Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Bristol (WECA) Commuters => Topic started by: Lee on February 12, 2007, 12:49:08



Title: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on February 12, 2007, 12:49:08
Read the latest superb effort , mostly the work of Cat Hobbs & Joe Patrick (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/60.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on April 16, 2007, 15:21:57
As outlined in a letter to the Bristol Evening Post (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Bus.htm


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on June 04, 2007, 15:49:44
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/61.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on July 02, 2007, 10:54:21
Meeting 17.05 onwards (on arrival of 16.22 from Severn Beach) at the GWR staff club , Station approach , Temple Meads Bristol.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on July 17, 2007, 10:30:43
Their response to the news that First is worst for overcrowding (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Post.htm


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on July 27, 2007, 10:17:55
Details contained in the links below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Complain.htm

http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Letter2.htm


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on September 04, 2007, 15:59:39
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/62.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on September 07, 2007, 10:29:26
FOSBR say that transport Policy in the Bristol Development Framework - Core Strategy for development in Bristol up to 2026 lacks rail-based initiatives to alleviate traffic congestion within the city (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Hulme.htm


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 08, 2007, 10:41:43
At the recent Passenger Focus meeting Alison Forster (for what its worth now) stated that the 142 pacers would be used doubled up and provide more seats per journey than a class 150 sprinter. With the proven unreliability of these units how many times will the services be short formed ???

And how (as I believe you have pointed out before , martyjon) will any Class 142 units be "spare" to provide the extra train required for a 40 minute frequency service on the Severn Beach Line from May 2008 , if they are going to "double up" in Devon?

On that note , I am told that Andrew Griffiths & Keith Walton are fed up with FOSBR's "negative attitude" regarding the constant Severn Beach line cancellations and broken promises regarding provision of the 40 minute frequency service.

Apparently AG & KW are saying that the train crews support their view on this.

Can anyone confirm that this is the case?


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: martyjon on October 08, 2007, 11:42:15
On that note , I am told that Andrew Griffiths & Keith Walton are fed up with FOSBR's "negative attitude" regarding the constant Severn Beach line cancellations and broken promises regarding provision of the 40 minute frequency service.

Apparently AG & KW are saying that the train crews support their view on this.

Lee.

Can you expand on this, I could understand it if the word "negative" was ommited or the word "hostile" used instead. If these two gentlemen had any bottle they would be supportive of the lines users, KW is supposed to be a "friend" of the lines users and should be supportive of them. AG is the "deliverer" of the service and his failure on occasions to provide road replacement transport show incomptenece in his sphere of operation.

As for the comments regarding the train crews support, it doesnt surprise me.

I attended the MTLS meeting in Bath way back at the beginning of the year. An RMT representative was there and spoke and gave his full support to any action (fare strike) that the passengers may instigate.

I spoke and asked him for his members to also support the passengers in cases where the passengers were denied boarding due to overcrowding for the driver to turn off the engine and halt all traffic on that route until another unit was brought to the location, no matter how much disruption is caused, and thus allow passengers wanting to travel, to travel in reasonable conditions.
Action of this nature would be headline front page news, rather than relegated to the inside pages, not that the MTLS campaign didnt achieve prominence.

The response from the RMT an outright NO.

Havent you in the past posted a link to the RMT site regarding their criticism of the MTLS campaign by the union. 

It wouldnt surprise me in the least to hear that the trains crews are taking the attitude as you described.

By the way the post I started this thread with was the text of an e-mail I received and I reproduced it in its entirety to start off this thread.

Regards.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 08, 2007, 12:01:40
By the way the post I started this thread with was the text of an e-mail I received and I reproduced it in its entirety to start off this thread.

Is that a request to move the thread to another board (eg Bristol Commuters?) If so , I will gladly do this , as I may have inadvertently veered off topic. Mind you , I am not the first , and I am sure that I wont be the last....

Regarding expanding on this further , basically Keith Walton sent an e-mail to anybody who is anybody in Bristol , blasting Julie Boston of FOSBR for their negative attitude. Andrew Griffiths also sent one to Julie along the same lines saying that FGW were prepared to work with FOSBR "if they are positive."

Also , I think that it is important to point out the difference between More Train , Less Strain (MTLS) and Friends Of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) , for the benefit of new forum readers :

MTLS were set up originally as a "direct action" group to protest against the effects of the December 2006 Timetable and the associated rolling stock reductions , but who now have wider aims. The RMT are largely supportive of MTLS (not withstanding the example you gave) but FGW would probably rather they didnt exist.

FOSBR are a user / pressure group of longstanding (many years.) RMT policy is to fully support their aims , and FGW actually encourage people to join FOSBR (see notes in Timetable E.) FOSBR are also fully - cooperative members of the Severn Beach Line Working Group , along with FGW , Network Rail , Bristol City Council & others. 

See their website for fuller details of what FOSBR stands for (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/

Another criticism raised by Keith Walton in his e-mail was that FOSBR's attitude somehow belittled the efforts of community groups who help maintain Severn Beach Line stations. This is most unfair , as not only have FOSBR publicised these groups efforts , they have also provided volunteers to help them (as KW well knows.)

FOSBR , in fact , passionately promotes the role of local rail in the community. One example is the talk that I am due to give on their behalf at a church in Shirehampton on October 23 2007. I am really looking forward to meeting the members of the congregation , listening to their views , and explaining how I feel that they and FOSBR can work together to maintain / improve things along their local line.

All things considered , I believe that FOSBR have a very positive attitude , and what they do is very much along the lines of what I wanted to do when I became a rail campaigner.

