Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 30 Dec 2024
 
- Replacement 'green' ferry emits more CO2 than old diesel ship
- What we know so far
- The driver who 'jumped' his bus over the Tower Bridge gap
- Gatwick flights returning to normal after fog
- Avanti West Coast strike to hit New Year's Eve trains
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 01/01/25 - Railway 200 'Whistle Up' UK
09/01/25 - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
30th Dec (1956)
Liverpool Overhead Railway closed (link)

Train RunningDelayed
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 30, 2024, 16:46:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[128] The Wider Picture - making it wider, but also clearer, hopeful...
[97] Working from roam: more people logging on from UK airports and...
[55] Weekend of 28th/29th December - Coffee Shop offline for engine...
[51] Terrible signalling error!
[44] Southern Railway to axe toilets from new train (BBC News 19/09...
[29] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: To Didcot from Swindon and the west - from December 2023  (Read 7502 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43000



View Profile WWW Email
« on: October 04, 2023, 11:37:15 »

"We have reviewed the calling pattern at Didcot to seek to address the uneven distribution of calls originally created in May 23 while protecting the acceleated Bristol services"

"New plan creates a 4 per hour calling plan for both up and down services"

From London, yes, it does. But one of them goes to Oxford and from Swindon and the West:

Didcot from Swindon - from December
xx:05 ex Cardiff
xx:17 ex Cheltenham
xx:28 ex Bristol

Didcot to Swindon
xx:08 to Cheltenham
xx:36 to Bristol
xx:52 to Cardiff

So that's a 37 minute gap from Swindon.  It does not address the un-evenness - quite the reveres as far as I can see, as previuously the maximum gap was 29 miutes (reading GWR (Great Western Railway)'s diagrams).  Could it be that this change is also going to make money saving through split tickets less convenient?

The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a Nprth Cotswold to Paddington service. This service will replace the turbo shuttle between Didcot and Oxford.  I suspect (can someone confirm) that this will save a train (GWR talk of "rationalising" the service.

How good is the timekeeping of the train coming off the North Cotswold line? It's planned to go forward at xx:44 from Didcot to Paddington, in the middle of the 37 minute gap, but will this be robust?  Are North Cotswold delays going to percolate?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2023, 11:55:08 »

Regarding the Didcot<>Oxford service…

It saves a unit but only for part of the day, so the total units required stays the same AIUI (as I understand it).  It does create an extra path I suppose, which could potentially be useful for freight or East West Rail.

It also frees up a driver, who can do other things…but the depot at Oxford is very over staffed anyway and ‘Didcot shuttles’ are a key part of their work allocation.

There is usually plenty of room on a 5-car IET (Intercity Express Train) on a Paddington to Oxford journey, but anything from the North Cotswolds is often close to capacity leaving Oxford.

Disappointing changes on many levels.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13004


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2023, 12:28:50 »

So that's a 37 minute gap from Swindon.  It does not address the un-evenness - quite the reveres as far as I can see, as previously the maximum gap was 29 minutes (reading GWR (Great Western Railway)'s diagrams).  Could it be that this change is also going to make money saving through split tickets less convenient?

The number of customers from Swindon actually wanting to alight at Didcot isn't many in the scheme of things - many of those want to change: either onto Oxford services or the RDG(resolve) stoppers - so are likely to use the two services an hour that 'connect' with the shuttles and/or stoppers to RDG.

Quote
The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a North Cotswold to Paddington service. This service will replace the turbo shuttle between Didcot and Oxford
.

So one IET (Intercity Express Train) is replacing the two turbo shuttles? Is that what you mean? A reduction (not replacement) in service between DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) and OXF» (Oxford - next trains) will affect far more passengers that your SWI» (Swindon - next trains)/OXF changes. Please confirm or clarify.

Quote
I suspect (can someone confirm) that this will save a train (GWR talk of "rationalising" the service.

I can understand the want to get as many turbos to the south west as possible with the Castles disappearing, but this change if confirmed is to much.

Quote
How good is the timekeeping of the train coming off the North Cotswold line? It's planned to go forward at xx:44 from Didcot to Paddington, in the middle of the 37 minute gap, but will this be robust?  Are North Cotswold delays going to percolate?

The GWML (Great Western Main Line) copes agt the moment with the North Cots timekeeping - I don't see why it shouldn't still frankly. What's changing to make it any worse?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43000



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2023, 12:38:50 »

Quote
The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a North Cotswold to Paddington service. This service will replace the turbo shuttle between Didcot and Oxford
.

So one IET (Intercity Express Train) is replacing the two turbo shuttles? Is that what you mean? A reduction (not replacement) in service between DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) and OXF» (Oxford - next trains) will affect far more passengers that your SWI» (Swindon - next trains)/OXF changes. Please confirm or clarify.

"A" rather than "the" - so one IET and one turbo between Didcot and Oxford, rather than two turbos Alternate turbos (so one every 2 hours) will carry on to Banbury.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43000



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2023, 12:43:13 »

The GWML (Great Western Main Line) copes agt the moment with the North Cots timekeeping - I don't see why it shouldn't still frankly. What's changing to make it any worse?

Passengers from Oxford to / via Swidon being shunted off the local turbo and onto the train coming though from the single line sections, pehaps from as far as Hereford.    And passengers from Didcot headed towards London joining that service rather than one of the others coming off a double track route.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13004


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2023, 14:00:39 »

I don't see why that should affect timekeeping?
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1727



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2023, 14:24:26 »

Quote
The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a Nprth Cotswold to Paddington service.

Does this mean an hourly stopping service from Reading and all stations to Cholsey for Oxford?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43000



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2023, 14:56:16 »

Quote
The fourth service at Didcot in each hour will be a Paddington to Oxford service and a Nprth Cotswold to Paddington service.

Does this mean an hourly stopping service from Reading and all stations to Cholsey for Oxford?


No ...


Taking a sample hour at Oxford ... GWR (Great Western Railway) trains leaving for the South
11:00 to Paddington calls at Didcot until December
11:06 to Didcot becomes 11:04
11:29 to Paddington (ex Great Malvern) calls at Didcot from December
11:37 to Didcot ceases in December

GWR trains arriving from the South
11:15 from Paddington calls at Didcot
11:24 from Didcot ceases in December
11:42 from Paddington (to Worcester Shrub Hill)
11:48 from Didcot becomes 11:52 from December

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13004


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2023, 17:42:48 »

So the intermediate stations between OXF» (Oxford - next trains) & DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) see their service drop by half? From two to one tph?
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1451


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2023, 17:56:11 »

One of the current Didcot-Oxford half-hourly shuttles off-peak is usually non-stop so there isn't much of a drop in service for the intermediates. There are a couple of exceptions to this but in these cases it misses out a stop at that station on the next or previous service.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13004


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2023, 18:08:00 »

Culham appears to get 2tph most hours between 1000 & 1600
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10357


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2023, 19:59:56 »

Culham appears to get 2tph most hours between 1000 & 1600

It gets two trains per hour most hours if you mean one heading towards Didcot and the other towards Oxford?  Not how one would usually describe ‘tph’ levels.

Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13004


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2023, 20:03:48 »

I misread the NRE(resolve) journey planner - apologies
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1260


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2023, 10:50:57 »

How good is the timekeeping of the train coming off the North Cotswold line? It's planned to go forward at xx:44 from Didcot to Paddington, in the middle of the 37 minute gap, but will this be robust?  Are North Cotswold delays going to percolate?

Lousy at the moment, but then the Cotswold Line always falls apart in the autumn.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page