Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 13 Mar 2025
 
- Tesco to trial giving away expiring food to shoppers
- 'Killed in front of our eyes': How the Pakistan train hijacking unfolded
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Community Rail Awards
19/03/25 - WWRUG AGM
19/03/25 - Forum offline 00:00 - 02:00
21/03/25 - TravelWatch SouthWest

On this day
13th Mar (2004)
Website of the week - Man in seat 61 (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:20 St Erth to St Ives
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:34 St Ives to St Erth
20:59 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
22:00 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:35 Castle Cary to Westbury
22:44 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Castle Cary
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:48 London Paddington to Swansea
19:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 13, 2025, 20:34:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[91] New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and ...
[87] First Bus cuts through buses from Falmouth to Newquay
[57] Night Riviera - merged posts, ongoing discussion
[56] Grotty Scotty Piccies
[53] Connectivity - north to south Wales
[38] Small rise in crime at Melksham Station
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Level Crossings (Inside Out BBC1)  (Read 6437 times)
plymothian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 855


View Profile
« on: March 18, 2009, 19:39:02 »

The Inside Out programme tonight is highlighting the perceived [my italics] danger of level crossings.

The main argument appears to be that 32 seconds after strike in is inadequate for users to be safe, that Network Rail is irresponsibly [again my understanding of the tone of the argument] reactive to accidents (ie that they won't do anything until someone dies) and that LCs (Level Crossing) should be eliminated completely.
Logged

Please be aware that only the first 4 words of this post will be platformed on this message board.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5340


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2009, 20:07:01 »

So are they suggesting all those LC (Level Crossing)'s in residential areas should be replaced by road bridges or underpasses, with every gradient DDA» (Disability Discrimination Act - about) compliant, so that'll be a few dozen houses demolished for every one?

Sounds like the sort of bowlocks Bob Crow might come out with.  Oh, he has already - with some regularity...

Paul
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2009, 20:35:26 »

It appeared that the elderly lady who died was trying to cross a gated foot crossing with no warning bells or lights, in thick fog, when within sight was a fully protected road level crossing. The interviewer might have suggested to her companion that maybe it wasn't a terribly good idea to cross at that point given the circumstances. But that wouldn't have made for good television would it?


 

Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19392



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2009, 20:56:18 »

This particular incident was discussed on the forum here previously: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2432.0
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2009, 21:14:22 »

Sorry, this is stupid. There is only one* point:

If the lights flash, if the bells ring, if the barriers come down..... DON"T CROSS.

That's it. Just give huge penalties to those who are caught jumping across and give a deterrent to others.

There is no need for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to spend billions eliminating every crossing. Everybody think of a crossing they know. Now imagine some sort of road/ rail bridge. Does it work? In my case it wouldn't!

*Obviously there are other crossings with no bells, barriers or lights. In these cases, phone the signalman and do what they say! Simple
Logged
r james
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 223


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2009, 23:10:58 »

There are cases where a bridge would be a much safer and idealsolution, however I think each location should be reviewed on its merit
Logged
gwr2006
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2009, 08:01:39 »

This particular incident was discussed on the forum here previously: see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2432.0

No, the crossing featured in the Inside Out programme where the lady was killed in fog was at Attleborough in Suffolk and had nothing to do with the accident at Tackley discussed on this forum.

The programme was totally unbalanced, saying 32 seconds was inadequate time before a train arrived and that all level crossings should be closed and replaced with bridges or subways.  As was found at Tackley a few years ago before the accident, local people living nearby didn't want either and the crossing remained.

The BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) also said more people are killed every year on level crossings that in derailments and crashes. As railways are one the safest means of travel in this country that is hardly surprising but one person every month is killed on a level crossing. That's 12 every year!!  Wow, however tragic, it is hardly a massive problem that demands billions of pounds to replace every level crossing. It's a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.

It's all about weighting the risks against the cost of mitigating that risk.  Level crossings are safe if people take care and observe warnings. The tragic accident at Elsenham happened as the two girls ignored the red warning lights (the same warning lights that other people want at their crossing), and locking gates means someone could get trapped on the wrong side of the fence and in a place of danger. Signs ande notices are there fore a reason and that's the jist of the Network Rail Don't Run he Risk campaign.

Whatever next...speed limiters in cars to stop thousands of people killed every year by excess speed!!!  Let's get this in some perspective.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2009, 09:55:19 »

One of the problems with level crossing accidents is that they are considered rail accidents rather than road accidents to either cars or pedestrians.

A car crossing after the lights or barriers come done is exactly the same as a car jumping traffic lights and colliding with a vehicle crossing on green.

Similarly a pedestrian hit crossing the railway is the same as pedestrian hit crossing the road. If they've ignore warning lights then they are jay walking.

As such I beleive unless train passengers are killed they should appear in the road not rail stats.

However, what I've often wondered is why don't we have straight traffic lights at level crossing and little green and red men for pedestrians. It would mean they would be  consistent with peoples' everyday experience and hopefully most people know what they mean.

But as I've posted before even full width gates didn't stop cars colliding with them.

One of the most biziarre experiences I've had with warning lights and sirens was not on rail but the canal. On the Stainforth and Keadby which runs parallel with the Doncaster  Grimsby line. They are a number of powered lift bridges on this stretch that the boat crew operate with their BW key. They are mostly very minor roads or farm tracks.

My mate has just put the key in and pressed the button and started the lights and  siren and the bridge had started lifting when this woman came hurtling round the corner and straight onto the rising bridge. Fortunately he quickly hit the stop button and then lowered the bridge and  she drove calmly drove away. She was obviously a local because if you know that part of the world it's a dead flat plain with little population, probably late to pick up the kids as it was mid afternoon.



Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5340


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2009, 14:04:09 »

However, what I've often wondered is why don't we have straight traffic lights at level crossing and little green and red men for pedestrians. It would mean they would be  consistent with peoples' everyday experience and hopefully most people know what they mean.


The usual explanation is that because certain emergency vehicles are allowed to go through 'ordinary' red traffic lights, there has to be a separate signal arrangement to indicate the absolute stop LCs (Level Crossing) require...

However pedestrians don't really take a lot of notice of the red/green men do they?

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page