In case anyone is wondering , this doesnt mean that I think that MTLS , or their campaign , are any less worthy.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: grahame on October 08, 2007, 18:43:08
Well - I think it's remarkable how positive some of the people campaigning for better services have been when you consider certain negative attitudes, and actions that can be considered as slaps in the face, by the varius organisations who specify and run the railways.  You'll notice that I'm not limiting that comment to *just* the Train Operating Companies.

Really, ... can Andrew be surprised by elements of negative attitude taken by the users of a line who have been promised a 40 minute service, and his employer have come back with a negative attitude themselves "thanks for the money.  But we won't be doing it at the moment, even though we said we would".  Is it a case of the pot calling the kettle black?

I know - not well, but I know - some of the people involved with FOSBR. They're tougher than we are here on the "TransWilts", and have far more campaigning skills and experience.  And perhaps that's why they've acheived what they have, which includes a handful of extra trains in the very early morning and evening on weekdays, where we have - as yet - achieved very little.  And these acheivements make them rather more of a threat to any organsation that doesn't share their goals.  Perhaps the outburst against FOSBR confirms that threat?


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: martyjon on October 08, 2007, 20:31:15
Lee.

I understand the situation now and Grahame has summed it up nicely. AG and KW are displaying the negative attitude not FOSBR but where do AG and KW get their claims that the train crews support them from.

I was aware of the FOSBR organisation and its aspirations but it is always helpful to post the information for newcomers to the forum.

Also I have been involved with MTLS but their campaign seems to have gone 'cold' at the moment.

Regards.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Timmer on October 08, 2007, 21:08:06
Also I have been involved with MTLS but their campaign seems to have gone 'cold' at the moment.
Indeed there hasnt been anything posted to their forum for quite sometime. Though Tony Ambrose has been active of late appearing on BBC Points West at the time of Alison's departure. Their main focus at the moment appears to be the new ticket hall at Bath Spa and the problems with purchasing tickets and getting thru the barriers.

I would suggest their campaign would soon 'heat' up should there ever be a repeat of what happened last December.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 22, 2007, 13:52:47
Text from the FOSBR Representation To Bristol City Council  on 16 October 2007 :

My name is Jonathan Bliss. I am a member of Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways, and make this statement on their behalf. I am a resident of Redland, I am fortunate to live close to Redland station, I use the Severn Beach railway line. I also cycle, walk and if I have to, take the bus or drive a car.

From Redland station, I can reach Temple Meads by train in 15 minutes, although the route is indirect, going through Easton, and a return journey will cost ^2. If I take a bus, the journey time will be anything up to 45 minutes and the return fare is a minimum of ^2.60. If I walk, it will take about 30 minutes. If I take a car (even at 4 in the morning), it takes 10 minutes with all the traffic lights, and the return journey will cost ^1.20 (3 miles at 40p per mile). The direct distance is 1.54 miles. The car journey works out at an average speed of about 9 miles an hour, and that is the fastest means of getting to the station!

As most Bristol residents agree, transport is one of the biggest issues affecting life in the city. It is clear that transport policy has been allowed to drift. Buses are not the only answer, as anyone can see from the congestion in the centre caused by buses, which frequently stop in traffic lanes rather than bus stops. And buses in Bristol are very expensive. The annual adult bus pass for Zones 1 and 2 in Bristol is nearly 40% more than the bus pass for the whole of the London Metropolitan area. (^725 for First
bus pass in Bristol:
http://www.firstgroup.com/etickets/showticket.php?locations=124
http://www.firstgroup.com/etickets/showticket.php?locations=124; ^520 in
London:
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/seasontickets/1061.aspx
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/seasontickets/1061.aspx

The Severn Beach line is a wonderful resource for the residents of north-west Bristol, but it is underused. We also believe that train services between Clifton/Redland and the office areas in South Gloucestershire should be much shorter and more frequent. The timetable shows a journey time up to 1 hour 18 minutes by train from Redland Station to Patchway, a direct distance under 5 miles.

We are very disappointed that the promised increase in services on the Severn Beach line has not materialised, and very concerned about the poor reliability of the service provided by First Great Western, with trains frequently cancelled, sometimes stranding schoolchildren (who are regular users of the line). We believe that trains should be even more frequent than what has already been promised, and that they should be adequately resourced.

We ask councillors of all parties to support the increase of services on the Severn Beach railway and other lines, and in particular, we ask the Executive Member for Transport to obtain to obtain a written commitment from First Great Western to providing the 40 minute service from May 2008, if not before.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on December 05, 2007, 10:11:17
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/63.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on December 10, 2007, 11:38:25
From Friends Of Suburban Bristol Railways :

Monday, 10 December 2007
FOSBR Campaign Group
17.45 to 19.10
meet at caf^ on platform 9 at Temple Meads Station (07791 867 512)

Thursday, 13 December 2007
Climate Change Committee
2 pm, Council House, College Green.
Support Ruth Webb in her statement urging the Climate Change Committee to include rail to its transport list.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on January 03, 2008, 11:05:12
Will be held on Saturday, 12 January 2008, 18:00, Great Western Staff Club, Temple Meads approach road


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on January 09, 2008, 10:12:33
Press release from FOSBR :

Quote
FARE STRIKE SPREAD TO BRISTOL AREA ?

The rail campaign group FOSBR will discuss whether to lead a fare strike in the Bristol area at its AGM on Saturday 12 January. If members give this the go ahead, FOSBR will organise a public meeting near Temple Meads Station with a speaker from More Trains Less Strain aimed at spreading the fare strike throughout the Bristol area.

