Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:15 05 Jan 2025
 
* Snow hits parts of the UK with amber weather warnings in place
- The year China's famous road-tripping 'auntie' found freedom
- Tributes to 'much loved and popular' boy after quad bike crash
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
5th Jan (1960)
Last service - Swansea and Mumbles Tramway (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 05, 2025, 05:16:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[266] Bridport branch reopening proposal
[78] Mining in Cornwall
[53] Update on collapsed Bridgewater Canal
[49] GWR Train Crew Weymouth
[48] Outstanding server / web site issues
[44] Old Oak Common Christmas Work
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Kingskerswell Bypass - ongoing discussions and updates (merged topic)  (Read 35915 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: December 29, 2007, 11:18:55 »

Half a century after Kingskerswell bypass - linking Torbay to Newton Abbot - was first planned, Devon County Council and Torbay Council have put forward a funding scheme bid (link below.)
http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=143632&command=displayContent&sourceNode=142719&contentPK=19388152&folderPk=91672&pNodeId=201778

The project was submitted for approval to the Department for Transport this week, with a revised cost expected to be as high as ^129.9 million.

One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this :

Quote
^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^

"Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added.

The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it.

Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each.

Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol.

Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ "
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2007, 16:44:06 »

Half a century after Kingskerswell bypass - linking Torbay to Newton Abbot - was first planned, Devon County Council and Torbay Council have put forward a funding scheme bid (link below.)
http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=143632&command=displayContent&sourceNode=142719&contentPK=19388152&folderPk=91672&pNodeId=201778

The project was submitted for approval to the Department for Transport this week, with a revised cost expected to be as high as ^129.9 million.

One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this :

Quote
^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^

"Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added.

The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it.

Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each.

Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol.

Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ "




No, no, no!!!!!!!! The delays!!!! Cars braking down!!!!!!! They would then shut the line!!!

Why not reopen the station at Kingskerwell?

This must not happen!

The bypass- don't care! The "railroad" NO!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2007, 21:15:53 »

Thank god. Countless times have i sat in traffic along that stupid road!

Its the traffic lights at the pub that cause the mega problems.
Logged
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2007, 19:54:12 »

I've been down this way myself caught up in serious congestion, stuck in a queue trying to head out of Torquay for at least half an hour. However I don't feel the dual route is such a good idea, as people like to travel on trains to avoid traffic. Trains caught behind queues of cars would do nothing except put people off and cause bad delays for those from Exmouth, too. And there are safety issues to consider like broken down cars, and people on the track. Buses only may not be such a bad idea though.

If it is those lights causing the issues, could there be another alternative such as a roundabout?

Also, reopening the station there may not be a bad idea at all as it seemed a fairly big place....
Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2007, 22:14:51 »


If it is those lights causing the issues, could there be another alternative such as a roundabout?


Perfect alternative, GO BY TRAIN!!!!!!!
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2007, 09:53:43 »

I would have said that a few months ago, but the service with the pacers is cheap and shabby. A relative commented on the poor state of the trains!

Get more people onto the 12/12A as it runs every 7 or so minutes.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2007, 10:39:25 »

Here is a link with further info on the HoldFast method.
http://www.rubberhighways.com/

This can also be used to convert railway lines into guided busways (link below.)
http://www.rubberhighways.com/transport_benefits.html

So far, I know of only one user/campaign group who thinks this is a good idea. Interestingly, its the Abbey Line Community Rail Partnership.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2007, 14:25:50 »

How can they be thinking of this.

The beauty of the railway is that you are separated from traffic!!!!!

Only tramways should share, and then with buses only.
Logged
zebedee
Guest
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2008, 12:19:18 »

Sounds like madness to me.  I am not sure about the whole by-pass there anyway, yes the traffic at Penn Inn is very busy especially in the morning and evenings and it's a pain trying to get out of our house as we are just off the Penn Inn but it would be a huge construction and I am just not convinced Newton Abbot needs it.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 24, 2008, 17:30:20 »

Sounds like madness to me.  I am not sure about the whole by-pass there anyway, yes the traffic at Penn Inn is very busy especially in the morning and evenings and it's a pain trying to get out of our house as we are just off the Penn Inn but it would be a huge construction and I am just not convinced Newton Abbot needs it.

Torbay does though, either that or we ban grockels from coming here!!
Logged
devonian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 135


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2008, 15:18:29 »

I read somewhere that Kingskerswll station is to be reopened as part of the plans with an additional station at Kerswell Gardens. Might be a mamouth task tracking it down but will look for the article. It was a council or DfT» (Department for Transport - about) article as well rather than a news report.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2008, 16:49:36 »

I saw that in the Herald Express
Logged
devonian
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 135


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2008, 10:49:12 »

They should! Kingskerswell is walking distance for me - would also mean I didn't have to drive to Newton Abbot everyday - one less car clogging up Penn Inn! I can't be the only one to whom this applies either
Logged
zebedee
Guest
« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2008, 14:58:28 »

Hmmm, not sure if this would be quicker for me or not....I am just off the Penn Inn roundabout on the edge of the notorious Buckland estate (which seems mostly harmless in the four years we've been there).

Although the only trains going this way would be slower trains stopping at every station I guess?
« Last Edit: January 29, 2008, 15:04:54 by zebedee » Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2008, 15:24:18 »

Quote from the article link below on the Regional Spatial Strategy.
http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=135239&command=displayContent&sourceNode=135077&contentPK=19528401&folderPk=79060&pNodeId=134831

Quote
The report supports improvements to road links through Kingskerswell, but does not specifically back the bypass.

There is also a call to consider re-opening the derelict railway station at Kingskerswell.

Richard Younger-Ross (Teignbridge Liberal Democrat MP (Member of Parliament)) commented: "I certainly would be in favour of a feasibility study being carried out into the provision of a railway station in Kingskerswell. Whether the former station site is the best location now is something that would need to be looked at."

There are three Kingskerswell bypass plans, according to the link below.
http://www.thisissouthdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=135239&command=displayContent&sourceNode=135077&contentPK=19552855&folderPk=79060&pNodeId=134831

Interesting Wikipedia link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disused_railway_stations_(Newton_Abbot_to_Kingswear_Line)#Kingskerswell
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page