Title: First class at Padd Post by: vacman on November 01, 2012, 12:24:39 I am surprised no one noticed the big anti abuse exercise at Paddington last week to prevent standard passengers boarding first class!
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on November 01, 2012, 12:26:24 it was noticed on twitter lol
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: BerkshireBugsy on November 01, 2012, 14:32:11 This week was the first week in about a year I had been in an out of Pad and the extra on-board PA announcments about the plebs keeping out of first class was noticable - and yes, I travel in standard so include myself as a pleb!
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: chineseJohn on November 01, 2012, 17:28:46 I travelled a weekend in the summer in First, the number people who held standard class tickets sitting in First was quite a few.
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on November 01, 2012, 18:20:54 I travelled a weekend in the summer in First, the number people who held standard class tickets sitting in First was quite a few. not sure if that's a joke relating to weekend first upgrades or not :D Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: Electric train on November 01, 2012, 19:47:06 FGW just don't bother checking the inner TV services, they should have ripped out the first class seats in the 165/6's and fitted extra standard seats when they did the refresh
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: thetrout on November 02, 2012, 18:23:47 FGW just don't bother checking the inner TV services, they should have ripped out the first class seats in the 165/6's and fitted extra standard seats when they did the refresh I don't necessarily agree with removal of First. But I 110% agree that it is seldom checked. I'm not though 100% Convinced this is an entirely exclusive problem for FGW. I have noticed it myself countless times on GA, SN and SE Services. It's particularly common IMO on DOO Services, of which alot of the services run by those operators are. I have to say though that GA's Revenue Team seem to be much more common sight than perhaps SN or FGW. My partner and I were once threatened with Penalty Fares on a SN Brighton - London Victoria because we were sat in First Class. The guy didn't know what to do when I placed 2 First Class Tickets on the table with a valid railcard and said: "Not always wise to make assumptions..." :-\ 8) I'm going to board a service at PAD shortly (Sat in the First Class Lounge ;D) so I'll see if such things are still happening ;) Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: thetrout on November 04, 2012, 11:49:07 Well I boarded the train at PAD and have an interesting journey.
Standard Class was full to bursting and the last minute stragglers boarded in First and walked through the buffet car. Shortly after the train left they came back and piled into the seats in Coach F (Where I was) Title: Re: First class at Paddington Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 04, 2012, 20:07:34 ... and what action did the train staff take (if any)? :P
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: swrural on November 04, 2012, 21:24:46 While we await the answer with barely containable patience, I am totally defeated by TheTrout's acronyms. What was that link please to that table of those ? (GA DOO etc)
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: Brucey on November 04, 2012, 21:27:41 While we await the answer with barely containable patience, I am totally defeated by TheTrout's acronyms. What was that link please to that table of those ? (GA DOO etc) At the top of the forum pages, in the blue-ish coloured bar, is a link to Acronyms/Abbreviations :PGA = Greater Anglia DOO = Driver Only Operation Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: grahame on November 04, 2012, 21:30:13 While we await the answer with barely containable patience, I am totally defeated by TheTrout's acronyms. What was that link please to that table of those ? (GA DOO etc) GA needs adding to the page, though ... and I had to think that one through ... thanks for the solution, Brucey! Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: bobm on November 04, 2012, 22:07:40 At the top of the forum pages, in the blue-ish coloured bar, is a link to Acronyms/Abbreviations :P It's not always blue-ish, depends what style you choose. On mine it's chocolate while the rest is cream! ;D Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: EBrown on November 05, 2012, 00:19:58 While we are discussing this... The correct abbreviations for each Train Operating Company (TOC), in brackets are some common AKAs (which are technically wrong):
AW - Arriva Trains Wales (AKA: ATW) CC - C2C CH - Chiltern Railways (AKA: CR) XC - Cross Country GR - East Coast (AKA: EC) EM - East Midlands Trains (AKA: EMT) ES - Eurostar FC - First Capital Connect (AKA: FCC & GW - First Great Western (AKA: FGW, FG) HT - First Hull Trains TP - First TransPennine Express (AKA: TPE) GX - Gatwick Express GC - Grand Central LE- Greater Anglia (AKA: GA) HC - Heathrow Connect HX - Heathrow Express IL - Island Line (Commonly referred to South West Trains (SW)) LM - London Midland LO - London Overground (AKA: LOROL) LT - London Underground (AKA: LU, TfL) ME - Mersey Rail NT - Northern Rail (AKA: NT) SR - ScotRail SW - South West Trains (AKA: SWT) SE - South Eastern (AKA: SET, SER) SX - Stansted Express VT - Virgin Trains Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: eightf48544 on November 05, 2012, 09:20:51 So if LT is London underground what are London Buses?
