking that was at least a likely reason, and also speculating why - probably that plan A for blocking that path (clipping) was impractical for just those bits of a double slip crossing, and plan B (temporarily changing the interlocking) might also be too difficult. The comments after that article suggest the same things, and add that testing any modified interlocking was a big job in itself.

If you look at the way the possession has changed each weekend, not just for the bank holiday, that means that whatever was done to that crossing needed to be undone and redone several times. That would have added to the difficulty of either plan.

During each weekend, the possession covers all four main lines out to Queenstown Road, leaving the passenger service only three tracks - fingers crossed nothing breaks there! It also means all possessed platforms are reached via a sizeable parking area for engineering trains. During the week, only the slow lines are taken over, meaning that platforms above 7 can only be reached via the West Crossings. But that's how trains in service get between the Main Fast Lines and their platforms. I'm guessing that was seen as the main danger point, though not one that can really be avoided.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 25, 2017, 13:22:29
Now that they are into the final phases of work the barrier train seems to be long gone, I think it went around 0230 Thursday.   There's now much less activity than before, haven't seen much in the way of yellow plant either.

I expect most of the interlocking testing is done in lineside locations, is there ever a stage when they actually get a handful of real trains out and test all the moves?

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 25, 2017, 13:41:03
Now that they are into the final phases of work the barrier train seems to be long gone, I think it went around 0230 Thursday.   There's now much less activity than before, haven't seen much in the way of yellow plant either.

I expect most of the interlocking testing is done in lineside locations, is there ever a stage when they actually get a handful of real trains out and test all the moves?

Paul
It depends on the complexity of the alterations.  In this case, just using my experience and personal judgement; no insider knowledge, that it would most likely be a reconfiguration of the interlocking rather than a total rewire and thus not requiring what we call 'Principles Testing' only requiring 'Functional Testing'.  Most of the alterations would probably be in external equipment housings and thus fairly straightforward......

Test trains are very expensive to hire in and run, so if needed they are usually restricted to one.  I once tested the whole of the new North Pole EPS Depot with a single locomotive (and if I recall correctly, it had some 90 signalled routes).


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 25, 2017, 14:04:08
Presumably one of the major aspects is the Wimbledon panel changes, because that is very much a hardware panel as opposed to a display?


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 25, 2017, 17:23:34
Presumably one of the major aspects is the Wimbledon panel changes, because that is very much a hardware panel as opposed to a display?
Possibly.  But the panel there consists of 48x48mm tiles with 'plug-in' LED indications so relatively easy to alter.  The actual wiring is directly fed to/from a remote control system (ex-ML Engineering Ltd TEML-41) that is housed in the control desk, so again fairly easy to re-program/rewire.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 25, 2017, 23:24:26
Another question would concern gauging for the various rolling stock to be used.  Would they have to physically test that, or just rely on accurate measurement?
 
I understood the existing Waterloo had all sorts of limitations as to which platforms could accept certain units or coaching stock, so hopefully they've allowed for more flexible use than before...

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 26, 2017, 08:06:12
....and of course there is the traction conductor rail to test for gapping etc.  Calling ET  ;)


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on August 26, 2017, 11:16:23
....and of course there is the traction conductor rail to test for gapping etc.  Calling ET  ;)

Section and sub section proving is done as a "dead" test now ie uses a low voltage continuity test, the only "live" test will be track "alive" at the track circuit breakers if the circuit breakers are renewed; as Waterloo station has "stub end feeds" into the platform the E & P Engineer may ask for a live line tester (used to be a "crate of eggs" but these have more or less been banned from use) at the stop block ends.

Gauging is done by measurement, a hand trolley is initially used which has GPS and laser alinement instruments also the tamper will give accurate positioning and finally any pinch points can be checked by hand


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 27, 2017, 14:56:01
This was posted on the WNXX Forum earlier today:

Quote
The Industrial Action involving platforms 7 & 8 at Waterloo discussed upstream has been suspended for 8 weeks to allow NR to plan an engineering solution to the signalling issues raised. For the 8 weeks trains over 8 cars require an additional person holding driver competancy to assist with signal sighting during dispatch when leaving platforms 7 or 8.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on August 27, 2017, 16:39:25
Gauging is done by measurement, a hand trolley is initially used which has GPS and laser alinement instruments also the tamper will give accurate positioning and finally any pinch points can be checked by hand

Or, have they come over all up-to-date, with gauging done in the CAD/CAE and the track measured to check whether as built=as drawn? Though that's not a huge difference, in practice, but I'm sure that will have been done to the platforms and any other structures.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on August 28, 2017, 09:28:43
Gauging is done by measurement, a hand trolley is initially used which has GPS and laser alinement instruments also the tamper will give accurate positioning and finally any pinch points can be checked by hand

Or, have they come over all up-to-date, with gauging done in the CAD/CAE and the track measured to check whether as built=as drawn? Though that's not a huge difference, in practice, but I'm sure that will have been done to the platforms and any other structures.

Yes gauging is done at the design stage, its one of the Interdisciplinary Checks (IDC) carried out by the Contractors Engineering Manager (CEM) and his/ her Contractors Responsible Engineers (CRE) one per discipline (Track, E&P S&T Structures etc) then the NR DPE (Designated Project Engineer) and his / her team of Project engineers carry out an IDR (Interdisciplinary Review) this is not the same as an IDC more an over view to ensure the IDC has be rigorous.

From the design data would be issued for the test and inspect checks as its built and then finally there is the commissioning and Entry into Service (EIS) each discipline has it own process for this but all the certs need to come together for the CEM to enter it into service, note its the contractor who takes this responsibility as its their liability.

So in a nutshell there still needs to be some physical measurements taken on site most are done by machines either by laser and GPS or with a gauging profile fitted but there are some places where manual methods are still used 


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Surrey 455 on August 28, 2017, 19:44:12
Quote
South Western Railway Alert Service <noreply@nexusalpha.com>
17:51 (1 hour ago)

 to me
Dear Customer,

A further five platforms at London Waterloo had to be closed from 16:00 this afternoon to help support the ongoing engineering works, resulting in platforms 1 -19 being closed.
Train services running across the whole South Western Railway network may be delayed or revised. We are anticipating disruption until the end of the day.

What We're Doing About It

Services from Exeter St. Davids will terminate at Basingtoke.You should change at Basingstoke to the next available London Waterloo bound service to continue your journey.

Services to Exeter St. Davids will commence from Basingstoke.You should travel on a Basingstoke, Bournemouth, Southampton Central or Weymouth bound service and change at Basingstoke.

Services to and from Guildford via Epsom will be suspended. You may use Southern services to and from London Victoria via Clapham Junction.

How We're Helping You Complete Your Journey

You may use your rail ticket on:

- Southern services via any reasonable route.
- Thameslink services via any reasonable route.
- Great Western Railway services via any reasonable route.
- Cross Country services between Bournemouth and Reading via Basingstoke.
- London Underground services via any reasonable route.
- TFL buses across the South Western Railway network.

Replacement buses will be in operation between Guildford and Leatherhead in both directions, operating every half hour, commencing from Guildford at approximately 18:00 and Leatherhead at approximately 18:30.

We are in the process of organising supplemental road transport. More details will be provided as soon as they have been confirmed.

The reduction in services will mean that trains will be much busier than normal. We strongly recommend you allow extra time to travel and check your journey before setting off by using http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/.

We apologise for the disruption to your journey today.