Fare increases, the erosion of the service between Severn Beach and BTM and delay on the Portishead passenger line (reopening) are issues in the Bristol travel to work area. The Severn Beach line had a record 27 cancellations in a single week leading up to Christmas, (Evening Post 31 Dec 07)

FOSBR applaud Kerry McCarthy MP's move to get the issue of rail in the Bristol area onto the parliamentary agenda.

Julie Boston 08 January 2008

The number of passenger journeys on buses in Bristol has dropped by 1 million every year since 2003.[1][1]

Meanwhile, the number of people travelling by local rail has increased in the Greater Bristol area by 19.4% since 2004.[2][2]

[1][1] Council^s Physical Environment Scrutiny Commission agenda 6/3/07.

[1][2] West of England rail survey 2006.

Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) campaigns for improved train services throughout Bristol.

Our current focus is on the Half Hour Train campaign for improved frequency on the Severn Beach line and reduced cancellations.

Contact us at 17, Belmont Road, Bristol, BS6 5AW or email severnbeach@hotmail.com. www.fosbr.org.uk

More on the forthcoming MTLS meeting in the link below.
http://thisisbath.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=180730&command=displayContent&sourceNode=232315&home=yes&more_nodeId1=163047&contentPK=19486802


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on March 17, 2008, 22:00:31
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/64.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on March 31, 2008, 08:12:42
Great Western Staff Club, Temple Meads Station down Approach Rd. Meeting starts 18.00 (or arrival of the 17.03 dep from Severn Beach) ends for 20.13 train.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on May 16, 2008, 17:42:40
Temple Meads Station/Great Western Staff Club at 6pm.

Andrew Griffiths, Regional Manager, Severn & Solent, First Great Western will include these topics in his talk :-

- lessons from improving the rail service on the Cornish branch lines

- the relevance for the Portishead passenger line

- aspirations for Bristol network

- current law & regulations on heavy and light rail running Bristol^s tracks

- areas where Mr Griffiths feels FOSBR can help with e.g. capacity issues

- Ticket sales ^ promotion of monthly season tickets, school student season tickets, Zone 1 & 2 sales

- Prospect for house building and re-opening of local stations

- There will be a Q&A at the end of the talk


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 16, 2008, 22:52:52
Thanks, Lee!

Saturday 12 July - yes, I'd like to be there for that meeting: sounds like some very relevant topics for us Bristol Commuters!

 ;)


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on June 03, 2008, 14:53:10
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/65.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on June 09, 2008, 18:22:21
FOSBR call for the extension of Avonmouth/Severn Beach trains to a reopened Ashton Gate calling at Bedminster and Parson Street (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/Unite.htm


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Graz on June 09, 2008, 19:35:03
I'm in total agreement here. Great idea from FOSBR.

What they didn't mention though is the station would also be handy for going to events in Ashton Court :)

And thinking about it, Long Ashton is only a stroll away too!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: swlines on June 09, 2008, 20:14:45
Quick thing...

Quote
A reopened Ashton Gate will also improve capacity in Temple Meads by allowing local trains to continue through and turn back at Ashton Gate. Laying the foundations for reopening the Portishead Line to passengers.

It would increase capacity for turning back trains there maybe, but it'd reduce overall pathing in the area towards Taunton as more trains would be going that way!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: John R on June 09, 2008, 20:23:12
Several comments here:-

Firstly, would it require an additional diagram? If so, can't see it is justified when compared with other uses you might put a set to. (Cue Graham....)

Secondly, it's not close enough to either Ashton Court or Long Ashton.

Thirdly, the traffic from Bed'r and P St don't justify any additional trains, and I can't quite see what demand there would be for Ashton Gate, except maybe on match days (until of course the new stadium is built).

Finally, I'm sure some sort of signalling/track changes would be involved, if it wasn't to completely screw up the freight service, as unless I'm mistaken, once past Ashton Jn a train will completely block the section all the way down to Portbury.   

So, nice try, FOSBR but I can't see this one working.     
   


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: swlines on June 09, 2008, 20:31:12
Several comments here:-

Firstly, would it require an additional diagram? If so, can't see it is justified when compared with other uses you might put a set to. (Cue Graham....)
Fairly certain it would - turnarounds at Bristol TM are 15-25 minutes and I can't see a unit doing the trip to Parson Street at least and back within that timeframe including the minimum turnaround time.

Secondly, it's not close enough to either Ashton Court or Long Ashton.

Quote
Finally, I'm sure some sort of signalling/track changes would be involved, if it wasn't to completely screw up the freight service, as unless I'm mistaken, once past Ashton Jn a train will completely block the section all the way down to Portbury.   

So, nice try, FOSBR but I can't see this one working.
Your thought on the signalling is correct. It's OTW down there.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Graz on June 09, 2008, 20:41:26
I'm not saying it would be right on the doorstep, but not more than a 20 min walk to Ashton Court surely? (I don't know the area too well and am just assuming where the station would go so forgive me ;) !)


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: John R on June 09, 2008, 21:49:56
Graz

I'm not sure that Ashton Court would generate much traffic, even if it were on it's doorstep, which it's not, being a good 20 mins uphill walk. Long Ashton is further, and both involve a fairly unpleasant walk (A370). If you're minded to use public transport the Long Ashton P&R offers services every 8 mins in the peak to all of Central Bristol and is much close to both locations. So I can't see a station at Ashton Gate attracting passengers to either location.

But my research on the topic did find out something interesting, but I'll post elseweher on that topic....     


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Graz on June 09, 2008, 22:02:56
Bear in mind though for people who don't drive such as myself it would be extremely useful! Looking forward to seeing what you found out...