LT used to be everything so I suppose that's now TfL What about Docklands and Tramlink? The river buses? What fun abbreviations are! Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: paul7575 on November 05, 2012, 09:36:39 Don't think of them as abbreviations.
A code such as LT should just be seen as an anachronistic two letter code that used to stand for London Transport, but it is left as LT because it is not generally intended as 'public facing information'. There is no cost benefit in updating codes in computerised systems everytime they change. They might not be able change it to TfL because the base system that use it (perhaps RJIS?) only allows for a two letter code such as TL - which might be confused with Thameslink. If correct, that will explain precisely why for instance FC is not shown as FCC - the data field isn't big enough, that's all. Likewise with the regular fares discussions. 'SVR' is one of the codes used for Offpeak Return - it used to be the main code for Saver, but that latter term should no longer be used, and isn't used in publicly displayed info such as on fares websites. You cannot buy a Saver, no matter how often the term is used in discussion by 'fares gurus' - what you buy is an Offpeak Return... Paul Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: JayMac on November 05, 2012, 16:59:17 The correct abbreviations for each Train Operating Company (TOC), in brackets are some common AKAs (which are technically wrong): I wouldn't say 'technically wrong'. The list you have given are the abbreviations used by the industry and its systems. The others, such as FGW, SWT, EMT, are in fairly common usage both within and without the industry. It's the usage for words, terminology, abbreviations, acronyms etc. that tends to define general acceptance as opposed to what may be official according to, in this case, ATOC and NR (that's the Association of Train Operating Companies and Network Rail ;) :P) That said, a post full of acronyms/abbreviations which hasn't included the full name for each term at least once should be avoided. I used to post a lot of abbrvs. thinking I was only conversing with folk who would know what I meant, forgetting the wider audience who may have stumbled on the forum via Google. I'm still guilty of posting acronyms/abbreviations without explanation occasionally, but I'm much better than I used to be. IYKWIM. ;D Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: bobm on November 05, 2012, 17:04:20 Even First Great Western use FGW - www.fgw.co.uk (http://www.fgw.co.uk)
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: swrural on November 05, 2012, 19:38:37 Thanks very much (my heading is definitely 'greeny') and regarding London Underground, do try not to use the acronym for that with Limited on the end. In Dutch it is an obscene profanity and I do hope the London Underground Ltd do not put it on station posters. (By the way it is the male member).
Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: thetrout on November 06, 2012, 20:00:38 Urm... I'm not sure what happened there... ???
My post was ALOT longer than that... Hmmm maybe when I copied it out of Word i didn't copy it all! (was on the train when I wrote the post in a 3G notspot* ) It explained what the staff did(n't) do... (Delete as applicable) I also posted a YouTube link of some prat who tried it on, on that very train! I'm on my iPhone in a Bar at the moment and about to go and see Skyfall so once I've seen an LT ( :-X ) train crash and got home again. If I'm allowed I will reapply the post as it'll be in my laptop cache ;D ;) * = A location where Cell Data doesn't exist/work reliably/hideously slow! Title: Re: First class at Padd Post by: TerminalJunkie on November 07, 2012, 11:23:26 regarding London Underground, do try not to use the acronym for that with Limited on the end. In Dutch it is an obscene profanity This should upset you, then: http://www.steveprentice.net/tube/TfLSillyMaps/rude_map.jpg This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |