Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 30 Dec 2024
 
- Replacement 'green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
- What we know so far
- The driver who 'jumped' his bus over the Tower Bridge gap
- Avanti West Coast strike to hit New Year's Eve trains
- Gatwick flights returning to normal after fog
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 01/01/25 - Railway 200 'Whistle Up' UK
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
30th Dec (1956)
Liverpool Overhead Railway closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:49 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
16:23 Exmouth to Paignton
17:19 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 30, 2024, 17:47:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[121] The Wider Picture - making it wider, but also clearer, hopeful...
[91] Working from roam: more people logging on from UK airports and...
[56] Server Map (mark 2) - as from January 2025 - a technical intro...
[51] Weekend of 28th/29th December - Coffee Shop offline for engine...
[48] Terrible signalling error!
[41] Southern Railway to axe toilets from new train (BBC News 19/09...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 114
  Print  
Author Topic: Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. From construction to operation - ongoing discussion  (Read 657949 times)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4494


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #225 on: September 28, 2012, 12:35:02 »

Link to an online "Evening Standard" artical http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/waste-hopper-collapses-at-paddington-station-8189268.html

Would appear it failed under its own weight ......... opps  Roll Eyes
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
The SprinterMeister
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 665


Trundling round the SW

Chris64ex4@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #226 on: October 01, 2012, 10:31:31 »

I am speculating here but wonder if they have got the counter balancing of the loading head right, there seems to be quite a mass overhanging the wagons with very little on the opposite side. 

If you were to add counterweights to the opposite side of the mechanism you would increase the total mass of the moveable part of the plant and the load carried on the longitudenal girders supporting it. Looks as if the load on the girders (particularly on the 'loading' side) may have been a problem as it is by the looks of things.....

The spoil train appears to have stopped the whole lot crashing onto the ground fortunately.
Logged

Trundling gently round the SW
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5630



View Profile
« Reply #227 on: October 01, 2012, 10:40:37 »

I think that it fell during or shortly after very heavy rain.
The spoil would of course become heavier due to soaking up water, and pools of water may have built up on the conveyor behind each pile of spoil.
This should of course have been allowed for in the design, but given some defect in design, material, or construction, the extra weight of the rainwater probably explains why it fell then and not before.

Does anyone know for long tunneling may continue without the conveyor ?
There is on site storage for the spoil, but I dont know how long it would take to fill up.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: October 04, 2012, 13:13:48 »

Bids for detailed design and construction of the western Crossrail stations have been invited from all the big construction players:

http://www.crossrail.co.uk/news/press-releases/network-rail-invites-bids-for-design-construction-crossrail-western-stations#.UG18GlGuVWg
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #229 on: October 22, 2012, 16:24:44 »

One of the two TBM's is on the move again, with the other set to restart next week:

http://www.constructionenquirer.com/2012/10/22/tunnelling-work-restarts-on-crossrail/
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #230 on: December 15, 2012, 11:25:09 »

Here's a diagram of the Acton dive under which shows the revised track layout in a detail I've not seen before.  New lines are marked in red, whilst the old layout is marked with green dashes and unchanged lines are marked in black.

A few people I've spoken to were assuming the freight line would dive under the passenger line, but this diagram clearly shows that Acton reception sidings and goods loops have been slewed north to allow the up relief line to dive under the down goods line and up goods line (which will also link to the reception lines and all sidings).

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #231 on: December 15, 2012, 11:47:23 »

I expect apart from the lack of space in the yard to install a ramp to/from the alternative of a freight dive under, it is far better operationally to have the heavier freights staying on the level, and the passenger units able to take a run up at least from the previous station!

I hadn't appreciated that the layout would allow parallel moves in and out of the yard - it could easily have been a single lead junction based on much of what has been done over the last 20 years or more.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43000



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #232 on: December 15, 2012, 11:57:20 »

So it keeps up Crossrail clear of freight from main lines and from down relief, but down Crossrail crosses main line freight on the level - have I read that right?  And up Crossrail can continue to use the surface lines too unless there's a conflicting freight movement?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #233 on: December 15, 2012, 11:58:21 »

If I've interpreted this correctly it also means that the diveunder will only be used when there is a conflicting movement coming out of the yard (and maybe going in to the yard too depending on how far the spur extends west of the dive under).

On another Crossrail topic, both the TBMs (Elizabeth and Victoria) have now set off westwards from Limmo Peninsula, and Phyllis is now under Hyde Park, so well on her way to Farringdon.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #234 on: December 15, 2012, 12:26:27 »

I expect apart from the lack of space in the yard to install a ramp to/from the alternative of a freight dive under, it is far better operationally to have the heavier freights staying on the level, and the passenger units able to take a run up at least from the previous station!