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on June 10, 2008, 18:04:26
Bristol Evening Post article link.
http://thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144913&command=displayContent&sourceNode=231190&home=yes&more_nodeId1=144922&contentPK=20831155


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on June 11, 2008, 07:26:58
Despite his secondment (click on http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2969.msg22807#msg22807) Andrew Griffiths will still be speaking at this meeting.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 12, 2008, 22:40:00
Thanks, again, Lee!

May I please, quite seriously, encourage anyone who is able to attend, to do so?  I will certainly be there, as it will be an excellent opportunity to hear from Andrew, who is clearly able to speak 'on behalf of FGW' in his senior role - and we can ask questions!  This surely has to be a 'must go to' event for all Bristol commuters??

Andrew, I look forward to seeing you there on 12 July - and if any of our Coffee Shop forum members can also attend, I will be delighted to introduce myself to you, too!

Chris  ;) :D ;D


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 07, 2008, 22:33:19
At the risk of labouring the point - but it's just a few days away now, so a final gentle reminder: I do look forward to seeing anyone from the forum, as well as Andrew Griffiths, on Saturday.

Chris  :)


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Ollie on July 13, 2008, 23:27:22
Related Link:
http://www.iworkforfgw.com/railblog/index.php?month=july08#1307082320


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Timmer on July 14, 2008, 07:04:57
Related Link:
http://www.iworkforfgw.com/railblog/index.php?month=july08#1307082320
Many thanks for the notes Ollie.

On the point about the 150 refurb. As Wabtec have done such a good job of the 158s and ahead of schedule, maybe they should be given the jobs of refurbing the remaining 150s which are way behind schedule if they were meant to be completed by May.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on July 23, 2008, 12:35:37
Various links are appearing as FOSBR look to overhaul their website.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000162

Three Questions about Avonmouth contract.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000161

Facts & Figures File.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/magazine.php?magid=0000000140

Re-opening Ashton Gate.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/magazine.php?magid=0000000141


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on August 14, 2008, 18:03:45
Clifton Down Turnback (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000166

RMT - "Rail v Air" (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000164


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: swlines on August 14, 2008, 18:19:59
Hurrah. Link below returns.  ;D


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on August 14, 2008, 18:43:00
Its good to be back.... ;D


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: John R on August 14, 2008, 19:55:30
The FGW Customer Panel minutes mention that, since the new timetable, passenger traffic is up around 25% in the first 3 months. I'm not sure what the target was, but that sound like a pretty reasonable result, and as word of mouth spreads the news of the improved service, one can hope that by the end of the first year the passenger growth will be very significant.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on August 19, 2008, 11:00:05
The 2008 Summer Line Count can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000167


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 03, 2008, 18:09:57
From Friends Of Suburban Bristol Railways :

Quote from: FOSBR
Saturday 11 October    FOSBR meeting   6 ^ 8pm

The transport, economic and environmental case for a publicly owned railway will be made by Bristol RMT Regional Secretary, Alex Gordon, and Bristol branch ASLEF secretary, Bernard Kennedy. This will be followed by plans to make a 10 minute film * showing the local network and the people who are making it happen.  The meeting is open to the public.

To get to there, walk from Temple Meads Station down Approach Rd to metal rail on right, Great Western Staff Club, then down steps to the lobby.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 12, 2008, 15:42:52
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/67.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Lee on October 31, 2008, 10:43:26
Friends Of Suburban Bristol Railways have organised a day celebrating recent acheivements, and looking forward to the future (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000173


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 18, 2008, 22:09:22
Can be found in the link below.
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/68.doc

... and sorry, but we appear to have overlooked 66 - which can be found in the link below ;D
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/newsletter/66.doc


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on December 24, 2008, 17:52:15
See the FOSBR website for details, at http://www.fosbr.org.uk/


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: John R on June 06, 2009, 19:46:58
This letter poses some interesting questions.

1. The service is subsidised to the tune of ^400k pa, ie ^8,000 per week, or ^1,230 per day, if you count Sunday as half a day. If that particular train lost, say ^120 in revenue (80 x 1.50 on average), how much could you reduce the subsidy if revenue collection was more diligent.

2. Does FGW have any controls in place to identify staff who appear to collect less in fares than would be expected on a particular train, or over a period of time.

3. Why don't some staff diligently check tickets and collect fares when they stand to gain a percentage of each fare sold?



 

Dear Sir,

I write to express concern at the deterioration in revenue collection on the Severn Beach railway line.

In May 2008, following Bristol City Council's unanimous decision to subsidise an extra train unit on the line for improved services to Avonmouth/Severn Beach, great improvements in regularity and reliability were introduced on the line and have lead to passenger numbers rising by more than 40% since May '08, a significant and resounding success.

However, many people have complained to FoSBR that, with increasing occurance, fares are not always being collected during journeys. I too have experienced this on several occasions including last Saturday (4th April) when not a single ticket was sold on the entire journey to the 80 or so passengers to Temple Meads.

The problem is not only revenue lost (and subsidised by our council) but also the loss of passenger journeys recorded. If the current trend continues, passenger loadings will appear to fall off (as official figures are based on ticket sales) and when it comes to renewing the BCC subsidy and the rail franchise, figures will be well down and improved service levels will not be deemed necessary, thus causing a major decline in the service.

Bristol City Council must take this matter up with First Great Western immediately and effectively. If not, the huge contribution that rail can make to the Bristol traffic problem resolution will be lost and further expansion to Portishead will be in jeopardy.

Yours sincerely,
Bernard Lane,
Chair Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways



Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: cereal_basher on June 06, 2009, 20:29:01
I sampled the end of the Severn Beach Line for the first time and the guard was brilliant. All tickets were checked and fares collected after every stop. Unfortunately I feel he could be a minority.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: welshman on June 07, 2009, 17:03:37
I think this is a common problem.  Recently I went from Cardiff to Bristol and back, using the Taunton service.  150 going and 158 coming back.

On the outward journey, the conductor/guard/train manager/whatever he's called this week checked every ticket and also insisted on checking everyone's passes - that applied to students and oldies.

On the return journey, at about 19:30, the c/g/tm/whctw was changed at Bristol and the new lady stayed in the back cab of a 2-car 158 all the way to Cardiff.  The train was not particularly crowded.  The only evidence of her presence was barely audible muttering over the PA.

I know that on ATW Valley Lines services the c/g/tm/whctw is under instruction not to conduct (no pun intended) ticket checks or sell tickets if there are standing passengers blocking the gangways.  This is apparently to ensure that he/she is at the rear door controls at every station.  Since most stops are only 4-6 minutes apart, this is perhaps understandable but Cardiff-Bristol is not exactly stop-start.

Lazy is the word.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: ReWind on June 07, 2009, 21:07:18
I have to say In my experience travelling on the Severn Beach Line, I have always witnessed the Conductor checking/selling tickets after every stop.  On a 143 (  the common SVB traction ), the conductor was under pressure to reach the front coach of the unit has he could only operate the doors from the rear of the unit ( this has now been resolved when the 143's were refurbed, the Conductor can now operate the doors from either end of the unit).

I cant remember the exact time the 143's were refurbed, but it was not long before the date of the letter i believe.

So perhaps the gentleman who wrote the letter always sat at the front of the train, therefore rarely seeing the Conductor.

I do agree that ticket checks on other routes, such as CDF - TAU and BPW - WSM are less eventful however.



Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: vacman on June 07, 2009, 21:31:33
Unfortunately there are too many lazy guards and theres no dicipline from management!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 07, 2009, 22:16:04
Hmm.

To be fair, on a couple of occasions recently, I was pleasantly surprised to see a 'conductor/guard' move purposefully forward through the length of the train, and start their ticket inspection from the front of the front carriage - catching some passengers out, I believe!  ::)


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: inspector_blakey on June 07, 2009, 22:31:44
It seems to be somewhat hit-and-miss, and dependent largely on the staff concerned. I do not use the SVB branch often but on the occasions I have recently (all off-peak, it must be said) the conductors have been very efficient. Their job must be made somewhat easier now by the simplified fares (which I think are largely in multiples of ^1 or 50p).

From my regular journeys on high-speed services and the Bristol - Keynsham - Bath locals I recognize plenty of the staff by sight and can now generally tell whether I'll get a ticket check or not as soon as I see the conductor who's working that service. This suggests to me that the same staff, day after day, must fail to pay in any revenue from their Avantix machines. I can only speculate about why this is not dealt with: because of issues with staff contracts (I would hazard a guess that some ex-BR staff probably are not required by their terms of employment to undertake commercial duties), a lack of management will to deal with the problem or would the RMT kick off if guards were being disciplined for failing to collect revenue?


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: devon_metro on June 07, 2009, 23:09:09
Hmm.

To be fair, on a couple of occasions recently, I was pleasantly surprised to see a 'conductor/guard' move purposefully forward through the length of the train, and start their ticket inspection from the front of the front carriage - catching some passengers out, I believe!  ::)

That trick is quite good at Highbridge. If two TMs are on, one hides up front and as the chavs see the visible guard moving to the front they do the same and out pops the second TM. Classic!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: vacman on June 08, 2009, 16:03:33
It seems to be somewhat hit-and-miss, and dependent largely on the staff concerned. I do not use the SVB branch often but on the occasions I have recently (all off-peak, it must be said) the conductors have been very efficient. Their job must be made somewhat easier now by the simplified fares (which I think are largely in multiples of ^1 or 50p).

From my regular journeys on high-speed services and the Bristol - Keynsham - Bath locals I recognize plenty of the staff by sight and can now generally tell whether I'll get a ticket check or not as soon as I see the conductor who's working that service. This suggests to me that the same staff, day after day, must fail to pay in any revenue from their Avantix machines. I can only speculate about why this is not dealt with: because of issues with staff contracts (I would hazard a guess that some ex-BR staff probably are not required by their terms of employment to undertake commercial duties), a lack of management will to deal with the problem or would the RMT kick off if guards were being disciplined for failing to collect revenue?
It's in all guards contracts to issue/check tickets as they were restructured in the late 90's, although it was in there beforehand for Conductor guards.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Tim on June 08, 2009, 17:10:48
some ex-BR staff probably are not required by their terms of employment to undertake commercial duties),

Some of the best staff are ex-BR and some are new.  I'm not sure thatthere is much of a correlation.

At root it is a management issue. 


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: grahame on October 24, 2009, 22:31:59
The Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) are a very active and well established group in the Bristol area - far more "IRL" [In Real Life] than the Coffee Shop in their campaigning to retain and improve services in the 'burbs around Bristol; their web site is at

http://fosbr.org.uk

FOSBR and FOSBR related posts are more than welcome here (always have been!) ... and may be more frequent in the future - I met up with some of the group this evening, and was able to express that welcoming approach in person (having discovered with of the FOUR exits from Stapleton Road lead to "The Sugar [hic] Loaf".

FOSBR have been part of some notable successes with improvements on the Severn Beach line - their achievements make the one extra train per week achieved so far on the TransWilts look very limited (and it is).  However, we look forward to giving them a run for their money here in Wiltshire, and hope they'll make enormous strides ahead too and remain a tough act to catch up with!

(http://www.wellho.net/pix/staps.jpg)
Awaiting the Avonmouth train at Stapleton Road

(http://www.wellho.net/pix/bristolbound.jpg)
The Frome train pulls in to Stapleton Road



Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: inspector_blakey on October 26, 2009, 00:00:08
I never tire of looking at the mural at Stapleton Road, it's great. I always seem to "find" something new every time I look at it. And notice how it's almost completely graffiti-free even after being there for some time!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Cruithne3753 on October 30, 2009, 20:11:18
I never tire of looking at the mural at Stapleton Road, it's great. I always seem to "find" something new every time I look at it. And notice how it's almost completely graffiti-free even after being there for some time!

I saw someone who appeared to be tending to it this afternoon, so it probably gets occasional maintenence.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: grahame on October 31, 2009, 13:37:28
I've posted some pictures of the murals and other railway atrwork in the Bristol area in the "Frequent Poster's Club" at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=5589.0 .

There are issues with copyright on photographs of art by artists who are still alive or who have been within the past 50 years, so I don't think I could post the images directly on the public readable board  :-[ - pity, because they're rather good pictures (made by the artwork, not the chump behind the camera!). However, we can I think show the withing our clique of well established mebers, which is whatI have done.

Cruithne3753 - welcome to the forum.  In just a few more posts, you'll move up automatically to the next level of membership which will give to access to "Frequent Posters" ... including the pictures and an extra board.   "Frequent Posters" isn't our busiest board, but it's an interesting place to catch up with folks and to be able to let your hair down just a little.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 12, 2009, 18:26:54
From the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/8356238.stm):

Quote
Campaigners fighting to improve local railway services are to lobby Network Rail bosses when they meet to discuss future transport plans for Bristol.

Network Rail (NR) propose the minimum service needed on the Severn Beach line is hourly.

Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) disputes this, claiming (NR) has used 2007 figures which do not show increases in passengers since then.

FOSBR will also meet local councillors and MPs to discuss the issues.

The group claims Network Rail has rejected the Greater Bristol Metro project which would offer a half-hourly service cross-city from Weston to Yate.

The proposal has the support of the West of England Partnership which has included it within its bid for government transport funding.

"People want a good local train service," said Rob Dixon of FOSBR. "We need to invest in rail schemes like Portishead, the Greater Bristol Metro, doubling the track between Clifton Down and Montpelier and increasing the number of tracks on the mainline."

FOSBR is also calling for the line from Temple Meads to Parkway, which is currently two tracks, to be widened to allow more services to be run.

In a statement Network Rail said: "Network Rail shares the aspiration to grow and improve the railway and welcomes opportunities to achieve that. Any proposals have to go through the formal process of consultation with the wider industry, which include train operators and local authorities. The wider industry will have to agree the feasibility of the proposals put forward before they are included in the 10-year strategy."


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: matt473 on November 12, 2009, 19:18:01
Having now sampled the delights of the traffic in Bristol since September, I can see why an Urban railway service is needed in Bristol. There are large amounts of traffic from around 7am up until 7pm suggesting a large number of people need to travel around Bristol for the majority of the day. There is a large potential market for such a railway system which can cater for commuters, students and leisure travellers. Living in the city centre, if it was not for my bus pass included in my rent I would be catching the train to University (UWE campus at Frenchay) as it is quicker and will not be affected by traffic. I am not the only person who would do this whilst people from Portishead area for example who currently drive in would use the train as they already don't want to drive but have no alternative as the bus service is not suitable. I really hope this gets off the ground as Bristol deserves a decent urban rail system.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: welshman on November 13, 2009, 21:36:52
There's lots of nice theory here and the suggested use of the Henbury loop and opening of Portishead would be great.

I'm afraid, however, that the centre of Bristol is too far away from the stations.

Temple Meads is well to the south of the city centre and the line running to the south west is on the far side of the Avon from the city centre.  Going east or rather north east from Temple Meads towards Filton/Parkway etc is even further from the city centre.  The Severn Beach line runs east- west between Montpelier, Redland and Clifton Down and as far to the north of the city centre as Temple Meads is to the south.

The centre of the city is the axis between the new Cabot Circus and The Centre outside the Colston Hall.  The old university is on the hill to the north of The Centre. UWE is split between three campuses (campi?) to the north east.  Anyone travelling to any of the current or proposed Bristol urban stations, especially if they have a pram or a pushchair, would need a bus as well.  If you were coming to Cabot Circus it's easier to drive in to Newfoundland Street from the M32.  CC is right in front of you.

The Bristol issue is that the railway is in the wrong place because it got there after the City.  Contrast Cardiff with its 20 stations. Cardiff is a consequence of the railway built to get coal to the docks.  It's two main stations are at either end of the shopping/working centre and there's a spur to the Bay (or down the docks as they called it in my day).

Bristol is a consequence of the slave trade and transatlantic sailing ships.  The slave trade was abolished in 1807 in the UK.  Brunel had to put his railway in the gaps.




Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 13, 2009, 23:01:41
I don't want to seem overly pedantic, but from the few snippets of local history I remember from attending school in Bristol it's been a major settlement for the last 1000 years or so. Bit of a stretch to say that the existence of the city is a consequence of the slave trade!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: welshman on November 14, 2009, 07:51:45
You've failed, you are overly pedantic.   ::)

A slight oversimplification, I grant.  But your comment reinforces my point - the railway got there well after Bristol whereas in Cardiff the railway got there first. 


