Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 30 Dec 2024
 
- Replacement 'green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
- What we know so far
- The driver who 'jumped' his bus over the Tower Bridge gap
- Avanti West Coast strike to hit New Year's Eve trains
- Gatwick flights returning to normal after fog
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 01/01/25 - Railway 200 'Whistle Up' UK
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
30th Dec (1956)
Liverpool Overhead Railway closed (link)

Train RunningShort Run
16:23 Exmouth to Paignton
17:19 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 30, 2024, 17:45:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[121] The Wider Picture - making it wider, but also clearer, hopeful...
[91] Working from roam: more people logging on from UK airports and...
[56] Server Map (mark 2) - as from January 2025 - a technical intro...
[51] Weekend of 28th/29th December - Coffee Shop offline for engine...
[48] Terrible signalling error!
[41] Southern Railway to axe toilets from new train (BBC News 19/09...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 [46] 47 48 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. From construction to operation - ongoing discussion  (Read 657940 times)
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #675 on: July 28, 2016, 19:41:17 »

There's also a new  acronymn on the block - ROCS (Rigid Overhead Conductor System) - Rigid Overhead Conductor Systems

Thanks, onthecushions: I've added it to the Coffee Shop forum acronyms / abbreviations page. CfN.
....hmm, need to be careful with that one CfN as it also stands for Railway Operating Centre(s)...... Roll Eyes
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19049


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #676 on: July 28, 2016, 21:42:15 »

Yes, I noticed that there were already several alternative definitions for a few of the abbreviations on that page.  I'll look again at how best to offer clarity in such cases.  Wink
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4494


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #677 on: July 28, 2016, 22:18:36 »


MR (Midland Railway) August gave a spacing of 8.5m for the roof supports in the Severn Tunnel. It depends how "floppy" the beam is and the necessary curvature.

OTC

More to do with line speed, in Canal Tunnels (part of Thameslink) the spacing of the beam supports was 12 meters because the lines speed is 50kph
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 500


View Profile
« Reply #678 on: July 29, 2016, 11:44:58 »

First pictures of the new trains have now appeared:
Exterior: http://twitter.com/Modern_Railways/status/758964943441960961/photo/1

And a short interior video http://twitter.com/Clinnick1/status/758971881500188672/video/1

I notice that it isn't completely longitudinal seating, there are a small number of side-by-side seats.
Travelling all the way from Reading in those longitudinal seats does not look like fun, I guess most commuters from Reading will stick with the GWR (Great Western Railway) trains.
Although I wonder if there will be cheaper Crossrail only season tickets to entice commuters off the GWR trains?
Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1105


View Profile
« Reply #679 on: July 29, 2016, 11:50:58 »

First pictures of the new trains have now appeared:
Exterior: http://twitter.com/Modern_Railways/status/758964943441960961/photo/1

And a short interior video http://twitter.com/Clinnick1/status/758971881500188672/video/1

I notice that it isn't completely longitudinal seating, there are a small number of side-by-side seats.
Travelling all the way from Reading in those longitudinal seats does not look like fun, I guess most commuters from Reading will stick with the GWR (Great Western Railway) trains.
Although I wonder if there will be cheaper Crossrail only season tickets to entice commuters off the GWR trains?


I have to be honest they look awful but nothing less than we expected..... on the positive side, I suppose the seat trim will hide the vomit nicely.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #680 on: July 29, 2016, 12:31:03 »

I notice that it isn't completely longitudinal seating, there are a small number of side-by-side seats.

There ought to be a significant number of side by side seats over the whole length of the train.  It is the only way of getting the declared total number of seats per train in, which averages out at 50 per carriage.

By comparison LO 378s are fully longitudinal, but only have about 34 seats per car on average.   Although the 345s are 3m longer, they also have an additional set of doors in each car, which will take up nearly all of that 'extra' length.

Paul
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 500


View Profile
« Reply #681 on: July 29, 2016, 12:37:00 »

Quote
There ought to be a significant number of side by side seats over the whole length of the train.  It is the only way of getting the declared total number of seats per train in, which averages out at 50 per carriage.

Paul
Looking at that video there only appear to be 16 side-by-side seats in that carriage, although of course that may not be typical of each carriage and is that video even a whole carriage length?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #682 on: July 29, 2016, 13:23:00 »

Looking at that video there only appear to be 16 side-by-side seats in that carriage, although of course that may not be typical of each carriage and is that video even a whole carriage length?

If that was 8 either side of the centre doors only, so 16 per 9 carriages, it would be 144 over the train length, which has 450 seats declared by TfL» (Transport for London - about), so 32%.   I would expect some cars will have flip up seats in stead of longitudinal ones adjacent to some multipurpose wheelchair/pushchair spaces.   

Don't know what bike policy will be on CR1 though, has anyone heard?

Paul
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #683 on: July 29, 2016, 16:46:35 »

Why no yellow ends?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #684 on: July 29, 2016, 16:53:28 »

Why no yellow ends?

Because all modern trains have (very) powerful (duplicated) headlights and I can tell you can certainly see those before you can see a yellow end.... Wink
Logged
chrisr_75
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1019


View Profile
« Reply #685 on: July 29, 2016, 17:06:10 »

Why no yellow ends?

Because all modern trains have (very) powerful (duplicated) headlights and I can tell you can certainly see those before you can see a yellow end.... Wink

Are the yellow cab ends no longer mandatory? I'm surprised the unions let that one slip past if that is the case...

Should also add that modern light technology (presume most use either LED or HID units these days?) is hugely more reliable than 'old fashioned' incandescent filament bulbs, so the risk of lights failing is very much diminished.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #686 on: July 29, 2016, 17:21:08 »

Are the yellow cab ends no longer mandatory? I'm surprised the unions let that one slip past if that is the case...

Should also add that modern light technology (presume most use either LED or HID units these days?) is hugely more reliable than 'old fashioned' incandescent filament bulbs, so the risk of lights failing is very much diminished.

There was stuff online on RSSBs (Rail Safety and Standards Board) website while back, and the process of amending the Rail Group Standard went on for about 2 years.   If the trade unions missed it at the time they mustn't have read the memo, I can't believe they aren't part of such a decision making process.

Of course if someone is determined to cause problems...

Paul
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 500


View Profile
« Reply #687 on: July 29, 2016, 20:20:33 »

More pictures here http://www.londonreconnections.com/2016/pictures-crossrails-trains-make-debut/

On question where do passengers put there luggage as it has no luggage racks?

The interior does really look like a tube train rather than an outer suburban unit (I assume Reading can be classed as outer suburban)
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4494


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #688 on: July 29, 2016, 21:00:11 »

Are the yellow cab ends no longer mandatory? I'm surprised the unions let that one slip past if that is the case...

Should also add that modern light technology (presume most use either LED or HID units these days?) is hugely more reliable than 'old fashioned' incandescent filament bulbs, so the risk of lights failing is very much diminished.

There was stuff online on RSSBs (Rail Safety and Standards Board) website while back, and the process of amending the Rail Group Standard went on for about 2 years.   If the trade unions missed it at the time they mustn't have read the memo, I can't believe they aren't part of such a decision making process.

Of course if someone is determined to cause problems...

Paul

The Trade Unions sit on various RSSB committees in an advisory roll, they would have been consulted as part of the discussions. 

Give me the bright headlights over grubby yellow paint, as S&T (Signalling and Telegraph) Engineer said you can see the head lamps well before the yellow paint
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #689 on: July 29, 2016, 22:19:59 »

More pictures here http://www.londonreconnections.com/2016/pictures-crossrails-trains-make-debut/

On question where do passengers put there luggage as it has no luggage racks?

The interior does really look like a tube train rather than an outer suburban unit (I assume Reading can be classed as outer suburban)

It always has been a pseudo tube train, which is why there's two schools of thought about the extension to Reading, as seen in a few years of discussions here...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 44 45 [46] 47 48 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page