I hadn't appreciated that the layout would allow parallel moves in and out of the yard - it could easily have been a single lead junction based on much of what has been done over the last 20 years or more.

Yes, I meant to say that in the text of my original post but forgot - starting a heavy freight from an incline would be a very bad idea!  Though in terms of the parallel moves it only permits a move into the yard (from the up relief) and from the down goods loop at the same time, not trains heading into the yard and out of the yard at the same time.  That might well be what you meant, but I thought I'd clarify.  Useful though.

And up Crossrail can continue to use the surface lines too unless there's a conflicting freight movement?

Yes, I hadn't realised that until you said.  Well spotted!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4494


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #235 on: December 15, 2012, 12:46:20 »

My guess, the normal Crossrail path will be the UR only using the UP Dive-under when a train movement is need from Goods lines
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #236 on: December 15, 2012, 16:09:18 »

Yes, I meant to say that in the text of my original post but forgot - starting a heavy freight from an incline would be a very bad idea!  Though in terms of the parallel moves it only permits a move into the yard (from the up relief) and from the down goods loop at the same time, not trains heading into the yard and out of the yard at the same time.  That might well be what you meant, but I thought I'd clarify.  Useful though.

Interesting comment. At a recent presentation to the (RCTS) Royal Corps of Trainspotters at Maiidenhead on the Reading rebuild the gradient on the freight line from Reading West under the mainline flyover to the Up Reliefs was highlighted as  being quite severe. It was suggested,  therefore. freights would require a clear run from Reading West into the station.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5333


View Profile
« Reply #237 on: December 15, 2012, 20:56:10 »

...Though in terms of the parallel moves it only permits a move into the yard (from the up relief) and from the down goods loop at the same time, not trains heading into the yard and out of the yard at the same time.  That might well be what you meant, but I thought I'd clarify.  Useful though.

My mistake, yes - I was considering the yard and the goods lines collectively as 'the yard'.

Regarding trains not using the diveunder unless they need to when there's a potential conflict, won't it depend on whether or not that is an accurate layout, or a schematic?  It's possible that there'll be no speed advantage either way, depending on the detailed design of the points, IYSWIM...

Paul
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #238 on: December 16, 2012, 00:16:01 »

So it keeps up Crossrail clear of freight from main lines and from down relief, but down Crossrail crosses main line freight on the level - have I read that right? 
The freight trains will likely be running on the the relief lines so sharing tracks with Crossrail services so there's no additional conflict because of the junction, Crossrail and freight would be sharing anyway.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6592


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #239 on: December 25, 2012, 18:33:20 »

The Christmas period is being used to install a junction at Acton, as part of the Crossrail project.

Quote
Important information about Ealing services during Christmas

Monday 10 December

Over the Christmas period Network Rail will be installing a new junction on the tracks at Acton as part of the Crossrail project to improve rail services in the area.

As a result of the work, services between London Paddington and Greenford will stop running from 8pm on Monday 24 December 2012 (Christmas Eve) and will resume on the morning of Wednesday 2 January 2013.

The major engineering works are essential to help increase capacity and improve reliability along the Great Western main line ahead of Crossrail services beginning in 2018. The Acton works must be completed when there are no trains on the affected lines and Network Rail will be working around the clock.   

James Adeshiyan, Senior Project Interface Manager First Great Western, said:

^This upgrade is vitally important to improve our customers^ travel experiences for the future. To minimise inconvenience as much as possible, the work is being done at the least busy time of the year and arrangements have been made to enable passengers to use tickets for these services on the tube and TfL» (Transport for London - about) buses.

^However, please plan your journey as there is the potential that these services will take you a little longer.^

No First Great Western services will be able to call at Acton Main Line, West Ealing, Hanwell, Drayton Green, Castle Bar Park, South Greenford and Greenford stations during this time. Alternative arrangements have been made to enable passengers to use tickets for these destinations on London Buses and London Underground.

When Crossrail services begin in 2018, even more trains will travel along the Great Western main line so work is needed to improve capacity in the area. The new Acton underpass ^ known as a diveunder ^ will allow freight trains to access Acton Freight Yard without crossing main line passenger tracks, helping improve rail capacity and provide a more reliable service for passengers.

For more information on how this work will affect rail journeys please visit www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk or call 08457 000 125.

http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/About-Us/Media-centre/Important-information-about-Ealing-services-during-Christmas
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 114
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page