Thank you,
South Western Railway

Will they finish tonight? I'm starting to worry about my journey to work tomorrow now. I'm expecting to wake up, turn my phone on and see multiple emails from SWR have arrived warning of delays and cancellations.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: TaplowGreen on August 28, 2017, 21:03:11
Unconfirmed but I'm hearing they're running 24 hours late.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: TaplowGreen on August 29, 2017, 06:58:35
http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/168727.aspx

Warning of severe delays for most of the day on the BBC


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 29, 2017, 08:07:22
Trains now (0800) appear to be running from most of the expected platforms for today, i.e. 1-20.  Not sure what proportion of the original timetable for today is running though.

Update at 1337, full timetable hoped for by 1400.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: eightf48544 on August 30, 2017, 09:25:37
Further Problems today some lines blocked.

Not a good start for South Western Railways


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on August 30, 2017, 09:58:23
Further Problems today some lines blocked.

Not a good start for South Western Railways

Yes, I heard that on the news this morning. However, having run through the arrivals into Waterloo up to 9:00 I can only see one that's over 10 minutes late, and that was less than 20 minutes lost around Raynes Park. So was there a problem with the signals - or someone in BBC local news having a problem with telling today's reports from yesterday's?


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: GBM on August 30, 2017, 10:29:22
From RAIB today (30th) 10h01
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/collision-near-london-waterloo-station-15-august-2017



News story
Collision near London Waterloo station, 15 August 2017
From:Rail Accident Investigation Branch Published:30 August 2017
Investigation into a collision near London Waterloo station, 15 August 2017.

Passenger train and wagons after the collision at Waterloo
Passenger train and wagons after the collision at Waterloo
At around 05:42 hrs on Tuesday 15 August 2017, a passenger train leaving London Waterloo station travelling at about 11 mph (18 km/h) collided with a stationary train of wagons. There were no injuries, but both trains were damaged and there was serious disruption to train services using the station.

The passenger train was the 05:40 hrs South West Trains service from Waterloo to Guildford and comprised 10 coaches, a combination of class 455 and class 456 electric units. The wagons were standing on a line adjacent to the intended route of the passenger train and had been provided as a safety barrier separating passenger services from an area where construction work was being undertaken as part of the Waterloo station upgrade project.

The collision occurred because a set of points were misaligned and directed the passenger train away from its intended route. The misalignment was a consequence of a temporary modification to the points control system which also caused the train driver and signaller to receive indications that the points were correctly aligned.

Our investigation will examine:

the circumstances leading to installation of the temporary control system modification
the safety measures provided while the temporary modification was in place
the checking and testing procedures applicable to the modification
any relevant underlying management factors.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: grahame on August 30, 2017, 14:30:43
From RAIB today (30th) 10h01

The collision occurred because a set of points were misaligned and directed the passenger train away from its intended route. The misalignment was a consequence of a temporary modification to the points control system which also caused the train driver and signaller to receive indications that the points were correctly aligned.


Interesting to see this initial report ... removing the possibility of it being a SPAD or a signaller's error


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on August 30, 2017, 15:23:00
To those of us who have undertaken risk assessments, it is always about one's position in the matrix bounded by likelihood - on the one hand - and consequences on the other, and what mitigation you employ in each part of that risk space. To my eyes, the barrier train did exactly what it was supposed to do in these circumstance.  It looks to me like it was the blunt, but all powerful, back-stop against a risk that was very unlikely, but with huge negative consequences if it happened.

I will be interested to see the RIAB look into the risk assessment programme.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Electric train on August 30, 2017, 15:57:48
To those of us who have undertaken risk assessments, it is always about one's position in the matrix bounded by likelihood - on the one hand - and consequences on the other, and what mitigation you employ in each part of that risk space. To my eyes, the barrier train did exactly what it was supposed to do in these circumstance.  It looks to me like it was the blunt, but all powerful, back-stop against a risk that was very unlikely, but with huge negative consequences if it happened.

I will be interested to see the RIAB look into the risk assessment programme.

Although the barrier train was more likely to prevent construction site RRV incursion onto the operational railway than operational rail vehicles incursion into the construction site.

Having been in many rolls which have involved signing off on work similar to this the report will be interesting to read to see if it was process or human failure or a combination of the two,


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on August 30, 2017, 16:10:45
Although the barrier train was more likely to prevent construction site RRV incursion onto the operational railway than operational rail vehicles incursion into the construction site.

I agree you that an RRV excursion was always more likely, or a trolley for that matter.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on August 30, 2017, 17:34:35
Yes, I heard that on the news this morning. However, having run through the arrivals into Waterloo up to 9:00 I can only see one that's over 10 minutes late, and that was less than 20 minutes lost around Raynes Park. So was there a problem with the signals - or someone in BBC local news having a problem with telling today's reports from yesterday's?

IIRC the opentraintimes live map showed P1 blocked for a fairly short time.   The BBC tend to report these things as though the world is about to end, and then leave the story 'live' all day...

Probably the usual sort of teething troubles.

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: eightf48544 on August 30, 2017, 18:07:47
From RAIB today (30th) 10h01

The collision occurred because a set of points were misaligned and directed the passenger train away from its intended route. The misalignment was a consequence of a temporary modification to the points control system which also caused the train driver and signaller to receive indications that the points were correctly aligned.


I would also have  expected the point in question to be clipped and padlocked as well as relying on "A temporary modification to the points control system". Might burn the point motor out!


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on August 30, 2017, 20:27:57
I would also have  expected the point in question to be clipped and padlocked as well as relying on "A temporary modification to the points control system". Might burn the point motor out!

It is a double slip crossover, with four routes/positions.    IIRC from other discussions there are four separate points machines, and four possible positions of the crossover.   AIUI they cannot be partially clipped out of use because of the way the moving blades have to interact.   Clipping it in one position, say UMR to P12/13, would have taken P11 out of use. (or vice versa.)

Paul


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 30, 2017, 20:47:23
I would also have  expected the point in question to be clipped and padlocked as well as relying on "A temporary modification to the points control system". Might burn the point motor out!

It is a double slip crossover, with four routes/positions.    IIRC from other discussions there are four separate points machines, and four possible positions of the crossover.   AIUI they cannot be partially clipped out of use because of the way the moving blades have to interact.   Clipping it in one position, say UMR to P12/13, would have taken P11 out of use. (or vice versa.)

Paul

That doesn't sound quite right. Surely the four routes only occur in two pairs, i.e. it has just two positions. If all the movements are linked, however many motors do the pushing, then you can't lock out one route without blocking the other route linked to it. If they all moved independently that might not be true - though detection might be an issue.


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on August 30, 2017, 21:34:27
I would also have  expected the point in question to be clipped and padlocked as well as relying on "A temporary modification to the points control system". Might burn the point motor out!

It is a double slip crossover, with four routes/positions.    IIRC from other discussions there are four separate points machines, and four possible positions of the crossover.   AIUI they cannot be partially clipped out of use because of the way the moving blades have to interact.   Clipping it in one position, say UMR to P12/13, would have taken P11 out of use. (or vice versa.)

Paul

That doesn't sound quite right. Surely the four routes only occur in two pairs, i.e. it has just two positions. If all the movements are linked, however many motors do the pushing, then you can't lock out one route without blocking the other route linked to it. If they all moved independently that might not be true - though detection might be an issue.
The point end approached by the passenger train that was incorrectly set is operated as a double slip pair.  The third end, controlled by the same point identity, was under the barrier train.  On a double slip each end is a pair that operate together from a single point operating mechanism.  I'll post up a drawing later.

In the meantime here is a video that shows the principle of operation.  Its not in the UK but the principles are the same: https://youtu.be/VpfJdm71u6g


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: stuving on August 30, 2017, 22:29:05
The point end approached by the passenger train that was incorrectly set is operated as a double slip pair.  The third end, controlled by the same point identity, was under the barrier train.  On a double slip each end is a pair that operate together from a single point operating mechanism.  I'll post up a drawing later.

Ah - so it is linkage (mechanical or not), but not what I said. After all, even if two routes can be set through that crossing at once, only one can be signalled - so there's no need to bother about their compatibility. It's more like linking the two ends of a crossover, and extending that to a third point end that can't usefully be moved independently.

And then trying to quickly alter it temporarily.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on August 30, 2017, 22:52:12
BBC South Today just now were reporting that the low-numbered platforms (not sure how many) will close again tonight, for more fixing. There was talk about people being unaware of their last train being cancelled.

This is on SWR's site (https://www.southwesternrailway.com/plan-my-journey/live-departures-and-arrivals), though not in all the obvious places:
Quote
Alterations to services due to additional late night engineering works at London Waterloo

We have been advised that access is required at  London Waterloo station from 22:45 to work on signalling equipment, this access will limit the number of platforms trains can use.

Seven trains will be altered this evening and advertised trains may leave London Waterloo from different platforms.

The following services have been amended:

·        21:33 London Waterloo via Twickenham train will terminate at Raynes Park
·        21:46 Guildford to London Waterloo train will terminate at Wimbledon
·        22:07 Guildford to London Waterloo train will terminate at Wimbledon
·        22:57 London Waterloo via Twickenham train will start at Raynes Park
·        22:15 Alton to London Waterloo train will terminate at Surbiton
·        23:03 London Waterloo to Guildford train will start at Wimbledon
·        23:48 London Waterloo to Basingstoke train will start at Surbiton

If you are travelling from London Waterloo station later tonight, you are advised to check your journey before travelling.

If you have advanced booked tickets for these trains, you will be able to travel on alternative trains.

So that looks like a case of having to take an alternative train and change - the question is whether in any cases the Waterloo departure is earlier.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on August 31, 2017, 21:27:07
Back to normal ... and today's normal is:
Quote
Incident created
    31/08/2017 18:49
Last updated
    31/08/2017 19:31
Route affected
      Between London Waterloo and Portsmouth Harbour / Alton / Guildford / Epsom / Woking / Reading / Weymouth / Poole
TOC(s) affected
    South Western Railway; 
Description
    Following a track circuit failure at London Waterloo all lines have now reopened.
    What's Going On:
    Train services running to and from this station may be delayed by up to 20 minutes. Disruption is expected until 21:00.
    What South Western Railway Are Doing About It:
    The signalling problem at London Waterloo has been temporarily fixed to allow trains to run on all lines. Engineers will be applying a permanent fix later today.
    South Western Railway may need to alter some trains but it will now have a minimal affect on the wider service.

The Twitter timeline shows that it only took 10 minutes from problem to all lines open, or rather it looks like platform 8 is not being used. Much the same happened earlier and took longer and led to a couple of trains being part cancelled.

There were also cancellations announced by SWR to SE services, which sounds odd. They are borrowing a platform (21, currently) for a week, accessed via the Nine Elms Flyover, or in other words by playing at being Eurostars.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on September 01, 2017, 13:25:54

There were also cancellations announced by SWR to SE services, which sounds odd. They are borrowing a platform (21, currently) for a week, accessed via the Nine Elms Flyover, or in other words by playing at being Eurostars.

P21 and P22 was planned for SE.  I think what has been happening is that if disruption to the wider SWR service is forecast, then they are being pre-emptively diverted to Blackfriars. Lose access to a main line (whether DMF, UMF, UMR) in the station throat and the knock on effects ripple across the other 5 lines.

The fact that Blackfriars appears to have spare capacity to take that 2 tph service anyway is intriguing, it is as if the four days planned at Waterloo was only being done to create a precedent for future use?

There seems to be a greater emphasis on normal "run of the mill" random faults at the moment.   AIUI no recent modifications were made to the platform lines on the Windsor side and in the middle of the array of platforms used by main fast trains.  It stands to reason that there will be a minor fault every few days or weeks, it has always been so.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Electric train on September 01, 2017, 22:32:43

There were also cancellations announced by SWR to SE services, which sounds odd. They are borrowing a platform (21, currently) for a week, accessed via the Nine Elms Flyover, or in other words by playing at being Eurostars.

P21 and P22 was planned for SE.  I think what has been happening is that if disruption to the wider SWR service is forecast, then they are being pre-emptively diverted to Blackfriars. Lose access to a main line (whether DMF, UMF, UMR) in the station throat and the knock on effects ripple across the other 5 lines.

The fact that Blackfriars appears to have spare capacity to take that 2 tph service anyway is intriguing, it is as if the four days planned at Waterloo was only being done to create a precedent for future use?

There seems to be a greater emphasis on normal "run of the mill" random faults at the moment.   AIUI no recent modifications were made to the platform lines on the Windsor side and in the middle of the array of platforms used by main fast trains.  It stands to reason that there will be a minor fault every few days or weeks, it has always been so.

Paul

There are no long term plans to run SE Trains into Waterloo, once this Christmas is over he temporary electrification infrastructure put in place to enable the use of lindford St curve gets removed; indeed there is no capacity at Waterloo for SE Trains.

The reason it was decided to run SE Trains into Waterloo was for the benefit of passengers from Kent that normally use Waterloo East and Charing Cross.   There is no added capacity at Blackfriars currently a number of services are not running into Blackfriars during the London Bridge rebuild, the same as Thameslink services are not running via London Bridge, in fact the TLP trains via Loughborough Jcn and Herne Hill are taking the paths of the Blackfriars terminators, in the 2018 full opening of London Bridge there will be reinstatement of Blackfriars terminators.
   


Title: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on September 02, 2017, 12:14:30
The point end approached by the passenger train that was incorrectly set is operated as a double slip pair.  The third end, controlled by the same point identity, was under the barrier train.  On a double slip each end is a pair that operate together from a single point operating mechanism.  I'll post up a drawing later.

In the meantime here is a video that shows the principle of operation.  Its not in the UK but the principles are the same: https://youtu.be/VpfJdm71u6g

Did you manage to find a drawing?  I'm thinking the signalling panel engraved lines means something the way they are drawn, presumably they show the default straight route (i.e. P11 left <> DMR right) with everything set normal?

I had a quick glance at the hardware from a passing train and it looks like these are "clamp lock" operation, does that affect how the pairs are linked/operated?

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 06, 2017, 16:37:03
The point end approached by the passenger train that was incorrectly set is operated as a double slip pair.  The third end, controlled by the same point identity, was under the barrier train.  On a double slip each end is a pair that operate together from a single point operating mechanism.  I'll post up a drawing later.

In the meantime here is a video that shows the principle of operation.  Its not in the UK but the principles are the same: https://youtu.be/VpfJdm71u6g

Did you manage to find a drawing?  I'm thinking the signalling panel engraved lines means something the way they are drawn, presumably they show the default straight route (i.e. P11 left <> DMR right) with everything set normal?

I had a quick glance at the hardware from a passing train and it looks like these are "clamp lock" operation, does that affect how the pairs are linked/operated?

Paul

Paul, still trying to find my drawings.  Might have to sketch it out myself......but have found a basic animation here: http://www.dccwiki.com/images/2/2f/CrossingDoubleSlip.gif

You are correct about the panel presentation and the fact the points concerned are Clamplock operated.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on September 06, 2017, 17:25:37
Thanks.   In the conversation about four positions, of course what we a looking at is analogous to a binary truth table, where Normal and Reverse are the equivalent of 0 and 1.  So two 'mechanisms' each with 2 conditions gives you four results?