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 27, 2010, 21:13:27
From the Network Rail press release (http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/Press-Releases/IMPROVEMENTS-GET-THUMBS-UP-FROM-FRIENDS-OF-SUBURBAN-BRISTOL-RAILWAY-146a/SearchCategoryID-7.aspx):

Quote
Network Rail today has received accolades from the local user group, Friends of Suburban Bristol Railway, for its efforts in improving the Severn Beach branch line.

Trains going northbound on the Severn Beach branch line can now terminate at or turn back from Clifton to Bristol Temple Meads.

This improvement promises a more reliable service for passengers travelling on the busiest part of the branch line.

It also spells an opportunity for more trains to run between these stations, accommodating the industry^s aspiration to boost capacity on this line in the future.

Jointly funded by Network Rail and the Bristol City Council, the scheme aims to reduce the delays by enabling services between Clifton ^ Bristol Temple Meads to continue to run when the rest of the branch line is congested or has failed.

Work was carried out by Network Rail to install a new signal equipment near Clifton Down. Depending on further study on time-table modelling, this enhanced capability could enable four trains to run per hour.

Mike Gallop, principal programme sponsor for Network Rail, said: ^We are honoured to receive this recognition from Friends of Suburban Bristol Railway.  Schemes like this are critical to improving service performance as the daily operation of the railway becomes more robust.  Around 75% of the passenger journeys made on the Severn Beach branch line are between Clifton ^ Bristol Temple Meads and this line is an important link for them.  We are really pleased to see a little of our effort will go a long way for passengers.^

Besides this, Network Rail has also renewed life-expired tracks between Montpelier Tunnel and Avonmouth Dock Junction as well as at Narroways Hill Junction.  These efforts have significantly improved the reliability of the infrastructure on the line.

The railway in Great Western is one of the top ten best performing routes with an annual average of 92.4% of trains arriving on time every day.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: IndustryInsider on May 30, 2010, 16:17:36
Welcome improvements for the local users of the route I'm sure, but is it just me, or do NR take the opportunity to blow their own trumpet a little too often?


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Brucey on May 30, 2010, 16:21:17
So services on the inner part of the line will increase but the outer part will see fewer trains?  Is this correct?


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: JayMac on May 30, 2010, 17:23:27
Back to hourly outside the peaks would be fine for Sea Mills, Shirehampton and Avonmouth. And that's coming from a regular user of Shirehampton. Don't really see the need for 3 every 2 hours through the day.

As long as the service is robust and the turnback isn't used as an excuse to cancel services beyond Clifton Down then 1/2 hourly to Clifton, hourly to Avonmouth and 2 hourly to Severn Beach would work out fine IMHO.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 12, 2010, 11:23:51
From the Bristol Evening Post (http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/lifestyle/Rail-industry-growing-needs-investment/article-2295216-detail/article.html):

Quote
Rail industry is growing and needs investment

I am writing on behalf of Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) in response to the announcement by Transport Secretary Philip Hammond that the Government is to review the provision of new carriages.

FOSBR is concerned about this and the likelihood that cuts to the transport budget are likely to fall disproportionately on rail, which is a more environmentally-friendly form of transport.

The Government has said it does not offer value for money because costs have increased and that new carriages may no longer be needed because of the recession.

The point about value for money has some basis in fact. Ever since the rail network was privatised, train companies have had to hire carriages at great expense from rolling stock companies. Our rail network costs more to run and maintain than those of other European countries because of the structures imposed by privatisation.

Under the previous government, the Department for Transport told train companies like First Great Western how many and what type of carriages they could hire. The Conservatives said before the election they would stop the department interfering with such details. We hope this review is not a sign this interference is continuing.

FOSBR understands the government is reviewing its spending in view of the financial crisis but believes it is vital that they invest for the future. FOSBR is concerned that Bristol needs investment in our railway and cuts will stop this from happening. For too long Bristol has been the poor relation when it comes to spending on the railways, and investment such as re-signalling has been repeatedly postponed. We are also concerned that cuts will lead to cuts in services, with fewer trains stopping at local stations.

Network Rail recently produced their 10-year strategy for our region. In this they said that demand in the Bristol area has not been affected by the recession.

Instead, demand is still rising at faster levels than expected. From 1994 to 2005, passenger numbers at Bristol area stations more than doubled and they have increased by a third again since then. It is predicted that they will increase by at least another 30 per cent in the next 10 years.

First Great Western are already short of trains. Network Rail said it is vital trains are lengthened on the routes through Bristol from Cardiff to Portsmouth and from Gloucester to Weymouth as these are already crowded.

FOSBR asks that our councillors and MPs put pressure on the government to ensure Bristol gets what it already needs and does not stay the poor relation in terms of transport.

Rob Dixon,

Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways,

Lawrence Hill.


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 13, 2010, 21:37:51
See http://fosbr.org.uk/events

Timetable:
09:46 Depart Severn Beach
10:08 Clifton Down
10:21 Bristol Temple Meads
10:37 Nailsea & Backwell
10:54 Arrive Weston-super-Mare

16:14 Depart Weston
16:33 Nailsea & Backwell
16:53 Bristol Temple Meads
17:05 Clifton Down
17:33 Severn Beach


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: JayMac on July 16, 2010, 23:28:08
I'm on this service on Sunday (18/07) from Shirehampton to Temple Meads (for onward travel to that London!). Am I likely to see some coffee shop faces? Will be nice, and kinda weird, to put faces to forum contributors.

