|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #106 on: July 29, 2011, 15:05:08 » |
|
let's resurrect Airtrack
Or maybe not Unless you can come up with a practical solution with the various level crossings on the line. I think an alternative has been suggested which would join the two windsor stations and replace them with a new single station. Then run take the heathrow trains on a short bit of new track to join the exisiting line from Windsor to Slough for connections to cross-rail
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
paul7575
|
|
« Reply #107 on: July 29, 2011, 16:38:28 » |
|
I think an alternative has been suggested which would join the two windsor stations and replace them with a new single station. Then run take the heathrow trains on a short bit of new track to join the exisiting line from Windsor to Slough for connections to cross-rail
Well it has definitely been suggested: http://windsorlink.net/...and I think it's been around for a couple of years, but I reckon that DfT» and Network Rail will have completely ignored it because it doesn't provide what passengers actually want at an affordable cost. It doesn't even rate a negative comment in the latest RUSs▸ , ie GWML▸ and London and SE. Paul
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #108 on: July 29, 2011, 18:00:26 » |
|
I would suspect the vast majority of the money spent on Crossrail is on the tunnelling (or perhaps just Canary Wharf station ), so I would imagine sending services to the WCML▸ slows would be relatively cheap. Just like extensions to Dartford (or preferably Ebbesfleet) and Reading. Airtrack - I know there are the level crossings, but I'm not convinced enough time has been spent looking at it. Staines would be a good start. But a local service from Waterloo to Heathrow would take plenty of cars off the road.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #109 on: July 29, 2011, 18:09:02 » |
|
I would suspect the vast majority of the money spent on Crossrail is on the tunnelling (or perhaps just Canary Wharf station ), so I would imagine sending services to the WCML▸ slows would be relatively cheap. Just like extensions to Dartford (or preferably Ebbesfleet) and Reading. Airtrack - I know there are the level crossings, but I'm not convinced enough time has been spent looking at it. Staines would be a good start. But a local service from Waterloo to Heathrow would take plenty of cars off the road. One problem with Airtrack, is that it is a very good idea but funding was a issue and hopefully perhaps it could be found to bring back the scheme in a few years. The main problem is in Richmond with the stupid council & Nimby's complaining about the level crossing's Shame really as i would have liked to see Airtrack, I wonder if they would go ahead and build a western link into Heathrow Airport, perhaps a hourly Oxford - Reading - Heathrow Airport service? it would be a good use for those class 360's which are owned by BAA if they do get replaced by the crossrail service.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #110 on: July 29, 2011, 19:00:28 » |
|
The main problem is in Richmond with the stupid council & Nimby's complaining about the level crossing's
Sorry, but that's grossly unfair. Traffic congestion around level crossings on the proposed Airtrack route is already very bad. Airtrack would've made that much worse, particularly in Egham where it was predicted that on two of the town's level crossings the barriers would be down for 34 minutes in each hour. There are already numerous public transport options for getting to Heathrow with CrossRail to come. Airtrack appeared to be a sop to affluent residents living south-west of London whose public transport options to Heathrow are the coaches from Reading or Woking or travelling via London. I don't have much sympathy for them. They already have an extensive commuter network to give them access to the existing Heathrow links.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #111 on: July 29, 2011, 19:01:52 » |
|
Ok perhaps i am being a bit unfair, and yes i do have some agreement with you consiering how good a public transport system they have around that area already.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ollie
|
|
« Reply #112 on: July 30, 2011, 03:35:30 » |
|
The main problem is in Richmond with the stupid council & Nimby's complaining about the level crossing's
particularly in Egham where it was predicted that on two of the town's level crossings the barriers would be down for 34 minutes in each hour. Similar figure was mentioned for the main level crossing in Wokingham (by the station) The other 2 in Wokingham wouldn't be down as often, but still a fair bit. Certainly not practical in the current state of the crossings. Which is why I mentioned if a solution was found it would be a good idea. So I wouldn't say it's being Nimby's at all
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #113 on: July 30, 2011, 22:37:20 » |
|
Jst read part of the RUS▸ which says that Network Rail want to run 10 crossrail trains per hour to Heathrow and 6 to Reading thus eliminating the need for some or most of them to terminate at Paddington and to provide 4 extra fast trains between Paddington & Reading using the current Heathrow express paths.
A western link into Heathrow airport is also suggested (Perhaps if such a link is built and the heathrow express services are withdrawn after crossrail comes into affect perhaps it could make use of the class 332's)
Also a proposal to run 12 carriage trains to Newbury & Oxford.
I havent read the full RUS yet but will be having a further browse through it tonight & tommorow. Makes for a interesting read.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
standclearplease
|
|
« Reply #114 on: July 31, 2011, 10:31:23 » |
|
A direct rail service between Reading and Heathrow would be very welcome indeed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
anthony215
|
|
« Reply #115 on: July 31, 2011, 11:45:36 » |
|
And i think a lot of people would use it. as for the question if there would be any paths for it.
I know that they propose running 6TPH between Paddington & Maidenhead/reading on the relief lines in addition to 10TPH to Heathrow Airport, so i suppose if the great western mainline i re-signalled then you could just about run a service although probably on a service every 30 minutes or so on the relief lines in between the crossrail services
Maybe by extending some of the local stopping services from Oxford which maybe 1 day might be extended to Milton Keynes etc.
I do agree with the idea of scrapping the Heathrow express services and using the paths to provide additional fast services between London Paddington & Reading.
I know there maybe a few people who would not be happy about the loss of heathrow express but wouldnt it be better to have very frequent services which run direct to central london & the city?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Btline
|
|
« Reply #116 on: July 31, 2011, 14:33:13 » |
|
After crossrail, the hex is redundant. However they'll want to keep it as it would still make money as people will fall for the con. I hope they see sense and axe it during the peaks... You could then run 4 IEPs▸ per hour just from discot and reading. Then axe most didcot and reading stops on other trains!
Just like gatwick. Thameslink is quicker anyway now, and serves more of the city. But tourists and businessmen see the signs and get the credit card out. Often then to get the tube to kings cross or monument!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
eightf48544
|
|
« Reply #117 on: July 31, 2011, 20:13:21 » |
|
If T5 ever became a through station it seems to me a possibility would be run a Alternate Abbey Wood. Shenfield all stations to Padd Ealing Broadway Hayes, T5 Slough Maidenhead Twyford Reading service 4 an hour or do do 2 on the ML lines Reading T5 Padd terminate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #119 on: August 30, 2011, 07:51:59 » |
|
Thanks for the link, Anthony215. Why is it that artists impressions of new stations - shown to illustrate this article - show just a handful of people which if it were to be the typical scene would make the whole thing a white elephant? (If people answer me on this, I may split it into a separate thread). Compare and contrast to the current number of passengers around - http://www.wellho.net/pix/bhhomea.jpg and http://www.wellho.net/pix/bhhome0.jpg
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|