N N
N R
R N
R R

...sort of thing?

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 06, 2017, 18:44:27
Thanks.   In the conversation about four positions, of course what we a looking at is analogous to a binary truth table, where Normal and Reverse are the equivalent of 0 and 1.  So two 'mechanisms' each with 2 conditions gives you four results?

N N
N R
R N
R R

...sort of thing?

Paul

Correct again (I'll make a signal engineer out of you yet ;) ).  In the incident the train was signalled through the points concerned NN, but they were actually set RN.  On clamplock operated double slips each end of a pair is individually driven by separate hydraulic rams but they are connected to the same single electro-hydraulic pump unit so 2 per double slip arrangement (there is a design version that has 2 separate electro-hydraulic pump units per pair - 4 in total for a set of double slips; but for reasons of economy in design, installation and ongoing maintenance, that configuration is rarely used).


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on September 08, 2017, 01:40:22
Well, I'm glad to see that you two apparently understand it ...  :P :-[



Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: eightf48544 on September 08, 2017, 10:11:29
Still doesn't answer why weren't the points clipped N N. If RN and RR would cause a collison


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 08, 2017, 10:14:16
Still doesn't answer why weren't the points clipped N N. If RN and RR would cause a collison

Its not for us to speculate why.  Its for RAIB to determine that.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on September 08, 2017, 10:16:50
Well, I'm glad to see that you two apparently understand it ...  :P :-[

I have tried to explain it in 'simple' non-technical terms but a double slip is probably the most complex set of points that exist so...... ::) :P

I have decided that I need to do you a drawing.  Watch this space  ;)


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on September 08, 2017, 16:01:15
Still doesn't answer why weren't the points clipped N N. If RN and RR would cause a collison

Because if clipped to straight through i.e. "NN" there would have been no access to P13?

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on September 18, 2017, 12:28:56
Roger Ford's monthly preview of his next Modern Railways article again quotes an unnamed source who says that the points simply "should have been clipped" so I still await the RAIB detailed explanation.   

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on December 20, 2017, 10:58:56
RAIB interim report.  I'm no expert - it is as expected all to do with stage works and testing, is very detailed and I'm hoping someone can follow it through and come up with a short precise.  Seems the point ends the train approached were physically 'mid position' as seen from the FFCCTV.

As was postulated in various forums at the time, the driver and signallers cannot be considered responsible in any way.

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/669469/IR022017_171220_Waterloo.pdf

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on December 20, 2017, 11:35:36
Primarily points 1524A and 1524B should have been clipped in their normal position (as per plan) but were not.

Secondarily, a test wire was left connected which shorted out the electrical detectors to 1524A&B and fooled the signalling system into believing the point blades were correctly set and locked normal.

If only one of the above had happened the accident would not have occurred - it required the combination of the two. Holes in the cheese.

Had unclipped point blades moved without the testing wire being present, detection would have been lost and the starting signal would not have cleared.



Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: IndustryInsider on December 20, 2017, 11:48:40
Along with the incident at Cardiff, these are gentle reminders to NR and it’s contractors that although the recent safety record is incredibly good, a major incident could still easily happen if safety procedures are allowed to slip.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 20, 2017, 12:59:15
Primarily points 1524A and 1524B should have been clipped in their normal position (as per plan) but were not.

Secondarily, a test wire was left connected which shorted out the electrical detectors to 1524A&B and fooled the signalling system into believing the point blades were correctly set and locked normal.

If only one of the above had happened the accident would not have occurred - it required the combination of the two. Holes in the cheese.

Had unclipped point blades moved without the testing wire being present, detection would have been lost and the starting signal would not have cleared.

10 out of 10 for that summary.  As a practicing signal engineer for nearly 50 years now, I am bitterly disappointed to have to read that the lessons learnt from the Clapham accident have not been followed through.  I know that the pressure to complete things to time is greater than ever, but when safety of the travelling public is concerned, we need to remember not to be frightend and to stand up when required and say NO.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on December 20, 2017, 13:50:25
With points 1524A and 1524B (and 1524C) all clipped normal, how would they achieve a route into P13/14?

Am I missing something obvious here?   Or did I misread something earlier that implied that 1524 and 1525 operated together?

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on December 20, 2017, 14:10:48
With points 1524A and 1524B (and 1524C) all clipped normal, how would they achieve a route into P13/14?

Through Points 1525A which were free to move independently of points 1524A or B.  Points 1525B were also free to move but were located on a locked-out route.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 20, 2017, 14:11:15
With points 1524A and 1524B (and 1524C) all clipped normal, how would they achieve a route into P13/14?

Am I missing something obvious here?

Paul
Paul,  if you look at Figure 2 in the report you will see that it is 1525AB points that direct trains into/out of Platforms 12/13/14/15.  1524ABC points are only required normal for those movements.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: paul7575 on December 20, 2017, 14:29:29
With points 1524A and 1524B (and 1524C) all clipped normal, how would they achieve a route into P13/14?

Am I missing something obvious here?

Paul
Paul,  if you look at Figure 2 in the report you will see that it is 1525AB points that direct trains into/out of Platforms 12/13/14/15.  1524ABC points are only required normal for those movements.

Ok ta.   Goes back to that '4 state' truth table we discussed earlier doesn't it.

Paul


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 20, 2017, 14:44:50
With points 1524A and 1524B (and 1524C) all clipped normal, how would they achieve a route into P13/14?

Am I missing something obvious here?

Paul
Paul,  if you look at Figure 2 in the report you will see that it is 1525AB points that direct trains into/out of Platforms 12/13/14/15.  1524ABC points are only required normal for those movements.

Ok ta.   Goes back to that '4 state' truth table we discussed earlier doesn't it.

Paul
Correct.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on December 20, 2017, 15:15:22
One of the basic principles of signalling testing is that all Test Straps are individually numbered.  When you fit them you ‘count them all out and then count them all back in again’ to make sure one doesn’t get accidentally left in place.  If a ‘strap’ is required to be left into place after commissioning then it should be made permanent and designed/checked/approved within well documented procedures and standards.

Lets wait and see what the continuing RAIB investigation throws up.......


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on December 20, 2017, 19:56:48
Yup. The number of wires landed on each terminal is in the plan.

Part of our [on my heritage railway] S+T sign-off, is confirming that each terminal has the correct wire count. Sounded anal to me the first time I had to do it, but this accident reinforces why it is so necessary.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Electric train on December 21, 2017, 18:26:08
One of the basic principles of signalling testing is that all Test Straps are individually numbered.  When you fit them you ‘count them all out and then count them all back in again’ to make sure one doesn’t get accidentally left in place.  If a ‘strap’ is required to be left into place after commissioning then it should be made permanent and designed/checked/approved within well documented procedures and standards.

Lets wait and see what the continuing RAIB investigation throws up.......

Like SandTEngineer I am surprised that a test strap and points were left unclipped; whilst there is much ribbing of S & T by E & P one thing I do know from experience of working with S & T  testing teams is their attention to detail, being methodical and not being concerned if they tell the powers that be "we ain't finish testing yet"


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: eightf48544 on January 29, 2018, 16:13:33

Lets wait and see what the continuing RAIB investigation throws up.......

Appears RAIB have produced their  Interim Report.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a3bc2b8ed915d61889d9b4e/IR022017_171220_Waterloo.pdf (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a3bc2b8ed915d61889d9b4e/IR022017_171220_Waterloo.pdf)

Roger Ford has a summary in Febs Modern Railway.