BTW, I'll be easy to spot. I'm the guy with a big nose and a hypo Staffordshire Bull Terrier!!!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: JayMac on July 19, 2010, 17:13:34
Can FoSBR organise more of these events? Perhaps on a daily basis to tie-in with when I use the Severn Beach Line. Reason I ask is FGW managed to rustle up a 3 car Class 158 for the Seaside Express on Sun 18th!

Never travelled in such luxury on the SVB line before.  ;) ;D


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: ReWind on July 19, 2010, 17:48:37
That's why I was travelling on a very crowded 2 car 158 Pompey service then! ::)


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: Brucey on July 19, 2010, 18:03:00
Can FoSBR organise more of these events? Perhaps on a daily basis to tie-in with when I use the Severn Beach Line. Reason I ask is FGW managed to rustle up a 3 car Class 158 for the Seaside Express on Sun 18th!

Never travelled in such luxury on the SVB line before.  ;) ;D
That's why I was travelling on a very crowded 2 car 158 Pompey service then! ::)
This "switch" seems to happen every now and then.  I came into Bristol from Portsmouth on a 2 coach 158 a few months ago.  The Severn Beach service had a platform alteration to platform 15, where there was a 3 coach 158 - the most comfortable journey I've ever had on the SVB line and the only time I've ever had an entire 158 coach to myself!


Title: Re: Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FoSBR) - merged topics
Post by: JayMac on September 27, 2010, 17:04:40
From the Bristol Evening Post (http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/FRIENDS-MAKING-RAIL-DIFFERENCE/article-2686459-detail/article.html):

Quote
LET'S be honest, groups of people who get together to talk about trains have developed a general reputation for a certain type of geekiness. All those trainspotters scribbling down engine numbers in notepads, or "age of steam" history bores who know the difference between Class A six-wheel switchers and a Class C eight-wheel switchers, without counting the wheels.

But the Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways (FOSBR) has never been that kind of group. Far from concerning themselves with the self-imposed autism of pointless rail-based facts and figures collecting, since its inception in 1995 FOSBR has been a vibrantly radical movement that has battled for the rights of commuters across the city.

When it seemed to many rail chiefs that suburban lines had become a sort of quaint anachronism ^ an unnecessary relic of a pre-car-oriented past ^ the good folk of FOSBR could see the future potential in the lines.

"We were ahead of the Green movement in recognising the need to get people out of their cars and back on to trains," explains spokesman Rob Dixon.

Born out of a couple of dozen passionate voices calling for a halt in the demise of the Severn Beach commuter line, FOSBR has now swelled into a powerful lobby group, with more than 200 members and a broad agenda to improve rail usage and protect and develop commuter lines.

Last night this small army of radical commuters gathered together for a party at the La Ruca Cafe in Gloucester Road, to celebrate 15 years of passionate campaigning.

"We've achieved a lot over the years. Passenger numbers on the suburban Bristol lines have more than doubled since 1995, but there's still a lot to do," Rob says. "We're so far behind other comparable cities across the country. We need to catch up with cities like Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham, where commuters in the outlaying suburbs know they can walk to their local train station and enjoy good, reliable half-hourly services into the centre of their city."

FOSBR was born at 7.30am on Monday, September 25, 1995, with a rush-hour protest at the reduction of the commuter services from Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach.

"We encouraged people to meet on Avonmouth station with bikes and buggies to show that a bus was no substitute for a train," Rob says. It was the start of months of similar protests, that eventually led to a subsidy being found for the line. Bristol City Council subsidised the line until 2007 when an hourly minimum service was included in the rail franchise," he says.

"Following that we campaigned energetically for half-hourly services, targeting the city council's budget in 2006/7. Councillors of all parties voted to invest money in extra trains in order to provide an improved service ^ a train approximately every 45 minutes during the day ^ for three years. This started in May 2008 and has resulted in a 60 per cent ticket sale increase, which proves that if the service is reliable and regular, commuters will be prepared to leave their cars at home."

But the members' resolve remains determined to keep pushing for improvements to the city's commuter service ^ driving change forward like a legion of little shunting engines.

"Every time a suburban train runs in the Bristol area it is a victory for FOSBR," says member Teresa McGill. "Recently FOSBR has been campaigning to ensure this service continues. We have successfully lobbied MPs and council officials across the South West region to include rail schemes in their bid for government funding for transport projects. This year our campaign to include local rail schemes was mentioned in Network Rail's regional strategy and resulted in a review of the service on the Severn Beach line and proposals for an additional service from Avonmouth to Bath. We have put pressure on the West of England Partnership to take steps to reopen the freight line from Avonmouth to Bristol Parkway to passengers, and to ensure the half-hourly service at stations that they have promised in the local transport plan. We regularly meet with the Severnside Community Rail Partnership, the council and train operator First Great Western to discuss the future of the line and our ideas."

So what drives these determined campaigners?

"I think everyone has their own individual reason for continuing the fight," Rob says. "I was simply a regular rail commuter who wanted to see an improvement in services."

As well as campaigning for investment and against cuts, FOSBR has promoted the local rail network in various ways.

"These days, we're not just about campaigning against the demise of the services, now we also actively try to promote rail usage among the public," Rob says. "We give out thousands of timetables every year, have stalls at local events, and publicise the suburban railway lines through special events such as trips to the seaside. Our golden goals are to achieve half-hourly services to all Bristol stations, see the reopening of the line to Portishead and from Avonmouth to Parkway, and lobby for the introduction of four tracks ^ rather than the current two ^ from Temple Meads to Filton."

Who knows? Perhaps in the next 15 years, the good folk of FOSBR will be on track to achieve their remaining golden goals.

● For more information about FOSBR, visit the website at fosbr.org.uk. (http://fosbr.org.uk/)



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net