Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 92
|
1
|
Sideshoots - associated subjects / Campaigns for new and improved services / Re: AQ19 - Greatest Losses
|
on: December 19, 2024, 22:37:59
|
"northern East Anglia" Having set the question, I should suggest an answer myself. But I don't know east Anglia very well. From what I read (but it may be biased by differential local emotions) I would wonder if Kings Lynn to Hunstanton, Lowestoft to Yarmouth South Beach or a line via Dereham to Wells-next-the-se would have been the one to keep. I could be surprised though - if you tell me that County School to Sheringham of all the lines shown should have been saved, with good reasons I could believe you. This map dates from after the closure of the majority of the Midland & Great Northern Joint network in 1959. There are a few stubs from these left on here but most of these went in their mid 1960s. There has been the idea floated of (re)opening a line from County School to Fakenham & then Holt, this joining up the preserved railways and forming a circular route but how actually useful that might be is not clear to me - or indeed how easy.
|
|
|
2
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Mind the Gap. Europe's Rail Operators: A comparative ranking.
|
on: December 15, 2024, 20:15:52
|
I have had a quick look through the raw data for the GWR▸ .
I couldn't see any real funnies such as fares above the theoretical maximum. However, this did show up that all the journeys have a start point of London, which may or may not be representative.There are a variety of shorter ones such as Reading, Didcot, & Oxford, and some longer ones such as Bristol, Cardiff, & Plymouth. Using the capital or a single major city as the sole starting point has not been followed for all of the operators studied though.
It is all done on single fares which can be distorting what people really pay for routes where a return is only a little more than a single and which most people would buy especially where no advances are made available. This is a common issue that arises in international fare comparisons and being a singular UK▸ wrinkle rarely gets specifically accounted for.
|
|
|
3
|
All across the Great Western territory / The Wider Picture in the United Kingdom / Re: Mind the Gap. Europe's Rail Operators: A comparative ranking.
|
on: December 14, 2024, 18:23:59
|
Some of the price data used in this study has been challenged by Simon Calder, who has apparently ploughed through some of the backing data. As the linked report says: "Victor Thévenet, the rail policy manager and author of the report, told me: “Data collection was carried out in August for September ticket sales. At the time of data gathering, we found prices [for the London-Milton Keynes trip] ranged from £15 to £74.” Yet the the maximum you can pay for a standard class fare is according to Avanti West Coast is an Anytime single between Euston to Milton Keynes for £24.20. (All operator fare is £24.80.) This may only be a single example and relates to Avanti but it puts a question mark over it as to how the data was gathered.
|
|
|
4
|
All across the Great Western territory / Buses and other ways to travel / Re: ‘HIF1’ relief road to Culham
|
on: December 12, 2024, 20:26:21
|
The 'concept' of a new road from the north / eastern side of Didcot to the east of Abingdon and then onto Oxford rather than its precise details has been around for decades - pre the Second World War in fact, alongside such other as yet unbuilt schemes such as a Marcham bypass.
Post WW2 there was general dithering about it between Berkshire & Oxfordshire, it being an overall priority for neither party. Fleetingly considered as a route for the A34 the version as built killed it off for about 30 years before it re-entered the 'review and report' cycle again. The last 10 years of procrastination was initially as to how it could fit in with an Oxford-Cambridge expressway.
|
|
|
7
|
Journey by Journey / Transport for London / Re: Elizabeth line Paddington station barriers
|
on: October 26, 2024, 12:44:29
|
The lift provision seems sized more in mind of the need to meet the needs of a limited people with mobility issues that make them unable or uncomfortable to use escalators rather than be the major method of access with luggage. Banks of large automatic lifts as found at Underground stations without escalators might have been more appropriate for this purpose. Reported elsewhere that it can currently take 15 minutes by lift from surface level to platforms which is a long time. Might be quicker than this now to go via the new Bakerloo Line access but that adds a lot of walking.
|
|
|
8
|
Journey by Journey / Transport for London / Re: Elizabeth line Paddington station barriers
|
on: October 25, 2024, 16:20:59
|
Unfortunately the lift capacity to get to the Elizabeth line at Paddington is inadequately sized to be able to cope with the full number of people with large luggage items. It also requires the use of two lifts - one to get to the ticket hall level and another after the barriers to get to the platform.
|
|
|
9
|
Journey by Journey / London to Swindon and Bristol / Re: Platform 14 stories
|
on: October 24, 2024, 13:12:01
|
"There is not much point in going to platform 14 because, as far as we can tell, no passenger train in service is ever scheduled to arrive or depart from this platform on a regular basis".
That statement is not true, there in the peaks a number of Didcot services booked there, it does come into its own when Elizbeth services are diverted into the main line station.
Indeed there is a arrival and departure pair of Didcot semis @ platform 14 around the time I am writing this (12:50 & 13:08) - at least accoring to Realtime Trains. Also stops at Platform 14 @ Reading.
|
|
|
11
|
All across the Great Western territory / Across the West / Re: Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsewhere - 2024
|
on: October 17, 2024, 19:49:58
|
"Our local stopping trains between Didcot Parkway and London Paddington will only run between Reading and London Paddington."
That seems hard luck on passengers between Reading and Didcot - stranded at stations with few facilities, if indeed any that are open in the afternoons. Usually in these circumstances, I think, there's a shuttle service between the two towns. At least Newbury-Paddington trains ran between Newbury and Reading.
Fortunately for those concerned this advice was wrong. GWR▸ on social.media corrected this to them running between Reading & Didcot Parkway as would be expected in this kind of disruption.
|
|
|
12
|
All across the Great Western territory / Fare's Fair / Re: Rail firms accused of misusing courts for ticket errors / fare evasion (merged posts)
|
on: October 10, 2024, 17:16:27
|
An Australian study analysed fare evasion into 4 categories: accidental, "not my fault", calculated risk taker, and career evaders. The attached figure gives some characteristics of each type.
The people in question are claiming that they are in the not at fault category; they had no intention to evade but this happened because the barriers to buying a correct ticket (complicated interactions between the poor naming of types of ticket, time of day, complicated railcard restrictions varying on what day of the week or month of the year it is) led them to buying an inappropriate one.
Northern (& apparently the legal system to date) are treating them as calculated risk takers. They picked from a list of train times and bought a ticket only offered for a later train but deliberately used it on an earlier one when it had not been offered. They knew what they were doing and the risk they were taking, and maybe did it regularly.
For any specific individual case either of these could be the "right" description. However, it makes sense to attempt to reduce the not my faulters by better design of fare systems. They aren't where the bulk of revenue is being lost.
|
|
|
14
|
Journey by Journey / Oxford, Didcot and Reading from the West / Re: New Oxford - Bristol Service Starting Sept 14th 2024
|
on: September 17, 2024, 11:28:20
|
Not all football followers want to be in the pubs,
some may have mobility issues and would welcome the chance to have a no change of trains option. ... and those with mobility issues might like to go to the pub too! I was struck at the "Didcot Dance" on Saturday when I returned on the earlier train to watch the 30 people transferring off the local from Oxford onto the Didcot to Bristol express to see them struggling up the stairs - heavy cases, pushchairs and young children, and in once case what I can only guess was a cello. And some not-so-mobile themselves struggling with the stairs. I don't think there's a lift to that platform? But it is possible to do it on the level (or rather slopes not steps) by going out of the barbered area, around the outside of the station, and entering again at the barrier set which faces towards the western car parks. I did not take a look at the signage to see how well signposted that option is, nor follow it round to see for myself - so an update from knowledgable members (correcting me as appropriate) would be appreciated. The outside slope to platform 1 is not signposted within the barriered part of the station as far as I am aware. I have directed people that way on occasion. You also often also see people struggling down the stairs with heavy loads from platforms 2-5 as they haven't seen the lift further down. For going up, the lift in the passageway is more obvious.
|
|
|
|