Appears a Test Strap was left in place and the relevant points not clipped. He says similar to Cardiff incident in 2106 when a decommissioned set of points was not clipped.

Very worrying.



Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Adelante_CCT on January 29, 2018, 18:40:41
I agree, very worrying that they know an incident will occur in Cardiff in 88 years time.


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: johnneyw on January 29, 2018, 19:32:19
I agree, very worrying that they know an incident will occur in Cardiff in 88 years time.

I see low ticket sales for the service on that day. On the upside, a good one to short form!


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on January 29, 2018, 20:47:35

Lets wait and see what the continuing RAIB investigation throws up.......

Appears RAIB have produced their  Interim Report.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a3bc2b8ed915d61889d9b4e/IR022017_171220_Waterloo.pdf (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a3bc2b8ed915d61889d9b4e/IR022017_171220_Waterloo.pdf)

Roger Ford has a summary in Febs Modern Railway.

Appears a Test Strap was left in place and the relevant points not clipped. He says similar to Cardiff incident in 2106 when a decommissioned set of points was not clipped.

Very worrying.



...err.  We discussed the interim report in this thread from post #58 onwards..... ::) ;)


Title: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: Fourbee on October 08, 2018, 19:58:38
There's a lift outside the Waterloo station 'arch' exit (exit 5, if you will). Where does it go?


Title: Re: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: stuving on October 08, 2018, 20:12:25
There's a lift outside the Waterloo station 'arch' exit (exit 5, if you will). Where does it go?

The sign on it says "Lift to Subway". Do you mean where does the subway go?


Title: Re: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: paul7575 on October 08, 2018, 20:58:31
Isn’t this one of the routes to the IMAX cinema on the roundabout?

Paul


Title: Re: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: stuving on October 08, 2018, 23:32:47
Isn’t this one of the routes to the IMAX cinema on the roundabout?

Paul

I think so, on the grounds there is such a subway and it seems likely this is its end. I found that in a Lambeth proposal from 2011 to close this part of the subway, making Waterloo Place more friendly to pedestrians.


Title: Re: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: Phantom on October 09, 2018, 10:12:26
There's a lift outside the Waterloo station 'arch' exit (exit 5, if you will). Where does it go?
Narnia?


Title: Re: Lift outside waterloo station
Post by: Fourbee on October 09, 2018, 10:52:09
I did wonder if it was a shortcut to anywhere; I remember going to the IMAX a long time ago.

I like using exit 4 to Tennison Way and doubling back into The Hole in The Wall ;-).


Title: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: rogerw on November 19, 2018, 07:50:13
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-46258720 (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-46258720)

At least Filton bank opened on time


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Timmer on November 19, 2018, 08:51:16
Another day of shockingly poor service for SWR’s customers.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: JayMac on November 19, 2018, 09:02:28
Whilst blame doesn't lie with SWR, they have to handle the fallout. And it looks like they're not doing a very good job communicating.

Sadly it appears to be another example of FirstGroup's Maxwell touch. Thats the polar opposite of the Midas touch. Named after Robert Maxwell - everything he touched turning to s***.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: stuving on November 19, 2018, 10:28:20
As of 10:16:
Quote
All lines have reopened between Surbiton and London Waterloo as the overrunning engineering work has now been completed. As trains and train crew are in the wrong locations for their next duty, services will remain severely disrupted for the rest of today.

Despite the way the news has been presented, most Windsor Lines services were running, though with a few gaps due to missing stock. Reading trains were worse than that, most delayed and some missing, but that was our old friend "signalling at Earley" having a bit of a strop.

And then, a little to the east:
Quote
Trains across the whole Southern and Thameslink network may be delayed, cancelled or revised this morning, this is due to earlier overrunning engineering work at various locations.
...
Following planned weekend engineering works over running, all lines have re-opened in the London Victoria area.

Additionally, a freight train is currently blocking the line in the Haydons Road area. This train was supposed to cross over onto the Wessex route earlier this morning but has been unable to due to overunning engineering works in the Surbiton area. Due to no alternative routes being available for the train to take the southbound line is currently blocked. Attempts are being made to move the train off the route as the engineering works have concluded, however as this took place a Track Circuit failed at Wimbledon and is now requiring further attention from Network Rail specialist signalling technicians.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: SandTEngineer on November 19, 2018, 11:10:08
I was never called a 'SPECIALIST' signal technician in my time in the S&T.  Can't repeat here what I was called at times, though...... ::)


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: ChrisB on November 19, 2018, 11:22:31
Whilst blame doesn't lie with SWR, they have to handle the fallout. And it looks like they're not doing a very good job communicating.

Correspondents here too.....The subject line is incorrect, as noted by posts above.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: stuving on November 19, 2018, 11:38:57
I was never called a 'SPECIALIST' signal technician in my time in the S&T.  Can't repeat here what I was called at times, though...... ::)

It's odd, isn't it? I guess they say that to make it sound as if these are a superior kind of technician, not the ordinary ones who know very little. But if it means anything in this kind of highly technical field, it means someone who has only been trained on a limited range of equipment, and can't be sent out to fix any fault anywhere. In other words, the equivalent of semi-skilled (but when did you last hear that used?) - after all the French equivalent of that is ouvrier specialisé (which you don't hear much these days either).


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: JayMac on November 19, 2018, 12:12:45
Correspondents here too.....The subject line is incorrect, as noted by posts above.

Do you mean the thread title? What's incorrect about it?


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: ChrisB on November 19, 2018, 12:18:30
Waterloo was severely disrupted, not 'closed'


Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: SandTEngineer on November 19, 2018, 18:01:04
Second report just published https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/report-19-2018-collision-at-london-waterloo

If anybody here struggles to understand any of it then please ask away and I'll try to answer/clarify.

Quite damming of NRs competence management processes (after all the recent cases on the preserved railway network).

In particular I was really concerned about this statement:

Quote
The RAIB has observed that there are certain similarities between the factors that caused the Waterloo accident and those which led to the serious accident at Clapham Junction in 1988. The RAIB has therefore expressed the concern that some of the lessons identified by the public inquiry, chaired by Anthony Hidden QC following Clapham, may be fading from the railway industry’s collective memory.

My involvement in Clapham was reasonably close and I always related this tale to anybody new that worked for me. At the time I was Project Engineer for the Waterloo Area Resignalling (WARS) at ML Engineering (Plymouth) Ltd. We had the contract for the Resignalling.  We were in the middle of installation in Clapham Relay Room (the new one for WARS located in Victoria Signalling Centre, yes, I know). New lineside cables had been installed terminating on racks, and the link terminals fitted with RED DOME NUTS (those in the S&T industry will know what they do). BR had stagework wiring installed on the Righthand side of the terminations whilst we were installing the new interlocking wiring on the Lefthand side, with the connecting link obviously not fitted. BR then used the new cables to connect the new trackside equipment being installed in stages to the old Clapham signalbox interlocking. So, one fateful morning, siting in my office having my day starting cup of tea, the telephone rang and the person at the other end said "Hey, have you heard there's been a big accident at Clapham Junction, three trains involved and lots of people killed and injured?". You obviously can guess that my heart certainly sank to the floor and thoughts started flashing through my mind, crikey hope our staff haven't done anything. Started looking at the news reports on the TV and you can then imagine how my feelings progressed during the day.

Well, I suppose my point is, it becomes one of those defining moments in your career that you NEVER FORGET. I just hope we don't end up having a repeat of all that to make people understand and learn it all over again.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Electric train on November 19, 2018, 18:32:37
Simple sequence of events ……….. as I understand it.

  • Defective rail need to be replaced, just routine work that had been planned in.
    Defective rails had been removed.
    RRV runs through a set of points in the wrong direction thus damaging the points, something that should not happen but sadly does.
    Whole team stood down for 3 hours for a safety brief /investigation
    Re-rail team informs NR that they will not complete intime
    At this time SWR Shunters had gone off shift, mainline drives do not have route knowledge for depots.
Melt down!!!!





Title: Re: Waterloo station - collision and derailment, 15 Aug 2017
Post by: Oxonhutch on November 19, 2018, 20:55:24
Notwithstanding finding 152, I am surprised that not securing the points wasn't higher up in the list of errors.  If this had happened, then none of the subsequent events with test wiring etc. would have had any effect. The report appears to lean most heavily on the testers themselves - perhaps echoing shades of Clapham - but with a simple scotch and clip, they would have got away with it.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Oxonhutch on November 19, 2018, 21:00:28
Point 4 appears to be the major problem - was that really necessary? Then Point 6 - what happened to the real [multi-tasking] railway workers?


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: JayMac on November 19, 2018, 21:08:49
Simple sequence of events ……….. as I understand it.

  • Defective rail need to be replaced, just routine work that had been planned in.
    Defective rails had been removed.
    RRV runs through a set of points in the wrong direction thus damaging the points, something that should not happen but sadly does.
    Whole team stood down for 3 hours for a safety brief /investigation
    Re-rail team informs NR that they will not complete intime
    At this time SWR Shunters had gone off shift, mainline drives do not have route knowledge for depots.
Melt down!!!!

What was the issue with NR staff unwilling to tamp that I've heard of elsewhere?


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: bradshaw on November 19, 2018, 22:12:41
Christian Wolmar on Twitter earlier today.

“Chaos at Waterloo today was caused by works to replace long sections of track which then proved to be faulty on testing and had to be relaid, along with tamper problems.”


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: SandTEngineer on November 19, 2018, 22:30:11
I trust he means rails, not track.  If the track had to be replaced it would have been very drastic and certainly taken more than a week..... ::)


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: TaplowGreen on November 20, 2018, 06:08:27
I trust he means rails, not track.  If the track had to be replaced it would have been very drastic and certainly taken more than a week..... ::)

 ;)



Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Surrey 455 on November 20, 2018, 09:07:05
Luckily, I had the day off yesterday so didn't have to cope with the SWR morning problems. Unfortunately I had already decided to go to Brighton from Dorking Deepdene. Multiple delays and cancellations on GWR North Downs line due to a broken down train.  :(


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: stuving on November 20, 2018, 10:34:36
Sunday's main possession was all four lines from Waterloo to Hampton Court Junction, including a wide range of planned work. Whether the rail renewal that is reported to have gone wrong was part of that, or a short-notice addition, I don't know. It included some work inside Wimbledon Park Depot, though there were some movements in and out via the District Line. On paper, it ran 01:10 Sunday to 04:30 Monday.

On Sunday there was, as is now customary, a limited service with long-distance trains diverting at Weybridge via Virginia Water. The Weybridge service was removed to make room, with the long-distance trains calling instead at Addlestone and Chertsey, and Byfleet and New Haw standing in for Weybridge.

Clearly that service could be run without using any lines inside the possession. So why was no attempt made to do something similar on Monday? Well, one possible answer is a lack of drivers for those diverted routes - as many as possible being used on Sunday. Another issue is how to recover to a normal service once the possession does eventually end. An alternative of splitting the routes, probably at Woking, might be better. But "flexibility" seems to have vanished from corporate objectives across the whole rail industry, doesn't it?

The passengers with the biggest beef are those using (or who would have used) the Weybridge service - even with the line free of interlopers, that didn't run; at least, nothing (from Addlestone) between the 5:39 and the 10:02.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Adelante_CCT on November 20, 2018, 15:12:02
but that was our old friend "signalling at Earley" having a bit of a strop.

More strops last night and again today

Quote
Due to a fault with the signalling system between Reading and Wokingham fewer trains are able to run on the line towards Wokingham

Last Updated:20/11/2018 15:00


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: eightonedee on November 20, 2018, 21:19:26
Pleased to report signalling problem at Earley fixed in time for 18:26 ex Guildford (following two cancelled trains in the same direction) to gallop through from Wokingham to Reading without slowing, catching up from two minutes late from Guildford to 3 minutes 30 early at Reading - hopefully a sign of an end to recent travails on the North Downs Line.


Title: Re: Waterloo closed by engineering over run
Post by: Western Pathfinder on November 26, 2018, 18:16:29
Meanwhile over on Twitter
https://mobile.twitter.com/PaulCliftonBBC/status/1067078401842954241


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: stuving on December 11, 2018, 15:06:12
At the start of this work (and thread) the opening of the revamped international platforms was due this month (NR's web site still says they all will). And yesterday P21-22 did in fact open, though 23-24 are now not due to do so until next May. Given that the extra trains that rely on the extra platforms aren't yet running (and the date of that timetable change, like all of them, has a credibility problem), I guess that rates a small cheroot. 

What can they be still be doing to P23-24, with hardly any possession time? Perhaps not much, but they just put highest priority on opening something on time so this bit is not quite there yet.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: Adelante_CCT on December 11, 2018, 15:25:00
As you say, they don't really need 23-24 yet, and would probably cost money to staff, clean and maintain those pair of platforms, probably easier to keep it under wraps until they plan on properly using them.


Title: Re: Waterloo station upgrade launched
Post by: paul7575 on December 11, 2018, 16:33:39
As you say, they don't really need 23-24 yet, and would probably cost money to staff, clean and maintain those pair of platforms, probably easier to keep it under wraps until they plan on properly using them.
There are suggestions elsewhere that they may well be available in emergency.  They were used during the 2017 blockade, so presumably (hopefully?) the track work and signalling is still functional.

Paul


Title: Waterloo chaos 22nd March and PAD / WAT line upgrades
Post by: Surrey 455 on March 22, 2019, 22:59:28
From London Evening Standard (https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/waterloo-delays-rush-hour-train-chaos-as-all-trains-are-cancelled-due-to-late-finish-to-engineering-a4098241.html)

Quote
Up to 100,000 rail commuters suffered travel chaos today as overrunning night engineering work halted services into mainline Waterloo station.

A second set of Network Rail (NR) overrunning engineering works in the Dorking and Epsom area added to the disruption.

Cancellations and late running and changes to the timetable will last most of the day.

Problems in the Waterloo area meant trains were unable to leave a number of depots and enter service.

When they did start running there were delays of an hour with cancellations and revised short notice changes to service.
Operator South Western Railway (SWR) told commuters tickets were being accepted on Great Western Railway (GWR) services between Basingstoke, Reading and Paddington.

Tickets are also being accepted on Southern Railway and London Underground between Waterloo, Richmond/Wimbledon and Paddington.

An NR spokesperson said:  “We apologise to passengers for the disruption to services across the south western network this morning owing to a possession overrun. Disruption, including severe delays and cancellations, will last until the afternoon. Passengers should check with their train operator or visit www.nationalrail.co.uk before travelling.”

It came as it was revealed London commuters face the threat of more overruns and weekend closures over the next five years as NR spends a record £24 billion from April trying to sort out the daily chaos with track, signal and points faults a top priority.

But it means more overnight engineering work bringing with it the threat of it not finishing on time and hitting morning rush-hour services.

NR will announce next week more than £2b will be spent on maintenance and day to day upgrades on lines out of Waterloo; Southern, Southeastern and Thameslink will receive £4.5b of upgrades with a further £4.5b on routes to and from Paddington.




Title: London Waterloo - station, facilities, incidents - and some quirks / odd facts (merged posts)
Post by: grahame on January 14, 2020, 22:46:33
from Get Surrey (https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/11-unusual-things-waterloo-station-17567994) - a list of "11 unusual things about Waterloo station you probably didn’t know".  I am sufficiently sad, old and fully read to rarely be surprised by things in these lists - but in this case 4 were new to me ... so sharing in case there are some new to you too.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: Robin Summerhill on January 14, 2020, 23:03:47
Hmm - item 9 "The name has been a sticking point"

It is said that when Winston Churchill was plannning his own funeral arrangements, he insisted that his funeral train would leave London from Waterloo, despite the insistence of railway managers that, as the eventual destination was to be Blenheim Palace and Bladon churchyard, Paddington would make much more sense. Churchill was adamant that the train should leave from Waterloo.

When  pressed even harder he said:

"If De Gaulle dies before me, it can leave from whatever damn station you like. But if I die before De Gaulle, it leaves from Waterloo"

 ;)



Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: broadgage on January 15, 2020, 00:24:39
After the closure of the old "news cinema" a moving message display board was installed at high level at the platform 1 end of the concourse.
The distinctive curved steel work for this was still in place until recently and might still exist.
This was long before the LED age, and the display contained thousands of small incandescent bulbs. It displayed news headlines, stock market prices and adverts.

Other trivia, the Duke of Wellington PH just outside the station was at one time operated by Travellers fare.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: Oxonhutch on January 15, 2020, 08:00:28
Until its demise in a German bombing raid in WWII, London Necropolis Company's trains (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Necropolis_Railway) to the cemetery at Brookwood ran from their own terminus just south of the main station, and whose post-war ruined remains can be seen here (https://maps.nls.uk/geo/explore/#zoom=18.60333333333333&lat=51.4988&lon=-0.1138&layers=170&b=1) (The entrance - still there today - is at 121 Westminster Bridge Road (https://goo.gl/maps/3bDnWzLoQsePxzBA8)). Trains bringing mourners back to London terminated at Waterloo itself.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: JontyMort on January 15, 2020, 09:54:05
from Get Surrey (https://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/surrey-news/11-unusual-things-waterloo-station-17567994) - a list of "11 unusual things about Waterloo station you probably didn’t know".  I am sufficiently sad, old and fully read to rarely be surprised by things in these lists - but in this case 4 were new to me ... so sharing in case there are some new to you too.

I see the section about it being the last terminus to use steam is illustrated by a Bulleid Pacific. Note to sub-editors: this is incorrect, next time use a Class 91. 🙂


Title: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Clan Line on October 18, 2022, 11:59:29

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-63175951


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: eXPassenger on October 18, 2022, 17:50:03
So it's a dead end with a bit of old stock in it?


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Surrey 455 on October 18, 2022, 21:34:36
I took a look a few weeks ago. It's a very long walk from the concourse to the Brewdog pub with only a handful of shops occupied in between. I wish I had used a stopwatch as when I got to Brewdog, I decided I then didn't have time to go in as I had to walk all the way back to the concourse and then walk from the twenty something platforms over to platform 1 to catch my train. The pubs outside the station are nearer.

Oh and I previously read somewhere that a pint in Brewdog is about £7. It's supposedly the largest bar in London and may be the only bar currently open in the station.


Title: London Waterloo: Inside the shopping centre that's almost deserted
Post by: Marlburian on October 18, 2022, 21:38:50
"There is an eerie silence in a shopping centre beneath London Waterloo, the station from which Eurostar trains once whisked people from the capital to mainland Europe."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/ (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-63175951)


Title: Re: London Waterloo: Inside the shopping centre that's almost deserted
Post by: ChrisB on October 18, 2022, 23:24:46
See Waterloo - the sidings thread for the same info


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: ChrisB on October 18, 2022, 23:26:38
Duplicate thread started in the SWR board


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: plymothian on October 19, 2022, 00:35:03
As per most 'new articles' others got there first.  Ian Visits (https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/the-sidings-waterloo-stations-deserted-shopping-mall-57836/) wrote about this back on 4 October


Title: Re: London Waterloo: Inside the shopping centre that's almost deserted
Post by: grahame on October 19, 2022, 03:59:07
See Waterloo - the sidings thread for the same info

Duplicate thread started in the SWR board

Now merged into this single thread


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Surrey 455 on October 19, 2022, 20:00:21
As per most 'new articles' others got there first.  Ian Visits (https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/the-sidings-waterloo-stations-deserted-shopping-mall-57836/) wrote about this back on 4 October

Some of the photos in that article make me think of 20th century BBC science fiction spaceship interiors.


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Surrey 455 on October 23, 2022, 21:17:27
I took a look a few weeks ago. It's a very long walk from the concourse to the Brewdog pub with only a handful of shops occupied in between. I wish I had used a stopwatch ......

I am going to retract this comment as I took another walk there last week and it didn't take anywhere near as long as I remembered the first time. I think the first time I also explored the lower level before I reached the entrance of Brewdog which probably explains why I thought it was a long walk.

This time I started from the National Windrush Monument on the concourse, pressed Start on the OutdoorActive app and walked to Brewdog and pressed End. The app tells me that this time I walked 0 metres. That's probably due to a lack of a GPS signal down there. It also tells me I walked less than a minute which also doesn't sound right. I'll try again next week using my phones stopwatch


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: CJB666 on October 24, 2022, 17:13:56
Roll on when they get Sainsburys finished. They’ll beat M&S in prices hands down. Meanwhile am really pi$$ed off that both M&S and Pure refuse to take cash payments. What’s wrong with our British money?


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: CJB666 on October 24, 2022, 17:19:31
Brewdog’s £7 a pint of beer-flavoured water is outrageous. When Spoons can do pints of real ale for £3.50’ish Brewdog’s greed is unacceptable.


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Clan Line on October 24, 2022, 19:21:57
Brewdog’s £7 a pint of beer-flavoured water is outrageous. When Spoons can do pints of real ale for £3.50’ish Brewdog’s greed is unacceptable.

If I could make a little plug here ? Just over Waterloo Road is the Union Jack Club: Cheap beer (£2.90), excellent food, superb value accommodation and first class general surroundings. If you are an ex member of the UK armed forces (non-commissioned) it is well worth its annual membership fee, just for a couple of visits a year to break even.

https://ujc.org.uk/


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: grahame on October 24, 2022, 20:29:23
Brewdog’s £7 a pint of beer-flavoured water is outrageous. When Spoons can do pints of real ale for £3.50’ish Brewdog’s greed is unacceptable.

If I could make a little plug here ? Just over Waterloo Road is the Union Jack Club: Cheap beer (£2.90), excellent food, superb value accommodation and first class general surroundings. If you are an ex member of the UK armed forces (non-commissioned) it is well worth its annual membership fee, just for a couple of visits a year to break even.

https://ujc.org.uk/

"The MOD has estimates there are 2 million armed forces veterans in the UK".  I understood at one point it might be possible for the other 58 million of us to stay there - not all at once, of course.


Title: Re: Waterloo - The Sidings
Post by: Surrey 455 on October 25, 2022, 20:14:05
This time I started from the National Windrush Monument on the concourse, pressed Start on the OutdoorActive app and walked to Brewdog and pressed End. The app tells me that this time I walked 0 metres. That's probably due to a lack of a GPS signal down there. It also tells me I walked less than a minute which also doesn't sound right. I'll try again next week using my phones stopwatch

OK. It took me 2 minutes and 10 seconds to get to Brewdog from the National Windrush Monument on the concourse today. Still haven't been inside yet.


Title: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: Timmer on April 13, 2023, 07:14:31
Quote
Due to a signalling problem at London Waterloo some lines are blocked.

What's Going On:
Train services running to and from this station may be cancelled, delayed or revised. Disruption is expected until the end of the day.

What We're Doing About It:
Due to a major signalling problem we are advising customers not to attempt to travel to or from London Waterloo this morning.

Until further notice, a significantly reduced service will operate to and from London Waterloo on a very limited number of lines.

From Network Rail Twitter:

We’ve suffered a major power failure to signalling equipment at @LondonWaterloo that means fewer than half the station platforms are usable by trains.
We are advising @SW_Help customers not to travel to or from Waterloo this morning as the disruption is severe.

Our team is on site tracing the fault, which occurred before 0400, but even if it is fixed soon disruption is likely across the network for some time.
Again - please do not travel into or out of Waterloo this morning.
We will update you when there is better news.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: bradshaw on April 13, 2023, 07:18:48
SWR have reported a major power failure affecting signalling at Waterloo, severely restricting the services.
Interestingly the WoE services to/from Exeter are terminating/starting at Wimbledon, rather than Basingstoke as is usual in times of disruption. Presumably this also allows the access to the District line for journeys into London.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: ChrisB on April 13, 2023, 08:16:27
Only the Reading line platforms are available, all the others are completely closed


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: broadgage on April 13, 2023, 08:35:20
Very poor planning if a single power failure can cause this scale of disruption.
What exactly has failed ? If the incoming supply from the DNO has failed, then network rail should have a functioning emergency generator to supply signalling and other critical loads.

If the incoming supply is functioning, and the fault lies in network rail internal infrastructure, then this should have been duplicated, with two supplies to critical loads, via different routes and preferably from different substations.

Presumably the DC traction supply is still available ? Did no one think of installing a backup supply to signalling, this being derived from the traction current supply.

And as a last resort, what about a hired generator ? These are available on short notice from Agreko, MEMs power and many others. They also hire cables and distribution equipment.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: bobm on April 13, 2023, 08:42:54
We had two topics with identical titles, barring one capital letter, started within minutes of each other so I have merged them.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: Electric train on April 13, 2023, 09:14:33
Very poor planning if a single power failure can cause this scale of disruption.
What exactly has failed ? If the incoming supply from the DNO has failed, then network rail should have a functioning emergency generator to supply signalling and other critical loads.

If the incoming supply is functioning, and the fault lies in network rail internal infrastructure, then this should have been duplicated, with two supplies to critical loads, via different routes and preferably from different substations.

Presumably the DC traction supply is still available ? Did no one think of installing a backup supply to signalling, this being derived from the traction current supply.

And as a last resort, what about a hired generator ? These are available on short notice from Agreko, MEMs power and many others. They also hire cables and distribution equipment.

The Southern Regions power supplies are generally very robust, signalling power supply points have 2 supplies available from the NR internal high Voltage distribution network which can be feed from 2 or more DNO / TNO bulk supply points, in the London area a dedicated 400V DNO supply as a back up.  It's not usual to have generators because of the 3 sources of supply, generators are notoriously unreliable ie never work when you need them.

There are UPS on the power supply system these are designed and size to only cover the time it takes to change from supply to another, there are smaller ones to cover a local power outage but these are only to allow systems to transfer or shut down safely.

Like all power supply systems there are weak points which are designed out as far as posible but you can never achieve a 100%.  A small piece of equipment fire in a relay room for instance can have a major impact, this may be the relay room etc.

The power supply to signalling systems in large and complex



Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: Timmer on April 13, 2023, 10:21:10
Latest from Network Rail on Twitter:

1015 update: we've identified the fault (which is in the cabling that powers the signals controlling the Waterloo area) - our team are now working on a plan to repair the issue. Our travel advice remains in place for now and we'll keep you updated as we get more info from site.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: stuving on April 13, 2023, 10:48:05
The signal maps are showing the lines blocked as being all four of the SWML at Vauxhall, plus one of the Windsor lines further out. That leaves only two tracks usable through Queenstown Road, able to access the northern half of Waterloo.

There is a ladder crossing east of Clapham Junction that could allow trains to get to of from any track, but costing a lot in conflicts to use it. Having said that, currently* there is not a single train moving east of Clapham Junction. (*True at 10:40, but immediately after checking it several turned up.)


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: stuving on April 13, 2023, 11:57:48
All lines now showing as clear - opened at 10:45, UIUI.


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: Electric train on April 13, 2023, 16:03:16
Major Power Signalling System Failure at Waterloo.  It was not a power related fault, its just when there is a wide area failure everyone jumps to the conclusion it must be a power supply issue.  In this instance it was to do with signalling equipment at a key point meant the signallers lost sight of a large area of control.

So not power related


Title: Re: Major Power Failure at Waterloo
Post by: Henry on April 14, 2023, 18:16:32

 Is this one of the disadvantages of having one large signalling centre ?


Title: London Waterloo: The hidden world beneath busy railway station
Post by: grahame on July 11, 2023, 23:40:13
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-england-london-66155288

Quote
London Waterloo: The hidden world beneath busy railway station

Beneath the UK's busiest railway station is a labyrinth of arches and alleyways dating back to 1848.
On its 175th anniversary, the BBC has ventured underneath London Waterloo to have a look around.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: grahame on September 17, 2023, 15:24:43
Our mirror also has an article http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/FINAL-Parsons-Coffins-by-Train.pdf

Made the BBC - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-66507599

Quote
Necropolis Railway: The railway trip where only some returned


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: CyclingSid on September 18, 2023, 06:59:32
Quote
The railway trip where only some returned

In another context could be some the services to Weymouth you report.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: grahame on June 03, 2024, 20:23:49
Does anyone fancy being landlord to 7 new MPs within easy walking distance of the Palace of Westminster?

https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/147548858

Quote
Dexters are delighted to introduce for sale this iconic Grade II Listed landmark building, Westminster Bridge House located on Westminster Bridge Road set within close proximity to London Waterloo station.

Constructed 1902, Westminster Bridge House, was the former offices and first-class entrance to the London Necropolis Railway, providing access to the London Necropolis Railway Station commonly known as "Cemetery Station".

The station closed in 1941 and the building was subsequently purchased by Transmarine Shipping Agencies Limited and used as their London Head Offices until 1987 when the property was acquired by Picasso Investment Corporation.

The grand façade and arched entrance provides access to this ornate Edwardian building featuring circa 750 square metres (8,076 sq ft) of internal space. The building is arranged over six floors plus a basement room and is currently designated as office space (Use Class E).

This historic building will be sold with the benefit of full planning permission for the change of use from the existing office space (Use Class E) to residential dwellings (Use Class C3) creating seven luxury private residential apartments (4nos. one-bedroom apartments and 3nos. two-bedroom apartments).


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: infoman on June 04, 2024, 04:51:51
Also an episode of fools and horse's was filmed at the station,

and direct HST's trains from London Waterloo non stop to Bath and Bristol and onto Cardiff in the 1990's.


Title: Re: Waterloo Station - some quirks and odd facts
Post by: grahame on June 04, 2024, 07:11:39
and direct HST's trains from London Waterloo non stop to Bath and Bristol and onto Cardiff in the 1990's.

I recall taking a train at Manchester Piccadilly (hotel) to Stockport (where I was giving a course) ... and listening to the announcement of where it was going ... Bradford-on-Avon ... Waterloo.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net